Is Mirror Protocol undergoing exploit for the second time? Here’s the truth

Ambcrypto发布于2022-05-31更新于2022-05-31

文章摘要

Is Mirror Protocol undergoing exploit for the second time? Here’s the truth.

Terra hit the bullseye lately, however, the bullseye for all the wrong reasons. Just when Terra thought that its day of difficulties has ended, there was more in store. But what went wrong this time?

Now, the Mirror Protocol allows the trading of synthetic assets, such as stocks and cryptocurrency on the Terra and Terra Classic layer-1 blockchains, BNB Chain (BNB), and Ethereum (ETH). But put that trading on an immediate halt now. Reportedly, at the time of writing, the Mirror protocol was undergoing an attack and might have lost as much as $2 million.

Consequently, MIR tokens went down 5% in the past 24 hours. Thus, trading at $0.30 during press time.

Error #101

Mirror protocol was drained of four synthetic asset pools due to a pricing error on Luna Classic (LUNC)- the older Terra blockchain. Governance participant ‘Mirroruser’ first flagged this exploit on the protocol’s forum. This got quickly circulated by Twitter user FatMan, who shared it in a series of tweets on 31 May.

So far, the mBTC, mETH, mDOT, and mGLXY pools on the protocol have lost almost all of their assets valued at over $2 million. But this situation could go further south ‘unless the dev team steps in and fixes the price oracle.’ A bug in the “price oracle” is the main reason behind this heist as explained in the tweets below.

Remember- Whenever someone wanted to bet against a stock on Mirror, they had to lock collateral — including UST, LUNA Classic (LUNC), and mAssets — for a minimum of 14 days. After the trade concluded, users could unlock the collateral to release the funds back to the wallet. This is done with the help of smart contract-generated ID numbers.

But not this time. The Mirror’s lock contract allegedly failed to check when someone used the same ID more than once to withdraw funds. Hence, the exploit.

Chainlink community ambassador ‘ChainLinkGod’ blamed or rather pointed at Terra’s ‘outdated version of the oracle software’. “Oracles are currently reporting the price of the new Terra 2.0 LUNA coin (~$9.80) instead of the original Terra Classic LUNC coin (~$0.0001).”

After much delay, it appeared that the pricing error fixed for LUNC, as the price verified by the oracle has returned to its real market value. Although, the respective team didn’t confirm the details yet.

Low-key mirroring

Notably, the protocol has ‘mirrored’ a similar activity in the past. It suffered a $90 million hack which was only discovered seven months after the fact. The previous bug in Mirror’s code was exploited “hundreds of times” since 2021 according to FatMan.

你可能也喜欢

贝莱德以BITA为代码推出备兑看涨比特币ETF

贝莱德推出了一款新的比特币ETF产品——iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF,交易代码为BITA。与单纯的现货比特币基金不同,该产品采用备兑看涨期权策略,旨在通过出售期权获得权利金收入,并向投资者提供每月派息,为寻求加密相关收益但不愿直接使用DeFi或离岸借贷产品的投资者提供了新选择。 这种策略意味着产品在比特币横盘或震荡市场中可能表现更佳,但在比特币价格快速上涨时,其收益可能会落后于单纯的现货持有。这并非产品缺陷,而是其设计核心:贝莱德将比特币波动性打包成一种收入策略,为更保守或注重收益的投资者提供了更接近传统期权ETF的产品形式。 BITA的推出表明比特币ETF市场正迅速超越单纯的现货产品,进入策略多样化阶段,如赚取溢价收入、对冲和结构化敞口等。这标志着比特币正逐渐被视作可整合进更广泛基金架构的市场要素,而不仅仅是孤立资产。 该产品主要吸引那些已接受比特币投资逻辑,但希望在经纪账户内获得更平滑、以收益为导向产品的投资者,以及寻求在不单纯依赖价格升值的情况下讨论比特币敞口的投资顾问。它并非现货比特币或IBIT的替代品,而是一种不同的工具。关键在于投资者是否理解其收益与上涨潜力之间的权衡。

bitcoinist40分钟前

贝莱德以BITA为代码推出备兑看涨比特币ETF

bitcoinist40分钟前

日本加息,为什么全世界都在紧张?

日本央行在2026年6月将政策利率提升至1%,这是自1995年来的首次。尽管1%的利率在主要经济体中并不高,但由于日本长期充当全球最低成本融资中心的特殊角色,此次加息引发了全球市场的广泛关注。 过去二十余年,日本近乎零的利率环境催生了大规模的日元套利交易。国际资本以极低成本借入日元,转而投资于全球高收益资产,如美国科技股和新兴市场债券,这为全球资产价格上涨提供了重要的流动性基础。日本加息意味着这一廉价资金源头开始收紧,可能引发全球资本的去杠杆化调整。 日本长期维持超低利率,源于其人口老龄化、长期通缩和高额政府债务等结构性约束。然而,疫情后全球通胀传导、国内工资持续增长(近年春斗涨薪均超5%)以及日元贬值压力,共同推动其货币政策转向。 市场担忧的核心并非当前1%的利率水平,而是日本持续三十年的超宽松货币政策框架发生根本性转变的趋势。这种变化将重塑全球套利交易的逻辑和风险资产的定价基础。不过,决定全球资本最终流向的关键,仍在于美日之间的利差变化。如果未来美联储进入降息周期而日本继续加息,两者货币政策差异的收窄可能对国际资本市场产生更深远的影响。 简言之,日本加息标志着全球最重要的低成本融资来源进入正常化进程,这可能引发建立在廉价日元资金之上的全球资本配置体系进行深度重估。

marsbit2小时前

日本加息,为什么全世界都在紧张?

marsbit2小时前

研报解读:MRVL 光学 AI 迎来爆发,为何高估值让大摩明星分析师选择按兵不动?

摩根士丹利分析师Joseph Moore于5月28日更新了对迈威尔(MRVL)的研报。尽管公司季报创纪录并大幅上调全年展望,但Moore维持“等权重”(中性)评级,目标价从172美元上调至195美元,仍低于当时股价。 **核心观点**:分析师认可迈威尔的AI增长机会,但认为当前股价已充分反映预期。195美元目标价对应约40倍2027年预期市盈率。对比英伟达,两者股价接近,但英伟达的每股盈利预期是迈威尔的两倍多。Moore认为,迈威尔需同时兑现以下假设才能支撑当前估值:1)光互联业务持续放量;2)定制AI芯片顺利大规模出货;3)存储及企业业务复苏。 **业务分析**: - **光互联**(高速增长):受益于AI集群数据传输需求,预计未来几个季度光模块产品线年化营收将达10亿美元,是当前最确定的增长点。 - **定制AI芯片**(正在爬坡):为云厂商设计专用芯片,新大客户预计2028财年量产,但今年收入尚不明朗。 - **传统业务**:存储、企业数据中心等板块仍处于去库存阶段,短期缺乏复苏动力。 **关键监测信号**:光模块营收能否如期达到10亿美元年化水平;新客户定制芯片项目能否在2028财年量产;传统业务何时复苏。若任何一环不及预期,当前高估值可能面临压力。 (本文为对第三方研报的解读,不构成投资建议。)

marsbit3小时前

研报解读:MRVL 光学 AI 迎来爆发,为何高估值让大摩明星分析师选择按兵不动?

marsbit3小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片