Blockchain Association Urges Congress To Keep BRCA Intact In Crypto Market Structure Bill

bitcoinist发布于2026-02-27更新于2026-02-27

文章摘要

With a March 1 deadline approaching for the CLARITY Act, the Blockchain Association is intensifying its advocacy efforts on Capitol Hill. The trade group is urging lawmakers to preserve the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) within the upcoming crypto market structure bill. Its primary focus is on Title III of the draft legislation, emphasizing the need to protect open-source software developers from being regulated as financial intermediaries. The association argues that developers who write and publish non-custodial code, without controlling user assets, should not be subject to the same rules as financial institutions. This distinction is presented as crucial for fostering American leadership in DeFi innovation. Concurrently, a new bipartisan bill, the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026, has been introduced in the House to explicitly protect developers from prosecution under laws targeting unlicensed money transmitters.

With a White House deadline on the anticipated CLARITY Act set for March 1, crypto policy discussions are intensifying in Washington. On Thursday afternoon, Senate Democrats are scheduled to meet to continue deliberations on the crypto market structure bill.

Ahead of those talks, the Blockchain Association returned to Capitol Hill to press lawmakers on how decentralized finance (DeFi) will be treated in the latest draft from the Senate Banking Committee.

Blockchain Association Lobbies For Developer Protections

The industry trade group, which represents a range of crypto companies, said its advocacy efforts are focused particularly on Title III of the draft legislation and on preserving the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) as negotiations move forward.

In a post on social media platform X, the organization stated that leaders from 18 member companies were meeting with 24 Senate offices across both the Banking and Agriculture Committees.

According to the association, the stakes extend beyond technical regulatory language. “Today’s meetings are about whether America will keep its commitment to open innovation — and to the developers who build permissionless software,” the group wrote.

It emphasized that it has consistently pushed for legislation that clearly distinguishes between developers of non-custodial software and financial intermediaries that actually take control of customer funds.

As Congress works toward a comprehensive framework for digital asset markets, the association argued, policymakers must ensure that DeFi protocols are not effectively pushed out of existence through overly broad rules.

Clear Line Between Custodians And Code Writers

Central to the debate is the treatment of open-source developers. The group maintains that developers who publish code but do not custody or manage user assets should not be regulated as financial institutions.

“Open-source developers should not be treated as financial intermediaries when they do not custody or control customer assets,” the association said, adding that the United States has a significant opportunity to lead globally in DeFi innovation if it gets the policy approach right.

Summer Mersinger, the Blockchain Association’s chief executive officer, reinforced that message in a post earlier Thursday. She described developer protections as foundational to what she called the next wave of American innovation.

As lawmakers advance market structure legislation, she said, it is essential to draw a clear boundary between entities that hold and control consumer funds and those that merely create and publish open-source software.

New Bipartisan Crypto Bill

The debate over developer liability is also unfolding in the House of Representatives. On Thursday, crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett reported that Representatives Scott Fitzgerald, Ben Cline, and Zoe Lofgren introduced the bipartisan Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026.

The proposed legislation is designed to protect software developers from prosecution under Section 1960 of the federal criminal code. The bill seeks to clarify that Section 1960 — originally crafted to address unlicensed money transmitters that custody customer funds — applies only to actors who actually control user assets.

It would exclude developers who simply write or publish code, a distinction that the crypto industry, and especially the DeFi sector, has been advocating to incorporate into the CLARITY Act.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap valuation at $2.3 trillion as of Thursday afternoon. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

相关问答

QWhat is the Blockchain Association urging Congress to do regarding the BRCA in the crypto market structure bill?

AThe Blockchain Association is urging Congress to keep the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) intact as negotiations on the crypto market structure bill move forward.

QWhich specific part of the draft legislation is the Blockchain Association's advocacy focused on?

AThe association's advocacy efforts are focused particularly on Title III of the draft legislation.

QAccording to the Blockchain Association, what is the fundamental distinction that must be made in regulation?

AThe association argues for a clear distinction between developers of non-custodial software and financial intermediaries that actually take control of customer funds.

QWhat is the name and purpose of the new bipartisan bill introduced in the House of Representatives?

AThe new bipartisan bill is called the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026. Its purpose is to protect software developers from prosecution under Section 1960 of the federal criminal code by clarifying that it only applies to actors who control user assets, not those who merely write or publish code.

QWhat does the Blockchain Association say is at stake in these policy discussions?

AThe association states that the stakes are about whether America will keep its commitment to open innovation and to the developers who build permissionless software, ensuring that DeFi protocols are not pushed out of existence by overly broad rules.

你可能也喜欢

不可能三角根本就是伪问题

加密行业构建了强大的密码学系统,但默认状态下却无法保护用户资金的隐私,所有交易和持仓都公开可查,这成为大规模资金入场的主要障碍。文章认为,区块链本质上是一台无人拥有的慢速、昂贵计算机,其核心价值在于提供无需许可的准入和去中心化信任。资金(尤其是稳定币)是天然适合上链的资产,因为账本记录即资产本身。 然而,行业长期关注的“不可能三角”(去中心化、可扩展性、安全性)并非真正瓶颈。实际阻碍在于两大设计缺陷:合法性与隐私。合法性方面,无许可特性导致监管灰色地带,但随着美国《GENIUS法案》等监管框架落地,合规环境正在改善。 更关键的缺陷是“透明度税”。链上所有交易公开,导致用户面临MEV(矿工可提取价值)被抢跑、夹击等风险,这实质上是一种持续的成本。对于家族办公室、大型机构等严肃资本而言,公开资产负债表是无法接受的。隐私并非与合规对立,现代密码学(如零知识证明)允许在不泄露具体数据的情况下证明合规性(如偿付能力、KYC),实现“可证明的合规隐私”。 作者指出,为链上交易添加隐私保护是一次纯粹升级,它将把加密系统从“公开的谷歌表格”转变为能保守秘密的共享机器,从而吸引数万亿规模的机构资金,真正释放区块链的潜力。

链捕手15分钟前

不可能三角根本就是伪问题

链捕手15分钟前

光芯片,集体扩产

近日,全球光芯片产业链密集出现扩产、投资与供应链绑定动作,以满足AI数据中心对光互连能力激增的需求。 美国方面,Coherent获政府资助扩建德州6英寸磷化铟(InP)产线,产能将提升至4倍,NVIDIA已对其战略投资并锁定未来产能。Lumentum在北卡罗来纳州新建激光器工厂,Nokia则在宾夕法尼亚扩建光子芯片先进测试与封装产能。日本材料商JX Advanced Metals计划大幅投资,将InP衬底产能提升7-10倍。欧洲方面,IQE与Tower Semiconductor达成InP外延片供应协议,推动硅光平台与III-V材料集成;ST计划在法国大幅提升300mm硅光产能;Sivers Semiconductors与格芯合作开发集成激光器的硅光方案。 国内光芯片产业链同样迅猛发展。东山精密旗下索尔思光电宣布投资12亿美元在常州扩建光芯片及光模块产能。三安光电已具备6英寸InP光芯片量产能力,云南锗业亦启动磷化铟单晶片扩产项目。产业链正从模块组装向材料、芯片、封测等全环节延伸。 行业分析指出,无论未来采用可插拔、CPO(共封装光学)还是其他架构,AI算力增长对带宽的需求将持续推高光芯片用量。目前CPO面临技术挑战,可能放缓落地,但光源路线呈现多元化(如硅光+连续波激光器、VCSEL、MicroLED等),将在不同应用场景分层并存。这场全球扩产竞赛实质是各国对AI数据中心光互连时代的关键布局,光子产业链已进入白热化竞争阶段。

marsbit2小时前

光芯片,集体扩产

marsbit2小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片