2 Days, 20x: A Quick Look at the Automated Market Making Mechanism of the New Gem Snowball

深潮發佈於 2025-12-22更新於 2025-12-22

文章摘要

Snowball, a new meme token launched on pump.fun on December 18, gained significant traction in the English-speaking crypto community by introducing an automated market-making mechanism designed to create a self-sustaining "snowball effect." Unlike typical meme coins where creators take a fee (usually 0.5%-1%) from each transaction, Snowball redirects 100% of this fee to an on-chain bot. This bot uses accumulated funds to buy back tokens, add liquidity to the pool, and burn a small portion of tokens periodically. The goal is to create continuous buy pressure and improve trading depth, theoretically allowing the token to grow organically through increased trading activity. Within four days, Snowball reached a $10 million market cap with over 7,000 holders and relatively decentralized ownership. However, the mechanism relies heavily on sustained trading volume to fuel the buyback bot. In a cold market with low on-chain activity, this "flywheel" could reverse if new buyers diminish. While the structure reduces developer exit risk, it doesn’t eliminate other meme coin dangers like large holder dumps or narrative fatigue. Similar projects like FIREBALL are emerging, indicating interest in "mechanism-driven memes," but past examples like OlympusDAO and Safemoon show that mechanisms alone don’t guarantee long-term value. Snowball remains primarily a meme experiment—interesting, but high-risk.

The crypto market in December is as cold as the weather.

On-chain transactions have been dormant for a long time, and new narratives are hard to come by. Just look at the drama and gossip in the Chinese CT (Crypto Twitter) space these past few days, and you'll know hardly anyone is playing in this market anymore.

But the English-speaking community has been discussing something new.

A meme coin called Snowball launched on pump.fun on December 18th. In four days, its market cap surged to $10 million and is still hitting new highs; yet it's barely mentioned in Chinese circles.

In the current environment, devoid of new narratives and where even memes are considered unplayable, this is one of the few things that catches the eye and shows some localized wealth effect.

And the name Snowball itself tells the story it wants to convey:

A mechanism that allows the token to "roll and grow larger by itself."

Turning Transaction Fees into Buy Pressure, Rolling the Snowball for Market Making

To understand what Snowball is doing, you first need to know how tokens on pump.fun typically make money.

On pump.fun, anyone can create a token in minutes. The token creator can set a "creator fee," essentially taking a cut of every transaction into their own wallet, usually between 0.5% and 1%.

This money could theoretically be used for community building or marketing, but in practice, most Devs choose to: accumulate enough and then run.

This is part of the typical life cycle of a shitcoin. Launch, pump, harvest fees, rug. Investors aren't betting on the token itself, but on the developer's conscience.

Snowball's approach is to not take this creator fee money.

To be precise, 100% of the creator fees do not go into anyone's wallet but are automatically transferred to an on-chain market-making bot.

This bot performs three actions at regular intervals:

First, it uses the accumulated funds to buy tokens on the market, creating buy-side support;

Second, it adds the bought tokens and the corresponding SOL to the liquidity pool, improving trading depth;

Third, it burns 0.1% of the tokens with each operation, creating deflation.

Additionally, the percentage taken as the creator fee is not fixed; it fluctuates between 0.05% and 0.95% based on market cap.

It takes a higher percentage when the market cap is low, allowing the bot to accumulate ammunition faster; it reduces the fee when the market cap is high, decreasing transaction friction.

In one sentence, the logic of this mechanism is: every time you trade, a portion of the money automatically becomes buy pressure and liquidity, instead of going into the developer's pocket.

Therefore, it's easy to understand this snowball effect:

Transactions generate fees → Fees become buy pressure → Buy pressure pushes the price up → Higher price attracts more transactions → More fees... theoretically, it can roll on its own.

On-Chain Data Situation

Now that we've covered the mechanism, let's look at the on-chain data.

Snowball launched on December 18th, so it's been four days now. Its market cap grew from zero to $10 million, with a 24-hour trading volume exceeding $11 million.

For a shitcoin on pump.fun, these results mean it's already one of the longer-lasting ones in the current environment.

In terms of token distribution, there are currently 7,270 holder addresses. The top ten holders combined hold about 20% of the total supply, with the largest single holder holding 4.65%.

(Data source: surf.ai)

There's no address holding 20-30% of the supply; the distribution is relatively decentralized.

Regarding trading data, there have been over 58,000 cumulative transactions since launch, with 33,000 buys and 24,000 sells. The total buy volume is $4.4 million, and sell volume is $4.3 million, resulting in a net inflow of about $100,000. Buying and selling are basically balanced, with no one-sided selling pressure.

The liquidity pool holds about $380,000, half in tokens and half in SOL. For a market cap of this size, the depth isn't very thick, and large orders would still experience significant slippage.

Another notable point is that Bybit Alpha announced listing the token less than 96 hours after launch, which to some extent confirms the short-term hype.

Perpetual Motion Meets a Cold Market

Looking around, you can see the English community's discussion about Snowball mainly focuses on the mechanism itself. Supporters' logic is straightforward:

This is the first meme coin that locks 100% of the creator fees into the protocol; developers can't take the money and run, making it structurally safer than other shitcoins, at least.

The Dev is also playing into this narrative. The developer wallet, market-making bot wallet, and transaction logs are all public, emphasizing "verifiable on-chain."

@bschizojew labels himself as "on-chain schizophrenia, 4chan special forces, first-generation meme coin veteran," radiating a self-deprecating degen vibe that really appeals to the crypto-native community.

But a safe mechanism and making money are two different things.

The snowball effect relies on the premise that there is sufficient trading volume to continuously generate fees to feed the bot for buybacks. More trades mean more ammunition for the bot, stronger buy pressure, higher prices, attracting more people to trade...

This is the ideal state for any meme coin's so-called buyback flywheel to spin up in a bull market.

The problem is, the flywheel needs external momentum to start.

What is the current crypto market environment? On-chain activity is sluggish, overall meme coin hype is down, and there's simply less capital willing to chase shitcoins. In this context, if new buy pressure doesn't keep up and trading volume shrinks, the fees the bot receives will become less and less, buyback strength weakens, price support falters, and trading willingness declines further.

The flywheel can spin forward, but it can also spin in reverse.

A more realistic problem is that the mechanism solves only one risk point—"developers taking money and running"—but meme coins face far more risks than that.

Whales dumping, insufficient liquidity, narratives going out of style—if any of these happen, 100% fee buybacks can only do so much.

Everyone is tired of being rugged. As one Chinese crypto brother aptly summarized:

Play if you want, but don't get in over your head.

More Than One Snowball Rolling

Snowball isn't the only project telling this automated market-making story.

Within the pump.fun ecosystem, a token called FIREBALL is doing something similar: automatic buybacks and burns, packaged as a protocol other tokens can plug into. But its market cap is much smaller than Snowball's.

This shows the market is currently responsive to the direction of "mechanism-based meme coins."

The traditional玩法 (playbook) of shilling, pumping, and community hype is finding it harder to attract capital. Using mechanism design to tell a "structurally safe" story might be one of meme coins' latest tricks.

That said, artificially creating a specific mechanism isn't a new玩法 (play) either.

OlympusDAO's (3,3) in 2021 was the most classic case, packaging a staking mechanism with game theory, telling the story "if everyone holds, we all profit together." It reached a peak market cap of several billion dollars. The ending, as everyone knows, was a death spiral, dropping over 90%.

Even earlier, there was Safemoon's玩法 of "taxing every transaction and distributing it to holders," also a narrative of mechanism innovation, which ended with the SEC suing and the founders charged with fraud.

A mechanism can be a great narrative hook, capable of gathering capital and attention in the short term, but the mechanism itself does not create value.

When external capital stops flowing in, even the most精巧 (ingenious) flywheel will stop.

Finally, let's recap what this little gem is actually doing:

Turning the meme coin's creator fees into an "automated market-making bot." The mechanism itself isn't complicated, and the problem it solves is very clear: preventing developers from directly taking the money and running.

Developers not being able to rug doesn't mean you'll make money.

If after reading this you find the mechanism interesting and want to participate, remember one thing: it is first and foremost a meme coin, and only secondly an experiment with a new mechanism.

熱門幣種推薦

相關問答

QWhat is the core mechanism that makes Snowball different from typical meme coins on pump.fun?

ASnowball's core mechanism is that 100% of the creator fees from each transaction are automatically sent to an on-chain market-making bot instead of going to the developer's wallet. This bot uses the accumulated funds to buy back tokens, add liquidity to the pool, and burn a small portion of tokens, creating a self-sustaining 'snowball effect' of buying pressure and liquidity growth.

QHow does the 'snowball effect' theoretically work in this token's economic model?

AThe 'snowball effect' works through a feedback loop: transactions generate fees → fees are used by the bot to buy tokens and add liquidity → buying pressure pushes the price higher → higher prices attract more traders and transactions → which generates more fees for the bot to continue the cycle.

QWhat are some of the risks or limitations of Snowball's automatic market-making mechanism?

AThe mechanism relies on sustained trading volume to generate fees for the bot. If new buyers dry up and trading volume decreases, the bot's buying power weakens, potentially leading to a downward spiral. It also doesn't protect against other risks like large holders dumping, liquidity issues, or narrative fatigue.

QHow does the creator fee percentage in Snowball adjust, and why?

AThe creator fee percentage in Snowball fluctuates between 0.05% and 0.95% based on market capitalization. It charges a higher percentage when the market cap is low to allow the bot to accumulate funds faster, and a lower percentage when the market cap is high to reduce transaction friction for traders.

QWhat precedent exists in crypto for 'mechanism-driven' tokens like Snowball, and what were their outcomes?

APrecedents include OlympusDAO's (3,3) staking mechanism, which collapsed after reaching a multi-billion dollar valuation, and Safemoon's transaction tax redistribution model, which ended with fraud charges from the SEC. These show that while mechanisms can drive short-term hype, they don't create inherent value and often fail when external capital stops flowing in.

你可能也喜歡

Coldcard攻击升级:第四波攻击使比特币失窃金额突破9000万美元

冷钱包安全事件升级:第四波攻击导致比特币被盗金额超过9000万美元 最初只是警告的漏洞,现已演变为比特币历史上最严重的硬件钱包安全事件之一。过去三天,运行存在漏洞固件的Coldcard设备遭到攻击者利用关键缺陷清空资产。 受影响设备生成的种子短语熵值低于预期,导致其可被预测和利用。此次事件已造成约9000万美元的损失,涉及超过4500个钱包,在多轮协同攻击中被盗比特币超过1367枚。 **第四波攻击仍在持续** Galaxy Research研究主管Alex Thorn指出很可能存在第四波攻击。在区块960,778至960,792大约2.5小时内的模式显示,218笔交易涉及462个受害地址,216个新的目标地址收到了388.92枚比特币。清扫活动速率达到正常水平的约45倍,每区块13.8次清扫,而基线为0.3次。所有交易均显示没有早于Coldcard固件边界之前的输入,拓扑结构为1:1(每个受害者对应一个新目的地),没有收集漏斗。在排除6个有先前交易历史的地址后,第四波攻击的核心数据为709个地址和448.73枚比特币。部分被盗资金已转移至第二跳地址,而一些交易仍带有RBF选择加入信号,这可能为受害者提供了短暂的响应窗口。 **Coldcard的应对措施** Coldcard背后的加拿大公司Coinkite已确认该漏洞并迅速采取行动:销毁了其设施内所有剩余受影响固件设备、暂停发货,并直接联系已收到受影响订单的用户提供迁移步骤。目前所有受影响型号均已提供修补固件,但该修复仅保护新生成的种子短语。在漏洞固件上创建的任何种子即使更新后仍面临风险,用户必须生成新钱包并立即转移所有资金。Satscard、Opendime和Tapsigner因使用不同代码库未受影响。对于需要立即替代方案的用户,Coldcard建议可临时使用Bitkey、Ledger、Trezor、Jade和Bitbox。公司还要求受影响用户保留设备以支持未来可能的恢复工作。受影响的固件版本为Coldcard Mk3的v4.0.1至v5.0.3。 此次大规模漏洞事件严重动摇了市场对比特币最受信任的冷存储解决方案之一的信心,也对硬件钱包安全性提出了广泛警示。

TheNewsCrypto14 分鐘前

Coldcard攻击升级:第四波攻击使比特币失窃金额突破9000万美元

TheNewsCrypto14 分鐘前

中国科技产业,正在批量越过“可见线”

最近,中国科技产业多个领域接连进入全球视野,如大模型Kimi K3和DeepSeek-V4-Flash发布、机器人设备受国际关注、辉瑞与信达生物达成创新药合作等。这标志着中国产业能力正集中越过“可见线”——即从内部积累进入全球市场验证的阶段。 回顾过去,中国出口主力从服装家电“老三样”,到新能源汽车等“新三样”,再到如今人工智能、机器人、创新药“新新三样”,产业迭代周期明显缩短。越过“可见线”的产业通常具备四大特征:形成规模、优势突出、增长加速、带动产业链。与以往不同,当前中国产业不再只是跟进成熟市场,而是通过降低门槛、开放生态,主动参与定义新产品和新需求。 这种变化源于中国产业体系从“完整”走向“稠密”:不同领域共享技术、人才与供应链,形成能力迁移。例如,新能源汽车积累的技术向机器人产业延伸,算力需求带动芯片、存储、光通信等整条产业链。产业与研发的距离缩短,真实应用反馈加速创新,规模化成为创新的一部分。 越过“可见线”意味着中国产业的竞争焦点,从“做出产品”延伸至构建包含专利、标准、生态的持续价值系统。未来,中国需在开放中筑牢产业护城河,通过开源、协同研发扩大生态,推动技术迭代与广泛应用。 “十五五”规划已布局战略性新兴产业与未来产业,持续将新产业推向市场检验。一批又一批产业越过“可见线”,不仅体现单点突破,更意味着中国正形成持续产生新产业的能力。

marsbit38 分鐘前

中国科技产业,正在批量越过“可见线”

marsbit38 分鐘前

福布斯:700 万枚比特币暴露在量子计算风险下,BTC 必须换一把“锁”了吗?

《福布斯》文章指出,量子计算对比特币构成潜在威胁。据估计,约有700万枚比特币(价值约4700亿美元)因公钥已在链上暴露而面临风险,这主要包括中本聪时代地址和重复使用的地址。不过,暴露不等于立即被盗,关键在于能破解椭圆曲线密码学的量子计算机尚未出现。 谷歌等机构研究显示,量子计算能力进步迅速,破解加密所需的量子比特数预估持续降低。以太坊基金会研究员预估,到2032年,量子计算机从暴露公钥破解私钥的概率约为10%。 比特币社区对应对方案存在分歧。BIP-360提案建议新增抗量子地址类型;BIP-361则提议分阶段淘汰旧签名,长期未迁移的币(包括可能属于中本聪的)将无法花费,此举被部分人视同“没收”。与此同时,Algorand等区块链已采用抗量子签名。 多家创业公司正积极开发解决方案。例如,American Fortress宣称其技术能让所有链上地址免迁移获得抗量子性,并计划通过软分叉自动冻结高风险休眠钱包。但其技术细节未公开、未经审计,部分说法有待验证。该公司还计划构建一个结合合规与隐私的交易层。 尽管修复方案不断涌现,但黄金支持者等质疑比特币能否像黄金那样经受超长时期的考验。当前,量子威胁虽未迫在眉睫,但已引发密码学升级与资产安全的广泛关注和提前布局。

marsbit44 分鐘前

福布斯:700 万枚比特币暴露在量子计算风险下,BTC 必须换一把“锁”了吗?

marsbit44 分鐘前

交易

現貨

熱門文章

如何購買QUICK

歡迎來到HTX.com!在這裡,購買Quickswap (QUICK)變得簡單而便捷。跟隨我們的逐步指南,放心開始您的加密貨幣之旅。第一步:創建您的HTX帳戶使用您的 Email、手機號碼在HTX註冊一個免費帳戶。體驗無憂的註冊過程並解鎖所有平台功能。立即註冊第二步:前往買幣頁面,選擇您的支付方式信用卡/金融卡購買:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即時購買Quickswap (QUICK)。餘額購買:使用您HTX帳戶餘額中的資金進行無縫交易。第三方購買:探索諸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方式以增加便利性。C2C購買:在HTX平台上直接與其他用戶交易。HTX 場外交易 (OTC) 購買:為大量交易者提供個性化服務和競爭性匯率。第三步:存儲您的Quickswap (QUICK)購買Quickswap (QUICK)後,將其存儲在您的HTX帳戶中。您也可以透過區塊鏈轉帳將其發送到其他地址或者用於交易其他加密貨幣。第四步:交易Quickswap (QUICK)在HTX的現貨市場輕鬆交易Quickswap (QUICK)。前往您的帳戶,選擇交易對,執行交易,並即時監控。HTX為初學者和經驗豐富的交易者提供了友好的用戶體驗。

511 人學過發佈於 2024.12.11更新於 2026.06.02

如何購買QUICK

相關討論

歡迎來到 HTX 社群。在這裡,您可以了解最新的平台發展動態並獲得專業的市場意見。 以下是用戶對 QUICK (QUICK)幣價的意見。

活动图片