South Korea Urges Crypto Circuit Breakers After $42B Bithumb Mishap

TheNewsCrypto发布于2026-04-13更新于2026-04-13

文章摘要

South Korea's central bank has recommended implementing cryptocurrency exchange "circuit breakers" following a major incident on Bithumb. In February, the exchange erroneously distributed 620,000 Bitcoin (worth approximately $42 billion) to customers instead of the intended 620,000 Korean won (about $400). This triggered panic selling, causing Bitcoin's price on the platform to plummet. Although Bithumb quickly halted trading and reversed the transactions, nearly $125 million in Bitcoin had already been sold. The Bank of Korea's report emphasizes that the crypto sector lacks the stringent internal controls of traditional finance and calls for mandatory systems to detect and prevent such human errors and discrepancies in asset records. This proposal is part of broader legislative moves in South Korea to enhance the security and transparency of virtual asset exchanges.

To avoid a recurrence of the market chaos that ensued in February when Bithumb accidentally delivered over $40 billion worth of Bitcoin to its clients, the South Korean central bank has suggested that cryptocurrency exchanges have “circuit breakers” that temporarily suspend trade.

In a payments report released on Monday, the Bank of Korea suggested that legislators think about implementing measures to halt trading in cryptocurrency in the event of unexpected price fluctuations, much as the trading limitations implemented by the Korea Exchange.

Stringent Protocols

According to the bank, the virtual asset sector is currently not well-regulated and does not have the same internal control procedures as more traditional financial institutions. Therefore, the research concluded, stronger applicable policies are required to proactively avoid such instances, as they may happen at other virtual asset exchanges.

This comes at a time when politicians in South Korea are trying to enact legislation that would further regulate cryptocurrency. The Bank of Korea has said that these regulations should include its recommendations to make virtual asset exchange activities more secure and transparent.

Rather than 620,000 Korean won, which was about $400, Bithumb mistakenly transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, which was valued around $42 billion at the time, to clients in early February. According to the bank’s assessment, the price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as consumers hurried to sell, which in turn caused others to panic-sell, further lowering its price.

Within minutes, Bithumb stopped trading and reversed their Bitcoin transfers. However, the exchange clarified that 1,788 BTC, or almost $125 million, had already been sold before it could take any action, and it made up the difference using corporate reserves.

Crypto exchanges should be obligated to have systems that can identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, according to the Bank of Korea. It went on to say that exchanges should also be able to detect and report differences between a platform’s internal assets and those on the blockchain.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitwise Accelerates Hyperliquid ETF Debut with Revised Filing

TagsAltcoinBitcoinBlockchain

相关问答

QWhat did the Bank of Korea propose to prevent a recurrence of the Bithumb mishap?

AThe Bank of Korea proposed that cryptocurrency exchanges implement 'circuit breakers' to temporarily suspend trade in the event of unexpected price fluctuations.

QWhat was the nature of the error that Bithumb made in February?

ABithumb accidentally transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, valued at approximately $42 billion, to its clients instead of 620,000 Korean won (about $400).

QWhat was the market impact of Bithumb's erroneous transfer?

AThe price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as customers hurried to sell the mistakenly received funds, which triggered panic-selling and further drove down the price.

QAccording to the Bank of Korea, why is the virtual asset sector particularly vulnerable to such incidents?

AThe Bank of Korea stated that the virtual asset sector is not well-regulated and lacks the same internal control procedures as traditional financial institutions.

QWhat specific systems did the Bank of Korea suggest exchanges be obligated to have?

AThe Bank of Korea suggested exchanges should have systems to identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, and to detect and report differences between a platform's internal assets and those on the blockchain.

你可能也喜欢

福建晋江,一家存储超级独角兽静悄悄

近日,随着长鑫科技A股上市成为股王,同为国内三大存储芯片项目之一的福建晋华集成电路有限公司(晋华)重新进入公众视野。这家位于福建晋江的DRAM企业,自2016年成立起便肩负打破海外垄断的使命,却因2018年被美国列入实体清单并遭遇司法指控而陷入长达数年的沉寂。2024年2月,美国法院裁定其无罪,晋华才得以摆脱法律阴影。 晋华的曲折发展与灵魂人物陈正坤密不可分。这位拥有美光与联电背景的工程师,怀揣自主开发DRAM的梦想加入晋华。公司初期通过与联电合作快速推进,但随后美光发起诉讼,指控技术窃密,导致晋华产线因设备禁运而停摆。在极端困难下,陈正坤带领团队改造国产设备、重构工艺,艰难维持运营。尽管最终赢得清白,但发展进度已被严重拖慢。目前,晋华专注于利基型DRAM市场,月产能约4万片,拥有千余项专利,但仍在美国实体清单限制之下。 晋江这座以鞋服闻名的民营经济强市,为引入晋华这一“硬科技”项目投入巨资,并以政府基金、全链条配套和持续的政策支持,助力企业在制裁中生存下来。如今,以晋华为龙头,晋江已形成超千亿规模的集成电路产业集群。在全球AI驱动存储繁荣的周期中,晋华虽规模尚小,但其在封锁中重建的经历,已成为中国存储产业自主攻坚的缩影。

marsbit1小时前

福建晋江,一家存储超级独角兽静悄悄

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
活动图片