After Vauld Fallout, Voices Grow Over Fund Safety On Crypto Exchanges

Coingape发布于2022-07-04更新于2022-07-04

文章摘要

The turbulent times in the cryptocurrency market raised doubts over safety of customer funds on exchanges.

The turbulent times in the cryptocurrency market raised doubts over safety of customer funds on exchanges. In the recent times, the crash of Terra network had a ripple effect on all players in the market. In these circumstances, doubts are being raised over Vauld fund safety.
What Caused Vauld To Suspend Withdrawals, Trading & Deposits?
Earlier on Monday, cryptocurrency exchange Vauld said it had suspended all withdrawals, trading and deposits on its platform with immediate effect. The Singapore-based company added that it was exploring restructuring options with its financial and legal advisors.
Financial challenges in the crypto market on various fronts caused this move from the Vauld management. However, this is believed to be more of a precautionary move than running out of funds.
Neel, a crypto influencer, feels this move from Vauld could be a precautionary measure to avoid ‘panic withdrawals’.
“This can be a precautionary measure to avoid bigger problems that can happen by panicked withdrawals and give them breathing room to come up with a solution.”
DOGE Price Analysis: Pullback Opportunity Eyes its Next Jump to $0.1
News
Also, the crypto exchange had recently raised funds from billionaire entrepreneur and venture capitalist Peter Theil.
The current market climate which has led to a significant amount of customer withdrawals of $197.7 million since June 12, Vauld said. In the second week of June, the cryptocurrency market was triggered by a collapse of Terraform Lab’s UST.
Doubts Over Vauld Fund Safety
Meanwhile, voices are growing rapidly around storing crypto assets on exchanges. A Bitcoin trader by name Nebraskangooner on Twitter said keeping money on exchanges only means to lose all of it.
“If all of your money is on Crypto exchanges then you’re already losing.
Johnny, another crypto enthusiast, said it essentially means to disown money if stored on cryptocurrency exchanges.
“Bunch of people keeping their money on exchanges right now are going to turn into a bunch of people getting their money kept by exchanges.”
CryptoGodJohn, another crypto trader, shared a personal experience of losing money stored on exchanges. “If you have money on sketchy exchanges, please do yourself a favor and take your money off the exchange. Happened to me with Cryptoia in 2018,” he shared.

你可能也喜欢

Claude 要封号查身份证了?刷脸是两个月前的旧账,「交数据给警方」是误读

近日,Anthropic宣布Claude的隐私政策将于7月8日更新,中文网络广泛传播其将“强制实名刷脸”并“降低向执法机构披露数据门槛”。经核实,这些解读存在显著误区。 首先,身份验证(包括证件提交和人脸识别)实为2026年4月已上线的旧机制,并非7月新政。此次更新仅是将其数据收集条款正式写入隐私政策。 其次,所谓“向执法机构敞开数据”的说法站不住脚。对比新旧政策,关于向政府或执法部门共享数据的核心原则未变。新版只是更结构化地列出了四种可能情形(如遵守法律、防止严重伤害等),并增加了“诚信信念”作为前提,这实际上是一项要求善意依据的限定,而非降低披露门槛。历史案例显示,Anthropic曾在法庭上拒绝过提供用户数据的请求。 本次政策真正的实质性更新,是针对Claude作为“智能体”(Agent)执行多步骤任务、连接第三方应用时的数据流向做出了明确规定。这涵盖了用户输入、指令及从第三方服务获取的数据如何处理,是随着产品能力扩展而补充的合规条款。 此外,政策新增了“研究参与数据”等章节,并细化了数据处理的法律依据。Anthropic重申了其不出售用户数据、产品无广告以及用户可控制对话是否用于训练的承诺。 总结而言,此次更新更像是一次“政策文本追上产品现状”的合规梳理,而非对用户隐私的主动收紧。普通用户面临的封号风险主要源于违反使用政策或触发风控,这一点此前已存在。关于数据被随意移交的担忧,依据现有文本和判例,被明显夸大了。

marsbit2分钟前

Claude 要封号查身份证了?刷脸是两个月前的旧账,「交数据给警方」是误读

marsbit2分钟前

Crypto 2029:加密行业四年周期终极预判

本文预测了加密行业2025至2029年的发展路径,核心围绕三大问题:代币价值来源、技术如何落地、以及加密资产成为金融基建后的演变。 文章预测,到2026年中,市场焦点将从缺乏价值支撑的山寨币,转向由Hyperliquid等平台推出的、锚定实体企业(如SpaceX)价值的非公开发行永续合约,这些合约成为未上市企业的重要估值参考。同时,“AI+加密”赛道因AI产业自身无需加密技术支持而逐渐没落,仅预测市场幸存。 2027年,公链基金会将明确转向服务合规机构,为后续向更广泛合格投资者开放打下基础。然而,非公开发行永续合约、稳定币和资产代币化三大赛道均因外部政策限制而遭遇发展天花板。 2028年,行业投机属性减弱。一次由大额平仓引发的连锁清算事件,暴露了缺乏底层现货锚定的合成合约市场的根本缺陷。这促使监管放宽限制,允许面向合格投资者公开宣传和交易私募证券二手份额,为真实资产提供了合法流通渠道。 到2029年,行业迎来由实体科创企业股权交易驱动的新牛市。代币市场彻底分化:成功转型为金融基建的公链代币捕获真实价值;无实体资产和法权支撑的代币将失去流动性。稳定币稳健增长,投机板块收缩。最终,加密货币作为金融基础设施将变得“隐形”且平淡,而它催生的、面向更广泛合规投资者的新型资产交易市场将成为核心遗产。 全文立论核心在于:行业未来瓶颈在于法律与合规突破,而非技术。若至2028年末普通投资者仍无法合法参与私募资产交易,则此预测框架需重新评估。

Foresight News23分钟前

Crypto 2029:加密行业四年周期终极预判

Foresight News23分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片