Inside Solana’s whale buying, ETF demand and rising downside risks

ambcrypto发布于2026-01-11更新于2026-01-11

文章摘要

Solana's market in 2026 was shaped by significant whale activity and institutional ETF demand, driving price growth. New whales, including ETFs, provided sustained bullish capital inflows, while a dormant whale re-entered with an $10.87 million purchase. The network demonstrated dominance by processing eight times more daily transactions than its closest competitors, highlighting strong real-world utility. However, technical analysis revealed growing downside risks. SOL faced potential declines to $102 if it lost key support at $122, with a further drop into the $50s possible. The RSI and MACD indicators showed weakness, and a liquidity cluster below $120 could accelerate selling pressure during market downturns. In summary, while fundamental demand from ETFs and whales provided support, weakening technical signals and clustered liquidity below key levels increased Solana's vulnerability to a significant correction if bearish sentiment intensified.

2026 shaped up as a pivotal year for Solana, with whale activity and institutional flows shaping price direction.

On-chain data also showed Solana processing eight times more Daily Transactions than rival networks.

At press time, ETF flows remained positive, with US Solana Spot ETF data showing persistent green sessions since December 2025.

That backdrop raised a key question: Did Solana maintain momentum, or did cracks begin to form?

New and old whales converge

Solana’s new whales, represented by ETFs, continued to pour bullish capital into the ecosystem since the 4th of December, fueling price growth.

On top of that, a dormant whale reactivated with an 80K SOL buy worth $10.87 million from Binance, signaling strong market conviction.

The combination of ETF inflows and whale activity suggested a strong position, though Solana needed to navigate key support levels for sustained growth.

Network activity stayed dominant

Solana dominated Daily Transactions, processing 8 times more than its closest competitors, underscoring its role as a key leader.

This high throughput reinforced Solana’s practical use case, demonstrating real network demand and strong participation across blockchain activity.

SOL chart signals flagged downside risk

Looking at the daily chart, Solana [SOL] traded at $136 on the 10th of January, but faced downside risks if it completed equal lows around $102 in a bearish market.

On the weekly timeframe, Solana faced pressure if it failed to hold the $122-$145 range on lower timeframes. Losing $122 support could lead to a drop to $102, marked by equal highs and a loss of ascending support, pointing to the 61% Fibonacci retracement at $102.

If Solana lost this zone, it could drop further into the $50s. Weakness in RSI and MACD indicated bottoming and increased downside risks if these levels failed.

Liquidity clustered below the price

Solana’s 2-week Liquidity Heatmap showed concentrated positions below $120, which could act as a magnet for downside pressure if bearish sentiment intensified.

A sharp move into that zone risked accelerating liquidations, especially during broader market weakness.


Final Thoughts

  • Solana’s market structure remained supported by ETF demand and whale accumulation, even as technical signals weakened.
  • Price action around the $117–$120 zone may shape near-term sentiment, especially if broader conditions soften.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat were the two main factors that shaped Solana's price direction in 2026 according to the article?

AWhale activity and institutional flows, specifically ETF demand.

QHow did Solana's transaction processing capacity compare to its closest competitors?

ASolana processed eight times more Daily Transactions than its closest competitors.

QWhat significant purchase did a dormant whale make, and what did it signal?

AA dormant whale reactivated to buy 80K SOL worth $10.87 million from Binance, signaling strong market conviction.

QWhat was the key downside price level identified by the 61% Fibonacci retracement?

AThe key downside level identified was $102.

QAccording to the liquidity heatmap, where was liquidity concentrated, and what risk did this pose?

ALiquidity was concentrated below $120, which could act as a magnet for downside pressure and risk accelerating liquidations if bearish sentiment intensified.

你可能也喜欢

SpaceX交易权限现已开放:WEEX上线SPCXON交易对

2026年6月,SpaceX完成了史上最大规模的IPO,但大量投资者因券商限制、开户障碍和地域壁垒而无法参与。加密货币交易所WEEX推出了解决方案SPCXON/USDT现货交易对。SPCXON是一种基于Ondo代币化股票框架构建的产品,旨在为美国以外的合格交易者提供追踪SpaceX经济收益的途径,以USDT结算,交易便捷,无传统券商门槛。 SpaceX IPO定价为135美元,首日收盘接近161美元,随后一度冲高至225美元,公司估值约1.75万亿美元。看涨理由基于星链收入增长、无可匹敌的发射频率以及星舰里程碑。看跌观点则认为,其估值已达营收的90-110倍,且存在流通股稀少和即将到来的内部持股解锁等风险。 需注意,SPCXON提供的是价格敞口,而非股票所有权,不包含投票权和直接股息。其价格可能相对净资产价值出现溢价或折价,交易者需关注价差。 WEEX平台整合了包括SpaceX、MicroStrategy和Micron在内的多种代币化股权产品,用户可在统一账户内交易加密货币和股权敞口。平台还提供高达400倍杠杆的加密货币期货交易。 WEEX成立于2018年,全球用户超过620万,提供超过1200个现货交易对,并设有1000 BTC保护基金。平台亦提供跟单交易和AI工具等功能。 免责声明:本文内容不构成投资建议。

TheNewsCrypto11小时前

SpaceX交易权限现已开放:WEEX上线SPCXON交易对

TheNewsCrypto11小时前

Gate 研究院:加密金融产品掀起“华尔街化”浪潮,是竞争还是融合?

2009年比特币的创世区块暗含对传统金融体系的批判,其理想是建立去中心化、去中介、去银行的点对点金融系统。然而十七年后,比特币现货ETF获批、贝莱德等巨头发行相关产品、CME推出受监管衍生品、RWA(真实世界资产)和代币化国债市场快速增长等现象,显示传统金融正系统性地介入加密资产的发行、定价、托管和分销环节,引发了加密市场是否“华尔街化”的讨论。 文章认为,这并非单方面的吞并,而是加密体系与传统金融的双向融合与互补。加密领域提供无许可开放性、24小时交易和可编程结算,但缺乏合规通道、机构级托管和主流分销网络;传统金融则拥有牌照、信任、资金和渠道,但受限于交易时间、跨境门槛和结算效率。双方正朝彼此的核心优势靠拢。 这种融合体现为两条路径:一是以Gate为代表的加密交易所,逐步从提供代币化美股、CFD差价合约,发展到接入真实股票、港股、韩股交易,成为连接加密账户与传统券商基础设施的前端入口;二是以Robinhood为代表的传统券商,通过收购加密交易所、推出股票代币和建设自有Layer 2,将加密资产和链上代币化产品整合进其平台。两者的共同目标是争夺下一代综合金融账户的入口,让用户在一个界面内交易多种资产。 同时,RWA和链上国债作为资产层的融合正在加速。尽管规模尚小,但代币化国债等产品为链上提供了低波动收益资产,并吸引JP摩根、贝莱德等传统机构参与,测试未来资本市场的底层结算方式。 最终,加密与华尔街并非谁征服谁,而是在共同塑造一个更高效、全球化的统一资本市场。用户未来或将在同一个账户中自由交易比特币、股票、ETF、链上国债等多种资产,体验无缝的跨资产配置。去中心化的理想仍在底层协议中延续,而在应用层,一个融合了双方优势的新金融形态正在形成。

marsbit12小时前

Gate 研究院:加密金融产品掀起“华尔街化”浪潮,是竞争还是融合?

marsbit12小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对S(S)币价的意见。

活动图片