SWIFT’s Blockchain Move Is Positive For Ripple? Why XRP Is Still The Better Option

bitcoinist发布于2025-10-02更新于2025-10-03

文章摘要

SWIFT’s decision to test a blockchain prototype with Consensys (Ethereum) has stirred debate in the crypto space, raising concerns about...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

SWIFT’s decision to test a blockchain prototype with Consensys (Ethereum) has stirred debate in the crypto space, raising concerns about whether XRP’s role in global finance may be under threat. While Ethereum may offer experimentation, a crypto analyst argues that the XRP Ledger (XRPL) already delivers enterprise-grade performance, compliance features, and real-world adoption that institutions rely on. 

SWIFT’s Blockchain Partnership Challenges XRP Position

On Tuesday, September 30, crypto market expert Pumpius shared a thread on X social media, unveiling the recent collaboration between SWIFT and Consensys that has triggered panic in the market. Although the partnership is presented as an innovative step, Pumpius argues that it exposes a fundamental weakness within SWIFT. 

According to the analyst, SWIFT has traditionally depended on legacy financial rails and is now attempting to modernize by leveraging Ethereum-based solutions. However, Pumpius points out that Ethereum continues to struggle with scalability, high transaction fees, and centralization concerns. He argues that while SWIFT is aware its legacy rails are deteriorating, adopting a “band-aid fix” is no replacement for core infrastructure. 

Ripple, on the other hand, has already moved beyond the experimental stage. Pumpius notes that the XRPL is designed to process transactions within three to five seconds, at minimal cost, making it far superior in terms of speed and accessibility. Unlike Ethereum prototypes, the analyst stated that Ripple’s solutions are actively in use across international payment corridors, supported by partnerships with over 100 banks, regulators, and major payment providers.

Another major challenge that debates SWIFT’s Ethereum venture is compliance. Pumpius explained that global financial systems demand robust Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) frameworks—areas where blockchain options often face limitations. He highlighted that Ripple addresses these challenges head-on with the integration of the DNA Protocol, a system enabling verifiable digital identities, zero-knowledge proof verification, and on-chain compliance mechanisms that satisfy regulators while preserving user privacy. 

Why XRP Holds The Long-Term Advantage

Upon further review of Pumpius’ analysis, he highlights that XRP’s position is strengthened by fundamentals that remain significantly relevant to institutions. He mentioned that Ripple has gained legal clarity in the US following the resolution of the SEC lawsuit and is also aligned with ISO 20022, the global standard for financial messaging. 

The analyst further pointed to Ripple’s growing momentum, highlighted by the launch of the RLUSD stablecoin with SBI and its ongoing applications for banking licenses. Against this backdrop, he emphasized that institutions do not chase hype but rather adopt infrastructures that reduce costs, boost efficiency, and ensure compliance with regulations. In his view, RippleNet and the XRP Ledger already meet all three requirements, which explains their growing global integration.  

Concluding his report, Pumpius calls SWIFT’s blockchain move a “desperation play,” framing it less as a threat and more as a sign that change is inevitable. He also described the effort as experimental, contrasting it with Ripple’s rollout of solutions while Consensys pushes Ethereum through lobbying efforts. To XRP investors, he stressed that they are holding an asset with the potential to reprice immediately once new financial rails are fully activated.

XRP
XRP trading at $2.98 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Adobe Stock, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

你可能也喜欢

美债危机和高收益率背景下,黄金作为“金融保险”的配置价值

本文探讨了在美债危机和高收益率背景下,黄金作为“金融保险”的配置价值。文章认为,美国巨额债务、高收益率环境以及地缘政治风险等因素,削弱了投资者对传统纸币和美元资产的信心,从而凸显了黄金作为无对手方风险的价值储存手段的重要性。 核心驱动力包括:1)黄金与实际利率呈反向关系,当前低实际利率环境提供支撑;2)地缘政治紧张与能源通胀推高避险需求;3)全球央行(尤其是中国央行)持续购金,形成结构性需求;4)投资需求(如ETF)创历史新高。文章回顾了金价从2025年初约2,624美元飙升至2026年1月历史高点5,589美元的历程,并指出当前价格在约4,460-4,523美元区间。 对于投资者,获取黄金敞口的主要途径有:实物黄金、黄金ETF(如GLD、IAU)以及黄金矿业ETF(如GDX)。后者具有杠杆效应,但风险也更高。文章同时提示了黄金面临的风险,包括实际利率大幅转正、美元走强、地缘政治缓和及估值过高等。 最后,文章建议将黄金视为投资组合的保险部分,而非增长型资产,多数情况下配置比例在5%-10%为宜。投资者需密切关注美国实际利率、美伊谈判进展、央行购金数据及关键价格位(如4,500美元和5,000美元),以判断未来走势。在当前宏观环境下,持有黄金的逻辑得到了罕见的基本面支撑。

marsbit36分钟前

美债危机和高收益率背景下,黄金作为“金融保险”的配置价值

marsbit36分钟前

MSTR 与 STRC 的「死亡螺旋」风险有多大?

MicroStrategy(MSTR)近期出售32枚比特币引发市场担忧,其股价及旗下永续优先股STRC价格均出现下跌。文章分析了MSTR、比特币(BTC)与STRC深度绑定的结构,并与已崩溃的LUNA-UST算法稳定币系统进行比较。 核心结论是,尽管MSTR-STRC结构与LUNA-UST在表面上有相似之处(如价格锚定、高收益和潜在的螺旋下跌风险),但两者存在根本差异。STRC的价格稳定依赖于股息率调整和公司信用,而非UST那种直接影响LUNA供给的算法机制。STRC持有人在公司破产时对剩余资产拥有优先追索权,这提供了价格下限支撑,与UST可归零不同。此外,MSTR支付股息的能力依赖于其通过增发股票等方式持续融资,而非UST那种依赖外部协议收益的模式。 目前,MicroStrategy的美元储备仅能支撑约6个月的利息和股息支出,未来融资能力高度依赖市场对比特币的信心以及其股价表现。文章指出,只要比特币价格不跌破约2.63万美元,优先股股东本金损失风险较低;且公司净杠杆率仅11%,因债务导致破产的概率很小。 未来六个月被视为关键期。若比特币市场能在此期间触底回暖,MicroStrategy或能通过健康去杠杆重启其资本运作引擎。总体来看,MSTR-STRC发生类似LUNA-UST那种灾难性“死亡螺旋”的概率极低,但其可持续性仍取决于市场信心和未来半年的融资环境。

Foresight News1小时前

MSTR 与 STRC 的「死亡螺旋」风险有多大?

Foresight News1小时前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

如何购买S

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Sonic(S)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Sonic(S)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Sonic(S)购买完您的Sonic(S)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Sonic(S)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Sonic(S)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

2.4k人学过发布于 2025.01.15更新于 2026.06.02

如何购买S

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对S(S)币价的意见。

活动图片