LUNA to Spike 80%? Here’s What Analysts Think

newsbtc发布于2022-03-23更新于2022-03-24

文章摘要

Terra's LUNA has been trending to the downside in the past few days, but different indicators show interesting signs and the next price movements could be fundamental to confirm either...

Terra’s LUNA has been trending to the downside in the past few days, but different indicators show interesting signs and the next price movements could be fundamental to confirm either an extremely bullish or a bearish signal.
What Is Boiling Up In LUNA’s Weekly Timeframe?
When an anonymous trader used Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) to analyze LUNA’s next possible movements, the weekly chart showed an interesting crossover.
“Something is up on $LUNA weekly timeframe. Last time the MACD crossover occured it sent $LUNA from $12 to $106.”
A MACD crossover can give a bullish signal when the MACD (see the blue line in the chart below) rises above the signal line (see the yellow line). The opposite crossover would give a bearish signal, which can also be seen below in previous months as an example.

LUNA’s MACD crossovers overtime | LUNAUSD on TradingView.com Another pseudonym trader noted that multiple time frames are looking good for the digital coin, which they think could be because a result of “the massive amount of BTC being bought to help support stable UST or it could be that the whole market is bubbling up”
“1 hour pointing upwards, 4 and 6 hours are about to print bullish twist above the cloud (max bull signal in my mind), 12 hour and daily charts look happy enough and will likely look even nicer as Luna presses to all time highs.”

4,36 Sharpe Ratio
The Sharpe Ratio is a risk/return measure highly used in finance. As per Investopedia, the Ratio describes how much excess return you receive for the extra volatility you endure for holding a riskier asset, determining the investment choice that will deliver the highest returns while considering risk.

  • “Usually, any Sharpe ratio greater than 1.0 is considered acceptable to good by investors.
  • A ratio higher than 2.0 is rated as very good.
  • A ratio of 3.0 or higher is considered excellent.
  • A ratio under 1.0 is considered sub-optimal.”

Similarly, a pseudonym crypto analyst explained during a Youtube Video analyzing LUNA’s share ratio that, in general, “If you are [the Sharpe ratio] at one, it is a superb result and it means you are crushing the market, you’re beating everything out there,” and LUNA Sharpe ratio is 4.36.
“It’s off the charts positive. This thing is just a beast and there’s many people calling for a $200 Luna in in the near term, but also potentially, $200 Avalanche, $200 SOL. Either way these three are kind of winners right now.”
However, there are limitations when using Sharpe Ratio, as it can oversimplify risk and treat all volatility as the same. Some inflated Sharpe Ratios can turn out to be misleading if the whole story of the investments was not addressed correctly.
Possible Double-Top
On the other hand, there is a possibility of a double top that could be triggered if the price breaks out from the support level neckline. This would be extremely bearish for LUNA.

LUNAUSD 4-hour timeframe on TradingView.com There are limitations when spotting a double top, and “Basing a double top solely on the formation of two consecutive peaks could lead to a false reading and cause an early exit from a position,” Investopedia explains.
Because of this reason, this is not a confirmed bearish signal and the following movements will be vital to identify a possible trend. A failed double top could shoot up LUNA’s price proving previous signs right.
In a different analyst’s opinion, he noticed LUNA’s double top but added that it is still showing a bullish mark structure in the 4-hour timeline.
“There’s a lot of high sell volume coming in, and it looks like there is potentially some type of head and shoulders pattern playing out. But I would be careful shorting this one personally just because I think that usually, you don’t want to short stuff that’s super strong in general.”
At the moment, it looks like the coin could go either way: a huge spike or a crash around 50%. Regarding Terra’s ecosystem, it is also important to see how recent developments unfold as they dig into the unknown territory of bitcoin-backed currencies.
At the time of writing, LUNA is down 2.04% in the day to $93,31.

你可能也喜欢

Claude Code 推出动态工作流:让AI学会自己组队干活

Claude Code 推出了动态工作流(workflows)功能,使AI能够根据任务动态组建多个智能体(Agent)团队协同工作,从而解决复杂的长周期任务。 该功能的核心价值在于,它改变了Claude Code原有的“单智能体在单一上下文内规划并执行”的模式。通过动态工作流,Claude可以将任务拆解,分派给多个拥有独立上下文的子智能体并行处理、交叉验证甚至彼此竞争,最后综合结果。这有效缓解了单智能体在处理长任务时常见的“智能体惰性”(提前宣布完成)、“自我偏好偏差”(倾向认可自己的结论)和“目标漂移”(逐渐偏离原始目标)等问题。 动态工作流通过执行一个包含特殊函数的JavaScript文件来协调子智能体。它支持多种实用模式,例如:将任务分类后路由给不同智能体;将任务拆分为多个小步骤并行处理再综合(扇出并综合);生成多个方案后通过锦标赛机制竞争筛选;以及进行对抗式验证等。 其应用场景显著超越了传统的代码任务,扩展至非技术领域。示例包括:代码迁移与重构、深度研究与事实核查、对大量简历或工单进行排序、从历史会话中提炼行为规则、进行事故根因调查、对积压任务进行大规模分诊,以及在命名、设计等需要探索和品味判断的任务中生成并筛选方案。 文章也指出,动态工作流并非万能。它通常会消耗更多token,因此不适合所有常规编程任务。最佳实践仍在形成中,开发者需要根据任务复杂度判断是否使用。用户可以通过详细提示(prompt)设计工作流,并结合 `/goal` 和 `/loop` 等指令,或设置token使用预算来优化效果。创建的工作流可以保存、共享甚至通过技能(skill)进行分发。 总的来说,动态工作流标志着Claude Code从一个代码助手向一个可编排的智能体工作台演进。未来AI工具的竞争力,可能不仅在于单个模型的智能程度,更在于其组织可靠、可复用执行流程的能力。

marsbit15分钟前

Claude Code 推出动态工作流:让AI学会自己组队干活

marsbit15分钟前

Hyperliquid,华尔街全天候交易便利店

《华尔街日报》报道,去中心化加密交易平台Hyperliquid已成为华尔街交易者,尤其是短线操作者的重要工具。其核心优势在于提供全年无休、全天候交易服务,允许投资者在美股休市(如周末)时提前建仓或平仓,以捕捉如地缘政治事件等带来的市场波动。对冲基金交易员Vala Zeinali分享了他利用该平台在中东冲突消息发布后,及时交易原油衍生品并获得高额回报的经历。 平台由前高频交易员Jeff Yan创立,旨在提供高性能且用户自主托管资产的交易系统,以应对类似FTX破产的风险。尽管公司仅有11名员工,但其业务增长迅速,去年营收约8亿美元,其原生代币HYPE市值已达约160亿美元。 Hyperliquid提供多样化的交易标的,包括比特币、标普500指数、原油以及SpaceX等未上市公司的永续合约,吸引了大量传统金融和加密领域资金。平台的高杠杆特性也意味着高风险,曾在市场剧烈波动时导致巨额爆仓。 目前,美国用户虽被协议禁止使用,但仍有人通过VPN访问。平台吸引力还在于其简洁的界面、丰富的产品以及活跃的社区文化,用户甚至可以直接与创始团队互动。Hyperliquid计划未来拓展至预测市场和期权交易领域,其终极目标是整合所有金融业务。然而,监管机构警告,永续合约结构复杂,面向散户的风险披露可能不足,存在隐患。

marsbit15分钟前

Hyperliquid,华尔街全天候交易便利店

marsbit15分钟前

谁为代理提供资金?

文章探讨了人工智能代理支付领域的关键问题:治理层的价值与竞争。OpenAI曾因缺乏清晰的购物规则(如退货、防欺诈)而关闭代理购物功能,这凸显了治理(支出控制、身份验证、政策执行)在代理经济中的核心地位。 目前,代理支付平均金额仅31美分,传统支付手续费(如Stripe)使得利润微薄,这为低成本的加密货币结算层(如Layer-2稳定币支付)创造了机会。Coinbase的x402协议和Stripe等公司推出的机器支付协议(MPP)正在争夺支付基础设施的主导权。 然而,真正的价值不仅在于处理交易,更在于管理资金流动的规则,即治理层。钱包(如Stripe收购的Privy)因其处在资金流动的关键节点,成为实施消费限额和审批的理想治理层。Stripe、Coinbase等巨头正通过垂直整合技术栈(覆盖结算、钱包、协议、治理等层面)来建立竞争优势。它们通过投资或收购治理初创公司,确保无论治理功能是内嵌还是独立,都能获利。 分析指出,支付处理终将商品化,价值会向上转移到决定交易能否发生的治理环节。预计到2030年,AI代理交易额可达3-5万亿美元,即使收取很低的治理费率,也能产生数十亿美元收入,堪比Coinbase目前的年订阅服务总收入。因此,在钱包、结算和治理层进行垂直整合,通过浮动余额收益、结算费用和合规费用多元获利,将是企业在代理支付时代保持竞争力的关键商业模式。

marsbit43分钟前

谁为代理提供资金?

marsbit43分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片