Cross-Border Payment Giant Wise Lands on NASDAQ

marsbit发布于2026-05-16更新于2026-05-16

文章摘要

Fintech company Wise has successfully listed its A-class shares on the Nasdaq stock exchange under the ticker "WSE," while maintaining its secondary listing on the London Stock Exchange. This move, more of a primary listing transfer to the US than a traditional IPO, reflects Wise's strategic shift to be closer to a key growth market, attract a broader investor base, and support its business evolution. Founded in London by two Estonians to solve personal pain points with costly and opaque international bank transfers, Wise initially grew as TransferWise by offering faster, cheaper, and more transparent currency exchange and cross-border payments. It has since expanded beyond a simple transfer tool into a comprehensive global financial services platform, offering multi-currency accounts, business services, debit cards, and the Wise Platform, which provides its infrastructure to banks and other institutions. Wise's latest fiscal year data highlights its scale: $243 billion in cross-border transaction volume, $39 billion in customer balances, and nearly 19 million customers. The company continues to emphasize its low average fee of 0.52% and fast transaction speeds, with 75% of payments arriving within 20 seconds. The Nasdaq listing aligns with Wise's ambitions in the US market, where it aims to grow its consumer and business user base and, critically, deepen partnerships with American banks through Wise Platform. To further strengthen its US operations, Wise is reportedly see...

Author: Zhijia Ge, Zhifu Zhijia

Two Estonians in London, seeking to save on a bank currency exchange fee, devised a method for matching funds between friends. Over a decade later, the company debuted on NASDAQ under the name Wise, with a market cap fluctuating around $15.5 billion.

Zhifu Zhijia has learned that Wise Group plc Class A ordinary shares began trading on NASDAQ on May 11, 2026, under the ticker symbol "WSE". On the same day, Wise maintained its secondary listing on the London Stock Exchange, with the LSE code "WISE".

As of delayed trading on May 11, WSE was quoted at $15.40, up $0.90 from the previous reference price, an increase of approximately 6.21%.

Wise's official disclosed data for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, also shows that the company's annual cross-border transaction volume reached $243 billion, customer-held funds balance reached $39 billion, transaction revenue was $1.9 billion, and net revenue was $2.5 billion. For a company that started with low-cost cross-border remittances, this scale is sufficient to support its market positioning as a "leading global cross-border payment company".

This is not a traditional initial public offering. Wise did not issue new shares to raise capital nor completely exit the London market. Instead, through a reorganization arrangement, Wise Group plc was placed as the new ultimate parent company of the group, and the primary listing location was moved to the US via a dual listing approach.

Wise's relocation of its primary listing to the US corresponds to a change in its business identity. A company that grew from a cross-border remittance tool is now using the US primary listing to reorganize its investor base, business narrative, and governance structure.

Wise, Born from Exchange Rate Gaps

The starting point of Wise's story is not complicated. Two young Estonians living in London, one needed pounds, the other needed euros. Taavet Hinrikus was an early employee at Skype, living in London but receiving income in euros; Kristo Käärmann was working at Deloitte at the time, also in London with income in pounds, but had a euro mortgage to repay in Estonia.

They both had to exchange currencies through banks, and both encountered the same problem.

Bank transfers were expensive, exchange rates were opaque, and fees were often hidden in seemingly inconspicuous exchange rate spreads. Cross-border fund movement was originally a very specific daily life issue, but the complex bank processes and non-transparent pricing methods created distance.

Their initial solution was simple. Taavet kept his euros in Europe, Kristo kept his pounds in the UK, and they matched funds at a rate close to the real exchange rate, each arranging funds locally. This way, the money didn't need to travel between the two countries every time, and the expensive bank exchange costs were bypassed.

This method later evolved into TransferWise.

What first attracted users wasn't complex financial concepts, but changes ordinary users could understand at a glance: using the real exchange rate, fees laid out transparently, and clear arrival times. Cross-border transfers were no longer a black box at bank counters, nor a process users could only passively wait for after payment.

This determined Wise's subsequent product character. It has always positioned itself with transparent pricing, low fees, and speed as its main labels. Users see not only whether they can send money but also know in advance how much they pay in fees, how much the recipient will ultimately receive, and approximately when the funds will arrive.

In the traditional bank cross-border remittance system, fees are often scattered across service charges, exchange rate spreads, intermediary bank fees, and delivery delays. Wise targeted these hidden costs from the start. It didn't enter the market with "more complex financial products" but with clearer pricing and more predictable delivery experiences, reducing user uncertainty about cross-border remittances.

This starting point influenced Wise's later expansion direction. Wise later expanded into accounts, business payments, cards, Wise Platform, and connections to local payment systems, but its early product logic never disappeared: cross-border fund flows should be faster, cheaper, and more transparent.

From a currency exchange arrangement between two friends to a listed company with a market cap fluctuating around $15.5 billion, Wise's growth was not solely driven by capital. It initially solved a real user pain point, and behind that pain point lay the long-standing issues of cost, efficiency, and transparency in global cross-border payments.

From this starting point, Wise's later expansion was not a deviation from cross-border remittances but rather the continuation of applying the product logic of "cheaper, more transparent, faster" to accounts, business payments, and institutional services.

The Ambition Without 'Transfer'

Wise was once called TransferWise. The name was direct, its core being cross-border transfers.

Early users understood it simply: use it to send money, cheaper than traditional banks; use it for currency exchange, prices are clearer; use it for transfers, delivery speed is more predictable. This positioning quickly gained TransferWise a batch of users involved in cross-border living, studying, working, freelancing, and small businesses.

But if a cross-border payment company remains only at "cheap transfers," it easily hits growth boundaries.

User remittance frequency is limited, per-transaction fees continue to decline, and market competition constantly squeezes profit margins. Wise's real subsequent change was expanding single cross-border remittances into a cross-border capital service system around individuals, businesses, and institutions.

Renaming to Wise was the external manifestation of this change.

From TransferWise to Wise, losing "Transfer," the company hopes the market sees it no longer as a single transfer tool. Today's Wise serves both personal cross-border transfers and business payments, multi-currency accounts, debit cards, customer-held funds balance management, and also provides cross-border payment capabilities to banks, financial institutions, and businesses through the Wise Platform.

Individual users use Wise to complete international transfers, currency exchange, overseas spending, and multi-currency fund management. Business users use Wise to receive payments from overseas customers, pay suppliers, manage multi-currency accounts, and handle payments in international operations. Institutional clients can embed Wise's cross-border payment capabilities into their own products and systems via the Wise Platform.

Wise's business has expanded from "helping users send one transfer" to "helping users and institutions manage cross-border fund flows." Single transactions are still important, but accounts, balances, cards, local payment system access, and institutional partnerships are becoming more critical.

Wise's officially disclosed data supports this change.

The latest financial report shows Wise's cross-border transaction volume reached $243 billion, a year-on-year increase of 31%; customer-held funds balance reached $39 billion, up 40%; transaction revenue reached $1.9 billion, and net revenue reached $2.5 billion. The company also served nearly 19 million personal and business customers in the 2026 fiscal year.

This data indicates that Wise can no longer be appropriately understood merely as a low-fee remittance tool. A low-fee remittance tool needs user growth and brand recognition; a cross-border capital platform requires a global payment network, an account system, local payment system access, compliance capabilities, institutional partnerships, and long-term understanding from capital markets. Wise's NASDAQ primary listing is happening precisely at this stage of its business.

Wise mentioned in its latest listing announcement that its global payment network consists of over 80 licenses and 8 markets directly connected to local payment systems, supporting over 40 currencies. Among payments completed via Wise, 75% arrive within 20 seconds, and 96% within 24 hours. The company also stated its average fee rate is 0.52%, lower than the global industry's common 3% to 5% charging level.

The value of a cross-border payment platform is not only the transaction entry point but also includes license coverage, local payment system access, delivery efficiency, cost control, pricing transparency, and large-scale processing capacity. The story Wise wants to tell has expanded from "cheap remittances" to "global capital service network."

A New Coordinate on NASDAQ

This is not Wise's first entry into public capital markets.

In 2021, Wise listed on the London Stock Exchange via a direct listing. At that time, it was one of the representative cases of UK fintech companies listing in London. The London market needed tech companies, UK fintech needed iconic listed companies, and Wise happened to be at that intersection.

In less than five years, Wise moved its primary listing to NASDAQ, retaining a secondary listing arrangement on the LSE.

Wise's shift to a US primary listing indeed means one fewer fintech representative case for the London market, but this migration doesn't only correspond to a geographical change in capital markets. For Wise itself, US market expansion, investor coverage, stock liquidity, and the cooperation potential of Wise Platform with banks and platform institutions are the more direct business contexts.

Reasons Wise previously provided in documents include: expanding the investor base, especially enabling more US-based institutional and retail investors to participate; enhancing stock liquidity; creating conditions for future inclusion in major US indices; and improving Wise's brand recognition among US customers.

In Wise's latest listing announcement, Chairman David Wells also mentioned that the US listing brings the company closer to the world's deepest, most liquid capital market and better matches the important growth opportunity that the US represents.

The US market holds two layers of meaning for Wise.

The first layer is users and business. The US itself is one of the most active markets for global cross-border fund flows. Studying abroad, immigration, freelancing, cross-border employment, overseas e-commerce, and global supply chains continuously generate small-amount, high-frequency, and enterprise-level cross-border payment needs. Wise's past rapid growth relied precisely on deconstructing the complex, opaque, slow, and expensive issues in traditional international remittances, using lower prices and faster speeds to capture some of the cross-border payment experience advantages from banks.

The second layer is institutional cooperation. Wise previously specifically mentioned in documents that the US has over 4,000 banks, including several global large banks. For Wise Platform, this is not an ordinary market statistic but a set of potential cooperation entry points. The core of Wise Platform is embedding the cross-border payment, multi-currency account, card issuance, and local payment network capabilities Wise has built into the systems of banks, financial institutions, platform companies, and large enterprises via APIs and institutional partnerships.

Wise's official listing announcement also emphasized that the company already serves millions of US consumers and businesses through Wise Account, Wise Business, and Wise Platform, and will continue to expand its local presence in the US to reach more US banks, online platforms, and cross-border transaction users. This statement directly links the NASDAQ primary listing with US business expansion.

The NASDAQ primary listing will also change how Wise faces investors.

Wise has previously mentioned that its 2026 fiscal year performance will be presented in US dollars and under US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), rather than continuing primarily in pounds and under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Currency, accounting standards, trading markets, and comparable companies will all influence how investors understand a company's growth and profits.

After entering the US primary market, Wise needs US investors to understand it in familiar ways. It is no longer just a fintech company in the London market, nor just a success story among European startups. It must place itself within the narrative systems of platform-type tech companies, payment network companies, and global fintech companies more familiar to the US market.

Wise did not completely exit London; the LSE still maintains trading arrangements. However, the most important trading and pricing venue shifts to the US. London remains part of the company's history, regulation, and shareholder structure, while NASDAQ becomes its capital market home field for the next growth stage.

From a capital market perspective, Wise's move to NASDAQ seeks deeper liquidity, broader investor coverage, and higher visibility. From a payment business perspective, it is also placing the US market in a higher position, paving the way for Wise Platform, US bank partnerships, and USD payment capability building.

The US primary listing addresses capital market understanding, while Wise Platform and US payment capabilities address business network issues.

From Bank Rival to Bank Partner

Wise Platform is a more critical piece in Wise's subsequent growth.

If early TransferWise mainly replaced bank cross-border remittance services, then Wise Platform reconfigures Wise's relationship with banks, platforms, and enterprises. In the past, users bypassed banks to use Wise for cheaper cross-border transfers; now, banks may also embed Wise's capabilities into their own products, using Wise to improve their clients' cross-border payment experience.

This is a role change. Wise is both a challenger to traditional banks' cross-border remittance business and a potential supplier of cross-border payment capabilities to banks.

Wise disclosed in its Form 20-F filing that Wise Platform can open capabilities such as instant cross-border transfers, multi-currency accounts, card issuance, and access to global local payment systems, wallets, and card networks to partner institutions.

The filing also mentioned that Wise Platform has been adopted by banks like Itaú, Mandiri, Nubank, Monzo, etc., but currently, this business contributes less than 10% of transaction revenue. The company's long-term goal is for Wise Platform to contribute over 50% of cross-border transaction volume.

If this goal is achieved, Wise's valuation logic will further change. Personal remittance business brings user scale and transaction volume, business account operations bring more stable cash flow and business relationships, while Wise Platform could turn Wise into a cross-border payment capability provider behind banks and platforms.

When a cross-border payment company reaches a certain scale, low fees are no longer just a front-end pricing strategy but also depend on back-end network capabilities. Whoever can more directly access local payment systems has a better chance to reduce intermediary layers, lower processing costs, improve delivery certainty, and output these capabilities to banks and platforms.

Building payment capabilities in the US market is precisely a key next-phase action for Wise.

A Reuters report mentioned that Wise has applied to establish a national trust bank in the US and plans to seek a master account with the Federal Reserve. If approved, Wise would have the opportunity to reduce reliance on intermediary banks, improve USD payment processing efficiency, and gain stronger control over its largest currency fund flows.

This step is important for Wise.

The US dollar is one of the core currencies in global cross-border payments. For a cross-border payment platform, USD fund processing efficiency, clearing costs, and account control capabilities directly impact user prices, delivery speed, and profit margins. Whether it can reduce dependence on intermediary banks and process USD fund flows more directly will affect Wise's competitiveness in the US market.

The NASDAQ primary listing and US payment capability building correspond to two arrangements for Wise in capital markets and business networks, respectively. Changing the listing location itself won't improve payment efficiency, but it can increase Wise's visibility, investor coverage, and business trust in the US market. Meanwhile, actions related to a national trust bank and master account are closer to back-end fund processing capabilities.

Combined, Wise is telling a complete story in the US market: front-end has individual and business clients, institutional side has Wise Platform, capital side has NASDAQ primary listing, and back-end is advancing more direct USD payment processing capabilities.

As cross-border payment competition becomes platform-based, early price advantages need to be supported by licenses, networks, accounts, local payment system connections, compliance capabilities, and institutional partnerships. Wise's growth has reached this stage.

For cross-border payment companies, truly long-term effective cost advantages ultimately return to local payment system access, fund processing efficiency, and compliance coverage capabilities.

China Corridor and the Market Cap Test

Wise is not entirely unrelated to mainland China.

Wise's official help center shows it supports individuals and businesses sending Renminbi to China, with receipt methods involving Alipay, WeChat Pay, UnionPay-related accounts, and bank transfers.

For sending Renminbi out of China, Wise states that this service is provided in cooperation with a licensed third-party payment institution regulated by the People's Bank of China and is only applicable to personal accounts meeting identity, work, and tax record requirements, with funds only transferable to the user's own overseas account or Wise account.

Wise's role in China-related cross-border fund scenarios mainly manifests as service reach and cooperation channel arrangements; mainland China licensed payment institutions assume the role of local channels. The "Lakala - Reserve Fund Account" appearing in Wise's payment instructions also corresponds to the practical arrangements for local payments, bank transfers, and reserve fund management in cross-border capital services.

Wise already has service reach in China-related cross-border fund scenarios, but Renminbi outflow services from China are completed via cooperation channels with domestic licensed payment institutions.

Cross-border payment is not a purely technical issue.

It involves local regulatory permits, payment institution reserve fund accounts, bank app transfers, user identity and tax materials, fund usage purposes, consistency of payer and payee account names, among other links. Wise's ability to integrate these complex requirements into the user process is part of its product capability; but in each market, it must design service boundaries according to local rules.

Listing on NASDAQ will not automatically change Wise's business boundaries in mainland China. It can bring higher US market visibility, better stock liquidity, and more investor coverage, but cross-border payment business itself remains constrained by local payment, foreign exchange, anti-money laundering, and client fund protection rules in each market. Capital market migration can change the company narrative but cannot bypass local regulatory requirements.

Beyond business boundaries, corporate governance is also an unavoidable part of Wise's primary listing location migration.

In 2025, when Wise shareholders voted on related arrangements, the proposal also included an extension of the dual-class share structure. Wise's Class A and Class B shares do not have equal voting rights, with Class B shares possessing higher voting power. Co-founder Taavet Hinrikus publicly opposed related proposals, with core dissatisfaction being that the primary listing location migration and voting rights arrangements were placed in the same package for voting.

This controversy reflects the balance between long-term founder control, ordinary shareholder rights, capital market preferences, and the company's long-term strategy as a fintech company enters the mature listed stage.

Dual-class share structures are not uncommon among US tech companies, and the market often accepts founders retaining stronger voting rights in exchange for strategic continuity and long-term investment. But such arrangements naturally trigger governance disputes, especially when bound together with listing location migration, whether ordinary shareholders have sufficient choice becomes a focal point of controversy.

Wise ultimately gained shareholder support, and the path to US primary listing continued. But the governance dispute left a practical question: when a payment tech company needs both long-term infrastructure investment and faces public market investors, how does it find balance between founder control, shareholder protection, and business long-termism.

Cross-border payments involve regulation, compliance, system investment, and long-term network building, indeed requiring operators to have a longer cycle. But listed companies must also respond to investor demands for transparency, equal rights, and governance constraints.

After listing on NASDAQ, new competition for Wise won't only occur in stock price performance. US investors will next watch whether its user growth can continue, whether cross-border transaction volume can continue to expand, whether customer-held funds balances and card business can bring more stable income, whether Wise Platform can grow from a low-proportion business into a long-term growth source for the company, and whether it can truly open bank partnership space in the US market.

The growth path of global cross-border payment companies is transitioning from single-point product competition to comprehensive capability competition. Early users care about whether transfers are cheap and fast; business customers care about payment coverage, account management, reconciliation efficiency, and compliance materials; banks and platforms care about interface capabilities, stability, costs, customer experience, and regulatory responsibility division; capital markets care about scale, revenue structure, profit margins, governance, and long-term growth space.

Wise's NASDAQ primary listing brings all these issues into public market pricing simultaneously. It is no longer content to be a representative of UK fintech, nor tells only a story of "cheaper international transfers." It must make the US capital market believe that Wise has the opportunity to become part of the global capital flow network and continuously amplify scale at the individual, business, and institutional cooperation levels.

Of course, NASDAQ won't automatically give Wise a higher valuation. The US market has stronger liquidity, broader investor coverage, and more direct requirements for growth, profitability, and governance.

Wise needs to prove that its low-fee strategy can coexist with profitability; its customer growth can be sustained; its Wise Platform can turn from a long-term goal into real transaction volume; its regulatory compliance capabilities in multiple markets like the US, Europe, and Asia can support larger-scale fund flows; and its governance structure won't become a source of long-term valuation discount.

Wise moving from London to NASDAQ appears to be a change in listing location, but behind it is a change in the development stage of a cross-border payment company. It once challenged traditional banks with low fees and transparent exchange rates; now it must rely on accounts, platforms, networks, compliance, and capital market understanding to support the next growth phase.

By choosing NASDAQ, what Wise truly faces is whether the US market, institutional partnerships, and local payment capabilities behind its approximately $15.5 billion market cap can support the next phase of growth.

相关问答

QWhen did Wise Group plc's Class A shares begin trading on the Nasdaq, and under what ticker symbol?

AWise Group plc's Class A shares began trading on the Nasdaq on May 11, 2026, under the ticker symbol 'WSE'.

QWhat was the primary reason for the founders of Wise to create their initial solution?

AThe founders created their initial solution to avoid the high and non-transparent foreign exchange fees charged by traditional banks when they needed to transfer funds between Estonia and the UK for personal expenses.

QWhat is the long-term strategic goal for the volume contribution of Wise Platform to the company's total cross-border transactions?

AThe long-term strategic goal is for Wise Platform to contribute over 50% of the company's total cross-border transaction volume.

QHow does the company's move of its primary listing to Nasdaq relate to its business expansion, particularly in the United States?

AThe move aligns with the company's expansion strategy in the US market, aiming to improve brand awareness, facilitate potential banking partnerships (especially for Wise Platform), access a deeper investor base and capital markets, and support efforts to establish more direct US dollar payment processing capabilities.

QWhat was one of the key corporate governance issues highlighted during the process of moving Wise's primary listing to Nasdaq?

AA key governance issue was the bundling of the primary listing relocation with a proposal to extend a dual-class share structure (giving certain shares higher voting rights) into a single shareholder vote, which sparked debate about founder control versus shareholder rights.

你可能也喜欢

我用了一年,才看清 Agent 支付扎心的真相

我用了一年时间深入研究Agent支付领域,发现当前市场存在诸多扎心现实。总体来看,真正的、大规模的需求尚未形成,初创公司面临结构性问题。 首先,在Agent对商户的“代购式商业”方面,用户体验存在根本缺陷。对于需要视觉比价的大多数商品(如服装、电子产品),纯文本对话界面远不如传统电商界面直观高效。虽然AI在理解需求和比价指令上表现不错,但无法替代并排浏览、挑选的体验。商户目前接入主要是出于“防御性”的“Agent引擎优化”考虑,担心未来落后,而非当前有实际客流。外卖等高频低决策场景有潜力,但受限于平台未开放API和过高的推理成本。另一个突破口是帮助用户处理复杂、体验差的购物流程(如叠加优惠、非母语操作),但这需要强大的B2C分发渠道,而这是巨头的优势。 其次,在Agent对API(机器间调用服务)方面,虽然存在机器间支付场景,但当前开发者大多已通过预付额度等方式解决小额支付问题。更深层矛盾在于,主流SaaS供应商的商业模式依赖大额企业合同,不愿支持极小额、临时性的API访问。新兴协议更适合服务长尾、小众的需求,但这个市场的付费意愿和规模有限。 第三,Agent对Agent的商业模式目前几乎完全停留在理论层面,尚未产生有意义的交易量。虽然这是一个需要专用结算基础设施的长期愿景,但与当前市场脱节。 相比之下,Agent对金融是目前唯一存在既有需求和付费意愿的类别。将AI嵌入基金经理、财务团队等现有工作流是自然演进,并能创造全新能力(如实时监控、自动调仓)。但该领域竞争激烈,受严格监管,老牌机构拥有显著优势。 文章最后指出,行业巨头因资金充足和防御心态仍在投入建设,但对初创公司而言,时间线至关重要。真正的机遇不在于单纯的支付层,而在于解决“协同”这一更宏大的问题——即如何协调Agent与人类的工作、验证成果并进行结算。大规模协同将自然催生结算机制,解决协同问题的公司终将吞并支付业务。经过一年探索,作者团队已将方向转向一个市场需求真实存在、增长迅速且尚未被充分服务的新领域。

链捕手15分钟前

我用了一年,才看清 Agent 支付扎心的真相

链捕手15分钟前

Claude Opus 4.8 找到一个 45 亿美元的 Bug,AI时代正在批量生产黑客

一名安全研究员使用AI模型Claude Opus 4.8在Zcash加密货币的隐私协议Orchard中发现了一个严重的“无限增发”漏洞,导致其市值短时间内蒸发约45亿美元。这一事件并非由Anthropic公司最尖端但受限的Claude Mythos模型完成,而是由已公开发布、进入日常工具的普通模型实现的,凸显了AI正在将发现高危漏洞的能力“民主化”和“廉价化”。 AI降低了漏洞挖掘的门槛,带来了双重影响:一方面,它催生了大量由AI生成的虚假或低质量安全报告,如同“注意力DDoS”攻击,消耗着本就人力匮乏的开源维护者精力;另一方面,它也能更快地找出那些隐藏多年、以往需要专家耗费巨大成本才能发现的真实漏洞。我们的数字世界一直建立在存在诸多潜在缺陷的代码之上,过去的“安全”在相当程度上源于发现成本高昂。 然而,能力的扩散并未带来责任的均摊。网络安全行业本就面临巨大的人才缺口,尤其是在复杂分析和应急响应层面。当AI让攻击和漏洞报告变得泛滥时,修复漏洞、守护系统的人力链条却变得更加紧张。破坏可以被自动化脚本轻易复制,但重建信任与安全仍需依赖稀缺的专业人力进行艰苦、细致的修复工作。 AI时代揭示了一个现实:我们习以为常的平稳数字生活,并非理所当然,而是依赖于一条脆弱的人力协作防线在持续对抗风险。未来真正的挑战或许不是找到漏洞,而是是否有足够的人愿意并能够修复它们。

marsbit49分钟前

Claude Opus 4.8 找到一个 45 亿美元的 Bug,AI时代正在批量生产黑客

marsbit49分钟前

以太坊价格预测:ETH可能翻倍,而Cardano(ADA)和这一新秀代币则有望迎来近500%的飙升

加密货币市场正显现新的活力迹象,投资者为下一轮牛市周期做准备。尽管大型加密货币仍占投资组合重要部分,但投资趋势正转向有望获得更高百分比回报的项目。 以太坊(ETH)作为领先的智能合约平台,若市场在2026年走牛,其价格可能从当前约2,014.7美元再次突破4,000美元,实现翻倍增长。 卡尔达诺(ADA)现交易价格约0.2329美元,因其对可扩展性、基于研究的开发和长期可持续性的关注而被部分投资者视为未来增长的基础。 新兴项目Little Pepe(LILPEPE)正获得显著关注。该项目是一个兼容以太坊的Layer 2环境,目前处于预售第13阶段,价格为0.0022美元,已筹集超过2,819万美元。它旨在为模因社区构建一个降低交易成本、提高速度并发展应用生态的Layer 2区块链。一些投资者基于其预售需求强劲、生态功能规划(如质押、模因启动平台和DAO治理)以及活跃的社区参与,预测其有500%的上涨潜力(目标价约0.0132美元)。 总结而言,以太坊仍是区块链领域重要的长期投资选择,卡尔达诺具备上行潜力,而Little Pepe则因其独特的Layer 2基础设施和社区建设,吸引着寻求高增长机会的投资者。随着市场预期2026年走强,这些项目值得关注。

TheNewsCrypto1小时前

以太坊价格预测:ETH可能翻倍,而Cardano(ADA)和这一新秀代币则有望迎来近500%的飙升

TheNewsCrypto1小时前

从以太坊到 AI的「CROPS」:Vitalik 反复强调的这套「慢变量」,究竟是什么?

以太坊基金会近期在文件“EF Mandate”中系统阐述了其核心指导原则“CROPS”,即抗审查性(Censorship Resistance)、抗捕获性(Capture Resistance)、开源(Open Source)、隐私(Privacy)和安全(Security)。这套原则旨在确保以太坊生态中,用户能在不依赖单一平台、不丧失最终控制权的前提下进行资产管理和链上交互。 Vitalik Buterin近期进一步将“CROPS”概念拓展至人工智能(AI)领域,提出“CROPS AI”的构想。随着AI Agent逐渐成为用户执行链上操作(如交易、资产整理)的入口,其中心化、黑箱化运行模式可能使用户的隐私、资产信息和操作意图面临风险。“CROPS AI”强调AI应具备抗审查、开放、保护隐私和安全的特点,提倡敏感操作尽可能在本地运行,减少对中心化云服务的依赖。 由此,以太坊的“CROPS Ethereum access layer”与“CROPS AI”产生了重要交集。两者共同关注的核心问题是:用户如何在调用远程服务(无论是链上RPC还是大语言模型)时,既能获得所需能力,又不泄露个人敏感信息。Vitalik提到的利用零知识证明实现付费远程LLM调用和私密Ethereum RPC读取,正是探索这一交集的具体方向。 “CROPS”原则并非抽象理念,它正具体化为对协议层、应用层(尤其是钱包)和用户体验层的设计要求。在未来,当AI成为数字世界的核心接口时,确保系统可理解、可验证、隐私且安全,将成为以太坊乃至整个Web3生态持续发展的关键价值主张和积极变量。

marsbit2小时前

从以太坊到 AI的「CROPS」:Vitalik 反复强调的这套「慢变量」,究竟是什么?

marsbit2小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片