Dalio's Annual Analysis: AI is in the Early Stages of a Bubble, Beware of These Risks in 2026

比推发布于2026-01-05更新于2026-01-05

文章摘要

In his annual reflection, Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio analyzes key market dynamics of 2025, emphasizing that currency devaluation—not U.S. equities—was the year's dominant story. The dollar fell significantly against gold (39%), the euro (12%), and other major currencies, making gold the best-performing asset with a 65% return in dollar terms. U.S. stocks returned 18% in dollars but declined 28% when measured in gold. Dalio notes a major shift in asset allocation away from U.S. markets, with non-U.S. equities (especially in Europe, China, and emerging markets) outperforming U.S. stocks. He highlights stretched valuations, low expected equity returns (4.7%), and compressed risk premiums as warning signs. Political and geopolitical factors—including U.S. domestic policies, wealth inequality, and a shift toward unilateralism—drove market behavior, boosting gold demand and reducing appetite for dollar assets. Regarding AI, Dalio states it is in the "early stages of a bubble." He warns of debt refinancing risks, potential Fed easing inflating bubbles further, and stresses the importance of currency-hedged strategies. The interplay of monetary, political, geopolitical, and technological forces will continue shaping the macro landscape in line with his "Big Cycle" framework.

Author: Ray Dalio, Founder of Bridgewater

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews


As a systematic global macro investor, at the end of 2025, I naturally reflect on the underlying mechanisms of the events that occurred, especially in terms of market performance. This is the purpose of today's reflection.

Although the facts and returns are undeniable, my perspective differs from that of most people.

While most people consider U.S. stocks, especially U.S. AI stocks, to be the best investment of 2025 and the core story of the year, the indisputable fact is that the richest returns (and the real headline story) came from: 1) changes in currency values (most importantly the U.S. dollar, other fiat currencies, and gold); and 2) the significant underperformance of U.S. stocks compared to non-U.S. stocks and gold (gold was the best-performing major market). This was primarily caused by fiscal and monetary stimulus, productivity improvements, and a large-scale shift in asset allocation away from the U.S. market.

In these reflections, I want to step back and examine how this currency/debt/market/economic dynamic worked last year, and briefly touch on how the other four major driving forces—politics, geopolitics, natural acts, and technology—affect the global macro picture within the evolving "Big Cycle."

1. Changes in Currency Values

Regarding currency values: The U.S. dollar fell 0.3% against the yen, 4% against the renminbi, 12% against the euro, 13% against the Swiss franc, and plummeted 39% against gold (gold is the second-largest reserve currency and the only major non-credit currency).

Therefore, all fiat currencies are depreciating. The biggest story and market fluctuations of the year stemmed from the weakest fiat currencies falling the most, while the strongest/hardest currencies rose the most. The most outstanding major investment last year was being long gold (a 65% return in USD), which outperformed the S&P 500 (an 18% USD return) by a whopping 47 percentage points. Or, put another way, measured in gold currency, the S&P index actually fell 28% in real terms.

Let's remember some key principles related to the current situation:

  • When a domestic currency depreciates, it makes things denominated in that currency appear to be rising. In other words, viewing investment returns through the lens of a weak currency makes them appear stronger than they actually are. In this case, the S&P index returned 18% for USD investors, 17% for yen investors, 13% for renminbi investors, but only 4% for euro investors, only 3% for Swiss franc investors, and for gold standard investors, its return was -28%.

  • Changes in currency are crucial for wealth transfer and economic direction. When a currency depreciates, it reduces a person's wealth and purchasing power, makes one's own goods and services cheaper in others' currencies, and simultaneously makes others' goods and services more expensive in one's own currency. In this way, it affects inflation rates and trade relations, although there is a lag in this effect.

  • Whether you are currency hedged is critical. What if you don't have, and don't want to have, a view on currencies? You should always hedge into your least risky currency mix and make tactical adjustments from it when you think you can do well. I'll explain how I operate later.

Regarding bonds (i.e., debt assets): Because bonds are promises to deliver currency, when the currency's value falls, their real value decreases even if the nominal price rises. Last year, 10-year U.S. Treasuries returned 9% in USD terms (about half from yield, half from price), 9% in yen terms, 5% in renminbi terms, but -4% in both euro and Swiss franc terms, and -34% in gold terms—and cash was an even worse investment.

You can understand why foreign investors dislike U.S. dollar bonds and cash (unless currency hedged).

So far, the bond supply-demand imbalance has not been a serious problem, but a large amount of debt (nearly $10 trillion) will need to be rolled over in the future. Meanwhile, the Fed seems inclined to cut rates to keep real rates low. Therefore, debt assets are unattractive, especially at the long end of the curve, and further steepening of the yield curve seems inevitable, but I doubt the Fed will ease as much as currently priced in.

2. Significant Underperformance of U.S. Stocks vs. Non-U.S. Stocks and Gold

As mentioned earlier, although U.S. stocks performed strongly in USD terms, they were much weaker in strong currencies and significantly underperformed stocks in other countries. Clearly, investors prefer to hold non-U.S. stocks, non-U.S. bonds rather than U.S. assets.

Specifically, European stocks outperformed U.S. stocks by 23%, Chinese stocks by 21%, UK stocks by 19%, and Japanese stocks by 10%. Emerging market stocks performed even better overall, with a return of 34%, emerging market dollar debt returned 14%, and emerging market local currency debt (USD denominated) returned 18% overall. In other words, a major outflow and value transfer of wealth is occurring from the U.S. outward, which could lead to more rebalancing and diversification.

Regarding last year's U.S. stocks, the strong results are credited to earnings growth and P/E multiple expansion.

Specifically, earnings grew 12% in USD terms, the P/E expanded by about 5%, plus about 1% in dividends, the total S&P return was about 18%. The "Magnificent Seven" tech stocks, representing about 1/3 of the market capitalization, saw 22% earnings growth in 2025, while the remaining 493 stocks also achieved 9% earnings growth.

Of the earnings growth, 57% was due to sales growth (up 7%), and 43% was due to margin improvement (up 5.3%). A large part of the margin improvement is likely attributable to technological efficiency, but it's hard to conclude definitively due to data limitations.

In any case, the earnings improvement was mainly because the "economic pie" got bigger, and capitalists captured most of the gains, with workers sharing relatively less. Monitoring margins is very important in the future, as the market currently expects this growth to continue, while left-wing political forces are trying to reclaim a larger share.

3. Valuations and Future Expectations

While the past is easy to know and the future is hard to predict, if we understand causality, the present can help us anticipate the future. Currently, P/E ratios are high and credit spreads are extremely low, valuations seem stretched. History proves that this预示着 lower future stock market returns. Based on current yields and productivity levels, my long-term expected stock return is only 4.7% (at a historically low percentile), which is very low relative to the 4.9% bond yield, so the equity risk premium is extremely low.

This means there is little return left to be squeezed out of risk premiums, credit spreads, and liquidity premiums. If interest rates rise due to currency depreciation leading to increased supply-demand pressures, it will have a huge negative effect on credit and stock markets.

Fed policy and productivity growth are two major uncertainties. The new Fed Chair and committee seem inclined to keep nominal and real rates low, which will support prices and inflate bubbles. Productivity will increase in 2026, but how much of that translates into profits rather than being used for taxes or wage increases (the classic left-right issue) is uncertain.

In 2025, Fed rate cuts and credit easing lowered discount rates, supporting assets like stocks and gold. These markets are no longer cheap now. It is noteworthy that these reflation measures did not benefit less liquid markets like venture capital (VC), private equity (PE), and real estate. If these entities are forced to finance their debt at higher interest rates, liquidity pressures will cause these assets to fall significantly relative to liquid assets.

4. Changes in the Political Order

In 2025, politics played a central role in driving markets:

  • Trump administration domestic policy: A leveraged bet on capitalism revitalizing U.S. manufacturing and AI technology.

  • Foreign policy: Frightened some foreign investors, concerns about sanctions and conflicts supported investment diversification and gold buying.

  • Wealth gap: The top 10% of capitalists own more stocks and have faster income growth, they don't see inflation as a problem, while the bottom 60% of the population feel overwhelmed by it.

The "currency value/purchasing power issue" will become the number one political issue next year, which could lead to Republicans losing the House and cause chaos in 2027. On January 1st, Zohran Mamdani, Bernie Sanders, and AOC converged under the banner of "Democratic Socialism," foreshadowing a battle over wealth and money.

5. Global Order and Technology

In 2025, the global order clearly shifted from multilateralism to unilateralism (might makes right). This led to increased military spending, expanded debt, protectionism, and increased deglobalization. Gold demand strengthened, while demand for U.S. debt and dollar assets decreased.

In terms of technology, the AI wave is currently in the early stages of a bubble. I will release my bubble indicator report soon.

Summary

In summary, I believe: Debt/currency/market/economic forces, domestic political forces, geopolitical forces (military spending), natural forces (climate), and new technological forces (AI) will continue to be the main drivers reshaping the global picture. These forces will largely follow the "Big Cycle" template I outlined in my book.

Regarding portfolio positioning, I don't want to be your investment advisor, but I hope to help you invest better. The most important thing is to have the ability to make independent decisions. You can infer the direction of my positions from my logic. If you want to learn how to do better, I recommend the "Dalio Market Principles" course offered by the Wealth Management Institute (WMI) in Singapore.

*Since Q4 results are not yet officially released, the above data are estimates.

When these premiums/spreads narrow, they exert upward pressure on the stock market.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7600261

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QAccording to Ray Dalio, what were the two biggest sources of returns and the main story in 2025?

AThe two biggest sources of returns were 1) changes in currency values (especially the US dollar, other fiat currencies, and gold) and 2) US stocks significantly underperforming non-US stocks and gold. The main story was the significant wealth transfer and value shift away from the US, driven by fiscal and monetary stimulus, productivity gains, and a large-scale asset allocation shift from US markets.

QWhat was the performance of the S&P 500 in 2025 when measured in gold, and what principle does this illustrate?

AWhen measured in gold, the S&P 500 had a return of -28%. This illustrates the principle that when a currency depreciates, it makes investments denominated in that currency appear to be performing better than they actually are.

QWhat is Ray Dalio's view on the current state of the AI market?

ARay Dalio states that the AI wave is currently in the early stages of a bubble.

QWhat are the key political drivers that impacted the markets in 2025, as identified by Dalio?

AThe key political drivers were: 1) The Trump administration's domestic policy, which was a leveraged bet on capitalism reviving US manufacturing and AI tech. 2) Foreign policy, which scared away some foreign investors and supported diversification and gold buying due to sanctions and conflict fears. 3) The wealth gap, where the top 10% of capitalists owned more stocks and saw faster income growth, while the bottom 60% felt overwhelmed by inflation.

QWhat does Dalio identify as the main forces that will continue to reshape the global landscape?

ADalio identifies the main forces as: the debt/currency/market/economic force, domestic political forces, geopolitical forces (military spending), natural forces (climate), and the force of new technology (AI). These forces will largely follow the 'Big Cycle' template outlined in his book.

你可能也喜欢

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

面对人工智能的冲击,许多人担心工作被取代。然而,真正的威胁在于个人对他人和系统的依赖,以及由此产生的“薪资奴役”——即为生存而从事无意义、枯燥的工作。摆脱这种困境的关键,不是抵制技术,而是成为拥有高自主性的“不可受雇”个体。 文章提出了成功抵御AI替代的五个核心要素:自主性(主动行动的能力)、品味(判断事物价值的经验)、说服力(让他人关注你工作的能力)、毅力(坚持并从错误中学习)和迭代(根据反馈持续改进)。这些能力无法仅通过理论学习获得,必须通过实践来培养。 要启动转变,首先要彻底改变环境,重塑身份认同。其次,应选择一个能获得真实、快速反馈的实践领域,例如创业。在众多技能中,内容创作(媒体)比编写代码更具优势,因为其价值是主观的,需要独特的审美和判断力,这正是AI目前难以完全复制的。 具体行动上,可以从三个步骤开始: 1. **挖掘原始素材**:反思自己长期痴迷的知识领域、轻松解决的难题或童年被压抑的兴趣,找到独特的个人经验。 2. **确立反向思考主轴**:找出你坚信但主流观点错误的地方,或行业内普遍忽视的“皇帝新衣”,形成独特的批判性视角。 3. **立即发布**:将前两步的思考融合,撰写并发布第一个核心内容(如帖子、视频),勇敢接受真实世界的反馈,并在此基础上持续学习和迭代。 最终,抵御AI的关键在于构建一份与自身身份深度契合的毕生事业,通过持续的内容创作和真实互动,建立无法被自动化取代的独特价值和影响力。行动,从今天发布第一个想法开始。

marsbit2小时前

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

marsbit2小时前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

文章探讨了通过投掷骰子生成比特币钱包种子短语的安全方法及其现实挑战。核心观点如下: **1. 骰子提供物理熵源** 骰子结果由众多微小变量决定,理论上虽可预测,但实践中无法被攻击者复制或计算,从而提供高质量的随机性。每个六面骰子投掷约产生2.585比特熵,50次投掷即可满足典型12词助记词(128比特熵)的安全需求。 **2. Coldcard漏洞事件凸显手工熵源的价值** 近期Coldcard硬件钱包因固件漏洞导致其内部随机数生成器存在缺陷,致使约1128枚比特币被盗。但那些**完全**通过足量骰子投掷生成种子短语的用户未受此漏洞影响,因为他们的主密钥未使用有缺陷的生成器。 **3. 重要警示:手工种子并非万能保护** 安全研究员指出,即使用户使用骰子生成了安全的种子,若他们使用了Coldcard的其他功能(如生成纸钱包、克隆密钥、共享签名密钥、密码等),这些**衍生密钥**仍可能调用有漏洞的随机数生成器,从而存在风险。安全种子不保证设备生成的所有秘密都安全。 **4. 手工生成熵源的现实局限性** 尽管数学上可靠,但该方法对大多数用户并不友好: * **过程繁琐易错**:需投掷50-99次,精确记录,任何输入错误都会导致钱包完全不同。 * **引入新风险**:用户可能在记录、转换过程中泄露信息,或使用有偏的骰子/投掷方式。 * **用户体验差**:难以想象大规模推广需要用户手动投掷近百次骰子。安全措施需适应现实生活场景和普通用户的知识水平。 **5. 给用户的建议** 受影响的Coldcard用户应: * 更新固件至最新版。 * 检查是否使用过有漏洞的功能生成了次级密钥或密码,如有则需立即更换。 * 考虑采用多签方案,使用不同厂商的设备分散风险。 **结论**:手工投掷骰子生成熵源是技术娴熟用户的一个有效安全选项,但其过程复杂、容易出错,不适合作为主流用户的默认方法。长远目标是依赖安全、透明且无需专业知识的硬件/软件随机数生成方案。

cryptonews.ru5小时前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

cryptonews.ru5小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

从H2A到A2A:AI Agent经济体与Crypto新机遇

6月17日,哈佛大学独立研究员、美国AI科学院(NAAI)通讯院士、比特币基金会终身会员韩锋做客火币HTX《大咖讲堂》第三期,以《从H2A到A2A》为主题,分享了其对Agent经济、Crypto基础设施及数字社会未来发展的思考。

532人学过发布于 2026.07.01更新于 2026.07.01

从H2A到A2A:AI Agent经济体与Crypto新机遇

美股TradFi:传统金融在AI IPO浪潮下的稳健锚点

2026年,美股IPO市场重回高热度。本文梳理即将上线或受关注的热门赛道龙头,分析具备投资潜力的交易标的及其逻辑,并探讨宏观趋势与相关风险。

2.5k人学过发布于 2026.07.08更新于 2026.07.08

美股TradFi:传统金融在AI IPO浪潮下的稳健锚点

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对AI(AI)币价的意见。

活动图片