MakerDAO members shoot down proposal for more centralization

Cointelegraph发布于2022-07-01更新于2022-07-01

文章摘要

In a major win for decentralization, members of MakerDAO, the lending protocol behind the Dai (DAI) stablecoin.

In a major win for decentralization, members of MakerDAO, the lending protocol behind the Dai (DAI) stablecoin, have rejected a series of proposals that would have seen the protocol’s governance structure become more centralized. 
On June 27, the members of MakerDAO (MKR) showed up to consider three proposals that would have reorganized the leadership of the decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) into something that more closely resembles a traditional corporation, complete with a board of directors.
The proposals were drafted as potential solutions for making the DAO more efficient and more capable of executing “high-level decisions.” Author of one of the proposals and member of the MakerDAO Protocol Engineering Core Unit, Sam McPherson voiced his frustration about the current governance model, tweeting:
“The status quo is not working… The DAO is not currently set up to make high-level decisions which is leading to decision paralysis or less informed parties making sub-optimal calls.”
The first proposal, called LOVE-001, suggested creating a new “oversight Core Unit.” Essentially this proposal would have established a new unit that would “periodically audit the activity of other Core Units” — a technical way of saying that a more centralized authority would be capable of exerting additional control over decisions concerning new collateral.
Over 60% of the 293,911 MKR delegated governance tokens were used to vote against the LOVE-001 proposal.
According to MakerDAO’s GitHub, the second proposal called “Makershire Hathaway” would create a 10-million-dollar special purpose fund designed to earn yield from the protocol’s stablecoin reserves. Makershire Hathaway was rejected by 65% of voters.
The third proposal, known only as MIP75c3-SP1, suggested the establishment of a discretionary fund that would be overseen by a new “Growth Task Force” that would aim to grow Maker “as fast as possible.” This proposal received the most unilateral rejection, with just over 76% of MKR tokens used to vote against it.
The three proposals appeared to have stirred the pot, with MakerDAO noting that they witnessed the largest amount of governance voting activity to date.
Average number of unique poll voters per month also hit an all-time high!
57 is the new record. Previous record was 38.
4/ pic.twitter.com/aQqJWYmgHd
— Maker (@MakerDAO) June 26, 2022
The rejection of these proposals combined with the historic voter turnout indicates that MakerDAO members may strongly prefer a properly decentralized model of governance, setting a strong precedent for other decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols.
MakerDAO is the governing body of the Maker protocol, which issues U.S. dollar-pegged DAI stablecoins in exchange for user deposits of Ether (ETH), Wrapped Bitcoin (wBTC) and nearly 30 other cryptocurrencies.
MakerDAO took another major step this month, with the protocol signaling its intent to invest a portion of its dormant stablecoin reserves into traditional financial assets. Earlier this month, as fears of DeFi contagion spread, MakerDao voted to cut off lending platform Aave’s ability to generate Dai for its lending pool without collateral.
Despite the series of crucial developments for the DeFi protocol, Maker’s governance token MKR is down roughly 10% over the past week, currently trading for $880 according to Cointelegraph Price Index.

你可能也喜欢

Zcash Orchard漏洞四问:曾被利用?资金可追?供应量可验?还有别的吗?

近日,隐私项目Zcash的新一代隐私池Orchard被曝曾存在关键伪造漏洞,引发市场对ZEC供应量与资金安全的担忧。Zcash创始人Zooko Wilcox对此发布长文回应,主要围绕四个核心问题展开。 首先,关于漏洞是否曾被利用,他认为可能性不大。该漏洞由专业团队使用先进AI工具主动发现,此前未被察觉。开发者在发现后迅速协调矿池冻结Orchard池并修复,限制了攻击窗口。历史上,加密货币漏洞利用多为快速变现,目前未见相关证据。 其次,关于合法Orchard资金能否追回,他认为可以。若漏洞未被利用,所有资金可完全追回。即便发生过伪造,现有的转门机制也会限制总迁移量,但用户可能无法追回全部资金。他建议谨慎用户可将资金转移至透明池或Sapling池,但也提示了关联交易暴露、依赖旧可信设置等额外风险。 第三,关于用户能否验证ZEC供应量未超标,目前尚不能。但即将到来的Ironwood升级将通过封存Orchard池来解决此问题,届时任何运行节点者都能独立验证流通中的ZEC未超过正确数额,恢复供应量的可验证性。 最后,关于是否存在其他伪造漏洞,目前不能完全确定,但持续审查(包括使用AI辅助分析)尚未发现其他类似漏洞,增加了信心。团队正与其他项目合作为此提供更多保证。 总结而言,Wilcox评估漏洞很可能未被利用,资金可追回,供应量安全,且暂无其他漏洞迹象。但用户最终不应依赖他人评估,而Ironwood升级将恢复用户自行验证供应量的关键能力。

Odaily星球日报15分钟前

Zcash Orchard漏洞四问:曾被利用?资金可追?供应量可验?还有别的吗?

Odaily星球日报15分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片