South Korea Urges Crypto Circuit Breakers After $42B Bithumb Mishap

TheNewsCrypto发布于2026-04-13更新于2026-04-13

文章摘要

South Korea's central bank has recommended implementing cryptocurrency exchange "circuit breakers" following a major incident on Bithumb. In February, the exchange erroneously distributed 620,000 Bitcoin (worth approximately $42 billion) to customers instead of the intended 620,000 Korean won (about $400). This triggered panic selling, causing Bitcoin's price on the platform to plummet. Although Bithumb quickly halted trading and reversed the transactions, nearly $125 million in Bitcoin had already been sold. The Bank of Korea's report emphasizes that the crypto sector lacks the stringent internal controls of traditional finance and calls for mandatory systems to detect and prevent such human errors and discrepancies in asset records. This proposal is part of broader legislative moves in South Korea to enhance the security and transparency of virtual asset exchanges.

To avoid a recurrence of the market chaos that ensued in February when Bithumb accidentally delivered over $40 billion worth of Bitcoin to its clients, the South Korean central bank has suggested that cryptocurrency exchanges have “circuit breakers” that temporarily suspend trade.

In a payments report released on Monday, the Bank of Korea suggested that legislators think about implementing measures to halt trading in cryptocurrency in the event of unexpected price fluctuations, much as the trading limitations implemented by the Korea Exchange.

Stringent Protocols

According to the bank, the virtual asset sector is currently not well-regulated and does not have the same internal control procedures as more traditional financial institutions. Therefore, the research concluded, stronger applicable policies are required to proactively avoid such instances, as they may happen at other virtual asset exchanges.

This comes at a time when politicians in South Korea are trying to enact legislation that would further regulate cryptocurrency. The Bank of Korea has said that these regulations should include its recommendations to make virtual asset exchange activities more secure and transparent.

Rather than 620,000 Korean won, which was about $400, Bithumb mistakenly transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, which was valued around $42 billion at the time, to clients in early February. According to the bank’s assessment, the price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as consumers hurried to sell, which in turn caused others to panic-sell, further lowering its price.

Within minutes, Bithumb stopped trading and reversed their Bitcoin transfers. However, the exchange clarified that 1,788 BTC, or almost $125 million, had already been sold before it could take any action, and it made up the difference using corporate reserves.

Crypto exchanges should be obligated to have systems that can identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, according to the Bank of Korea. It went on to say that exchanges should also be able to detect and report differences between a platform’s internal assets and those on the blockchain.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitwise Accelerates Hyperliquid ETF Debut with Revised Filing

TagsAltcoinBitcoinBlockchain

相关问答

QWhat did the Bank of Korea propose to prevent a recurrence of the Bithumb mishap?

AThe Bank of Korea proposed that cryptocurrency exchanges implement 'circuit breakers' to temporarily suspend trade in the event of unexpected price fluctuations.

QWhat was the nature of the error that Bithumb made in February?

ABithumb accidentally transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, valued at approximately $42 billion, to its clients instead of 620,000 Korean won (about $400).

QWhat was the market impact of Bithumb's erroneous transfer?

AThe price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as customers hurried to sell the mistakenly received funds, which triggered panic-selling and further drove down the price.

QAccording to the Bank of Korea, why is the virtual asset sector particularly vulnerable to such incidents?

AThe Bank of Korea stated that the virtual asset sector is not well-regulated and lacks the same internal control procedures as traditional financial institutions.

QWhat specific systems did the Bank of Korea suggest exchanges be obligated to have?

AThe Bank of Korea suggested exchanges should have systems to identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, and to detect and report differences between a platform's internal assets and those on the blockchain.

你可能也喜欢

突发——迈克尔·塞勒试图平息比特币内部的派系争斗——但他能做到吗？

迈克尔·塞勒发表新文章，试图缓和比特币社区内部日益凸显的分歧。他将比特币世界划分为四个阵营：**比特币最大化主义者**（视比特币为数字硬通货与抗通胀盾牌）、**比特币资本家**（致力于将比特币融入投资组合、资产负债表及传统金融基础设施）、**比特币技术专家**（关注协议在可扩展性、隐私安全等方面的持续改进）以及**比特币原教旨主义者**（强调自我托管、去中心化与抗审查的核心属性）。 塞勒认为，这种分歧是比特币成长过程中的自然表现，而非分裂信号。他主张比特币可以在保持底层协议稳定的同时，容纳周边金融市场、托管服务及金融产品的多元发展。 此文发布之际，塞勒担任执行董事长的微策略公司近期出售了少量比特币，为2022年以来首次，引发市场关注。尽管塞勒将当前争论定性为“成长的阵痛”，但在金钱、理念与政治交织的复杂局面下，能否真正调和各阵营间的矛盾，仍是未知数。

bitcoinist28分钟前

突发——迈克尔·塞勒试图平息比特币内部的派系争斗——但他能做到吗？

bitcoinist28分钟前

霍斯金森否认退出卡尔达诺的传闻：'我不会离开'

卡尔达诺创始人查尔斯·霍斯金森在6月4日的直播中否认了关于他将离开生态系统的传言，称自己只是减少公开沟通，并非辞职。此前他在X平台发布的“休息一下”帖子引发了社区担忧。 霍斯金森在直播中表示，他决定远离社交媒体主要是因为X平台上的毒性环境已难以忍受。他分析了自己近期帖子的约130条回复，发现近三分之一充满敌意、辱骂或污言秽语，部分甚至显示出有组织的攻击迹象。他认为在这种环境下进行有意义的交流几乎不可能。 他强调自己并未离开卡尔达诺，仍致力于包括RealFi、比特币可编程化、Midnight等项目的研究与开发工作。但他明确表示，自己的热情并非推动ADA价格上涨以满足投机者，他从未将此视为自己的职责。 霍斯金森描述了“两个卡尔达诺”的现状：一方面，自2021年以来协议、工程基础、去中心化和研究栈取得了显著进步；另一方面，市场价格表现导致批评者称该项目失败。这种差距造成了“认知失调”，他认为社区需要解决这个问题。 他呼吁生态系统需要做出改变：放弃以X为主要讨论场所、重新思考建设者激励、调整部分管理文化，并制定一个新的路线图以凝聚共识。他特别批评了卡尔达诺基金会，称其治理结构是自己职业生涯中“最糟糕的错误”，社区缺乏对其董事会、优先事项和人员的有效问责机制。 霍斯金森表示将暂时远离公开视频、采访和社交媒体，继续专注于Midnight的工作。他计划进行反思和恢复，未来再提出关于卡尔达诺发展的建议，范围可能从渐进式改革到更彻底的变革。他强调自己的底线是必须得到尊重和尊严，只愿留在能确保这一点的沟通渠道中。

bitcoinist1小时前

霍斯金森否认退出卡尔达诺的传闻：'我不会离开'

bitcoinist1小时前

本月安排有FOMC会议，但美联储的决策会影响比特币吗？

美联储联邦公开市场委员会（FOMC）会议每年举行八次，其决策对比特币等市场具有重要影响。下一次会议定于6月16日至17日举行，会后美联储主席鲍威尔将发表讲话阐明会议结果。根据CME FedWatch工具的市场情绪追踪，目前市场预计美联储有99.4%的概率将维持利率在3.5%-3.75%不变，加息至3.75%-4.0%的概率极小，降息概率则为0%。 若美联储如预期维持利率不变，比特币价格很可能延续现有趋势，因投资者缺乏改变立场的动机。若意外加息，则可能对比特币产生看跌影响，因为高利率会降低投资者的风险偏好，减少市场流动性并可能引发抛售。反之，若降息则是最看涨的情景，低利率会鼓励资金流向比特币等风险资产，从而可能推高其价格。

bitcoinist3小时前

本月安排有FOMC会议，但美联储的决策会影响比特币吗？

bitcoinist3小时前

Anthropic 启动 IPO：商业奇迹 or 估值泡沫？

近期，硅谷AI公司Anthropic已秘密提交IPO申请，最快或于今年10月上市。其最新估值已达9650亿美元，上市后有望冲击1.5万亿至2万亿美元，或成为全球Pre-IPO阶段市值最高的公司。 针对市场对AI估值泡沫的担忧，作者认为当前情况与2000年互联网泡沫有本质区别。当年公司依赖“故事”和想象力估值，缺乏实际收入支撑；而Anthropic则展现出坚实的商业表现：年化收入从2025年初的10亿美元飙升至今年5月的470亿美元，并预计年底达到1000亿美元，且已在上市前实现单季盈利。其人均产值超过1000万美元，客户包括大量财富500强企业，收入模型清晰。 此外，作者指出更深刻的趋势在于经济范式从“碳基”（人力驱动）向“硅基”（算力与AI驱动）转型。企业竞争力日益取决于其智能资源（算力、模型）而非单纯人力规模。Anthropic的上市正是这一转型的关键信号，而非单纯的估值狂欢。

链捕手3小时前

Anthropic 启动 IPO：商业奇迹 or 估值泡沫？

链捕手3小时前

美国参议员敦促银行监管机构制定‘公平’的加密货币资本规则

美国参议员呼吁制定“公平”的加密资本规则。由参议院数字资产小组委员会主席辛西娅·卢米斯牵头，多名共和党参议员致信美联储、联邦存款保险公司（FDIC）及货币监理署（OCC）负责人，要求为银行从事加密资产活动建立更清晰、公平的资本框架。 信中批评了巴塞尔银行监管委员会现行的加密资产资本标准，该标准对加密资产施加了1250%的风险权重，参议员们认为这并非基于实际风险评估，而像是一种按资产类别“一刀切”的惩罚，实质上阻碍了银行持有此类资产，与监管机构倡导的“技术中立”原则相悖。 议员们赞赏了监管机构近期关于代币化证券的联合指引，该指引明确了此类资产应获得与其非代币化对应物同等的资本待遇。他们敦促监管机构将这一风险导向原则一致性地应用于其他数字资产，并基于近期在加密市场结构法案方面的进展，开始为银行的资产负债表加密资产活动制定新的资本框架。 与此同时，FDIC、OCC和美联储负责人近期在国会作证时，概述了其转向更“基于风险”的监管方向，旨在改革监管框架以提高效率，并审查过去的监管措施。他们强调，强有力的资本标准对保障银行体系韧性和支持经济增长至关重要，同时监管应促进而非阻碍负责任的创新。

bitcoinist3小时前

美国参议员敦促银行监管机构制定‘公平’的加密货币资本规则

bitcoinist3小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片

热门分类right-arrow

热门标签right-arrow