Blockchain Association Urges Congress To Keep BRCA Intact In Crypto Market Structure Bill

bitcoinist发布于2026-02-27更新于2026-02-27

文章摘要

With a March 1 deadline approaching for the CLARITY Act, the Blockchain Association is intensifying its advocacy efforts on Capitol Hill. The trade group is urging lawmakers to preserve the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) within the upcoming crypto market structure bill. Its primary focus is on Title III of the draft legislation, emphasizing the need to protect open-source software developers from being regulated as financial intermediaries. The association argues that developers who write and publish non-custodial code, without controlling user assets, should not be subject to the same rules as financial institutions. This distinction is presented as crucial for fostering American leadership in DeFi innovation. Concurrently, a new bipartisan bill, the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026, has been introduced in the House to explicitly protect developers from prosecution under laws targeting unlicensed money transmitters.

With a White House deadline on the anticipated CLARITY Act set for March 1, crypto policy discussions are intensifying in Washington. On Thursday afternoon, Senate Democrats are scheduled to meet to continue deliberations on the crypto market structure bill.

Ahead of those talks, the Blockchain Association returned to Capitol Hill to press lawmakers on how decentralized finance (DeFi) will be treated in the latest draft from the Senate Banking Committee.

Blockchain Association Lobbies For Developer Protections

The industry trade group, which represents a range of crypto companies, said its advocacy efforts are focused particularly on Title III of the draft legislation and on preserving the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) as negotiations move forward.

In a post on social media platform X, the organization stated that leaders from 18 member companies were meeting with 24 Senate offices across both the Banking and Agriculture Committees.

According to the association, the stakes extend beyond technical regulatory language. “Today’s meetings are about whether America will keep its commitment to open innovation — and to the developers who build permissionless software,” the group wrote.

It emphasized that it has consistently pushed for legislation that clearly distinguishes between developers of non-custodial software and financial intermediaries that actually take control of customer funds.

As Congress works toward a comprehensive framework for digital asset markets, the association argued, policymakers must ensure that DeFi protocols are not effectively pushed out of existence through overly broad rules.

Clear Line Between Custodians And Code Writers

Central to the debate is the treatment of open-source developers. The group maintains that developers who publish code but do not custody or manage user assets should not be regulated as financial institutions.

“Open-source developers should not be treated as financial intermediaries when they do not custody or control customer assets,” the association said, adding that the United States has a significant opportunity to lead globally in DeFi innovation if it gets the policy approach right.

Summer Mersinger, the Blockchain Association’s chief executive officer, reinforced that message in a post earlier Thursday. She described developer protections as foundational to what she called the next wave of American innovation.

As lawmakers advance market structure legislation, she said, it is essential to draw a clear boundary between entities that hold and control consumer funds and those that merely create and publish open-source software.

New Bipartisan Crypto Bill

The debate over developer liability is also unfolding in the House of Representatives. On Thursday, crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett reported that Representatives Scott Fitzgerald, Ben Cline, and Zoe Lofgren introduced the bipartisan Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026.

The proposed legislation is designed to protect software developers from prosecution under Section 1960 of the federal criminal code. The bill seeks to clarify that Section 1960 — originally crafted to address unlicensed money transmitters that custody customer funds — applies only to actors who actually control user assets.

It would exclude developers who simply write or publish code, a distinction that the crypto industry, and especially the DeFi sector, has been advocating to incorporate into the CLARITY Act.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap valuation at $2.3 trillion as of Thursday afternoon. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

相关问答

QWhat is the Blockchain Association urging Congress to do regarding the BRCA in the crypto market structure bill?

AThe Blockchain Association is urging Congress to keep the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) intact as negotiations on the crypto market structure bill move forward.

QWhich specific part of the draft legislation is the Blockchain Association's advocacy focused on?

AThe association's advocacy efforts are focused particularly on Title III of the draft legislation.

QAccording to the Blockchain Association, what is the fundamental distinction that must be made in regulation?

AThe association argues for a clear distinction between developers of non-custodial software and financial intermediaries that actually take control of customer funds.

QWhat is the name and purpose of the new bipartisan bill introduced in the House of Representatives?

AThe new bipartisan bill is called the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026. Its purpose is to protect software developers from prosecution under Section 1960 of the federal criminal code by clarifying that it only applies to actors who control user assets, not those who merely write or publish code.

QWhat does the Blockchain Association say is at stake in these policy discussions?

AThe association states that the stakes are about whether America will keep its commitment to open innovation and to the developers who build permissionless software, ensuring that DeFi protocols are not pushed out of existence by overly broad rules.

你可能也喜欢

英特尔 CEO 陈立武首次播客访谈:我们的目标是“5-10 年 10 倍”,押注先进封装、玻璃基板和人工钻石

英特尔CEO陈立武在接受播客访谈时,提出了“5-10年实现10倍回报”的股东回报目标,并系统阐述了其领导下的转型战略。面对传统工艺微缩接近物理极限的挑战,他将突破点聚焦于先进封装技术(如EMIB)、新型基板材料(如玻璃基板)以及氮化镓、碳化硅和人工合成钻石等半导体新材料,旨在通过材料科学与封装创新延续性能增长。 陈立武将转型过程分为“爬、走、跑”三个阶段。目前英特尔处于夯实基础的“爬行”阶段,首要任务是稳固资产负债表、聚焦简化产品线、并倾听客户需求。他特别指出,智能体AI和推理场景的爆发正带动CPU需求强劲回升。 在代工业务方面,他强调这是一门“信任的生意”,核心是提升良率、缺陷密度和周期时间等基础能力,以服务客户并保障美国本土供应链安全。他同时透露,与埃隆·马斯克合作的Terafab项目进展顺利,双方正共同应对AI算力增长带来的半导体基础设施挑战。 陈立武认为,市场目前低估了英特尔的长期潜力。他预计到2030-2032年,外界将真正看到其在PC基本盘之外,于边缘计算、物理AI与智能体AI等新兴市场的价值。通过整合XPU(混合架构)、先进封装与代工能力,为不同工作负载提供定制化芯片解决方案,是其为英特尔锚定的长期战略方向。

marsbit25分钟前

英特尔 CEO 陈立武首次播客访谈:我们的目标是“5-10 年 10 倍”,押注先进封装、玻璃基板和人工钻石

marsbit25分钟前

AI 成绩单背后,藏着一位华人“出题人”

AI领域重要的基准评测MMLU-Pro、MMMU、MMMU-Pro背后,都站着同一位“出题人”——加拿大滑铁卢大学助理教授陈文虎。 随着大语言模型能力快速提升,旧的评测基准如MMLU逐渐“失灵”,顶尖模型得分趋近满分,难以区分高下。为此,陈文虎团队于2024年推出MMLU-Pro。它通过将选项扩至10个、增加推理题比例、剔除简单题等方式,使模型准确率相较旧基准显著下降16%-33%,成绩波动更小,有效拉开了模型间的真实差距。 在多模态评测方面,陈文虎团队推出的MMMU基准包含1.15万道需结合图像与专业知识的复杂题目,即便是当时最强的GPT-4V和Gemini Ultra准确率也未超过60%。后续的MMMU-Pro则进一步堵住模型仅凭文本猜答案的漏洞,强制其进行真正的多模态理解。 陈文虎的研究方向长期聚焦于复杂信息理解与推理。他曾于谷歌DeepMind参与Gemini多模态模型的研发与评估工作,这让他深谙模型能力增长路径与评估盲区。他创立的“老虎实验室”不仅做评测,也研发视频理解与生成等模型,这种“既做题也出题”的经历,使其能更精准地设计出触及模型能力边界的评估体系。 如今,陈文虎已加入Meta超级智能实验室,继续专注于多模态预训练与评估工作。他的故事反映了在AI浪潮中,众多华人研究者正深度参与并塑造着行业发展的核心基础工作。

marsbit2小时前

AI 成绩单背后,藏着一位华人“出题人”

marsbit2小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片