Bitcoin: Here’s how the tides have changed for BTC despite sharks’ input

Ambcrypto发布于2023-01-20更新于2023-01-20

文章摘要

Stablecoin inflow has been met with a decrease in Bitcoin reserves. Whales behavior could help BTC regain bullishness provided the UTXO value bands maintain status quo.

The euphoria around Bitcoin [BTC] might have come to an abrupt end after the king coin failed to register significant gains for the first time in the new year.

""

At press time, BTC was back at the $20,000 region despite calls to breakout farther. However, the price trend is not the only part that has changed in the Bitcoin system.

""

The flow has now backtracked

""

When the market was in its boom era, there was a massive flow of stablecoins in exchanges. This action depicted investors’ resolve to grab a share of the accumulation and profit taking.

""

According to CryptoQuant analyst Joaowedson, there was a recent inflow of $250 million into the Binance USD [BUSD]. As this generated a lot of buzzes, it also impacted the BTC price uptick.

""

However, the inrush into the spot market meant that there was a decrease in the reserves. So, while there was increased buying pressure in pushing the price, the dip in reserve was also influential in driving down the demand.

""

Besides that, Joaowedson confirmed that the BUSD stablecoin flow tides have changed for the past few days as indicated by the data on CryptoQuant. This decrease means that only a few number of investors were participating in Bitcoin transactions.

Source: CryptoQuant

""

Concerning the social volume, data from Santiment showed that the metric was relatively at a low point compared to the previous peaks it had hit in the last 18 days. At the time of writing, the social volume was 2774.

""

The social volume displays how trendy an arbitrary search for an asset is. Since the volume had decreased, it implied that traders had filtered Bitcoin out of the top crypto searches.

""

Additionally, the positive sentiment accompanied the direction of the social volume with a glaring fall off. This means that investor perception of the coin was no keener.

Source: Santiment

""

Will whales help with the BTC cause?

""

In another CryptoQuant publication, AxelAdler Jr admitted that there were still signs that the market could remain bullish. In defense of his stance, the analyst referred to how Bitcoin whales have massively accumulated the coin.

""

According to AxelAdler Jr, the Unspent Transaction Output (UTXO) value bands within the 1,000 to 10,000 range began scooping on 11 January. Those with 100 to 1000 also joined the party on 16 January.

""

Since this indicator displays the behavior of whales, the switch to the green zone shows evident whale presence in the market. Hence, a continual accumulation could influence the market broadly.

Source: CryptoQuant

你可能也喜欢

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

今年以来,比特币先驱Adam Back及其创立的Blockstream频繁引发争议。本月初,调查账号NatInfoSec发布长文,指控Blockstream发行的比特币矿业票据(BMN)可能存在严重问题。 指控核心包括:1. **算力与兑付能力存疑**:根据BMN的兑付义务,Blockstream需运营远超其公开显示的算力(约15 EH/s),但未在公开渠道找到相匹配的矿场、电力或算力证据。票据条款允许其以任意来源的BTC进行兑付,透明度不足。2. **高收益与高风险**:相关票据提供高达20%的固定年化收益,在波动剧烈的挖矿行业中难以持续,资金来源成疑。3. **关键人物前科与披露问题**:Blockstream矿业业务的重要关联方、Exacore CEO Christopher Cook曾被判邮件欺诈罪,但此前未在发行文件中披露,其背景陈述也存在夸大。4. **牵连BSTR上市计划**:质疑者担心BMN的潜在风险可能波及Adam Back关联的、正筹备SPAC上市的Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company(BSTR),尽管其法律独立性尚不明确。 BitMEX Research随后发表评论,承认Cook的前科属实且高收益令人担忧,但认为其他部分指控证据不足或存在误导,例如BMN与BSTR在法律上可能独立。社区争论焦点集中于Blockstream矿场算力的**可验证性**——投资者能否独立核查支撑收益的真实挖矿活动。 目前,围绕BMN仍存在几个关键疑问:实际发行规模与责任边界、矿场算力是否足以支撑兑付、近20%固定收益的具体来源、兑付资金的链上可验证性,以及Cook的实际角色。Blockstream尚未对此作出系统性回应。尽管指控有待最终证实,但BMN产品在透明度、风险披露和收益合理性方面,确实存在需要厘清的空间。

marsbit56分钟前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

marsbit56分钟前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

今年以来,比特币先驱Adam Back及其创办的Blockstream频陷争议。年初,美国司法部文件披露Jeffrey Epstein曾通过关联基金投资Blockstream;四月,《纽约时报》将其列为中本聪有力候选人;同时,其关联的比特币财库公司BSTR正筹划通过SPAC上市。 然而,本月初调查账号NatInfoSec发布长文,指控Blockstream旗下挖矿票据(BMN)存在严重问题。文章核心质疑包括:1. **算力与兑付能力存疑**:根据BMN兑付义务,Blockstream需运营20 EH/s以上算力,但其仪表盘显示实际仅15 EH/s,且公开渠道(如电网记录、矿池数据)未见匹配的大规模矿场证据。BMN条款允许其以任意来源的BTC兑付,缺乏透明度。2. **高收益与高风险**:BMN票据承诺的年化收益高达近20%,在波动剧烈的挖矿行业中难以持续,且部分到期本金滚入更高收益新票据,引发庞氏担忧。3. **关键人物前科与披露问题**:负责矿业的Exacore公司CEO Christopher Cook曾因邮件欺诈被判刑,此记录未在BMN文件中披露,其“NASA任职”经历亦被指夸大。4. **关联BSTR/SPAC的潜在风险**:文章质疑Cook的前科及BMN巨额负债未在BSTR上市文件中披露,可能存在治理与责任边界不清问题。 对此,BitMEX Research认为部分指控证据不足,例如BMN与BSTR法律结构独立,Cook非BSTR董事故无强制披露义务。但社区争论焦点集中于**算力与收益的可验证性**:投资者能否独立核实支撑BMN兑付的真实矿场算力与BTC来源? 目前Blockstream尚未系统回应。事件凸显BMN产品在规模、收益来源、资产验证及关键人员披露方面仍需澄清,其高固定收益在周期性强的挖矿行业中风险显著。

链捕手2小时前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

链捕手2小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片