Bitcoin Created By The CIA? Chinese Professor Jiang Xueqin Makes Bold Claim

bitcoinist发布于2026-04-17更新于2026-04-17

文章摘要

Chinese-Canadian educator Jiang Xueqin claimed Bitcoin was likely created by U.S. intelligence agencies like the CIA or NSA, rather than the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto. He argued that only state-level actors would have the resources and motive to develop such technology, suggesting Bitcoin serves purposes like surveillance and covert financing. He also questioned early large investments, like those from the Winklevoss twins, as suspicious. The Bitcoin community strongly rejected these claims. Commentators like Ansel Lindner and Lyn Alden argued that Jiang fundamentally misunderstands Bitcoin’s decentralized, open-source nature. They emphasized that Bitcoin’s value lies in its transparency and distributed network, which operates independently of any central control, making its origins irrelevant. At the time of reporting, BTC was trading at $74,886.

Chinese-Canadian educator and Predictive History host Jiang Xueqin has stirred debate after arguing that Bitcoin may have been created by the CIA or a broader US “deep state,” rather than by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto. The claim, made on the April 15 episode of the Jack Neel Podcast, quickly drew pushback from prominent Bitcoin commentators who said Jiang’s argument rests on a basic misunderstanding of how the network works.

Was Bitcoin A CIA Project?

Jiang, a Beijing-based commentator with 2.3 million YouTube subscribers, framed the theory around what he described as a game-theory process of elimination. He said the standard origin story “makes no sense,” asking why someone would spend years or even decades developing blockchain technology only to release it to the world for free and then disappear.

“So then you have to ask yourself three questions,” Jiang said. “First of all is who would have the technology and the expertise to create something like the blockchain. Second of all, you have to ask who would benefit from this blockchain creation. The third question you want to ask is why would they keep it secret?”

From there, Jiang argued that the likely candidates were US intelligence and defense agencies, citing the role government-linked institutions played in building foundational internet infrastructure. “Probably the same people who created the internet, probably the same people who created GPS, DARPA, NSA, CIA, probably these guys,” he said. In his telling, blockchain would serve two strategic purposes: surveillance and covert financing.

He pushed the argument further by suggesting that the network’s value depends on people believing it sits outside political control. “The answer is only if people believe that this was transparent, open and beyond authority, beyond political control, would it have value,” Jiang said. “So the moment people recognize that this is a CIA operation, people won’t put their money into blockchain. People won’t put their money into Bitcoin.”

Jiang also pointed to what he sees as suspicious early adoption, specifically referencing the Winklevoss twins’ decision to allocate millions of dollars into Bitcoin when it was still a fringe asset. “These are not technologists, right?” he said. “How why would they put millions and millions of dollars into this thing? That’s really strange.”

Bitcoin Community Reacts

The backlash from Bitcoin-focused voices was immediate and blunt. Ansel Lindner dismissed the theory as the product of people who “don’t understand decentralization,” adding “This is the opinion of so many midwits. It’s also the reason even some gold bugs cannot comprehend bitcoin to this day, and why midwits believe in centralized scam sh*tcoins.”

Lyn Alden agreed. “Ansel is right,” she wrote. “People with this view don’t truly understand the open source aspect or the proof of work aspect fully. A strong point about Bitcoin is that it literally doesn’t matter who created it. It can be assessed on its own merits since it’s transparent and decentralized.”

That line of rebuttal goes to the core of the dispute. Jiang’s theory hinges on origin and hidden control; but the facts about Bitcoin’s design makes those questions far less important than he suggests, because the network is public, open-source, and maintained by participants rather than by a central operator.

MDB, another Bitcoin commentator, focused on one of Jiang’s specific questions: “Where are the servers of Bitcoin located?” He said that question alone showed the core problem and lack of understanding by Xueqin. “Bitcoin does not run on one company’s servers,” MDB wrote. “Bitcoin runs on a distributed network of nodes spread across the world, which is exactly why it is hard to censor, shut down, or control.”

At press time, BTC traded at $74,886.

BTC must close above the 1.0 Fib, 1-week chart | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView.com

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWho does Jiang Xueqin claim created Bitcoin instead of Satoshi Nakamoto?

AJiang Xueqin claims Bitcoin may have been created by the CIA or a broader US 'deep state' rather than by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto.

QWhat three questions does Jiang Xueqin propose to analyze Bitcoin's origin through game theory?

AJiang's three questions are: 1) Who would have the technology and expertise to create blockchain? 2) Who would benefit from blockchain creation? 3) Why would they keep it secret?

QWhat two strategic purposes does Jiang suggest blockchain would serve according to US agencies?

AJiang suggests blockchain would serve two strategic purposes for US agencies: surveillance and covert financing.

QHow did Bitcoin commentators respond to Jiang's theory about its origin?

ABitcoin commentators immediately dismissed Jiang's theory, stating it shows a misunderstanding of decentralization, open-source nature, and proof-of-work mechanics, arguing that Bitcoin's creator doesn't matter because the network is transparent and decentralized.

QWhat specific example of early adoption did Jiang find suspicious?

AJiang pointed to the Winklevoss twins' decision to invest millions of dollars in Bitcoin when it was still a fringe asset as suspicious early adoption.

你可能也喜欢

比特币提现仍在继续:Coldcard冷钱包8年存储终成空

硬件钱包Coldcard遭黑客攻击,导致大量资金从易受攻击设备中被持续转出。据Galaxy Research数据,截至2026年8月2日,已有4585个地址被盗,损失总额达1367.05 BTC(约合8860万美元),远超7月30日最初报告的594.5 BTC。大部分被盗资金仍停留在攻击者地址。 问题根源并非固件,而是设备生成的种子短语存在漏洞。2021年3月起,因程序员错误集成libNgU库,设备从使用STM32硬件随机数生成器转为使用软件生成器Yasmarang,该生成器由公开可获取的芯片序列号和计时器状态初始化,导致生成的种子短语可在离线状态下被暴力破解。即使固件后续已更新,只要用户未将资金转移至基于新种子短语生成的新地址,旧钱包就始终处于风险中。 受影响的设备包括特定固件版本的Mk2/Mk3、Mk4/Mk5及Q系列。仅当种子短语是通过至少50次独立掷骰子或强唯一性BIP-39密码短语创建时方可幸免。官方建议受影响用户立即在已修复的固件上生成新种子短语并转移资产。 报道提及一位39岁投资者的案例,他因该漏洞损失了2 BTC(约13万美元)。他多年来通过体力劳动积攒比特币,将其视为在制裁和高通胀国家中的财务保障与提前退休的途径。此次事件使他的长期持有策略和“冷存储”信心遭受重击,他因此决定彻底退出加密货币领域。 从历史数据看,随机数生成器缺陷并非首例,类似问题曾导致巨额损失。此次事件警示,即使离线存储也未必绝对安全,其安全性高度依赖于底层硬件和算法的可靠性。

cryptonews.ru3小时前

比特币提现仍在继续:Coldcard冷钱包8年存储终成空

cryptonews.ru3小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

2025年5月22日,比特币价格正式突破11万美元大关,创下历史新高。在政策面、宏观经济、资金面与投资者结构共同作用下,一场结构性牛市浪潮正在展开。而此轮上涨背后的核心驱动,是美国《GENIUS稳定币法案》的实质性进展以及多项利好的叠加。本文将从政策端突破、宏观环境转向、链上与ETF资金结构、交易行为演化,以及重点受益赛道五大维度,全面解析此轮BTC再创新高的深层逻辑,并前瞻下半年市场的潜在趋势。

1.8k人学过发布于 2025.05.22更新于 2025.05.22

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对BTC(BTC)币价的意见。

活动图片