Solana Hit By One Of The Largest DDoS Attacks In Internet History

bitcoinist发布于2025-12-16更新于2025-12-16

文章摘要

Solana has successfully withstood one of the largest DDoS attacks in internet history, estimated at 6 Tbps, without significant performance degradation. Despite the massive scale of the attack, which lasted for over a week, the network maintained median transaction confirmations around 450ms and stable slot latency. Ecosystem builders highlighted that the attack had zero noticeable impact on regular users or traders. The event underscores that blockchains have become high-value targets for industrial-scale DDoS campaigns. Solana’s resilience is attributed to its engineering and validator infrastructure, though experts note that validator count alone isn’t the sole factor in network defense. At the time of reporting, SOL traded at $126.

Solana has been battling what some ecosystem builders are calling an internet-scale DDoS campaign — and, despite the usual “Solana is fragile” jokes, the network seems to be shrugging it off.

Pipe Network said of the ongoing attack via X today: “The ongoing DDoS attack on Solana is one of the largest in internet history. 6 Tbps volumetric attack translates to billions of packets per second. Under that kind of load, you’d normally expect rising latency, missed slots, or confirmation delays.”

Pipe further says that’s not what the data is showing. “Median tx confirmation ~450ms,” the team wrote, adding that p90 remains under 700ms and slot latency is holding at 0–1 slots. In other words, if you’re a regular user or trader, you might not even know anything’s happening. Which is kind of the point.

Largest DDos attacks in internet history | Source: X @pipenetwork

Reactions From The Solana Community

Raj Gokal, Solana Labs’ co-founder and COO, put it more bluntly in a reply to a broader DDoS debate: “have you heard about the ongoing DDOS against Solana that has had zero effect on performance?”

The backdrop here matters. Justin Bons had posted about Sui being DDoS’d yesterday, claiming it triggered “mass delays” and arguing that “127 validators is not enough,” with the broader warning: don’t let validator counts drift too low if you want a chain to be resilient.

Mert Mumtaz, CEO of Helius, largely agreed with the premise — but pushed back on the simplistic “more validators = solved” framing.

“I understand your point & mostly agree with you,” Mert wrote, before adding that “a chain is more resistant to DDoS with 100 professional high powered validators compared to 10k validators run by amateurs.” He also said there are scenarios where higher validator count can help, but emphasized it isn’t the core defense by itself. Then he dropped the key detail: Solana’s attack hasn’t been a one-day headline, it’s been going on for a while.

“And fyi there has been a colossal ddos attack on Solana for weeks now,” Mert wrote, later adding that Solana “has been under a colossal DDoS attack for at least over a week now btw” — and that the fact most users haven’t felt it is “a big testament to the level of engineering present here.”

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko chimed in with a more technical angle on why validator count can matter in specific leader-hand-off dynamics: “Validators count helps if the previous leader can finish their block while the current one is being hit. Then the cost of ddos approaches the cost of ddos the whole network.”

Translation: if an attacker wants to reliably disrupt block production, they may have to sustain pressure across more of the network, not just pick off a single leader at the wrong moment. That gets expensive fast.

SolanaFloor summed it up via X: “Solana has been under a sustained DDoS attack for the past week, peaking near 6 Tbps, the 4th largest attack ever recorded for any distributed system. Network data shows no impact, with sub second confirmations and stable slot latency. The Sui network was also targeted by a DDoS attack yesterday, resulting in delays in block production and periods of degraded network performance.”

And there’s a more strategic takeaway that’s starting to sound less theoretical each month: blockchains are now juicy targets. David Rhodus, founder of Permissionless Labs (and a contributor to Pipe Network), said: “This puts Solana among the most heavily DDoSed targets in internet history. It reinforces that blockchains are now Tier-1 DDoS targets. This is not “script kiddie” activity — 6 Tbps is industrial-scale.”

If you’re a validator, Mumtaz offered the practical advice you’d expect in a week like this: have backups across multiple hosting providers and regions. Because even if the chain holds, your own infrastructure might not.

The broader point, though, is the new baseline: these networks are getting stress-tested like mainstream internet services now. Solana’s claim today is that it passed — quietly, under load, and without users noticing. That’s the kind of victory that doesn’t look dramatic on a chart. It just [...] works.

At press time, Solana traded at $126.

SOL remains above the 200-week EMA, 1-week chart | Source: SOLUSDT on TradingView.com

热门币种推荐

你可能也喜欢

从Anthropic谈起,拆解Hyperliquid永续合约赛道

本文探讨了Hyperliquid平台上的HIP-3协议及其在交易未上市公司(如Anthropic)合成永续合约方面的应用。文章从Anthropic股权在二级市场的疯狂需求切入,引出了散户通过传统途径难以参与此类投资的困境,进而介绍了Hyperliquid HIP-3协议如何允许任何人通过质押高额保证金来部署永续合约DEX。 文章重点分析了该赛道上的三个主要案例:已停运的Ventuals、当前主导的trade.xyz和新晋者Entropy。Ventuals因资金费率失控(曾高达年化8700%)和价格剧烈偏离而失败。trade.xyz采用纯内部交易均价定价,简单有效,占据了HIP-3大部分交易量。Entropy则尝试改进,采用混合预言机(结合订单簿和私有市场估值),并将资金费率限制在10%左右,但其以总市值(而非股价)为Anthropic定价的模式,以及未来上市转换机制的不确定性,仍面临挑战。 文章还指出,为已上市公司(如闪迪)定价相对容易,可通过套利机器人对齐现货价格;而为Anthropic等未上市公司定价则需依赖过时或不透明的私有市场估值,存在根本性困难。最后,提及Kraken可能在测试许可制、合规的HIP-3版本,暗示受监管机构对此技术的兴趣,但需在中心化框架下运行。 总之,HIP-3协议正在尝试创建全新的私有资产交易类别,其发展过程是一个不断试错和演进的过程。

marsbit28分钟前

从Anthropic谈起,拆解Hyperliquid永续合约赛道

marsbit28分钟前

赛勒暗示公司Strategy已‘回归’比特币购买

微策略公司创始人迈克尔·塞勒在社交媒体上发布“我们回来了”的简短声明,暗示这家公司可能即将恢复对比特币的购买。 市场观察者认为,这通常是一个强烈的心理信号,塞勒过往在周末发布类似隐晦预告后,往往会紧接着在周一早上宣布公司动用国库资金买入比特币。如果这一模式再度应验,则意味着在经历了夏季显著的购买暂停后,这家公司将重启其企业级的比特币积累计划。 过去两个月,微策略暂停了其常规的每周比特币购买,转而专注于强化资产负债表,包括稳定其优先股发行、积累51亿美元现金储备,并通过大规模发行普通股建立了15.9亿美元的独立现金池。这一策略间歇期恰逢市场低迷,导致该公司持有的巨额比特币头寸曾一度处于深度账面亏损状态。 然而,近期比特币价格因宏观市场驱动而反弹至8万美元以上。由于微策略持有超过84万枚比特币,平均成本约为75385美元,近期价格回升已使其整体持仓自数月来首次重返盈利区间。 塞勒的“我们回来了”声明具有多重含义。从运营角度看,它可能标志着公司准备再次将大量流动性储备投入其长期倡导的资产。从心理层面看,这既是其持仓重获盈利的宣告,也象征着全球最大企业比特币储备将重新开启其积累攻势。

cryptonews.ru2小时前

赛勒暗示公司Strategy已‘回归’比特币购买

cryptonews.ru2小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对SOL(SOL)币价的意见。

活动图片