South Korea Urges Crypto Circuit Breakers After $42B Bithumb Mishap

TheNewsCrypto发布于2026-04-13更新于2026-04-13

文章摘要

South Korea's central bank has recommended implementing cryptocurrency exchange "circuit breakers" following a major incident on Bithumb. In February, the exchange erroneously distributed 620,000 Bitcoin (worth approximately $42 billion) to customers instead of the intended 620,000 Korean won (about $400). This triggered panic selling, causing Bitcoin's price on the platform to plummet. Although Bithumb quickly halted trading and reversed the transactions, nearly $125 million in Bitcoin had already been sold. The Bank of Korea's report emphasizes that the crypto sector lacks the stringent internal controls of traditional finance and calls for mandatory systems to detect and prevent such human errors and discrepancies in asset records. This proposal is part of broader legislative moves in South Korea to enhance the security and transparency of virtual asset exchanges.

To avoid a recurrence of the market chaos that ensued in February when Bithumb accidentally delivered over $40 billion worth of Bitcoin to its clients, the South Korean central bank has suggested that cryptocurrency exchanges have “circuit breakers” that temporarily suspend trade.

In a payments report released on Monday, the Bank of Korea suggested that legislators think about implementing measures to halt trading in cryptocurrency in the event of unexpected price fluctuations, much as the trading limitations implemented by the Korea Exchange.

Stringent Protocols

According to the bank, the virtual asset sector is currently not well-regulated and does not have the same internal control procedures as more traditional financial institutions. Therefore, the research concluded, stronger applicable policies are required to proactively avoid such instances, as they may happen at other virtual asset exchanges.

This comes at a time when politicians in South Korea are trying to enact legislation that would further regulate cryptocurrency. The Bank of Korea has said that these regulations should include its recommendations to make virtual asset exchange activities more secure and transparent.

Rather than 620,000 Korean won, which was about $400, Bithumb mistakenly transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, which was valued around $42 billion at the time, to clients in early February. According to the bank’s assessment, the price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as consumers hurried to sell, which in turn caused others to panic-sell, further lowering its price.

Within minutes, Bithumb stopped trading and reversed their Bitcoin transfers. However, the exchange clarified that 1,788 BTC, or almost $125 million, had already been sold before it could take any action, and it made up the difference using corporate reserves.

Crypto exchanges should be obligated to have systems that can identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, according to the Bank of Korea. It went on to say that exchanges should also be able to detect and report differences between a platform’s internal assets and those on the blockchain.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitwise Accelerates Hyperliquid ETF Debut with Revised Filing

TagsAltcoinBitcoinBlockchain

相关问答

QWhat did the Bank of Korea propose to prevent a recurrence of the Bithumb mishap?

AThe Bank of Korea proposed that cryptocurrency exchanges implement 'circuit breakers' to temporarily suspend trade in the event of unexpected price fluctuations.

QWhat was the nature of the error that Bithumb made in February?

ABithumb accidentally transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, valued at approximately $42 billion, to its clients instead of 620,000 Korean won (about $400).

QWhat was the market impact of Bithumb's erroneous transfer?

AThe price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as customers hurried to sell the mistakenly received funds, which triggered panic-selling and further drove down the price.

QAccording to the Bank of Korea, why is the virtual asset sector particularly vulnerable to such incidents?

AThe Bank of Korea stated that the virtual asset sector is not well-regulated and lacks the same internal control procedures as traditional financial institutions.

QWhat specific systems did the Bank of Korea suggest exchanges be obligated to have?

AThe Bank of Korea suggested exchanges should have systems to identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, and to detect and report differences between a platform's internal assets and those on the blockchain.

你可能也喜欢

从以太坊到AI的“CROPS”:Vitalik反复强调的这套“慢变量”,究竟是什么?

以太坊创始人Vitalik Buterin近期频繁强调一个概念——CROPS,它代表抗审查性(Censorship Resistance)、抗捕获性(Capture Resistance)、开源(Open Source)、隐私(Privacy)和安全(Security)。这一理念源于以太坊基金会发布的指导文件,旨在确保用户在数字生活中不依赖单一平台、不丧失最终控制权。 随着AI技术深入钱包和自动化执行场景,CROPS的内涵超越了以太坊的原有范畴,成为AI时代用户能否掌控自身数字生活的关键问题。Vitalik指出,真正的“CROPS AI”应支持多种硬件平台,而不仅仅是“去中心化AI”。当AI成为用户的数字代理人,处理资产管理和链上操作时,确保其抗审查、开放、隐私和安全变得至关重要。 CROPS Ethereum与CROPS AI存在显著交集。例如,通过零知识证明实现付费远程大模型调用和私密以太坊RPC读取,旨在让用户在获取远程服务的同时避免暴露敏感信息。未来,可能出现更多针对以太坊场景微调的AI模型,用于提升智能合约和生态安全。 这一理念将深刻影响Web3生态,尤其是钱包等入口层产品。在市场关注短期热点的背景下,CROPS提醒我们关注那些决定长期方向的技术变量:在AI加速接管数字世界的时代,确保系统可理解、可验证、注重隐私和安全,才是以太坊持续价值的真正体现。

marsbit1小时前

从以太坊到AI的“CROPS”:Vitalik反复强调的这套“慢变量”,究竟是什么?

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片