US Spot Bitcoin ETFs Near Yearly Outflow Territory

TheNewsCrypto发布于2026-05-25更新于2026-05-25

文章摘要

US spot Bitcoin ETFs are nearing net annual outflows following six consecutive days of withdrawals, with a significant $105.2 million outflow on Friday alone. This streak, which began May 14, has reduced the total net inflows for 2026 to $536 million. Major funds like BlackRock's IBIT and Fidelity's FBTC led the recent outflows, contributing to an overall withdrawal of $1.55 billion since mid-May. This trend indicates a potential cooling of institutional interest in Bitcoin, with notable reductions in ETF holdings by firms like Jane Street and Goldman Sachs earlier in the year. While the broader US Bitcoin ETF market remains in net positive territory for 2026, inflows are dominated by IBIT and are not expected to reach 2025's levels. In contrast, spot Ether ETFs have seen net outflows, and new altcoin ETFs have struggled to gain traction. A positive note is the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT), launched in April, which has attracted $264 million in net inflows.

The US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund market is about to see net outflows for the year after six days of withdrawals that began on Friday. After Friday’s market loss of $105.2 million—$68.9 million for BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and $36.3 million for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC)—net inflows into Bitcoin ETFs for 2026 have decreased to $536 million.

Withdrawal Streak Shrinks 2026 Inflows

The outflow on Friday added to the $1.55 billion that has been drained from the ETFs since May 14, when the last net inflow was reported, even though no other Bitcoin ETF based in the US saw a change in flows.

It is possible to gauge the level of institutional interest in Bitcoin and the flow of new money into the cryptocurrency market by looking at the net inflows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs. The first quarter saw a 70% reduction in Bitcoin ETF holdings at institutional market maker Jane Street and a 10% reduction at investment bank Goldman Sachs.

The majority of the $2.7 billion in net inflows to the US Bitcoin ETF market this year have originated from IBIT, however the industry as a whole is still seeing net inflows for 2026.

While most of its rivals have seen a decline in 2026, its inflows this year are not expected to surpass the $25 billion it received in 2025. So far in 2026, there have been net outflows from US-based spot Ether ETFs, and new altcoin ETFs have failed to meet the same level of demand as their predecessors.

The Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust ETF (MSBT) is one encouraging trend; it debuted on April 8 and has received $264 million in net inflows so far.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

VItalik Buterin Defends Long-Term Vision Amid Token Price Concerns

TagsAltcoinBitcoin

相关问答

QWhat is the main concern regarding the US spot Bitcoin ETF market as mentioned in the article?

AThe US spot Bitcoin ETF market is nearing net outflows for the year, having seen six consecutive days of withdrawals starting from a certain Friday.

QWhat were the specific outflow amounts for BlackRock's IBIT and Fidelity's FBTC on the mentioned Friday?

AOn that Friday, BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) had an outflow of $68.9 million and the Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) had an outflow of $36.3 million.

QWhat does the article suggest is a potential indicator of institutional interest in Bitcoin?

AThe article suggests that net inflows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs can be used to gauge the level of institutional interest in Bitcoin and the flow of new money into the cryptocurrency market.

QAccording to the article, which new Bitcoin ETF showed an encouraging trend and what were its inflows?

AThe Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust ETF (MSBT), which debuted on April 8, showed an encouraging trend with $264 million in net inflows so far.

QWhat is the current state of net inflows for US spot Ether ETFs and new altcoin ETFs in 2026 according to the article?

AThe article states that so far in 2026, there have been net outflows from US-based spot Ether ETFs, and new altcoin ETFs have failed to meet the same level of demand as their predecessors.

你可能也喜欢

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

2023年3月,在GPT-4发布前,作者王健硕对ChatGPT的未来做出了二十项预测。三年后的2026年,他使用AI agent对这些判断进行回顾验证,评估其准确性。 **主要看对的方面:** 1. **RAG成为主流**:预测通过外部检索而非修改模型来解决知识更新和幻觉问题,这已成为行业标准架构。 2. **LUI(自然语言界面)兴起**:预测自然语言交互将催生巨大新产业,Agent、MCP协议等发展印证了这一点,但LUI是与GUI共存而非取代。 3. **机器人网络与新寻址系统**:预测Agent将自动协作并需要新寻址方式,MCP、A2A等协议正朝此方向发展。 4. **中国能做出可用大模型**:预测中美模型差距会迅速缩小,事实如此,但真正领先的国内厂商与其当初点名不同。 5. **AI无意识与图灵测试本质**:核心判断“AI无意识,图灵测试仅测表象”基本成立,但“绝无意识”的绝对论断被后续研究置于灰区。 **看错或看偏的方面:** 1. **GPT-4参数数量**:所传“100T参数”严重错误,实际约为1.8T。 2. **LLM的数学能力**:诊断“数学差需外挂工具”正确,但“不可能自行学会”的结论被后续“推理模型”在IMO夺金证伪。 3. **价值捕获**:预测价值在应用层,但现实中算力层(如英伟达)捕获了最大利润,模型层反而亏损。 4. **版权问题**:判断“生成物可能无法登记版权”正确,但认为能“规避侵权”则错误,已出现巨额侵权赔偿案例。 5. **信息茧房与世界大同**:机制上AI会将观点向众数平均,但AI正快速走向“千人千面”的个性化,可能制造新茧房而非消解极化。 6. **大模型成本**:预测“局部战争”和玩家涌入正确,但“5-10亿美元封顶”的成本估算与前沿训练实际花费严重不符。 **总结规律:** 1. 判断**方向和机制**比具体数字、程度更可靠。 2. 倾向于**高估短期变化速度,低估长期能力上限**。 3. 容易忽略**问题内部的分布差异**(如总量正确但部分群体受损)。 4. **留有餘地、分层表述**的判断更经得起时间检验。 5. 一些根本性争论,**三年时间不足以给出最终答案**。 这次回顾表明,在快速变化的领域,把握大方向比追求精确预测更重要,同时需警惕绝对化表述并承认认知的局限性。

链捕手1小时前

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

链捕手1小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片