Crypto Market Structure Bill: Democrat Senators Push For Bipartisan Authorship

bitcoinist发布于2025-09-21更新于2025-09-21

文章摘要

After the Senate Banking Committee advanced the GOP-led legislation on the crypto market structure, a growing number of Democratic senators...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

After the Senate Banking Committee advanced the GOP-led legislation on the crypto market structure, a growing number of Democratic senators have stepped forward to demand the chance to actively contribute to one of the most potentially important digital asset regulations. This development comes as the crypto regulatory framework remains center stage in the US Congress, following President Donald Trump’s adoption of a crypto-friendly administrative stance.

Crypto Structure Bill Gathers Traction

Notably, the present crypto market structure bill is led by Republican senators, including Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott (R-S.C.), along with Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), and Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio). The updated discussion draft of the “Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2025” was released in early September, introducing some key changes that sparked public interest. ‘

One of these changes is the proposal of a joint regulatory committee involving the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), as well as 14 non-government members from across the industry, academia, user base, and the National Institute of Science and Technology.

However, on September 9, popular crypto critic and Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) shared heavy criticism of the GOP-led bill, citing a lack of sufficient consultation with Democrats or disclosure of industry feedback. She argues that partisanship and lack of transparency threaten both the integrity and effectiveness of the legislation. Following this development, the Democrats have since released their own version of the cryptocurrency regulatory framework, backing their call for bipartisan authorship.

The Demand For Shared Authorship

In a statement released on September 19, this group of 12 Democratic senators reaffirmed their desire to be more than bystanders in the crypto structure bill. Senators Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), Mark Warner (D-VA), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Andy Kim (D-NJ), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), and Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD) together called for a bipartisan authorship process matching the norm for legislation of this scale.

The statement read:

Last week, we released a framework on market structure legislation, highlighting our desire to work on this issue. As we stated then, digital assets are a $4 trillion global market that will require a considered and bipartisan approach to regulation.

We hope our Republican colleagues will agree to a bipartisan authorship process, as is the norm for legislation of this scale. Given our shared interest in moving forward quickly on this issue, we hope they will agree to reasonable requests to allow for true collaboration.

The Democratic proposed framework centers around seven key pillars, including clarifying regulatory jurisdiction, integrating digital-asset issuers and trading platforms into oversight, combating illicit finance and corruption, promoting fair regulation, and closing gaps in how non-security digital assets are regulated.

At press time, the total crypto market cap remains valued at $4.03 trillion following a 0.34% gain in the past day.

Crypto
Total crypto market valued at $3.99 trillion on the daily chart | Source: TOTAL chart on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Flickr, chart from Tradingview
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Semilore Faleti works as a crypto-journalist at Bitconist, providing the latest updates on blockchain developments, crypto regulations, and the DeFi ecosystem. He is a strong crypto enthusiast passionate about covering the growing footprint of blockchain technology in the financial world.

你可能也喜欢

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

微信与Telegram在架构层面有着根本性的差异,主要体现在数据存储、功能设计和生态开放度上。 **数据存储方式**:Telegram提供无限云端存储,所有消息历史在各设备间自动同步。微信则采用本地存储,消息在服务器交付后不保留,因此更换设备需通过特定功能迁移,且桌面版必须依赖手机在线确认才能登录。 **功能设计差异**:在频道讨论方面,Telegram为帖子自动关联评论区,实现一体化讨论。微信的公众号文章评论需经发布者审核才可显示,缺乏与文章直接关联的讨论系统,用户交流需跳转至聊天或小程序。文件传输上,Telegram支持最大2-4GB的文件,微信则限制为200MB,大文件需借助“文件传输助手”或第三方服务。 **开发与生态**:Telegram的Bot API完全开放免费,开发门槛低。微信小程序生态庞大(活跃数量超480万),但属于封闭系统,需经过审核、认证,甚至提供商业许可才能使用部分API,准入要求更高。 **支付整合**:微信支付深度融入中国日常生活,覆盖绝大多数线下场景及公共服务,替代了现金和银行应用。Telegram没有内置的法定货币支付系统,主要通过第三方机器人实现支付功能,尤其侧重加密货币,这反映了其去中心化理念,但在传统金融基础设施完善的地区,限制了其作为日常金融工具的应用。 **安全考量**:文章未深入讨论加密机制。Telegram提供端到端加密的私密聊天选项,而微信聊天信息不采用端到端加密。值得注意的是,微信将通讯与支付高度集成于单一界面,理论上扩大了潜在的攻击面。有数据显示,仅2025年初新加坡就记录了数百起涉及仿冒微信等支付平台员工的诈骗案件,损失巨大。这引出一个技术问题:当通讯与支付功能在同一个应用内结合得越紧密,聊天安全漏洞可能带来的代价就越高。 总结而言,两者代表了不同的平台哲学:微信构建了一个深度融入现实经济的封闭但高度集成的生态系统;而Telegram则围绕开放协议、灵活数据存储和低开发者门槛进行设计。这种架构选择决定了各自的目标用户和使用场景。

cryptonews.ru1小时前

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

cryptonews.ru1小时前

交易

现货
活动图片