‘Attempts to hijack the CLARITY Act are shameful’: Trump advisor slams banks

ambcrypto发布于2026-03-11更新于2026-03-11

文章摘要

White House advisor Patrick Witt criticizes the banking lobby for opposing the pro-innovation CLARITY Act, calling attempts to turn it into an anti-competition bill "shameful." The dispute centers on stablecoin rewards, which banks argue create an uneven playing field and risk deposit flight, potentially reducing bank lending. Stablecoin issuers view restrictions as a threat to their business model and cite competition with China's digital yuan. Lawmakers propose limiting types of stablecoin reward activities as a compromise, but the bill's future remains uncertain without resolution.

The White House continues to express disappointment with the banking lobby’s hardline against the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act.

The two industries, the crypto and banking sectors, have failed to reach an amicable agreement on stablecoin rewards. The stablecoin rewards issue has stalled the bill’s progress since early this year.

At a recent bankers’ summit in Washington, the industry maintained a hardline stance against any compromise on the bill, prompting criticism from the White House.

In response, Trump’s crypto advisor, Patrick Witt, said,

“The CLARITY Act must remain a pro-innovation piece of legislation. Attempts to hijack the legislative process and turn it into an anti-competition bill are shameful.”

Bankers’ plea

Witt’s statement followed Rob Nichols, president of the American Bankers Association, an advocacy group, who framed the current dispute as ‘anti-competitive.’

During the Washington summit, Nichols cautioned,

“Our industry welcomes competition and innovation...what we don’t support is an uneven playing field.”

Since last year, the traditional banking sector has maintained that stablecoin rewards will lead to deposit flight and harm the financial system.

The industry argues that the U.S. stablecoin law, the GENIUS Act, created a loophole that allows intermediaries to share yield with users, thereby bypassing the direct reward ban imposed on issuers.

To mitigate this, banks want the ban extended to intermediaries as well. This would mean amending the GENIUS Act or imposing the ban in the CLARITY Act.

However, stablecoin issuers view this as a threat to their business model. In fact, beyond disrupting their model, supporters view stablecoin yield as a national security issue, citing China’s push in the sector with rewards for digital yuan.

Proposed CLARITY Act compromise

Senators have tried to bring the two sides into a compromise on the issue.

During the banks’ summit, Democrat Senator for Maryland, Angela Alsobrooks, stressed that each faction will be ‘just a little bit unhappy’ but will help push for clear rules for the sector.

“We absolutely have to have these protections to prevent the deposit flight, but we’re going to probably have to make some compromises.”

Congressional Research Service (CRS) estimates that the stablecoin yield could reduce bank lending by $65 billion to $1.26 trillion, because the GENIUS Act prohibits lending of stablecoin reserves. The CRS urged banks to offer higher interest rates to depositors to remain competitive.

The compromise lawmakers have been pushing for is to narrow the types of stablecoin activity crypto platforms can allow to receive stablecoin rewards.

However, the banks’ opposition has faced a series of criticisms from the White House for the past few days. As such, the path forward for the CLARITY Act remains uncertain unless the concerned stakeholders resolve the stablecoin yield issue.


Final Summary

  • White House slammed banks for framing the CLARITY Act as an ‘anti-competition’ bill.
  • The banking industry reiterated its concerns about stablecoin yields during a recent meeting.

相关问答

QWhat is the main criticism expressed by Trump's crypto advisor, Patrick Witt, regarding the CLARITY Act?

APatrick Witt criticized attempts to hijack the legislative process and turn the CLARITY Act into an anti-competition bill, stating that such attempts are shameful and that the act must remain a pro-innovation piece of legislation.

QWhy does the banking industry oppose stablecoin rewards according to the article?

AThe banking industry opposes stablecoin rewards because they believe it will lead to deposit flight and harm the financial system, arguing that the GENIUS Act created a loophole allowing intermediaries to share yield with users, bypassing the direct reward ban on issuers.

QWhat compromise have lawmakers proposed regarding stablecoin rewards in the CLARITY Act?

ALawmakers have proposed narrowing the types of stablecoin activity that crypto platforms can allow to receive stablecoin rewards as a compromise to address concerns from both the banking and crypto sectors.

QWhat did the American Bankers Association president, Rob Nichols, say about competition during the Washington summit?

ARob Nichols stated that the banking industry welcomes competition and innovation but does not support an uneven playing field, framing the current dispute over the CLARITY Act as 'anti-competitive'.

QAccording to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), what impact could stablecoin yield have on bank lending?

AThe Congressional Research Service estimates that stablecoin yield could reduce bank lending by $65 billion to $1.26 trillion because the GENIUS Act prohibits lending of stablecoin reserves, and they urged banks to offer higher interest rates to depositors to remain competitive.

你可能也喜欢

中国AI为什么发展得这么快?答案藏在实验室内部

本文通过作者走访中国头部AI实验室的经历,探讨了中国AI快速发展的原因及其与美国的路径差异。文章指出,中国AI的优势不仅在于人才、工程和迭代速度,更在于其务实的组织方式:少谈概念,多做模型;强调团队执行而非个人明星;倾向于自研核心技术栈而非依赖外部服务。 中国AI生态呈现出与美国不同的发展模式:美国注重原创范式、资本投入和顶尖科学家的个人影响力;中国则更擅长在已有方向上快速追赶,通过开源协作、工程优化和大量年轻研究者的投入,将模型能力迅速推向前沿。中国的许多核心贡献者是学生,他们带着谦逊和专注投入工作,较少受个人主义或哲学讨论的干扰,更专注于模型构建本身。 在产业层面,中国公司普遍持有“技术所有权”心态,倾向于自建而非购买技术栈,大型科技公司纷纷研发自己的大语言模型以掌控核心技术。尽管对英伟达算力有强烈需求,且国内数据产业不如西方发达,但中国AI需求正在增长,更接近云市场的支出模式而非传统的SaaS市场。 文章认为,未来的AI竞争不仅是模型能力的比拼,更是组织能力、开发者生态和产业执行力的竞争。中国AI正以自身独特的方式参与全球前沿,两种不同的发展路径正在形成。作者最后强调,尽管存在地缘政治紧张,但全球开放AI生态的繁荣对世界更为有益,并表达了对中美在AI领域协同发展的期望。

marsbit14小时前

中国AI为什么发展得这么快?答案藏在实验室内部

marsbit14小时前

3年5倍,百年玻璃厂重生

本文探讨了拥有175年历史的玻璃制造商康宁公司如何在AI数据中心建设浪潮中,借助光纤需求爆发实现业绩与股价的飞跃。文章核心内容如下: AI数据中心对光纤的需求出现结构性爆发,根据CRU数据,年增长率高达75.9%,导致供需缺口扩大。英伟达为此投资康宁等三家公司,总金额达45亿美元,旨在打通从激光器、光芯片到光纤的全链条。康宁作为被选中的光纤供应商,承诺大幅扩张产能。 需求爆发的背后有两重逻辑:一是光纤核心材料“预制棒”的扩产周期长、工艺要求高,供给存在刚性约束;二是AI芯片算力提升迫使数据通信从电转向光,以降低能耗并提高传输效率,这直接推动了高端特种光纤(如用于CPO共封装光学)的需求。AI数据中心的光纤用量可达传统机柜的5-10倍,并随GPU集群规模超比例增长。 在此背景下,康宁光通信业务收入从2023年的13亿美元快速增长,2026年Q1同比增长93%,并获得了Meta、英伟达等科技巨头的长期大额订单。虽然从全球市场份额看康宁并非最大,但其在超低损耗、高密度、高抗弯等AI所需的高端特种光纤技术上具备优势,且企业级(数据中心)客户收入占比已超40%,这使其区别于以电信运营商客户为主的其他厂商。 文章指出,光纤涨价红利正惠及全行业。康宁当前股价和估值已大幅攀升,未来表现将取决于CPO技术落地节奏、大客户订单执行情况以及“空芯光纤”等潜在技术变革的影响。尽管前景看好,但短期过快的涨幅也可能带来波动风险。

marsbit15小时前

3年5倍,百年玻璃厂重生

marsbit15小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片