South Korea Urges Crypto Circuit Breakers After $42B Bithumb Mishap

TheNewsCrypto发布于2026-04-13更新于2026-04-13

文章摘要

South Korea's central bank has recommended implementing cryptocurrency exchange "circuit breakers" following a major incident on Bithumb. In February, the exchange erroneously distributed 620,000 Bitcoin (worth approximately $42 billion) to customers instead of the intended 620,000 Korean won (about $400). This triggered panic selling, causing Bitcoin's price on the platform to plummet. Although Bithumb quickly halted trading and reversed the transactions, nearly $125 million in Bitcoin had already been sold. The Bank of Korea's report emphasizes that the crypto sector lacks the stringent internal controls of traditional finance and calls for mandatory systems to detect and prevent such human errors and discrepancies in asset records. This proposal is part of broader legislative moves in South Korea to enhance the security and transparency of virtual asset exchanges.

To avoid a recurrence of the market chaos that ensued in February when Bithumb accidentally delivered over $40 billion worth of Bitcoin to its clients, the South Korean central bank has suggested that cryptocurrency exchanges have “circuit breakers” that temporarily suspend trade.

In a payments report released on Monday, the Bank of Korea suggested that legislators think about implementing measures to halt trading in cryptocurrency in the event of unexpected price fluctuations, much as the trading limitations implemented by the Korea Exchange.

Stringent Protocols

According to the bank, the virtual asset sector is currently not well-regulated and does not have the same internal control procedures as more traditional financial institutions. Therefore, the research concluded, stronger applicable policies are required to proactively avoid such instances, as they may happen at other virtual asset exchanges.

This comes at a time when politicians in South Korea are trying to enact legislation that would further regulate cryptocurrency. The Bank of Korea has said that these regulations should include its recommendations to make virtual asset exchange activities more secure and transparent.

Rather than 620,000 Korean won, which was about $400, Bithumb mistakenly transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, which was valued around $42 billion at the time, to clients in early February. According to the bank’s assessment, the price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as consumers hurried to sell, which in turn caused others to panic-sell, further lowering its price.

Within minutes, Bithumb stopped trading and reversed their Bitcoin transfers. However, the exchange clarified that 1,788 BTC, or almost $125 million, had already been sold before it could take any action, and it made up the difference using corporate reserves.

Crypto exchanges should be obligated to have systems that can identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, according to the Bank of Korea. It went on to say that exchanges should also be able to detect and report differences between a platform’s internal assets and those on the blockchain.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitwise Accelerates Hyperliquid ETF Debut with Revised Filing

TagsAltcoinBitcoinBlockchain

相关问答

QWhat did the Bank of Korea propose to prevent a recurrence of the Bithumb mishap?

AThe Bank of Korea proposed that cryptocurrency exchanges implement 'circuit breakers' to temporarily suspend trade in the event of unexpected price fluctuations.

QWhat was the nature of the error that Bithumb made in February?

ABithumb accidentally transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, valued at approximately $42 billion, to its clients instead of 620,000 Korean won (about $400).

QWhat was the market impact of Bithumb's erroneous transfer?

AThe price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as customers hurried to sell the mistakenly received funds, which triggered panic-selling and further drove down the price.

QAccording to the Bank of Korea, why is the virtual asset sector particularly vulnerable to such incidents?

AThe Bank of Korea stated that the virtual asset sector is not well-regulated and lacks the same internal control procedures as traditional financial institutions.

QWhat specific systems did the Bank of Korea suggest exchanges be obligated to have?

AThe Bank of Korea suggested exchanges should have systems to identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, and to detect and report differences between a platform's internal assets and those on the blockchain.

你可能也喜欢

a16z:区块链为 AI 代理基础设施提供帮助的 5 种方式

人工智能代理正迅速从“副驾驶”转变为经济参与者,但其发展速度超过了现有基础设施的支持能力。当前代理缺乏标准化的方法证明身份、权限和跨环境报酬机制,身份无法跨平台共享,支付方式尚未实现可编程,协调工作也各自独立。 区块链技术为代理基础设施提供了关键支持,主要体现在五个方面: 1. **非人类身份**:代理经济当前的瓶颈是身份而非智能。区块链提供可移植的身份层、可编程钱包和可验证证明,帮助代理建立跨平台的可信身份(KYA,了解你的代理),解决权限证明和跨平台独立运作问题。 2. **AI运行系统治理**:当代理操作关键系统时,治理成为核心问题。区块链通过链上记录和自动执行决策,确保代理行为符合用户利益,防止模型供应商单方面控制结果,实现真正的去中心化治理。 3. **支付系统空白填补**:代理开始进行无头交易(如数据购买、API调用),稳定币成为默认支付方式。加密支付支持无许可编程和低风险承保,推动代理对代理的商业发展,如x402和MPP协议已处理大量代理驱动支付。 4. **重新定价信任**:当智能成本趋近于零时,验证成为稀缺资源。区块链提供可审计的历史记录和加密收据,确保代理行为的透明度和可追溯性,从而降低规模化风险,将信任硬编码到系统架构中。 5. **保留用户控制权**:随着用户将更多任务委托给代理,加密技术通过智能合约和基于意图的架构(如NEAR Intents)设定代理的行为边界,确保用户保持最终控制权,减少盲目信任。 人工智能降低了规模化门槛,但信任建立仍需依赖加密货币和区块链技术,以确保透明度、问责制和用户控制。互联网基础设施的设计需适应非人类行为者,以实现真正的代理经济。

marsbit1小时前

a16z:区块链为 AI 代理基础设施提供帮助的 5 种方式

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片