90% of Rare Earth Refining is in China's Hands, American Humanoid Robot Mass Production Faces a Hardware Bottleneck

marsbit发布于2026-03-16更新于2026-03-16

文章摘要

The article highlights a critical vulnerability in the U.S. ambition to mass-produce humanoid robots like Optimus: China’s dominance over the hardware supply chain, particularly rare earth elements (REEs). China controls 70% of global rare earth mining, 85–90% of refining capacity, and over 90% of rare earth magnet production—key components in actuators, motors, and sensors essential for robotic joints and drivetrains. Major U.S. robotics firms rely heavily on Chinese and Japanese suppliers for critical components such as harmonic reducers, servo systems, and precision gears, while retaining only the AI "brain" domestically. In a scenario with 1 billion humanoid robots by 2050, Morgan Stanley estimates massive demand for neodymium, dysprosium, and terbium—consuming significant portions of global reserves. The author urges the U.S. to invest in rebuilding its rare earth supply chain—from mining and refining to magnet production—and lists key firms involved in magnet metals, structural metallurgy, and semiconductors. Without secure, cost-competitive access to these materials, U.S. robotics growth faces a structural risk, with China holding a potential "shut-off switch" over hardware production.

Author: Serenity

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Intro: All the discussions about the robot revolution focus on AI and software, but this tweet points out a more fundamental structural risk: China controls 70% of global rare earth mining, 85-90% of refining and separation capacity, and over 90% of rare earth magnet manufacturing. The joints and actuators of humanoid robots like Optimus all rely on Chinese or Japanese suppliers; what the US retains is just the "brain." The author uses specific material lists and Morgan Stanley's demand forecasts to quantify this bottleneck, projecting its impact on rare earth reserves in the era of 1 billion humanoid robots.

Full Text Below:

The United States is losing the robot and humanoid robot race with China.

Software and AI are only half the battle.

China holds a kill switch over the US robotics hardware supply chain because: The US cannot manufacture the materials needed for humanoid robots at scale and at a reasonable cost.

If China presses this "kill switch," the entire US robotics build-out will slow down—because China has dominant control over the "body" (actuators, reducers, metallurgy) and the raw materials required to manufacture humanoid robots.

Consequently, US robotics companies have signed contracts with Chinese manufacturers to procure all humanoid robot components, in order to assemble products like Optimus at a low enough cost. However, they are trying to keep the "brain" in the US.

Look at all the top robotic transmission/motion suppliers; none are from the US:

  • Leaderdrive (China): Harmonic reducers
  • Harmonic Drive (Japan): Harmonic reducers
  • Nabtesco (Japan): RV reducers
  • Sanhua Intelligent (China): Linear actuator assemblies
  • Zhejiang Shuanghuan Transmission (China): RV reducers/gears
  • Shenzhen Inovance Technology (China): Servo systems/ball screws

There is a core reason behind this:

China currently controls nearly 70% of global rare earth mining, and more critically, holds 85% to 90% of global refining and separation capacity, and over 90% of finished rare earth magnet manufacturing.

Therefore, the biggest threat is: Chinese export controls pose a structural risk hanging over US robotics projects.

Beijing has already demonstrated a willingness to weaponize this monopoly, as Japan did in a similar situation.

To break the dependence on the robotics and Optimus supply chain and ensure the robot revolution can proceed domestically, Western capital needs to flow to companies rebuilding the rare earth ecosystem, covering:

  • Upstream mining
  • Midstream separation/metallization
  • Downstream magnet manufacturing

If the global number of humanoid robots reaches 1 billion by 2050—a baseline scenario in Morgan Stanley's model—it would require approximately 400,000 tons of neodymium, 80,000 tons of dysprosium, and 16,000 tons of terbium. This would consume about 15% of the world's known neodymium reserves, 25% of dysprosium reserves, and 30% of terbium reserves, constituting a demand shock.

In short: China has control over the US robotics hardware supply chain.

Now is the historical moment when the US must invest in securing its own supply chain to ensure victory in the robotics race with China.

The key lies in rare earths, a prerequisite for producing robotic humanoid hardware at competitive prices.

Here are the areas the US government needs to focus on:

1. Magnet Metals (for frameless torque motors)

Neodymium (Nd) and Praseodymium (Pr): These "light rare earths" are the core components of NdFeB magnets

Dysprosium (Dy) and Terbium (Tb): Rare earth elements alloyed into magnets

Samarium (Sm) and Cobalt (Co): Used to make SmCo magnets

Boron (B) and Iron (Fe): Key stabilizing minerals, accounting for about 1% of the weight of NdFeB magnets

2. Structural Metallurgy (for harmonic reducers and planetary roller screws)

Titanium (Ti), Vanadium (V), and Molybdenum (Mo): Gears in harmonic reducers and threaded shafts in planetary roller screws

Niobium (Nb), Chromium (Cr), Nickel (Ni), and Manganese (Mn): Critical microalloying elements added to structural steel to improve toughness, prevent corrosion, and significantly reduce robot joint weight

Cerium (Ce) and Lanthanum (La): Prevent premature failure of robot gears

3. Computing Power, Perception & Power Supply (Brain, Eyes, and Battery)

Gallium (Ga) and Germanium (Ge): Indispensable for advanced semiconductors, LiDAR systems, and high-frequency communication chips

Lithium (Li), Graphite (C), and Copper (Cu): A single full-size humanoid robot requires approximately 2 kg of lithium, 3 kg of graphite, and up to 6.5 kg of copper

Key Company List

The most important US companies to secure the above capabilities are:

1. Magnet Metals (Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb, Sm, Gd):

$UUUU, $MP, $ALOY, $USAR, $LYSDY (Lynas Rare Earths), $NEO (TSX), $ILU, $ARU (ASX)

2. Structural Metallurgy (Nb, V, Ti, Be):

$ATI, $CRS, $FCX, $NB, $MTRN, $LGO

3. Computing Power, Perception & Power Supply (Ga, Ge, Graphite, Battery Metals):

$BMM, $VNP, $TECK, $ALB, $EAF, $ALTM, $SYR, $FCX, $AW1 (ASX)

Taking a robot joint as an example, it is a permanent magnet motor requiring a neodymium processing supply chain:

1. Neo Performance Materials (TSX: NEO)

2. $MP

3. $UUUU—Processes monazite concentrate into NdPr oxide

The US government should meticulously review the Bill of Materials (BOM) for each robotics supply chain and then invest heavily to ensure processing capacity for raw materials.

Currently, the transmission systems needed to manufacture humanoid robots, as well as the global infrastructure to produce these components, are highly concentrated in China.

The US is highly vulnerable in the physical robotics supply chain. Securing domestic metal and midstream processing capabilities is crucial for competing with China.

The US must invest heavily in critical material supply chains today to maintain long-term dominance in the robotics industry.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QAccording to the article, what percentage of global rare earth refining and separation capacity does China control?

AChina controls 85% to 90% of the global rare earth refining and separation capacity.

QWhat is the core structural risk for the U.S. humanoid robot industry mentioned in the text?

AThe core structural risk is that China holds a 'shutdown key' over the U.S. robotics hardware supply chain, as it dominates the production of actuators, reducers, metallurgy, and the raw materials required.

QWhich two Chinese companies are listed as suppliers of harmonic and RV reducers for humanoid robots?

ALeaderdrive (harmonic reducer) and Double Ring Transmission (RV reducer/gears) are the Chinese companies mentioned.

QWhat massive demand shock for rare earths is predicted if 1 billion humanoid robots are built by 2050?

AIt would require approximately 400,000 tons of Neodymium (consuming 15% of global reserves), 80,000 tons of Dysprosium (25% of reserves), and 16,000 tons of Terbium (30% of reserves).

QWhat are the three key areas the U.S. government should focus on to secure its supply chain for robotics, as outlined in the article?

AThe three key areas are: 1. Magnet Metals (for frameless torque motors), 2. Structural Metallurgy (for harmonic drives and planetary roller screws), and 3. Computing, Perception & Power (for the brain, eyes, and battery).

你可能也喜欢

比特币提现仍在继续:Coldcard冷钱包8年存储终成空

硬件钱包Coldcard遭黑客攻击,导致大量资金从易受攻击设备中被持续转出。据Galaxy Research数据,截至2026年8月2日,已有4585个地址被盗,损失总额达1367.05 BTC(约合8860万美元),远超7月30日最初报告的594.5 BTC。大部分被盗资金仍停留在攻击者地址。 问题根源并非固件,而是设备生成的种子短语存在漏洞。2021年3月起,因程序员错误集成libNgU库,设备从使用STM32硬件随机数生成器转为使用软件生成器Yasmarang,该生成器由公开可获取的芯片序列号和计时器状态初始化,导致生成的种子短语可在离线状态下被暴力破解。即使固件后续已更新,只要用户未将资金转移至基于新种子短语生成的新地址,旧钱包就始终处于风险中。 受影响的设备包括特定固件版本的Mk2/Mk3、Mk4/Mk5及Q系列。仅当种子短语是通过至少50次独立掷骰子或强唯一性BIP-39密码短语创建时方可幸免。官方建议受影响用户立即在已修复的固件上生成新种子短语并转移资产。 报道提及一位39岁投资者的案例,他因该漏洞损失了2 BTC(约13万美元)。他多年来通过体力劳动积攒比特币,将其视为在制裁和高通胀国家中的财务保障与提前退休的途径。此次事件使他的长期持有策略和“冷存储”信心遭受重击,他因此决定彻底退出加密货币领域。 从历史数据看,随机数生成器缺陷并非首例,类似问题曾导致巨额损失。此次事件警示,即使离线存储也未必绝对安全,其安全性高度依赖于底层硬件和算法的可靠性。

cryptonews.ru3小时前

比特币提现仍在继续:Coldcard冷钱包8年存储终成空

cryptonews.ru3小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买S

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Sonic(S)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Sonic(S)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Sonic(S)购买完您的Sonic(S)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Sonic(S)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Sonic(S)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

3.3k人学过发布于 2025.01.15更新于 2026.06.02

如何购买S

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对S(S)币价的意见。

活动图片