2 Days, 20x: A Quick Look at the Automated Market Making Mechanism of the New Gem Snowball

marsbit发布于2025-12-22更新于2025-12-22

文章摘要

The meme token Snowball" launched on pump.fun on December 18 and gained significant traction in the English-speaking crypto community, reaching a $10 million market cap within four days while largely flying under the radar in Chinese crypto circles. Its core innovation is an automated market-making mechanism: instead of the typical "creator fee" (usually 0.5%–1% per transaction) going to the developer’s wallet—a common setup that often leads to rug pulls—Snowball directs 100% of this fee to an on-chain bot. This bot periodically: 1. Buys back tokens to create buy pressure, 2. Adds the purchased tokens and corresponding SOL to the liquidity pool to improve depth, 3. Burns 0.1% of tokens to induce deflation. The fee rate also adjusts dynamically based on market cap (0.05%–0.95%) to balance accumulation and transaction friction. The idea is a "snowball effect": trading generates fees → fees fuel buybacks → buybacks may push price up → higher prices attract more trading. On-chain data shows 7,270 holders, with the top 10 holding ~20% of supply. Trading volume has been relatively balanced between buys and sells. However, the token remains highly speculative. While the structure reduces dev exit risk, it doesn’t eliminate other meme coin risks like low liquidity, narrative fatigue, or large holder dumps. Similar projects like FIREBALL are emerging, suggesting a trend toward "mechanism-driven memes." But as past examples like OlympusDAO and Safemoon show, complex t...

The crypto market in December is as cold as the weather.

On-chain transactions have been dormant for a long time, and new narratives are hard to come by. Just look at the drama and gossip circulating in the Chinese CT (Crypto Twitter) these past few days, and you'll know hardly anyone is playing in this market anymore.

But the English-speaking community has been discussing something new.

A meme coin called Snowball launched on pump.fun on December 18th. In four days, its market cap surged to $10 million and is still hitting new highs; yet it's barely mentioned in Chinese circles.

In the current environment, lacking new narratives and where even memes are considered unplayable, this is one of the few things that catches the eye and shows some localized wealth effect.

And the name Snowball itself tells the story it wants to convey:

A mechanism that allows the token to "roll and grow bigger by itself."

Turning Transaction Fees into Buying Pressure, Rolling the Snowball for Market Making

To understand what Snowball is doing, you first need to know how pump.fun tokens typically make money.

On pump.fun, anyone can create a token in minutes. The token creator can set a "creator fee," essentially taking a cut of every transaction into their own wallet, usually between 0.5% and 1%.

This money could theoretically be used for community building and marketing, but in practice, most Devs choose to: accumulate enough and then rug.

This is part of the typical life cycle of a shitcoin. Launch, pump, harvest fees, rug. Investors aren't betting on the token itself, but on the developer's conscience.

Snowball's approach is to not take this creator fee money.

To be precise, 100% of the creator fees do not go to anyone's wallet but are automatically transferred to an on-chain market-making bot.

This bot performs three actions at regular intervals:

First, it uses the accumulated funds to buy tokens on the market, creating buying support;

Second, it adds the bought tokens and the corresponding SOL to the liquidity pool, improving trading depth;

Third, it burns 0.1% of the tokens with each operation, creating deflation.

Additionally, the percentage of creator fees this coin charges is not fixed; it fluctuates between 0.05% and 0.95% based on market cap.

It takes a higher percentage when the market cap is low, allowing the bot to accumulate ammunition faster; it reduces the fee when the market cap is high, decreasing transaction friction.

In one sentence, the logic of this mechanism is: every time you trade, a portion of the money automatically becomes buying pressure and liquidity, instead of going into the developer's pocket.

Therefore, you can easily understand this snowball effect:

Transactions generate fees → Fees become buying pressure → Buying pressure pushes up the price → Higher price attracts more transactions → More fees... theoretically, it can roll on by itself.

On-Chain Data Situation

Now that we've covered the mechanism, let's look at the on-chain data.

Snowball launched on December 18th, four days ago. Its market cap grew from zero to $10 million, with a 24-hour trading volume exceeding $11 million.

For a shitcoin on pump.fun, this performance is considered relatively long-lasting in the current environment.

In terms of token distribution, there are currently 7,270 holder addresses. The top ten holders combined account for about 20% of the total supply, with the single largest holder holding 4.65%.

(Data source: surf.ai)

There's no address holding 20-30% of the supply; the distribution is relatively decentralized.

Regarding transaction data, there have been over 58,000 transactions since launch, with 33,000 buys and 24,000 sells. The total buy volume is $4.4 million, and the sell volume is $4.3 million, resulting in a net inflow of about $100,000. Buying and selling are basically balanced, with no one-sided selling pressure.

The liquidity pool holds about $380,000, half in tokens and half in SOL. For a market cap of this size, the depth isn't very thick, and large orders would still experience significant slippage.

Another noteworthy point is that Bybit Alpha announced listing the token less than 96 hours after launch, which to some extent confirms the short-term hype.

Perpetual Motion Meets a Cold Market

After looking around, you can see that the English community's discussion about Snowball mainly focuses on the mechanism itself. Supporters' logic is straightforward:

This is the first meme coin that locks 100% of the creator fees into the protocol, preventing developers from rugging, making it structurally safer than other shitcoins, at least.

The Dev is also playing into this narrative. The developer wallet, market-making bot wallet, and transaction logs are all public, emphasizing "verifiable on-chain."

@bschizojew labels himself as "on-chain schizophrenic, 4chan special forces, first-generation meme coin veteran," radiating a self-deprecating degen vibe that strongly appeals to the crypto-native community.

But a safe mechanism and making money are two different things.

The snowball effect relies on the premise that there is sufficient trading volume to continuously generate fees to feed the bot for buybacks. More trades mean more ammunition for the bot, stronger buying pressure, higher prices, attracting more people to trade...

This is the ideal state where any meme coin's so-called buyback flywheel spins up in a bull market.

The problem is, the flywheel needs external force to start.

What is the current crypto market environment? On-chain activity is sluggish, overall meme coin hype is down, and there's already little capital willing to chase shitcoins. In this context, if new buying pressure doesn't keep up and trading volume shrinks, the fees the bot receives will become less and fewer, buybacks will weaken, price support will diminish, and trading willingness will decline further.

The flywheel can spin forward, but it can also spin in reverse.

A more realistic problem is that the mechanism solves only one risk point—"developers taking the money and running"—but meme coins face far more risks than that.

Whales dumping, insufficient liquidity, narratives going out of style—any one of these happening would render the 100% fee buyback largely ineffective.

Everyone is tired of being rugged. A Chinese crypto brother summarized it quite well:

Play if you want, but don't get in over your head.

More Than One Snowball is Rolling

Snowball isn't the only project telling this automated market-making story.

Within the pump.fun ecosystem, a token called FIREBALL is doing something similar: automatic buybacks and burns, packaged as a protocol other tokens can plug into. But its market cap is much smaller than Snowball's.

This indicates the market is currently responsive to the direction of "mechanism-based meme coins."

The traditional玩法 of shilling, pumping, and community hype is finding it harder to attract capital. Using mechanism design to tell a "structurally safe" story might be one of the recent trends for meme coins.

That said, artificially creating a specific mechanism isn't a new玩法.

The most typical case in 2021 was OlympusDAO's (3,3), which used game theory to package a staking mechanism, telling the story "if everyone holds, everyone profits," reaching a peak market cap of billions of dollars. The ending, as everyone knows, was a death spiral, dropping over 90%.

Even earlier, there was Safemoon's玩法 of "taxing every transaction and distributing it to holders," also a narrative of mechanism innovation, which ended with the SEC suing and charging the founders with fraud.

Mechanisms can be great narrative hooks, capable of gathering capital and attention in the short term, but the mechanism itself does not create value.

When external capital stops flowing in, even the most精巧designed flywheel will stop turning.

Finally, let's recap what this little gem is actually doing:

Turning the meme coin's creator fees into an "automated market-making bot." The mechanism itself isn't complicated, and the problem it solves is very clear: preventing developers from directly taking the money and running.

The developer not being able to rug doesn't mean you will make money.

If after reading this you find the mechanism interesting and want to participate, remember one thing: it is first and foremost a meme coin, and only secondly an experiment with a new mechanism.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat is the core mechanism that Snowball uses to create a 'self-rolling' effect?

ASnowball uses a mechanism where 100% of the creator fees from each transaction are automatically sent to an on-chain market-making bot. This bot periodically uses the accumulated funds to buy tokens (creating buy pressure), adds the purchased tokens and corresponding SOL to the liquidity pool, and burns 0.1% of the tokens to create deflation.

QHow does the creator fee in Snowball differ from a typical pump.fun token?

AIn a typical pump.fun token, the creator fee (usually 0.5% to 1%) goes directly into the developer's wallet, which they can withdraw and potentially abandon the project with. In Snowball, 100% of this fee is automatically sent to an on-chain market-making bot instead of going to any individual, making it structurally harder for the developer to 'rug pull'.

QWhat are the potential risks of investing in a meme coin like Snowball, according to the article?

AThe risks include a general decline in market activity and meme coin hype, which could lead to reduced trading volume. If new buying pressure doesn't materialize, the bot's funding from fees decreases, weakening buy support and price stability. Other risks not solved by the mechanism include large holders (whales) dumping, insufficient liquidity, and the narrative simply falling out of fashion.

QWhat precedent does the article mention for meme coins with innovative mechanisms, and what was their outcome?

AThe article mentions OlympusDAO's (3,3) staking mechanism, which promised mutual gains if holders sold, but its市值 eventually fell over 90%. It also references Safemoon, which used a transaction tax redistribution mechanism and whose founders were later charged with fraud by the SEC. These examples show that mechanisms can be a good narrative but don't inherently create value if external capital stops flowing in.

QWhat key piece of advice does the article give to potential participants interested in Snowball's mechanism?

AThe key advice is to remember that Snowball is first and foremost a meme coin, and only secondly an experiment with a new mechanism. While the mechanism addresses developer rug pulls, it does not guarantee profits. Participants are advised to 'play but don't get too carried away' or 'don't go overboard'.

你可能也喜欢

CPU杀回牌桌,一场1700亿美元的“上位”大戏开启

英伟达在2026年台北电脑展上首次发布独立CPU产品线Vera CPU,标志着其业务重心从GPU向更广阔的计算领域扩展。CEO黄仁勋指出,在AI智能体时代,CPU已成为数据中心性能的关键瓶颈。与此同时,AMD将服务器CPU市场规模预测大幅上调至1200亿美元以上,行业预测其潜在市场规模将在2030年达到约1700亿美元。 市场格局正在发生变化。2026年一季度,AMD在服务器CPU收入份额上逼近英特尔,显示出高核数产品的强大溢价能力。分析指出,AI发展正从训练转向推理和智能体阶段,后者需要频繁进行复杂控制流、工具调用和数据处理,这些任务严重依赖CPU而非GPU。在智能体任务中,GPU利用率可能低于50%,而CPU工作量占比可达七成以上。这导致CPU与GPU的配比从过去的1:8显著收敛至1:4甚至1:1。 需求变化直接推动了十多年来首次大规模涨价,英特尔和AMD服务器CPU价格普遍上涨10%-15%,且出现产能紧张。市场分化为配合GPU的高核数CPU和用于智能体任务编排的中核数批量CPU两类需求。 英伟达基于ARM架构的Vera CPU入局,进一步凸显了CPU的战略地位。这对中国CPU产业链既是机遇也是挑战。国产CPU厂商如海光信息、华为鲲鹏等,既受益于全球AI需求增长,也面临信创政策带来的国产替代窗口期。行业共识是,AI大规模落地的关键已从单芯片性能转向CPU与GPU的协同能力。

marsbit9小时前

CPU杀回牌桌,一场1700亿美元的“上位”大戏开启

marsbit9小时前

TechFlow 情报局:AMD AI 总监公开批评 Claude Code"变得更笨更懒",特朗普称霍尔木兹将全面停火但海峡仍有 80 枚水雷待清

**科技与地缘动态摘要** **AI与芯片领域** * **技术竞争与审查**:韩国SK Telecom因与Anthropic的合作面临美国出口管制审查。与此同时,中国Z.AI发布了不依赖英伟达芯片、性能对标Claude Opus的GLM-5.2大模型,引发关于技术围堵效果的讨论。 * **安全与伦理问题**:Google Gemini被曝在诈骗场景中提供误导建议,引发AI安全担忧。GitHub上发现上万个分发木马的仓库,开源供应链安全敲响警钟。 * **行业动态**:亚马逊正洽谈对外出售其自研AI芯片,意图进军市场。苹果据悉将为特殊版iPhone独享台积电最新制程工艺。0G Labs宣布其链上AI推理总量突破重要里程碑。 * **争议与监管**:AMD AI总监公开批评Claude Code性能下降。多名亚马逊工程师因批评公司AI数据中心扩张的环境影响遭内部调查。微软、亚马逊云服务或面临欧盟严厉反垄断审查。 **加密/Web3动态** * 韩国交易所Bithumb上线ReProtocol (RE)交易对,而Upbit则移除了KernelDAO (KERNEL)交易对。 **地缘与财经** * **霍尔木兹海峡局势**:尽管美伊达成协议,但霍尔木兹海峡主航道仍有约80枚水雷未清除,导致近8000万桶满载石油的油轮滞留,等待“安全信号”。伊朗取消了赴瑞士外交行程,和谈前景不明。特朗普称协议是伊朗“无条件投降”,并宣称总统拥有无限权力。 * **美股表现**:美股半导体板块大涨,英特尔因与苹果合作传闻暴涨10.6%,而SpaceX股价下跌3.5%。 **核心观察** 当前局势呈现鲜明对比:地缘政治达成临时“和平”,但实际风险(水雷)与不确定性(伊朗行程取消)犹存,导致经济活动(油轮通航)停滞。与此同时,科技领域的竞争与重构却在加速进行,从芯片自主研发、AI模型突破到供应链安全,科技公司正以另一种方式重塑全球格局。

marsbit9小时前

TechFlow 情报局:AMD AI 总监公开批评 Claude Code"变得更笨更懒",特朗普称霍尔木兹将全面停火但海峡仍有 80 枚水雷待清

marsbit9小时前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

如何购买QUICK

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Quickswap(QUICK)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Quickswap(QUICK)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Quickswap(QUICK)购买完您的Quickswap(QUICK)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Quickswap(QUICK)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Quickswap(QUICK)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

644人学过发布于 2024.03.29更新于 2026.06.02

如何购买QUICK

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对QUICK(QUICK)币价的意见。

活动图片