Cardano Founder Blasts Ripple For Playing Dirty With New CLARITY Act, Here’s What He Said

bitcoinist发布于2026-04-01更新于2026-04-01

文章摘要

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has launched a direct attack against Ripple and its CEO Brad Garlinghouse, accusing them of engineering the CLARITY Act to shield Ripple’s interests while harming the broader crypto ecosystem. Hoskinson claims the bill, in its current form, would classify most digital assets as securities by default, forcing projects into a difficult regulatory process. He warns this could expose open-source developers to legal risks and remove protections for DeFi builders. He also criticized the XRP community, alleging years of propaganda have eroded critical thinking. Hoskinson has consistently opposed the bill, suggesting it unfairly benefits XRP. The probability of the CLARITY Act being signed into law has fallen to 51%, down from 78% in early March.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has launched one of his most direct attacks yet on Ripple and its CEO Brad Garlinghouse, accusing the payments company of engineering the CLARITY Act to eliminate competition while shielding its own interests.

The remarks were delivered during Hoskinson’s most recent weekly rollup on YouTube, where he laid out what he believes is a deeper issue surrounding the bill and how it could change competition across the crypto sector.

Hoskinson Accuses Ripple Of Playing Dirty

According to Charles Hoskinson, the CLARITY Act, in its current form, was crafted with Ripple’s fingerprints on it. He is of the notion that the bill’s structure would classify most digital assets as securities by default, forcing projects to fight their way out of that designation through a regulatory process he warned the SEC could easily weaponize. “They’re trying to pass a bill that hurts the entire ecosystem while they get protected,” he said.

As noted by Hoskinson, if the CLARITY Act is passed, projects would need to prove otherwise, effectively placing the burden of defense on developers and startups from the outset.

Open-source contributors could face legal risks even when they are not directly responsible for how their code is used. He pointed to the legal exposure faced by developers connected to Tornado Cash as an example of what could become standard practice if the CLARITY Act passes in its current form.

He also flagged the removal of existing protections for DeFi developers as a provision that would send a chilling signal across the entire community of crypto developers.

Cardano Founder Says XRP Community Is Incapable Of Critical Thinking

Hoskinson also reserved some of his remarks for members of the XRP community. He accused Ripple directly of conducting a sustained campaign of layer after layer of marketing and propaganda. Furthermore, years of social media consumption, cable news, and yellow journalism have left segments of the XRP community with an inability to think critically.

Hoskinson has been building this argument over several months, and his recent statements tie into a broader pattern of criticism against Ripple and the CLARITY Act.

Back in early March, he noted that the CLARITY Act’s structure effectively labels everything as a security first, creating a system where only a few projects will be spared. He suggested that XRP could be among the assets that receive more favorable treatment under the framework proposed by the CLARITY Act.

His criticism against Brad Garlinghouse has also been very persistent. A notable example is during a January 2026 livestream where he questioned why the Ripple CEO is supportive of advancing the bill despite its perceived flaws.

Polymarket odds of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026 have now fallen to 51%, down from above 78% in early March, following Coinbase’s opposition to a stablecoin yield compromise and the departure of crypto czar David Sacks from his role.

ADA trading at $0.24 on the 1D chart | Source: ADAUSDT on Tradingview.com

相关问答

QWhat is the main accusation Charles Hoskinson makes against Ripple regarding the CLARITY Act?

ACharles Hoskinson accuses Ripple of engineering the CLARITY Act to eliminate competition while shielding its own interests, claiming the bill is crafted with Ripple's fingerprints on it.

QAccording to Hoskinson, what would be the default classification for most digital assets under the CLARITY Act?

AAccording to Hoskinson, the CLARITY Act's structure would classify most digital assets as securities by default.

QWhat potential legal risk does Hoskinson highlight for open-source contributors if the CLARITY Act passes?

AHoskinson warns that open-source contributors could face legal risks even when not directly responsible for how their code is used, citing the legal exposure faced by Tornado Cash developers as an example.

QWhat does Hoskinson claim about the XRP community's ability to think critically?

AHoskinson claims that years of marketing, propaganda, and media consumption have left segments of the XRP community with an inability to think critically.

QWhat has happened to the Polymarket odds of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026, and what are the cited reasons?

AThe Polymarket odds of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026 have fallen to 51% from above 78% in early March, following Coinbase's opposition to a stablecoin yield compromise and the departure of crypto czar David Sacks.

你可能也喜欢

美国参议员敦促银行监管机构制定‘公平’的加密货币资本规则

美国参议员呼吁制定“公平”的加密资本规则。由参议院数字资产小组委员会主席辛西娅·卢米斯牵头,多名共和党参议员致信美联储、联邦存款保险公司(FDIC)及货币监理署(OCC)负责人,要求为银行从事加密资产活动建立更清晰、公平的资本框架。 信中批评了巴塞尔银行监管委员会现行的加密资产资本标准,该标准对加密资产施加了1250%的风险权重,参议员们认为这并非基于实际风险评估,而像是一种按资产类别“一刀切”的惩罚,实质上阻碍了银行持有此类资产,与监管机构倡导的“技术中立”原则相悖。 议员们赞赏了监管机构近期关于代币化证券的联合指引,该指引明确了此类资产应获得与其非代币化对应物同等的资本待遇。他们敦促监管机构将这一风险导向原则一致性地应用于其他数字资产,并基于近期在加密市场结构法案方面的进展,开始为银行的资产负债表加密资产活动制定新的资本框架。 与此同时,FDIC、OCC和美联储负责人近期在国会作证时,概述了其转向更“基于风险”的监管方向,旨在改革监管框架以提高效率,并审查过去的监管措施。他们强调,强有力的资本标准对保障银行体系韧性和支持经济增长至关重要,同时监管应促进而非阻碍负责任的创新。

bitcoinist1小时前

美国参议员敦促银行监管机构制定‘公平’的加密货币资本规则

bitcoinist1小时前

从以太坊到AI的“CROPS”:Vitalik反复强调的这套“慢变量”,究竟是什么?

以太坊创始人Vitalik Buterin近期频繁强调一个概念——CROPS,它代表抗审查性(Censorship Resistance)、抗捕获性(Capture Resistance)、开源(Open Source)、隐私(Privacy)和安全(Security)。这一理念源于以太坊基金会发布的指导文件,旨在确保用户在数字生活中不依赖单一平台、不丧失最终控制权。 随着AI技术深入钱包和自动化执行场景,CROPS的内涵超越了以太坊的原有范畴,成为AI时代用户能否掌控自身数字生活的关键问题。Vitalik指出,真正的“CROPS AI”应支持多种硬件平台,而不仅仅是“去中心化AI”。当AI成为用户的数字代理人,处理资产管理和链上操作时,确保其抗审查、开放、隐私和安全变得至关重要。 CROPS Ethereum与CROPS AI存在显著交集。例如,通过零知识证明实现付费远程大模型调用和私密以太坊RPC读取,旨在让用户在获取远程服务的同时避免暴露敏感信息。未来,可能出现更多针对以太坊场景微调的AI模型,用于提升智能合约和生态安全。 这一理念将深刻影响Web3生态,尤其是钱包等入口层产品。在市场关注短期热点的背景下,CROPS提醒我们关注那些决定长期方向的技术变量:在AI加速接管数字世界的时代,确保系统可理解、可验证、注重隐私和安全,才是以太坊持续价值的真正体现。

marsbit4小时前

从以太坊到AI的“CROPS”:Vitalik反复强调的这套“慢变量”,究竟是什么?

marsbit4小时前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对ADA(ADA)币价的意见。

活动图片