The Launch Event Became a Make-up Ceremony? Why Hasn't Pools.trade Spawned a High-Market-Cap Meme Coin Yet?

marsbit发布于2026-08-07更新于2026-08-07

文章摘要

Uniswap's new token launchpad, Pools.trade, debuted on Robinhood Chain but was overshadowed by pre-launch trading, raising fairness concerns. Despite generating over $150M in pre-launch volume and becoming a top platform by daily trade volume, it has failed to produce a high-market-cap meme coin. Key features include Instant and Crowd Launch modes, with a low 0.25% transaction fee (vs 1% on rivals), most of which is auto-reinvested into liquidity. However, its top two tokens by market cap, FRONG (~$7M) and POOLS (~$1.8M), were both minted days before the official announcement, leading to accusations of insider advantage ("sniping") and dampening community enthusiasm. The article concludes that while Pools.trade has Uniswap's infrastructure and Robinhood Chain's hype, a perceived lack of a fair launch has prevented a breakout meme coin. Success may hinge on the next token with a compelling narrative and a clean, uncontested launch.

Author | Asher(@Asher_ 0210)

The 'P Army' had already memed hard even before the Pools.trade frontend officially opened.

At 00:00 on August 5th, with a 24-hour countdown to the official launch of Uniswap's Pools.trade beginning. During this countdown period, the community found the platform's early-deployed contracts ahead of time, directly trading the already-issued tokens on-chain. By the time the Pools.trade frontend officially opened, these early contracts had already accumulated over $150 million in trading volume.

Regarding this, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams stated that the massive volume of early transactions forced the team to re-adjust the website and data indexing, simultaneously making it compatible with both test and final version contracts, which disrupted the originally planned launch schedule.

This sense of disarray shown by a DeFi veteran like Uniswap felt somewhat 'amateurish,' yet the trading data was undeniably high. Dune data shows that on August 5th alone (the frontend didn't officially open until the morning of August 6th Beijing time, with most of this volume generated pre-launch), Pools.trade trading volume reached $99.1 million, accounting for approximately 54.2% of the total trading volume on the Robinhood Chain token launch platform that day, far exceeding the previously top-ranked Pons for two weeks.

Pools.trade: The Token Launch Platform Introduced by Uniswap Itself

Project Overview

Pools.trade is a token launch platform launched by Uniswap Labs on Robinhood Chain. Officially positioned as a Meme coin launchpad, users can create new tokens, discover new coins, and trade—all on the same page. Each token has a fixed total supply of 1 billion tokens, ultimately entering Uniswap v4 with liquidity permanently locked.

Tokens launched on Pools.trade are immediately integrated into the Uniswap web interface, wallet, Launches page, and Trading API, reaching MetaMask, Ledger, and multiple DEX aggregators. Compared to new platforms starting from scratch to find trading entry points, Pools.trade launched with Uniswap's ready-made user base and distribution channels.

Two Launch Methods

Pools.trade offers Instant Launch and Crowd Launch modes, respectively:

  • Instant Launch: Launch immediately. After the creator fills in the name, ticker, image, and description, the token opens for trading directly. The price fluctuates with market buying and selling, with no minimum market cap requirement or fixed end time.
  • Crowd Launch: Employs a four-hour launch window. Participants submit budgets in advance, with orders executed progressively throughout the remaining time—typically the earlier the participation, the lower the price. After the launch ends, if the token's FDV reaches $10,000, it enters trading; if it fails to meet the threshold, all participating funds are refunded. This mode primarily aims to reduce the impact of bot front-running and bundle transactions at launch.

The Platform's Most Prominent Feature: Trading Fees Only a Quarter of Pons and Flap

Pools.trade does not charge additional launchpad fees. Each transaction incurs a 0.25% Uniswap v4 pool fee. If the creator enables the fee split, 0.05% goes to the creator, and 0.20% is automatically reinvested into the permanently locked liquidity pool. Uniswap Labs does not take a share.

Trading fees for both Pons and Flap are 1%. Calculating with $10 million in trading volume: Pools.trade generates $25,000 in fees, with the token creator receiving $5,000; Pons generates $100,000 in fees, and based on a 70% creator share, the token creator would receive $70,000.

Pools.trade lowers transaction costs and keeps most of the fees within the liquidity; Pons and Flap offer higher direct income incentives for token creators. The former benefits trading more, while the latter provides more direct motivation for creators.

For a detailed introduction, recommended reading: "Uniswap Launches Token Launch Platform Pools.trade, Reshuffling the Robinhood Launchpad Ecosystem?".

Only Two Tokens Surpass $1 Million Market Cap, Early Minting Raises Fairness Concerns

Compared to the impressive number of token launches and platform trading volume, Pools.trade has not yet produced a high-market-cap Meme coin. As of now, only two tokens on Pools.trade have a market cap above $1 million, namely FRONG and POOLS; additionally, tokens with a market cap above $400,000 include HOOKR, UNIPEG, CHWDR, and PosM.

FRONG: Market Cap Once Touched $18 Million

FRONG is currently the highest-market-cap Meme on Pools.trade. At 00:00 on August 5th, Uniswap's official Twitter account began the 24-hour countdown for Pools.trade's launch, posting a video of a frog "playing" by a pond.

After the tweet was posted, the community quickly noticed the frog-themed Meme coin—FRONG—issued through the Pools.trade early contract and began to view it as the platform's mascot concept coin. Driven by this FOMO sentiment, FRONG's market cap briefly touched $18 million.

However, FRONG had already been minted via contract before Uniswap even started the Pools.trade launch countdown. On-chain records show that FRONG was minted and a trading pool was established as early as July 30th, five days before Uniswap's countdown announcement; related contracts were even deployed roughly three weeks prior, at that time with no indication of affiliation with Uniswap or Pools.trade.

As this time gap was discovered, questions arose about the fairness of FRONG's launch, and its market cap rapidly retreated from its highs. Even after Pools.trade officially launched yesterday at 00:00, FRONG did not receive strong community enthusiasm, its market cap remaining below $10 million, currently reported at around $7 million.

POOLS: Market Cap Once Broke $4 Million

POOLS, currently the second-highest market cap token on Pools.trade, shares a similar situation with FRONG—it was also a Meme coin minted before the platform's official launch.

Compared to FRONG's "frog mascot" narrative, POOLS's logic is more direct—its name matches the platform, so the community treated it as the Pools.trade concept coin. Its market cap once exceeded $4 million before falling back to around $1.8 million.

FRONG relied on the "frog mascot" narrative, POOLS on the platform's namesake—both should have had higher market cap expectations. However, both faced diminished community FOMO sentiment due to the "insider trading" controversy arising from early minting, resulting in market caps below $10 million.

The most fundamental logic of Meme coins is that everyone wants to believe they are starting from the same line. Once fairness is questioned, even the best token narrative struggles to sustain spontaneous community propagation. This is perhaps why Pools.trade, despite impressive data, has yet to produce a high-market-cap Meme coin.

However, Uniswap stands behind Pools.trade, and Robinhood Chain is one of the most discussed public chains for Memes at the moment. Currently, the platform lacks not for traffic, but for a new narrative that is intriguing enough and free from "insider trading" controversy. The first "speedrun" on Pools.trade might not be far off.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat was the main reason why Pools.trade's launch did not go as planned according to the article?

AThe main reason was that the community discovered and started trading tokens on the early deployed contracts before the official front-end launch, generating over $150 million in volume and forcing Uniswap to scramble to adjust the site and data indexing, disrupting the planned launch schedule.

QWhat are the two token launch modes offered by Pools.trade?

APools.trade offers two modes: Instant Launch (immediate token creation and trading with no minimum market cap or fixed end time) and Crowd Launch (a 4-hour launch window where orders are filled progressively, with a $10,000 FDV threshold for the token to go live post-launch).

QHow does the transaction fee structure of Pools.trade compare to platforms like Pons and Flap?

APools.trade charges a 0.25% fee per transaction (0.05% to the creator and 0.20% auto-reinvested into the permanently locked liquidity pool), while Pons and Flap charge a 1% fee, which offers creators a higher direct revenue share.

QAccording to the article, why haven't any high-market-cap meme coins emerged on Pools.trade despite its high volume?

AThe primary reason is that the early high-profile tokens like FRONG and POOLS were minted before the official platform announcement, leading to 'fair launch' controversies and 'rat warehouse' accusations, which severely dampened community FOMO and trust, undermining their potential for sustained growth.

QWhat key advantage does Pools.trade have over new token launch platforms, as mentioned in the article?

APools.trade's key advantage is that it launches with immediate access to Uniswap's existing user base, distribution channels, and integrations (like the Uniswap web interface, wallet, Launches page, Trading API, MetaMask, Ledger, and DEX aggregators).

你可能也喜欢

Carbon推出原生TradFi链上衍生品交易平台,单一账户集成950+市场

2026年8月7日,链上全球市场主要经纪商Carbon宣布其Carbon TradFi市场正式向公众开放交易,提供超过950种交易工具的一站式账户。 Carbon推出了超过250个涵盖股票、指数、外汇和大宗商品的传统金融(TradFi)市场。其核心创新在于“1:1对冲”架构:交易者在链上自托管钱包中开仓,Carbon的求解器系统随即在受监管的链下经纪商处进行等额对冲。这使得交易者无需放弃自我托管,即可获得与传统金融市场同等的价格和市场深度,解决了链上现实世界资产常见的冷启动流动性问题。 Carbon平台现已整合三类市场:超过530种加密永续合约、150种24/7交易的现实世界资产(RWA)市场,以及新推出的250多种Carbon TradFi市场。其中约30种资产同时提供后两种产品,允许交易者在同一账户内套利两种融资利率。所有TradFi市场在上市首日即具备机构级深度,无需流动性激励计划。 此次发布同时向公众开放了Carbon流动性提供者(CLP)金库的存款功能。CLP是一种delta中性收益产品,通过为交易流背后的对冲提供资金来赚取收益,其模型化年化收益率取决于资金利用率和交易流量。 Carbon自2023年上线以来,累计交易额已超过200亿美元,拥有超过3.6万名独立交易者。该平台在Arbitrum上运行。

TheNewsCrypto10分钟前

Carbon推出原生TradFi链上衍生品交易平台,单一账户集成950+市场

TheNewsCrypto10分钟前

Ondo公司创始人之母为争夺控制权提起诉讼,试图罢免首席执行官

Ondo Finance创始人母亲诉诸法庭以求罢免CEO,争夺公司控制权。 已故创始人Nathan Allman的遗产继承方(其母亲Kathleen Allman作为遗产管理人)在特拉华州起诉了这家代币化公司的现任CEO Ian De Bode。纠纷源于创始人5月底突然去世后公司治理陷入僵局:他同时是唯一董事和控股股东,其投票权股份在遗产处理期间无人有权行使,且董事会席位空缺导致无法任命继任者。6月底,夏威夷遗产法庭任命其母亲为遗产管理人,赋予其投票权。 诉状指控De Bode在遗产认证空档期利用公司章程自任CEO,并依据股东协议任命自己为唯一董事,单方面行动。继承方主张,根据章程,CEO空缺仅能由董事会决议填补,而当时并无有效董事会,因此其任命及后续所有行为均属无效。继承方还指责De Bode利用公司资源施压签署巩固其控制权的文件,并拒绝提供股东名单。 继承方在获得投票权后并未立即解雇De Bode,而是加入董事会并制定了临时运营政策以维持业务,同时要求获取公司核心文件但遭拒绝。De Bode称这些指控“毫无根据”,并表示公司继续获得关键利益相关方支持。 Ondo Finance成立于2021年,主要投资方包括Coinbase等,在现实世界资产(RWA)领域领先,总锁仓价值约35亿美元。受控制权纠纷消息影响,其代币$ONDO价格24小时内下跌约6%,较2024年12月历史高点下跌约84%,据报有超1000万枚代币被转移至交易所。

cryptonews.ru1小时前

Ondo公司创始人之母为争夺控制权提起诉讼,试图罢免首席执行官

cryptonews.ru1小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买CAP

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Cap(CAP)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Cap(CAP)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Cap(CAP)购买完您的Cap(CAP)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Cap(CAP)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Cap(CAP)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

706人学过发布于 2026.06.26更新于 2026.06.26

如何购买CAP

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对CAP(CAP)币价的意见。

活动图片