Singapore’s changed stance on crypto

cryptoslate发布于2022-06-25更新于2022-06-25

文章摘要

Last year, Singapore was gearing up to be a global crypto hub. Now the regulators are hardening their approach.

As recently as last year, Singapore was positioning itself to become a global crypto hub. But with the downtrend and the liquidity crisis in the market, regulators are hardening their stance.

Sopnendu Mohanty, chief fintech officer of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the country’s central bank, told the Financial Times:

“We have no tolerance for any market bad behaviour. If somebody has done a bad thing, we are brutal and unrelentingly hard.”

He added:

“We have been called out by many cryptocurrencies for not being friendly.

My response has been: friendly for what? Friendly for a real economy or friendly for some unreal economy?”

Mohanty’s comments present a slightly different view than the one shared by MAS director Ravi Menon last year. The crypto economy that Mohanty dismissed as “unreal” was viewed to have the potential for job creation and value addition by Menon.

In an interview with Bloomberg in November 2021, Menon had said:

“If and when a crypto economy takes off in a way, we want to be one of the leading players.

It could help create jobs, create value-add, and I think more than the financial sector, the other sectors of the economy will potentially gain.”

Over the past few years, a number of cryptocurrency exchanges, including Binance and Gemini, turned to Singapore for its crypto-friendly stance. The perceived crypto-friendly regulations and low taxes were key enticers for these businesses.

But over the last few months, MAS has issued more strict digital asset-focussed guidelines. For instance, in January 2022, MAS banned cryptocurrency-related advertisements in public spaces as well as cryptocurrency ATMs from operating. Since then, Binance and other cryptocurrency exchanges have shifted their base.

In Mohanty’s words, Singapore has introduced a “painfully slow” and “extremely draconian due diligence process” for licensing crypto firms. The city-state has been cautious in presenting crypto licenses, with Crypto.com becoming the latest firm to win an in-principle license on June 22. In total, Singapore has granted 14 licenses and in-principle approvals.

Mohanty said:

“I think the world at large is lost . . . in private currency, which is causing all this market turmoil.”

While Mohanty does not hold digital assets in high regard, he is receptive to central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). He said Singapore will be ready to launch its own CBDC within three years.

你可能也喜欢

打下万亿江山的存储大佬,终究成不了首富

《打下万亿江山的存储大佬,终究成不了首富》一文聚焦存储芯片企业家朱一明及其创立的两家公司——兆易创新与长鑫科技。 文章指出,即将登陆科创板的长鑫科技市值或超万亿,但因其无实控人且股权分散,作为“灵魂人物”的朱一明间接持股不足3%,难以凭借公司市值成为顶级富豪。 随后,文章将兆易创新(市值3400亿)视为“长鑫科技前传”,回顾其发展历程。公司2005年创立时资金匮乏,朱一明采取精准“捡漏”策略,在巨头退出的细分市场(如Nor Flash、利基存储)中发展壮大。公司产品从单一存储芯片扩展至微控制器(MCU)、传感器、模拟芯片,形成多元化布局,但存储芯片和MCU仍是主要收入来源。兆易创新凭借在行业周期波动中保持较高的毛利润率(常年在40%以上)和较低的费用控制,展现出“绩优股”特质,但其净利润仍随存储芯片强周期而明显波动。 文章进而分析了存储芯片行业的商业模式。历史表明,在该行业采用重资产的IDM(垂直整合)模式并进行“反周期扩张”是巨头存活的关键,而轻资产的Fabless(无晶圆厂)模式在周期低谷中抗风险能力较弱。兆易创新作为Fabless公司,难以独自涉足资金技术壁垒极高的DRAM等领域。 因此,朱一明于2016年与合肥市政府合作创立了长鑫科技,进军DRAM制造,补齐了产业链关键环节。朱一明在长鑫表现出极大奉献精神,如放弃薪酬、稀释股权、延长锁定期,这增强了国资与银行的信心,使得长鑫得以进行巨额资本投入(截至2025年末机器设备账面值约1693亿,甚至超过比亚迪)。 最终,文章点题:即便长鑫科技市值达到2万亿,结合其持有的兆易创新股权,朱一明的个人身价预估也难以跻身中国顶级富豪行列。其选择通过绑定长鑫、以非完全控制的方式打造存储帝国,奠定了产业地位,但也意味着放弃了成为首富的可能性。

marsbit5分钟前

打下万亿江山的存储大佬,终究成不了首富

marsbit5分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片