Bitcoin Created By The CIA? Chinese Professor Jiang Xueqin Makes Bold Claim

bitcoinist发布于2026-04-17更新于2026-04-17

文章摘要

Chinese-Canadian educator Jiang Xueqin claimed Bitcoin was likely created by U.S. intelligence agencies like the CIA or NSA, rather than the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto. He argued that only state-level actors would have the resources and motive to develop such technology, suggesting Bitcoin serves purposes like surveillance and covert financing. He also questioned early large investments, like those from the Winklevoss twins, as suspicious. The Bitcoin community strongly rejected these claims. Commentators like Ansel Lindner and Lyn Alden argued that Jiang fundamentally misunderstands Bitcoin’s decentralized, open-source nature. They emphasized that Bitcoin’s value lies in its transparency and distributed network, which operates independently of any central control, making its origins irrelevant. At the time of reporting, BTC was trading at $74,886.

Chinese-Canadian educator and Predictive History host Jiang Xueqin has stirred debate after arguing that Bitcoin may have been created by the CIA or a broader US “deep state,” rather than by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto. The claim, made on the April 15 episode of the Jack Neel Podcast, quickly drew pushback from prominent Bitcoin commentators who said Jiang’s argument rests on a basic misunderstanding of how the network works.

Was Bitcoin A CIA Project?

Jiang, a Beijing-based commentator with 2.3 million YouTube subscribers, framed the theory around what he described as a game-theory process of elimination. He said the standard origin story “makes no sense,” asking why someone would spend years or even decades developing blockchain technology only to release it to the world for free and then disappear.

“So then you have to ask yourself three questions,” Jiang said. “First of all is who would have the technology and the expertise to create something like the blockchain. Second of all, you have to ask who would benefit from this blockchain creation. The third question you want to ask is why would they keep it secret?”

From there, Jiang argued that the likely candidates were US intelligence and defense agencies, citing the role government-linked institutions played in building foundational internet infrastructure. “Probably the same people who created the internet, probably the same people who created GPS, DARPA, NSA, CIA, probably these guys,” he said. In his telling, blockchain would serve two strategic purposes: surveillance and covert financing.

He pushed the argument further by suggesting that the network’s value depends on people believing it sits outside political control. “The answer is only if people believe that this was transparent, open and beyond authority, beyond political control, would it have value,” Jiang said. “So the moment people recognize that this is a CIA operation, people won’t put their money into blockchain. People won’t put their money into Bitcoin.”

Jiang also pointed to what he sees as suspicious early adoption, specifically referencing the Winklevoss twins’ decision to allocate millions of dollars into Bitcoin when it was still a fringe asset. “These are not technologists, right?” he said. “How why would they put millions and millions of dollars into this thing? That’s really strange.”

Bitcoin Community Reacts

The backlash from Bitcoin-focused voices was immediate and blunt. Ansel Lindner dismissed the theory as the product of people who “don’t understand decentralization,” adding “This is the opinion of so many midwits. It’s also the reason even some gold bugs cannot comprehend bitcoin to this day, and why midwits believe in centralized scam sh*tcoins.”

Lyn Alden agreed. “Ansel is right,” she wrote. “People with this view don’t truly understand the open source aspect or the proof of work aspect fully. A strong point about Bitcoin is that it literally doesn’t matter who created it. It can be assessed on its own merits since it’s transparent and decentralized.”

That line of rebuttal goes to the core of the dispute. Jiang’s theory hinges on origin and hidden control; but the facts about Bitcoin’s design makes those questions far less important than he suggests, because the network is public, open-source, and maintained by participants rather than by a central operator.

MDB, another Bitcoin commentator, focused on one of Jiang’s specific questions: “Where are the servers of Bitcoin located?” He said that question alone showed the core problem and lack of understanding by Xueqin. “Bitcoin does not run on one company’s servers,” MDB wrote. “Bitcoin runs on a distributed network of nodes spread across the world, which is exactly why it is hard to censor, shut down, or control.”

At press time, BTC traded at $74,886.

BTC must close above the 1.0 Fib, 1-week chart | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView.com

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWho does Jiang Xueqin claim created Bitcoin instead of Satoshi Nakamoto?

AJiang Xueqin claims Bitcoin may have been created by the CIA or a broader US 'deep state' rather than by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto.

QWhat three questions does Jiang Xueqin propose to analyze Bitcoin's origin through game theory?

AJiang's three questions are: 1) Who would have the technology and expertise to create blockchain? 2) Who would benefit from blockchain creation? 3) Why would they keep it secret?

QWhat two strategic purposes does Jiang suggest blockchain would serve according to US agencies?

AJiang suggests blockchain would serve two strategic purposes for US agencies: surveillance and covert financing.

QHow did Bitcoin commentators respond to Jiang's theory about its origin?

ABitcoin commentators immediately dismissed Jiang's theory, stating it shows a misunderstanding of decentralization, open-source nature, and proof-of-work mechanics, arguing that Bitcoin's creator doesn't matter because the network is transparent and decentralized.

QWhat specific example of early adoption did Jiang find suspicious?

AJiang pointed to the Winklevoss twins' decision to invest millions of dollars in Bitcoin when it was still a fringe asset as suspicious early adoption.

你可能也喜欢

STRC股息收益率维持在12%的战略框架下,因股价低于面值

纳斯达克上市公司Strategy执行主席迈克尔·赛勒于8月1日确认,其STRC系列A无期限可变利率优先股的股息率将维持在12.00%直至2026年8月。STRC于2025年7月以9%的利率发行,经过连续七次月度上调,于2026年7月1日达到12%。 该股息的“棘轮”机制规定,每当STRC股价跌破95美元,股息率将永久性上调0.5%,旨在将股价推回100美元的面值,以减少波动并为公司通过“随时发行”计划增发STRC、筹集资金购买比特币提供支持。然而,该机制效果不及预期。截至7月31日,STRC股价收于89.46美元,仍低于面值约10-11%,尽管其股息率已达历史最高。 竞争压力加剧了困境。竞争对手Strive发行的优先证券提供约13%的收益率并每日派息,吸引了投资者需求,导致STRC与SATA之间的价差扩大至历史高位。持续的折价迫使Strategy暂停了通过ATM计划发行新的STRC证券,限制了其通过此渠道增持比特币的能力。 分析人士警告,“棘轮”结构具有长期风险,因其义务只会单向增加。此外,约83%的流通STRC股票由散户持有,他们在市场下跌时可能更易恐慌性抛售。有律师事务所已就比特币价格低于公司平均成本时,Strategy能否维持优先股股息支付展开调查。 为应对担忧,Strategy建立了流动性储备,可覆盖约26个月的股息和利息支付,并于6月底通过了“数字信贷资本框架”,授权动用20亿美元进行优先股和普通股回购,同时启动了比特币变现计划,以便在认为有利时出售比特币补充储备,但公司强调并无出售义务。

cryptonews.ru8分钟前

STRC股息收益率维持在12%的战略框架下,因股价低于面值

cryptonews.ru8分钟前

交易

现货

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

2025年5月22日,比特币价格正式突破11万美元大关,创下历史新高。在政策面、宏观经济、资金面与投资者结构共同作用下,一场结构性牛市浪潮正在展开。而此轮上涨背后的核心驱动,是美国《GENIUS稳定币法案》的实质性进展以及多项利好的叠加。本文将从政策端突破、宏观环境转向、链上与ETF资金结构、交易行为演化,以及重点受益赛道五大维度,全面解析此轮BTC再创新高的深层逻辑,并前瞻下半年市场的潜在趋势。

1.8k人学过发布于 2025.05.22更新于 2025.05.22

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对BTC(BTC)币价的意见。

活动图片