Troubled Crypto Firm Vauld Filed for Protection Against Creditors (Report)

CryptoPotato发布于2022-07-21更新于2022-07-21

文章摘要

Following the disruption on its platform and the dismissal of staff, Vauld seeks for protection against creditors.

One of the worst affected crypto companies by the unpleasant macroeconomic conditions – Vauld – reportedly filed for protection against creditors in Singapore. The process should grant the entity the “breathing space” it needs to reconstruct its distressed operations.
Looking for a Way Out
It is safe to say that the crypto winter has harmed numerous organizations in the field, including the Singaporean digital asset exchange – Vauld. Last month, the company backed by Peter Thiel’s Valar Ventures and Coinbase suspended deposits, withdrawals, and trading. Shortly after, it dismissed around 30% of its staff, citing the economic slowdown and prolonged market downturn.
According to a recent coverage by WSJ, Vauld will attempt to ease the turbulence by filing for protection against creditors. The process is much similar to Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the USA. The debtor remains in charge of its operations and receives more time to resolve its financial problems. In Vauld’s case, the moratorium should give the company the necessary “breathing space” after all the adverse events:
“The management has decided that, in light of the current circumstances, it would be in the best interests of all stakeholders (including creditors) to file the Application for a moratorium order … This is so as to give Defi Payments [its Singapore entity] and the Vauld management the breathing space it requires to prepare for the intended restructuring for the benefit of all stakeholders.”
It is worth mentioning that Singapore is home to another digital asset firm that has experienced significant issues amid the ongoing bear market – Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Its problems were mainly prompted by the collapse of Terra’s algorithmic stablecoin – UST – and its native token – LUNA – as well as the failing prices of most digital currencies.
As a result, the crypto hedge fund failed to meet margin calls last month. Days later, a court in the British Virgin Islands ordered it into liquidation. This was considered a major hit for the industry since some of 3AC’s creditors include BlockchainCom and Voyager Digital. According to some sources, the firm owns approximately $3.5 billion to 27 entities.
Can Nexo Provide a Light in the Tunnel?
As CryptoPotato reported earlier this month, the cryptocurrency lender – Nexo – has been closely monitoring Vauld’s issues and might soon purchase it. The two parties signed a 60-day exclusive exploratory period focused on the deal. If successful, the agreement will see Nexo owning up to 100% of the Singaporean firm.
Darshan Bathija – Vauld’s Co-Founder and CEO – opined that the acquisition could ensure additional protection for investors and ease some of the platform’s problems:
“Operating under the Nexo umbrella puts us instantly in a position of strength to continue the execution of our fiduciary obligations to our customers and at the same time to execute upon both companies’ ambitious roadmaps, regardless of the market conditions.”

你可能也喜欢

Gate 研究院:ETF 流出压制风险偏好,双向系统穿越弱势市场

本文分析了2026年5月加密市场的表现与交易策略回溯。5月市场呈现先冲高、后回落、月末低波整理的特征。BTC、ETH、SOL均在月初创出阶段高点后进入调整,主流ETF出现连续净流出,市场结构呈现现货偏弱、杠杆交易主导的特点。 策略测试显示,在弱势震荡市中,双向交易策略显著优于买入持有和只做多策略。三资产等权买入持有收益约-6.09%,只做多均线突破策略收益约-3.65%,而双向均线簇突破策略收益为+2.11%。收益主要来源于5月中下旬ETH和SOL的空头趋势交易,验证了在趋势不明朗、假突破频发的市场环境下,允许双向交易的重要性。 有效的交易框架是:识别均线簇压缩状态,允许价格向上或向下突破选择方向;使用EMA12作为动态退出线管理失败信号,配合2.5%的固定止损和3倍风险回报比(3R)的止盈来保留趋势利润。这种低胜率、高盈亏比的框架更适合5月的市场结构。 资金面上,稳定币总市值保持稳定,但BTC和ETH现货ETF资金流出,资金转向局部主题ETF和高弹性品种。衍生品交易活跃,永续合约成交规模远超现货。同时,加密市场与美股(尤其是标普500指数)保持较高相关性,美股AI科技龙头股的强劲表现吸引了部分风险资金,加剧了主流加密资产的资金流出压力。 展望6月,报告建议继续采用纪律化的双向交易系统,将BTC作为市场整体风险偏好的锚,并结合美股表现、ETF资金流向等宏观过滤条件来调整多空信号的权重,在控制单笔风险的前提下捕捉趋势机会。

marsbit14分钟前

Gate 研究院:ETF 流出压制风险偏好,双向系统穿越弱势市场

marsbit14分钟前

Anthropic CEO最新访谈:论技术爆发、安全红线与文明契约

本次访谈中,Anthropic CEO达里奥·阿莫代分享了其对AI行业现状与未来的深度思考。他描述AI发展如同“平稳的指数级增长”,虽表面平缓但终将迎来爆发。面对这种压力,他强调需保持外科医生般的理性冷静,避免在恐慌与漠视间摇摆。 阿莫代回顾了离开OpenAI的核心原因,并非单纯技术分歧,而是源于根本性的信任与价值观破裂。他强调,行业合作的基础是信任,主张可信的参与者应联合制定标准,以带动整个生态负责任地发展。 在商业模式上,Anthropic坚定选择企业级市场,认为这与公司“安全、向善”的价值观更具协同性,能避免消费级市场常见的成瘾性与低质内容竞争。他谈及AI对就业的冲击,认为社会需提前规划宏观经济政策,并引导企业利用AI“做更多事”,而非简单裁员,以寻求正和博弈。 关于AI安全与军事应用,阿莫代划出了明确红线:坚决反对大规模监控和全自主武器系统,坚持“人类在回路中”的原则。他以公司暂不发布高风险网络安全模型“Mythos”为例,阐释了在能力与安全之间主动权衡的实践。 在权力制衡方面,他承认私营公司掌控强大技术存在风险,介绍了Anthropic设立“长期利益信托”等机制来引入制衡,并呼吁政府实施基于风险的合理监管,而非在“放任不管”与“全面国有化”两个极端间跳跃。 最后,阿莫代承认AI可能导致文明崩溃的风险,但表示Anthropic的行动正是为了降低该概率。他认为重建硅谷失去的信任不能靠言语,而要靠如推迟产品发布、切断某些市场访问等实际牺牲来证明其“做正确的事”的承诺。

marsbit17分钟前

Anthropic CEO最新访谈:论技术爆发、安全红线与文明契约

marsbit17分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片