Dalio's Annual Analysis: AI is in the Early Stages of a Bubble, Beware of These Risks in 2026

比推发布于2026-01-05更新于2026-01-05

文章摘要

In his annual reflection, Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio analyzes key market dynamics of 2025, emphasizing that currency devaluation—not U.S. equities—was the year's dominant story. The dollar fell significantly against gold (39%), the euro (12%), and other major currencies, making gold the best-performing asset with a 65% return in dollar terms. U.S. stocks returned 18% in dollars but declined 28% when measured in gold. Dalio notes a major shift in asset allocation away from U.S. markets, with non-U.S. equities (especially in Europe, China, and emerging markets) outperforming U.S. stocks. He highlights stretched valuations, low expected equity returns (4.7%), and compressed risk premiums as warning signs. Political and geopolitical factors—including U.S. domestic policies, wealth inequality, and a shift toward unilateralism—drove market behavior, boosting gold demand and reducing appetite for dollar assets. Regarding AI, Dalio states it is in the "early stages of a bubble." He warns of debt refinancing risks, potential Fed easing inflating bubbles further, and stresses the importance of currency-hedged strategies. The interplay of monetary, political, geopolitical, and technological forces will continue shaping the macro landscape in line with his "Big Cycle" framework.

Author: Ray Dalio, Founder of Bridgewater

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews


As a systematic global macro investor, at the end of 2025, I naturally reflect on the underlying mechanisms of the events that occurred, especially in terms of market performance. This is the purpose of today's reflection.

Although the facts and returns are undeniable, my perspective differs from that of most people.

While most people consider U.S. stocks, especially U.S. AI stocks, to be the best investment of 2025 and the core story of the year, the indisputable fact is that the richest returns (and the real headline story) came from: 1) changes in currency values (most importantly the U.S. dollar, other fiat currencies, and gold); and 2) the significant underperformance of U.S. stocks compared to non-U.S. stocks and gold (gold was the best-performing major market). This was primarily caused by fiscal and monetary stimulus, productivity improvements, and a large-scale shift in asset allocation away from the U.S. market.

In these reflections, I want to step back and examine how this currency/debt/market/economic dynamic worked last year, and briefly touch on how the other four major driving forces—politics, geopolitics, natural acts, and technology—affect the global macro picture within the evolving "Big Cycle."

1. Changes in Currency Values

Regarding currency values: The U.S. dollar fell 0.3% against the yen, 4% against the renminbi, 12% against the euro, 13% against the Swiss franc, and plummeted 39% against gold (gold is the second-largest reserve currency and the only major non-credit currency).

Therefore, all fiat currencies are depreciating. The biggest story and market fluctuations of the year stemmed from the weakest fiat currencies falling the most, while the strongest/hardest currencies rose the most. The most outstanding major investment last year was being long gold (a 65% return in USD), which outperformed the S&P 500 (an 18% USD return) by a whopping 47 percentage points. Or, put another way, measured in gold currency, the S&P index actually fell 28% in real terms.

Let's remember some key principles related to the current situation:

  • When a domestic currency depreciates, it makes things denominated in that currency appear to be rising. In other words, viewing investment returns through the lens of a weak currency makes them appear stronger than they actually are. In this case, the S&P index returned 18% for USD investors, 17% for yen investors, 13% for renminbi investors, but only 4% for euro investors, only 3% for Swiss franc investors, and for gold standard investors, its return was -28%.

  • Changes in currency are crucial for wealth transfer and economic direction. When a currency depreciates, it reduces a person's wealth and purchasing power, makes one's own goods and services cheaper in others' currencies, and simultaneously makes others' goods and services more expensive in one's own currency. In this way, it affects inflation rates and trade relations, although there is a lag in this effect.

  • Whether you are currency hedged is critical. What if you don't have, and don't want to have, a view on currencies? You should always hedge into your least risky currency mix and make tactical adjustments from it when you think you can do well. I'll explain how I operate later.

Regarding bonds (i.e., debt assets): Because bonds are promises to deliver currency, when the currency's value falls, their real value decreases even if the nominal price rises. Last year, 10-year U.S. Treasuries returned 9% in USD terms (about half from yield, half from price), 9% in yen terms, 5% in renminbi terms, but -4% in both euro and Swiss franc terms, and -34% in gold terms—and cash was an even worse investment.

You can understand why foreign investors dislike U.S. dollar bonds and cash (unless currency hedged).

So far, the bond supply-demand imbalance has not been a serious problem, but a large amount of debt (nearly $10 trillion) will need to be rolled over in the future. Meanwhile, the Fed seems inclined to cut rates to keep real rates low. Therefore, debt assets are unattractive, especially at the long end of the curve, and further steepening of the yield curve seems inevitable, but I doubt the Fed will ease as much as currently priced in.

2. Significant Underperformance of U.S. Stocks vs. Non-U.S. Stocks and Gold

As mentioned earlier, although U.S. stocks performed strongly in USD terms, they were much weaker in strong currencies and significantly underperformed stocks in other countries. Clearly, investors prefer to hold non-U.S. stocks, non-U.S. bonds rather than U.S. assets.

Specifically, European stocks outperformed U.S. stocks by 23%, Chinese stocks by 21%, UK stocks by 19%, and Japanese stocks by 10%. Emerging market stocks performed even better overall, with a return of 34%, emerging market dollar debt returned 14%, and emerging market local currency debt (USD denominated) returned 18% overall. In other words, a major outflow and value transfer of wealth is occurring from the U.S. outward, which could lead to more rebalancing and diversification.

Regarding last year's U.S. stocks, the strong results are credited to earnings growth and P/E multiple expansion.

Specifically, earnings grew 12% in USD terms, the P/E expanded by about 5%, plus about 1% in dividends, the total S&P return was about 18%. The "Magnificent Seven" tech stocks, representing about 1/3 of the market capitalization, saw 22% earnings growth in 2025, while the remaining 493 stocks also achieved 9% earnings growth.

Of the earnings growth, 57% was due to sales growth (up 7%), and 43% was due to margin improvement (up 5.3%). A large part of the margin improvement is likely attributable to technological efficiency, but it's hard to conclude definitively due to data limitations.

In any case, the earnings improvement was mainly because the "economic pie" got bigger, and capitalists captured most of the gains, with workers sharing relatively less. Monitoring margins is very important in the future, as the market currently expects this growth to continue, while left-wing political forces are trying to reclaim a larger share.

3. Valuations and Future Expectations

While the past is easy to know and the future is hard to predict, if we understand causality, the present can help us anticipate the future. Currently, P/E ratios are high and credit spreads are extremely low, valuations seem stretched. History proves that this预示着 lower future stock market returns. Based on current yields and productivity levels, my long-term expected stock return is only 4.7% (at a historically low percentile), which is very low relative to the 4.9% bond yield, so the equity risk premium is extremely low.

This means there is little return left to be squeezed out of risk premiums, credit spreads, and liquidity premiums. If interest rates rise due to currency depreciation leading to increased supply-demand pressures, it will have a huge negative effect on credit and stock markets.

Fed policy and productivity growth are two major uncertainties. The new Fed Chair and committee seem inclined to keep nominal and real rates low, which will support prices and inflate bubbles. Productivity will increase in 2026, but how much of that translates into profits rather than being used for taxes or wage increases (the classic left-right issue) is uncertain.

In 2025, Fed rate cuts and credit easing lowered discount rates, supporting assets like stocks and gold. These markets are no longer cheap now. It is noteworthy that these reflation measures did not benefit less liquid markets like venture capital (VC), private equity (PE), and real estate. If these entities are forced to finance their debt at higher interest rates, liquidity pressures will cause these assets to fall significantly relative to liquid assets.

4. Changes in the Political Order

In 2025, politics played a central role in driving markets:

  • Trump administration domestic policy: A leveraged bet on capitalism revitalizing U.S. manufacturing and AI technology.

  • Foreign policy: Frightened some foreign investors, concerns about sanctions and conflicts supported investment diversification and gold buying.

  • Wealth gap: The top 10% of capitalists own more stocks and have faster income growth, they don't see inflation as a problem, while the bottom 60% of the population feel overwhelmed by it.

The "currency value/purchasing power issue" will become the number one political issue next year, which could lead to Republicans losing the House and cause chaos in 2027. On January 1st, Zohran Mamdani, Bernie Sanders, and AOC converged under the banner of "Democratic Socialism," foreshadowing a battle over wealth and money.

5. Global Order and Technology

In 2025, the global order clearly shifted from multilateralism to unilateralism (might makes right). This led to increased military spending, expanded debt, protectionism, and increased deglobalization. Gold demand strengthened, while demand for U.S. debt and dollar assets decreased.

In terms of technology, the AI wave is currently in the early stages of a bubble. I will release my bubble indicator report soon.

Summary

In summary, I believe: Debt/currency/market/economic forces, domestic political forces, geopolitical forces (military spending), natural forces (climate), and new technological forces (AI) will continue to be the main drivers reshaping the global picture. These forces will largely follow the "Big Cycle" template I outlined in my book.

Regarding portfolio positioning, I don't want to be your investment advisor, but I hope to help you invest better. The most important thing is to have the ability to make independent decisions. You can infer the direction of my positions from my logic. If you want to learn how to do better, I recommend the "Dalio Market Principles" course offered by the Wealth Management Institute (WMI) in Singapore.

*Since Q4 results are not yet officially released, the above data are estimates.

When these premiums/spreads narrow, they exert upward pressure on the stock market.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7600261

相关问答

QAccording to Ray Dalio, what were the two biggest sources of returns and the main story in 2025?

AThe two biggest sources of returns were 1) changes in currency values (especially the US dollar, other fiat currencies, and gold) and 2) US stocks significantly underperforming non-US stocks and gold. The main story was the significant wealth transfer and value shift away from the US, driven by fiscal and monetary stimulus, productivity gains, and a large-scale asset allocation shift from US markets.

QWhat was the performance of the S&P 500 in 2025 when measured in gold, and what principle does this illustrate?

AWhen measured in gold, the S&P 500 had a return of -28%. This illustrates the principle that when a currency depreciates, it makes investments denominated in that currency appear to be performing better than they actually are.

QWhat is Ray Dalio's view on the current state of the AI market?

ARay Dalio states that the AI wave is currently in the early stages of a bubble.

QWhat are the key political drivers that impacted the markets in 2025, as identified by Dalio?

AThe key political drivers were: 1) The Trump administration's domestic policy, which was a leveraged bet on capitalism reviving US manufacturing and AI tech. 2) Foreign policy, which scared away some foreign investors and supported diversification and gold buying due to sanctions and conflict fears. 3) The wealth gap, where the top 10% of capitalists owned more stocks and saw faster income growth, while the bottom 60% felt overwhelmed by inflation.

QWhat does Dalio identify as the main forces that will continue to reshape the global landscape?

ADalio identifies the main forces as: the debt/currency/market/economic force, domestic political forces, geopolitical forces (military spending), natural forces (climate), and the force of new technology (AI). These forces will largely follow the 'Big Cycle' template outlined in his book.

你可能也喜欢

比特币将涨至40万美元?分析师用黄金走势叠加做出2026年大胆预测

一位名为Vivek Sen的分析师近日发布图表分析,提出大胆预测:如果比特币(BTC)能够复制黄金历史上的突破结构,其价格可能在2026年达到40万美元。这一论断的核心依据是将比特币当前的市场走势图与黄金过去的长期突破形态进行叠加比较。 分析师认为,随着现货比特币ETF的推出,比特币作为一种数字价值储存手段,与黄金的类比更加常见,两者在投资组合配置中的角色日益接近。图表叠加展示了一种相似的宏观上升趋势。 然而,文章明确指出,这种基于图表视觉对比的预测存在重大局限。比特币和黄金在市场深度、流动性、波动性以及投资者构成上存在根本差异。黄金的历史走势并非比特币未来的可靠蓝图。比特币价格受到衍生品持仓、ETF资金流、交易所流动性和加密货币领域特有的高杠杆影响,其波动更为剧烈和敏感。 要实现如此高的价格目标,市场需要一系列条件的支持,包括持续强劲的机构资金流入、改善的流动性、有利于硬资产需求的宏观经济环境,以及整体的加密货币风险偏好上升。此外,比特币必须维持其宏观上升趋势。 因此,这篇报道强调,40万美元的目标应被视为一种基于社交媒体分析的看涨情景设想,而非严谨的概率加权预测。它更像是提供了一个讨论上行空间的框架,其实现需要实际市场资金流和价格行为的进一步确认。投资者在参考此类乐观类比时,应同时关注更实际的价格水平、资金流动数据等基本面信息。

bitcoinist1小时前

比特币将涨至40万美元?分析师用黄金走势叠加做出2026年大胆预测

bitcoinist1小时前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:原油飓风、AI巨浪与比特币的十字路口

全球金融市场正经历一场由地缘冲突引发的系统性重估:霍尔木兹海峡封锁导致原油一度暴涨30%,G7紧急释放储备后涨幅收窄,滞胀风险取代通胀成为核心担忧,美元成为“唯一避风港”并逼近100大关,亚太及美股遭遇“黑色星期一”全线重挫;AI领域则冰火两重天,国家发改委提出“十五五”末10万亿规模目标,OpenClaw项目火爆推动概念股狂飙;比特币在宏观风暴中跌破70000美元关键防线。

567人学过发布于 2026.03.12更新于 2026.03.12

加密市场宏观研报:原油飓风、AI巨浪与比特币的十字路口

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对AI(AI)币价的意见。

活动图片