Morgan Stanley Initiates Bitcoin Miner Coverage, Rates Cipher and TeraWulf Overweight, Marathon Underweight

TheNewsCrypto发布于2026-02-10更新于2026-02-10

文章摘要

Morgan Stanley has initiated coverage on major Bitcoin miners, framing them as infrastructure businesses rather than pure cryptocurrency plays. The bank assigned Overweight ratings to Cipher Mining and TeraWulf, citing their potential to transition into stable utility-like companies through long-term power contracts and site leasing—particularly to AI tenants. Cipher is seen as well-positioned for a potential “REIT endgame,” while TeraWulf’s management experience in power and infrastructure supports its positive outlook. In contrast, Marathon Digital received an Underweight rating due to its heavy dependence on Bitcoin price volatility, mining difficulty, and energy costs, making it a higher-risk investment. Morgan Stanley emphasizes that the infrastructure model offers more predictable income and deserves higher valuation multiples.

Morgan Stanley has started formally analyzing the three major publicly traded Bitcoin miners. They argued that these miners should not be viewed as a cryptocurrency bet; instead, they should be valued as an infrastructure business. The bank has given overweight ratings on Cipher Mining and Terawulf, while giving Marathon Digital an underweight rating.

Morgan Stanley believes that once the mining company starts building large, powered sites and signing long-term contracts with customers, it starts looking like a real utility and infrastructure company. Infrastructure investors usually pay higher valuations because income is predictable and contracted with less dependence on the bitcoin value.

Why Cipher and TeraWulf Seem to be Positive

Morgan Stanley says Cipher is well-positioned for what he called a “REIT endgame.” If the Cipher leases its building and power capacity to the AI instead of mining, then risk drops, and valuation could increase. Morgan Stanley sees more upside if the transaction happens.

TeraWulf also received a similar positive rating because the management has deep power and infrastructure experience, with the company already having a history of signing hosting and data center agreements. The analyst believes that future sites can be converted from mining to AI tenants.

Why is Morgan Stanley Cautious on Marathon Digital

For Marathon Digital, Stanley took a different position. Morgan Stanley says that the MARA behaves mainly like the bitcoin price vehicle, and it actively tries to increase BTC exposure. So its stock performance depends heavily on the difficulty, power costs, and BTC price swings. Morgan Stanley warns that mining profitability faces pressure from competition and rising energy demands.

These reports arrive when the investors are debating the future identity of Bitcoin miners. Morgan Stanley replies with its report to all the investors that the infrastructure model gives more stability and deserves a higher value than pure mining.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Dogecoin Price Shows Mixed Signals as Key Technical Levels Are Tested

TagsCipher MiningJPMorganMarathon

相关问答

QWhat is Morgan Stanley's main argument regarding the valuation of major Bitcoin miners?

AMorgan Stanley argues that Bitcoin miners should not be viewed as a cryptocurrency bet but should be valued as infrastructure businesses, as they build large powered sites and sign long-term contracts, making them similar to utility companies.

QWhich two Bitcoin mining companies received an 'overweight' rating from Morgan Stanley?

ACipher Mining and TeraWulf received overweight ratings from Morgan Stanley.

QWhy does Morgan Stanley view Cipher Mining positively, specifically mentioning a 'REIT endgame'?

AMorgan Stanley views Cipher positively because it is well-positioned for a 'REIT endgame,' where leasing its building and power capacity to AI instead of mining would reduce risk and increase valuation.

QWhat is the reason for Morgan Stanley's cautious (underweight) rating on Marathon Digital?

AMorgan Stanley is cautious on Marathon Digital because it behaves mainly as a Bitcoin price vehicle, actively increasing BTC exposure, making its stock performance heavily dependent on mining difficulty, power costs, and BTC price swings, with profitability facing competition and rising energy demands.

QAccording to the report, what advantage does the infrastructure model offer to investors?

AThe infrastructure model offers more stability and deserves a higher valuation because income is predictable and contracted, with less dependence on the value of Bitcoin.

你可能也喜欢

STRC大脱锚后的首份财报,Strategy如何修复资本飞轮?

比特币财库公司Strategy于7月31日公布了2026年第二季度财报。报告显示,公司总营收1.22亿美元,但因比特币价格波动,录得82.2亿美元净亏损,其中未实现亏损达83.2亿美元。尽管账面亏损严重,Strategy仍坚持其比特币战略,截至季度末持有843,775枚BTC,平均持仓成本约7.5万美元,每股对应比特币数量也有所增加。 市场更关注的是,自其核心融资工具STRC(一种优先股)于5月脱锚(价格低于100美元面值)以来,Strategy的资本模式可持续性面临考验。为此,公司推出了“数字信用资本框架”,其资本管理策略从过去单一的“融资-买币”单向循环,转向更加主动和灵活的双向管理。这体现在:1)BTC可作为储备资产,也可通过“变现计划”出售以获取流动性,截至7月26日已出售约2.184亿美元BTC;2)利用现金储备、证券回购(如已回购2890万美元面值STRC)和债务优化(如折价回购债券降低长期债务)来管理负债和支撑STRC价格。 管理层在电话会上明确,当前首要任务是修复STRC至面值区间,并设定了9月8日左右为关键参考节点。在回锚前,公司将不会折价增发STRC,并计划维持其12%的年化派息率。同时,公司美元储备已增至37.5亿美元,用以增强市场信心。 未来,Strategy资本飞轮能否重启取决于两大考验:短期内STRC能否成功回锚,以恢复市场对其数字信用体系的信任;长期则仍需比特币价格重回上行通道,为其整体增长逻辑提供根本支撑。

Odaily星球日报43分钟前

STRC大脱锚后的首份财报,Strategy如何修复资本飞轮?

Odaily星球日报43分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片