Crypto Market Structure Bill Paused: Senate Banking Cancels Markup

bitcoinist发布于2026-01-15更新于2026-01-15

文章摘要

The Senate Banking Committee has postponed the markup of a crypto market structure bill following opposition from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, who argued the current draft is "materially worse than the status quo" and would effectively ban tokenized equities, restrict DeFi, and stifle innovation. Committee Chairman Tim Scott described the delay as a tactical pause to continue bipartisan negotiations, emphasizing the goal of establishing clear rules to protect consumers and national security. The move has split the crypto industry, with firms like a16z, Circle, and Ripple expressing support for the legislative effort, while others, including Bitwise Asset Management, sided with Coinbase's stance that "no bill is better than a bad bill." Despite the setback, key figures like Galaxy Digital's Mike Novogratz remain optimistic about a eventual compromise, noting ongoing good-faith discussions among lawmakers. The total crypto market cap was $3.22 trillion at the time of reporting.

The Senate Banking Committee has pulled the scheduled Thursday markup of its crypto asset market structure bill after a late-stage flare-up with Coinbase, freezing what had looked like a tightening path toward action. The pause lands at a sensitive moment for Washington’s crypto negotiations: industry heavyweights are publicly splitting over the Senate draft even as lawmakers insist bipartisan talks are still alive.

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R-S.C.) said Wednesday the committee will postpone the markup “as bipartisan negotiations continue,” framing the delay as tactical rather than terminal. “I’ve spoken with leaders across the crypto industry, the financial sector, and my Democratic and Republican colleagues, and everyone remains at the table working in good faith,” Scott wrote on X. “As we take a brief pause before moving to a markup, this market structure bill reflects months of serious bipartisan negotiations and real input from innovators, investors, and law enforcement.”

Scott positioned the bill as a foundational framework rather than a narrow industry carveout. “The goal is to deliver clear rules of the road that protect consumers, strengthen our national security, and ensure the future of finance is built in the United States,” he added.

Coinbase Breaks Ranks Late

The immediate catalyst was Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, who said the exchange “can’t support the bill as written” after reviewing “the Senate Banking draft text over the last 48hrs.”

Armstrong argued the draft contains multiple provisions he says would be “materially worse than the current status quo,” contending that it amounts to “a defacto ban on tokenized equities,” includes “DeFi prohibitions” that expand government access to financial records and erode privacy, and would “stifl[e] innovation” by weakening the CFTC relative to the SEC.

He also pointed to “draft amendments” he said “would kill rewards on stablecoins,” warning the changes could allow banks to “ban their competition.” Armstrong’s bottom line was blunt: “We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill.” Still, he struck a conciliatory note about process and odds of a compromise, adding he was “quite optimistic” that continued work could produce “the right outcome.”

That posture split the difference between hard opposition to the text and support for continued negotiations,an important distinction as the markup process is typically where senators offer and vote amendments.

Crypto Industry Split

Coinbase’s stance quickly triggered a counter-response from other major crypto firms and advocacy groups backing the Senate Banking GOP’s push. Support was voiced by a16z, Circle, Kraken, The Digital Chamber, Ripple, and Coin Center, coalescing into a public front aimed at keeping momentum intact despite the delay.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse cast the bill as overdue but directionally positive. “While long-overdue, this move by @SenatorTimScott and @BankingGOP on market structure is a massive step forward in providing workable frameworks for crypto, while continuing to protect consumers,” he wrote. He said Ripple would remain engaged, adding: “We are at the table and will continue to move forward with fair debate. I remain optimistic that issues can be resolved through the mark-up process.”

Meanwhile, Tim Draper said Armstrong’s opposition is justified, arguing the Senate compromise “is worse than no bill at all” and suggesting that “the banks have been meddling.”

Ryan Rasmussen, Head of Research at Bitwise Asset Management , called the current CLARITY Act draft broadly harmful, listing tokenization, stablecoins, DeFi, privacy, builders, users, investors, and innovation, and concluded that the industry would “rather have no bill than a bad bill.”

White House Crypto Czar David Sacks urged the industry to treat the delay as a narrow window to align rather than an opening to splinter. “Passage of market structure legislation remains as close as it’s ever been,” Sacks wrote. “The crypto industry should use this pause to resolve any remaining differences. Now is the time to set the rules of the road and secure the future of this industry.”

Galaxy Digitall’s CEO Mike Novogratz struck a more optimistic tone, saying: “While the crypto bill might be delayed to keep working on it, I am very confident that a bill will get done soon. I have spoken to over 10 senators on both sides of the aisle in the past 24 hrs and I believe they all are working in good faith to get something done. Always gets tense at the end.”

At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $3.22 trillion.

Total crypto market cap needs to overcome the 20-and 50-week EMAs, 1-week chart | Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

相关问答

QWhy did the Senate Banking Committee postpone the markup of the crypto market structure bill?

AThe Senate Banking Committee postponed the markup to allow more time for bipartisan negotiations to continue, as stated by Chairman Tim Scott, who framed the delay as tactical rather than terminal.

QWhat were Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's main objections to the draft bill?

ABrian Armstrong argued the draft bill contained provisions that would be 'materially worse than the current status quo,' including a de facto ban on tokenized equities, DeFi prohibitions that expand government access to financial records, and measures that would stifle innovation by weakening the CFTC relative to the SEC.

QWhich major crypto firms and advocacy groups publicly supported the Senate Banking GOP's push for the bill?

ASupport for the bill was voiced by a16z, Circle, Kraken, The Digital Chamber, Ripple, and Coin Center.

QWhat was the overall sentiment of Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse regarding the bill?

ABrad Garlinghouse viewed the bill as a long-overdue but massive step forward, calling it a positive framework for crypto that protects consumers, and he remained optimistic that issues could be resolved through the mark-up process.

QHow did White House Crypto Czar David Sacks advise the crypto industry to respond to the delay?

ADavid Sacks urged the industry to use the pause as a narrow window to resolve remaining differences and align, rather than splinter, emphasizing that this is the time to set the rules of the road and secure the industry's future.

你可能也喜欢

赛场之外:围绕世界杯的逐利游戏

《赛场之外:围绕世界杯的逐利游戏》一文揭示了2026年世界杯如何成为一个巨大的全球投机窗口。文章指出,这项赛事不仅吸引了球迷,更催生出一套完整的投机生态。 文章从七个层面剖析了这一现象: 1. **预测市场崛起**:以Polymarket和Kalshi为代表的预测平台交易量暴增,其链上财富故事极具传播力,正挑战传统体育博彩。 2. **传统体育博彩**:尽管面临新兴市场冲击,传统博彩凭借成熟用户和庞大市场,仍是世界杯投机的最大基本盘,预计美国相关投注额将达数百亿美元。 3. **股市概念炒作**:球队战绩直接影响相关“概念股”股价,如韩国的炸鸡股、日本的直播平台和运动品牌股,股价随赛果剧烈波动,成为“情绪盘口”。 4. **门票转售套利**:门票在二级市场成为套利工具,价格因球队、球星、地点等因素差异巨大。甚至出现了类似“卖空”的操作,以及FIFA官方“购票权”(RTB)的“二阶投机”。 5. **藏品与周边投机**:Panini贴纸因稀缺性和收藏价值在二级市场可能身价暴涨;限量版或带有身份象征的球衣也被热炒,假货市场同样活跃以满足球迷的现场表达需求。 6. **加密货币狂热**:世界杯催生了大量未经授权的主题Meme币,它们在短期内可能制造惊人回报,但更多是暴涨暴跌的投机工具,风险极高。 7. **内容与信息服务**:有人通过开发门票比价工具、出售付费投注推荐等方式,为投机者提供信息和工具,从庞大的信息需求中获利。 文章总结,世界杯赛场之外,一个围绕注意力、情绪和稀缺资源的全球交易网络悄然运行,真正的赢家往往是那些最早洞察并利用这种注意力流动规则的人。

marsbit42分钟前

赛场之外:围绕世界杯的逐利游戏

marsbit42分钟前

Hyperliquid ETF资产声明引关注,HYPE叙事在X平台持续升温

一篇X平台推文声称,三只在2026年5月推出的Hyperliquid(HYPE)交易所交易基金(ETF)已合计积累了1.58亿美元的资产,从而引发了市场关注。 根据用户AlphaOnChain的帖子,其中Bitwise HYPE ETF据称拥有8800万美元资产,21Shares HYPE ETF则为6600万美元。然而,此数据来源于社交媒体,并非官方基金发行人的正式文件或数据看板,因此需要谨慎对待,更多应被视为市场情绪和话题热度的风向标。 这一话题的热度反映了当前加密市场的关注点可能正在从比特币、以太坊等主流资产向外扩散。Hyperliquid以其链上永续交易和交易所生态而闻名,如果相关ETF产品确实吸引了可观的资金流入,可能表明机构和散户投资者开始将目光投向更具潜力的山寨币领域。HYPE本身结合了去中心化金融(DeFi)、衍生品和交易所基础设施等多个叙事,使其在交易者转向高风险资产时成为一个自然的炒作标的。 对于交易者而言,关键在于区分社交媒体热度与基本面支撑。尽管社交讨论可能在短期内影响市场,但持续的价格上行通常需要经过验证的资金流入、充足的流动性以及生态系统的持续成长作为基础。 因此,虽然Hyperliquid ETF的叙事正在获得更多关注,但在获得官方数据证实前,投资者应保持审慎态度。

bitcoinist2小时前

Hyperliquid ETF资产声明引关注,HYPE叙事在X平台持续升温

bitcoinist2小时前

芯片设备“铁律”,正在被打破

长期以来,半导体设备行业存在一条“买方市场”铁律:设备商在新设备导入时常需大幅降价,后续重复采购时也面临持续压价压力。但这一规则正在被打破。近期,SK海力士的多家设备供应商反向提出涨价请求,反映出AI算力狂潮引发的设备供需失衡。 以TCB(热压键合)设备为例,因HBM4扩产需求,韩美半导体、韩华Semitech等厂商订单激增。尽管混合键合技术被视为未来方向,但在HBM4阶段,TCB因技术成熟、量产风险低仍是主流,且其自身也在不断升级。市场预计TCB与混合键合将在未来一段时间内共存。 AI扩产潮还导致测试设备面临关键零部件(如FPGA、CPU、Driver IC)短缺,这些部件被数据中心优先抢购,致使测试设备交付延迟,形成“AI芯片缺货-扩产-测试设备需求增加-关键部件被抢-设备延期”的连锁反应。 整体上,半导体设备行业正进入由AI驱动的新一轮上行周期。SEMI预计全球设备销售额将持续增长至2027年。增长动力主要来自三条主线:先进逻辑芯片(如台积电、英特尔扩产)、存储(尤其是HBM带动DRAM投资)以及先进封装(如CoWoS)。AI算力需求正在重塑设备市场的格局与定价权。 总之,头部设备商凭借在关键工艺节点上的技术壁垒和产能保障能力,正获得前所未有的议价权,改写半导体行业的利益分配格局。

marsbit2小时前

芯片设备“铁律”,正在被打破

marsbit2小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片