'Lord, You Told Me to Do This': Pastor Defends Taking $1.3M From Failed Crypto

CoinDeskPolicy发布于2024-01-22更新于2024-01-24

文章摘要

Eli Regalado said God told him to start the INDXcoin project and he's waiting on further guidance after Colorado securities officials accused him of running a crypto scam.

  • Pastor Eli Regalado said he was under God's orders to set up his failed crypto project and he's now counting on a miracle.
  • He said it's true that he and his wife took $1.3 million from the investors, and that God told them to spend hundreds of thousands to remodel their home.
  • He'll have a chance to start explaining that beginning with a court hearing scheduled for January 29.
13.4K

To err is human. But Colorado securities officials said that what Pastor Eli Regalado has been doing is more like fraud.

Regalado and wife Kaitlyn launched a crypto token last year called INDXcoin. Colorado Securities Commissioner Tung Chan filed charges last week against the couple and the entities they ran, accusing them of pocketing $1.3 million in crypto proceeds while more than 300 investors had no way to recover any of their money.

The pastor – who had worked in digital marketing – responded in a video message posted on the project's website, sharing a sentiment that's unusual from a crypto founder cornered by government authorities: "Those charges are true."

"We sold a cryptocurrency with no clear exit," he said, explaining that God told him to build it and give investors ten times the money they put in. "We did. We took God at his word."

Advertisement
Advertisement

"The Lord told us to walk away from our parking company. ... He took us into this cryptocurrency ... well, that cryptocurrency turned out to be a scam.... And I said Lord ... you told me to do this," he said in the video.

The couple also took about $1.3 million from more than $3 million raised for the project. Regalado said about $500,000 went to the Internal Revenue Services, and a "few hundred thousand" was devoted to a home remodeling project that "the Lord told us to do."

The pastor, described in the token's white paper as an "ordained Marketplace Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ," said he insisted to God before the project began, "I don't have any experience in this industry. I don't know what I'm doing."

He and his wife launched the Kingdom Wealth Exchange, and investors began pouring money in.

"The exchange technology failed; things went downhill," he said. "We've just been waiting on the Lord, literally, for a miracle."

At this point, according to Colorado officials pursuing the charges in Denver District Court, the crypto is "Illiquid and practically worthless."

"We allege that Mr. Regalado took advantage of the trust and faith of his own Christian community and that he peddled outlandish promises of wealth to them when he sold them essentially worthless cryptocurrencies," Chan said in a statement.

A hearing is scheduled in the case on January 29, according to a search of the Colorado state court docket.

Most of the comments posted on the INDXcoin site are supportive of the pastor, quoting biblical passages and praising the way he's handling the accusations.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"We were just always under the impression that God was going to provide, that the source was never ending," Regalado said, granting that he knows this situation "looks terrible" and that he doesn't know what's coming next. "I don't know how God is going to turn this around."

But he asserted, "God is not done with INDXcoin."

Edited by Marc Hochstein.

你可能也喜欢

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

今年以来,比特币先驱Adam Back及其创办的Blockstream频陷争议。年初,美国司法部文件披露Jeffrey Epstein曾通过关联基金投资Blockstream;四月,《纽约时报》将其列为中本聪有力候选人;同时,其关联的比特币财库公司BSTR正筹划通过SPAC上市。 然而,本月初调查账号NatInfoSec发布长文,指控Blockstream旗下挖矿票据(BMN)存在严重问题。文章核心质疑包括:1. **算力与兑付能力存疑**:根据BMN兑付义务,Blockstream需运营20 EH/s以上算力,但其仪表盘显示实际仅15 EH/s,且公开渠道(如电网记录、矿池数据)未见匹配的大规模矿场证据。BMN条款允许其以任意来源的BTC兑付,缺乏透明度。2. **高收益与高风险**:BMN票据承诺的年化收益高达近20%,在波动剧烈的挖矿行业中难以持续,且部分到期本金滚入更高收益新票据,引发庞氏担忧。3. **关键人物前科与披露问题**:负责矿业的Exacore公司CEO Christopher Cook曾因邮件欺诈被判刑,此记录未在BMN文件中披露,其“NASA任职”经历亦被指夸大。4. **关联BSTR/SPAC的潜在风险**:文章质疑Cook的前科及BMN巨额负债未在BSTR上市文件中披露,可能存在治理与责任边界不清问题。 对此,BitMEX Research认为部分指控证据不足,例如BMN与BSTR法律结构独立,Cook非BSTR董事故无强制披露义务。但社区争论焦点集中于**算力与收益的可验证性**:投资者能否独立核实支撑BMN兑付的真实矿场算力与BTC来源? 目前Blockstream尚未系统回应。事件凸显BMN产品在规模、收益来源、资产验证及关键人员披露方面仍需澄清,其高固定收益在周期性强的挖矿行业中风险显著。

链捕手31分钟前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

链捕手31分钟前

a16z:AI 时代,公司争夺人才先从职位命名开始

本文探讨了在AI时代,公司如何通过重新命名职位来争夺人才和定义新兴能力。文章以Palantir创造的“前沿部署工程师”(FDE)为例,说明这一角色将客户现场的技术落地工作从边缘的售后或实施范畴,提升为一种关键的组织能力。这种策略被称为“职位名称套利”,即当某种能力价值上升而旧有职位名称未能体现时,抢先定义新职位可以吸引人才并占据市场心智。 职位名称是一种组织语言,反映了工作的价值变迁。从“程序员”到“软件工程师”,从“数据录入”到“机器学习工程师”,名称的变化标志着该工作在商业中战略地位的提升。有效的命名不是虚假镀金,而应基于真实涌现的新工作模式,例如“法律工程师”或“增长工程师”,它们对应了AI时代所需的、兼具业务理解和自动化能力的新角色。 对于AI to B创业者而言,思考产品将在客户组织内催生何种新岗位至关重要。为一个新角色命名(如Legal Engineer),能帮助客户内部识别和授权这些高杠杆个体,从而反过来巩固产品的心智定位。文章指出,AI转型的深层挑战往往在于组织缺乏语言来认可那些创造新价值的人。 当前,AI原生公司的产品与服务边界日益模糊,客户现场经验直接塑造产品演进。因此,像FDE这样能准确描述“在客户现场将复杂需求转化为可复制能力”的职位名称,比传统的“售后”或“实施”更贴合实际价值。最终,成功的公司不仅能命名新能力,更能从汇报线、激励机制等方面真正将这些角色置于组织的核心,从而构建竞争壁垒。

marsbit2小时前

a16z:AI 时代,公司争夺人才先从职位命名开始

marsbit2小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片