Market Pulse: Week 14

insights.glassnode发布于2025-04-03更新于2025-04-04

Beta release. Please submit feedback here. Free for a limited period.

Overview

The Bitcoin market remains in a defensive posture as signs of weakness persist across spot, derivatives, and on-chain metrics. Price momentum cooled notably after last week's failed rally attempt, while Spot CVD continued to deteriorate, reflecting persistent net sell pressure. Spot volumes rebounded slightly from multi-month lows, yet remain far below bull market levels, indicating muted speculative participation. In the derivatives market, open interest continues to unwind, funding rates remain below neutral, and perpetual CVD signals dominance by short sellers — a combination suggesting cautious positioning and limited risk appetite.

Options market activity contracted sharply due to the March expiry, with open interest falling well below statistical norms. However, both volatility spread and 25 Delta Skew point to elevated hedging behavior, as traders brace for uncertainty and potential downside. Meanwhile, ETF flows turned negative again after a short-lived rebound, and trade volumes remain suppressed, reinforcing the narrative of institutional risk-off sentiment.

On-chain activity remains weak, with only modest upticks in active addresses and transfer volume during recent volatility. Fee revenue has retraced its short-term gains, confirming a lack of meaningful new demand. Liquidity metrics echo these conditions, with realized cap growth still sluggish and hot capital share continuing to decline. Short-term holder supply ratio remains low, emphasizing a broader shift toward holding over trading.

Profitability metrics also weakened, with Percent Supply in Profit and NUPL both trending lower. Realized Profit/Loss ratio plunged to its statistical low, underscoring a shift toward loss realization as conviction wanes. Overall, the market structure remains fragile. Amid looming macro risks such as a potential tariff war, low liquidity and rising hedging demand suggest that downside pressure remains a credible threat unless significant inflows return to the market.

Off-Chain Indicators

On-Chain Indicators

Don't miss it!

Smart market intelligence, straight to your inbox.

Subscribe now

Disclaimer: This report does not provide any investment advice. All data is provided for information and educational purposes only. No investment decision shall be based on the information provided here and you are solely responsible for your own investment decisions.

Exchange balances presented are derived from Glassnode’s comprehensive database of address labels, which are amassed through both officially published exchange information and proprietary clustering algorithms. While we strive to ensure the utmost accuracy in representing exchange balances, it is important to note that these figures might not always encapsulate the entirety of an exchange’s reserves, particularly when exchanges refrain from disclosing their official addresses. We urge users to exercise caution and discretion when utilizing these metrics. Glassnode shall not be held responsible for any discrepancies or potential inaccuracies. 

Please read our Transparency Notice when using exchange data.

你可能也喜欢

散户“带头大哥”Serenity vs 新晋股神Leopold:两大顶级猎手如何掘金AI“物理极限”?

过去两年,单纯买入英伟达的策略已逐渐失效。如今,两位风格迥异的投资者成为AI投资领域的新风向标。 一位是匿名交易者Serenity,他隐藏在社交媒体背后,通过拆解AI供应链最底层的“卡脖子”环节进行投资。他提出“紫苏叶理论”,专注于寻找那些市值小、技术垄断性强、对产业链不可或缺的隐形厂商,例如在光电共封装(CPO)等领域的关键材料供应商。据称,其投资年内获得了惊人收益。 另一位是年仅24岁的Leopold Aschenbrenner,他曾是OpenAI研究员,后创办规模超百亿美元的对冲基金。他的核心理念是,AI发展的真正瓶颈在于电网、土地、数据中心等物理基础设施,而非算法本身。其投资策略是“基础设施套利”:一方面重仓押注存储硬件、算力云和比特币矿企等物理资源;另一方面,大规模做空半导体板块,认为芯片估值已严重脱离基础设施的实际建设速度。 两人策略的核心共同点是:抛弃软件层叙事,重仓受物理法则约束的硬件和基础设施。他们都认为,谁掌握了物理世界的稀缺资源,谁就掌握了AI时代的“算力买路财”。 然而,两种策略也各有风险。Serenity推荐的微盘股面临流动性低、波动性巨大的风险,且其个人背景未经证实,跟单需谨慎。Leopold的宏观押注则面临市场情绪滞后和巨头股价持续强势的挑战,可能导致其空头头寸承受巨大压力。 他们的走红标志着AI投资逻辑的转变:产业价值正从半导体本身,向更底层的材料、设备、能源和土地等物理瓶颈环节迁移。

marsbit6小时前

散户“带头大哥”Serenity vs 新晋股神Leopold:两大顶级猎手如何掘金AI“物理极限”?

marsbit6小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片