SEC and CFTC signal execution phase for crypto regulation at harmonization meeting

ambcrypto发布于2026-01-29更新于2026-01-29

文章摘要

US financial regulators, the SEC and CFTC, have announced a shift from coordination to execution in crypto regulation. At a harmonization meeting, officials outlined plans to advance joint rulemaking using existing authority, without waiting for final legislation from Congress. A key initiative, "Project Crypto," aims to create a shared taxonomy for crypto assets, clarify jurisdictional boundaries, and reduce regulatory duplication and uncertainty. The CFTC stated that most crypto assets are not securities, marking a departure from past ambiguity. Planned rulemaking covers tokenized collateral, onshore crypto perpetual derivatives, retail leveraged trading, and treatment of software in DeFi. The goal is to provide regulatory clarity and reduce friction while maintaining market integrity.

US financial regulators signalled a shift from coordination to execution on crypto oversight on Thursday, 29 January.

Senior officials from the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission [CFTC] outlined plans to advance joint rulemaking using existing authority.

The remarks came during a rescheduled SEC–CFTC harmonization meeting, where both agencies emphasised regulatory clarity, reduced duplication, and a more coordinated approach to overseeing crypto asset markets.

Regulators move beyond coordination rhetoric

Speaking at the event, Michael S. Selig said the CFTC would begin exercising oversight of the crypto market without waiting for Congress to finalize market structure legislation.

He described the moment as a transition toward implementation. Staff have been directed to draft rules and revisit existing proposals that have contributed to regulatory uncertainty.

Selig said the CFTC would work jointly with the SEC on “Project Crypto.” This is a framework aimed at harmonizing oversight across agencies.

The initiative is designed to establish a shared crypto asset taxonomy. Also, it is to clarify jurisdictional boundaries and reduce overlapping compliance requirements.

Joint taxonomy and jurisdictional clarity

A central focus of the meeting was developing a common classification framework for digital assets. Selig said he agreed with Paul S. Atkins that most crypto assets trading today are not securities.

This position would mark a departure from years of regulatory ambiguity.

Selig added that CFTC staff have been instructed to work with their SEC counterparts on the joint codification of a crypto asset taxonomy as an interim measure. At the same time, Congress continues to work on broader legislation.

The aim, he said, is to draw clearer jurisdictional lines and avoid leaving market participants “trapped in uncertainty.”

Rulemaking plans span derivatives, collateral, and software

Beyond taxonomy, Selig outlined several areas where the CFTC plans to move forward with rulemaking.

These include developing rules to support the use of tokenised collateral, creating pathways to onshore perpetual crypto derivatives. Also, the rule will clarify the treatment of leveraged and margined retail crypto trading.

He also announced plans to withdraw earlier proposals that restricted certain event contracts and to begin rulemaking on prediction markets.

In addition, the CFTC will explore whether innovation exemptions or safe harbours are appropriate for software developers and non-custodial systems operating in the decentralized finance space.

Harmonization aimed at reducing regulatory friction

Both agencies framed harmonization as a practical exercise rather than a blurring of statutory boundaries.

Selig said substituted compliance and aligned requirements could allow firms to operate more efficiently without compromising market integrity. This is particularly as crypto markets span products traditionally overseen by different regulators.

While recent congressional action has advanced market structure legislation, regulators stressed that the execution phase would proceed independently, using existing authorities to modernise oversight as innovation continues.


Final Thoughts

  • US regulators signalled a move from coordination to implementation, with the SEC and CFTC outlining concrete steps toward joint crypto rulemaking.
  • Planned actions span asset classification, derivatives, tokenised collateral, and software treatment, indicating regulatory execution will move ahead of final legislation.

相关问答

QWhat was the main shift signaled by US financial regulators regarding crypto oversight on January 29?

AUS financial regulators signaled a shift from coordination to execution on crypto oversight, with the SEC and CFTC outlining plans to advance joint rulemaking using existing authority.

QWhat is the name of the joint framework mentioned for harmonizing crypto oversight between the SEC and CFTC?

AThe joint framework is called 'Project Crypto', aimed at harmonizing oversight, establishing a shared crypto asset taxonomy, clarifying jurisdictional boundaries, and reducing overlapping compliance requirements.

QAccording to Michael S. Selig, what is the classification of most crypto assets trading today?

AMichael S. Selig agreed that most crypto assets trading today are not securities, which marks a departure from years of regulatory ambiguity.

QWhat are some specific areas where the CFTC plans to move forward with rulemaking?

AThe CFTC plans to develop rules for tokenised collateral, create pathways to onshore perpetual crypto derivatives, clarify treatment of leveraged and margined retail crypto trading, withdraw earlier proposals restricting certain event contracts, and begin rulemaking on prediction markets.

QHow do the agencies view harmonization in the context of crypto regulation?

ABoth agencies framed harmonization as a practical exercise aimed at reducing regulatory friction, allowing firms to operate more efficiently without compromising market integrity, through substituted compliance and aligned requirements.

你可能也喜欢

比特币提现仍在继续:Coldcard冷钱包8年存储终成空

硬件钱包Coldcard遭黑客攻击,导致大量资金从易受攻击设备中被持续转出。据Galaxy Research数据,截至2026年8月2日,已有4585个地址被盗,损失总额达1367.05 BTC(约合8860万美元),远超7月30日最初报告的594.5 BTC。大部分被盗资金仍停留在攻击者地址。 问题根源并非固件,而是设备生成的种子短语存在漏洞。2021年3月起,因程序员错误集成libNgU库,设备从使用STM32硬件随机数生成器转为使用软件生成器Yasmarang,该生成器由公开可获取的芯片序列号和计时器状态初始化,导致生成的种子短语可在离线状态下被暴力破解。即使固件后续已更新,只要用户未将资金转移至基于新种子短语生成的新地址,旧钱包就始终处于风险中。 受影响的设备包括特定固件版本的Mk2/Mk3、Mk4/Mk5及Q系列。仅当种子短语是通过至少50次独立掷骰子或强唯一性BIP-39密码短语创建时方可幸免。官方建议受影响用户立即在已修复的固件上生成新种子短语并转移资产。 报道提及一位39岁投资者的案例,他因该漏洞损失了2 BTC(约13万美元)。他多年来通过体力劳动积攒比特币,将其视为在制裁和高通胀国家中的财务保障与提前退休的途径。此次事件使他的长期持有策略和“冷存储”信心遭受重击,他因此决定彻底退出加密货币领域。 从历史数据看,随机数生成器缺陷并非首例,类似问题曾导致巨额损失。此次事件警示,即使离线存储也未必绝对安全,其安全性高度依赖于底层硬件和算法的可靠性。

cryptonews.ru16分钟前

比特币提现仍在继续:Coldcard冷钱包8年存储终成空

cryptonews.ru16分钟前

帕克·刘易斯解释为何比特币仍是最佳货币

知名比特币分析师帕克·刘易斯在访谈中批评了某些上市公司以“数字信贷”形式销售永续优先股的营销策略,认为这从根本上扭曲了比特币的本质。他指出,比特币在算法层面不具备法币收益性,承诺定期分红主要依赖牛市吸引新投资者来维持,风险极高。 刘易斯引用数据说明此类衍生品的巨大风险:全球信贷市场规模达300万亿美元,而永续优先股市场仅约1万亿美元,这表明机构有意规避这种无还款期限的资产,将风险转嫁给信息不足的散户。 针对“比特币波动性太大”的常见观点,他认为波动性是这一供应量严格受限的新资产被大规模采用过程中的自然数学结果。新人入场需出更高价从早期持有者手中购买,导致价格剧烈波动。他建议投资者直接持有比特币,这比投资MicroStrategy等公司发行的衍生品更安全。 投资者将焦点从直接持有加密货币转向公司衍生品,会忽视法币急速贬值的真正威胁。刘易斯以自创的“肋眼牛排指数”为例,指出其本地超市一款牛排价格从2020年的19.99美元涨至37.99美元,反映年化约12-13%的真实通胀,远超官方平滑后的CPI数据。 在全球通胀环境下,最明智、保守且安全的策略仍是直接持有比特币并完全掌控私钥。追逐加密货币国库股等公司工具的收益只会叠加隐性系统风险,而理解去中心化货币的本质才能有效保护财富免受宏观经济动荡影响。

cryptonews.ru3小时前

帕克·刘易斯解释为何比特币仍是最佳货币

cryptonews.ru3小时前

交易

现货
活动图片