Why Biden’s Hostile Tax Proposal Threatens Crypto Investors

Bitcoinist发布于2022-03-29更新于2022-03-29

文章摘要

Crypto investors could tumble if Biden's expected proposal for a minimum 20% tax on unrealized gains were to pass Congress....

Crypto investors could tumble if Biden’s expected proposal for a minimum 20% tax on unrealized gains were to pass Congress. The harsh  “eat the rich” measure has been described as unworkable and unconstitutional by many experts.
The “Billionaire Minimum Income Tax” would target U.S. households worth more than $100 million and assess a 20% minimum tax rate on both income and unrealized capital gains. This would mean that assets that have not yet become income (stocks, real state, crypto, etc, that have not been sold) would also be taxed.
This plan seems to be full of issues. Starting from having to redefine what ‘income’ is, plus the impossibility to achieve its promises, and many threats that could endanger investors from all classes, not just billionaires.
Analyst Willy Woo believes that “It would crush the stock market. Imagine forcing every successful founder and investor to sell their shares in said successful public company every time valuation goes up to pay tax. Then pass that tax money from the best capital allocators to the worst.”
The aggressive approach traces back to the one offered last year by Senate Democrats, which focused on the idea that “The wealthy pay low-income tax rates” citing two primary reasons: their income is taxed at preferred rates and they are able to choose when their capital gains income appears on their income tax returns.
The Hill alleged that “if successful, it is unlikely that this untapped source of money would be confined to the Bezos class. It would allow the government to tax wealth.”
Crypto Investors And Unrealized Capital Gains
The White House said in a statement that president Biden “believes that it is wrong for America to have a tax code that results in America’s wealthiest households paying a lower tax rate than working families.”
The Hoover Institution’s Tyler Goodspeed argued via Yahoo Finance “If you do think that the highest-income households… in the U.S. should pay a higher tax burden, then there are more efficient ways to do that,” adding that “There are lots of issues when you start taxing unrealized capital gains.”
Regarding preferred rates go, Fisher Investments had noted that there are two simple reasons for it:
“One is incentivizing long-term investment, which drives job creation. The other is to account for inflation, which can offset a large chunk of long-term returns. Preferential rates help people avoid taking inflation-adjusted losses on their investments, which would skew the risk/reward calculation.”
Applying the tax would be complex. The valuation of several assets can be subjective, not to mention a costly operation. And for stock and crypto gains, as analyst Willy Woo mentioned, investors would likely have to sell part of their holdings.
Fisher Investments added that “Considering many of these same politicians decry investors’ alleged short-termism, discouraging long-term investing is a very odd position to take.”
“… forcing people to sell stocks in order to pay Uncle Sam for their unrealized gains forces them to make moves that run counter to their long-term investment goals and preferred portfolio strategy. It is basically a giveaway to overseas institutional investors, who would be the logical buyers.”
Moreover, it is not clear yet whether unrealized losses would be taken into account. If so, a complex scenario of tax refunds might take place if a market crash happens.
Why Crypto Investors Should Care
Last year, The Washington Post called out this tax-the-rich idea explaining that “In practice, it would be an unworkable and arguably unconstitutional mess that could harm everyone,” given that the Constitution may not even permit taxation of unrealized gains.
For this reason, many think that this plan will not pass Congress.
It has been widely pointed out that it would be impossible –besides illegal– to apply this tax to billionaires only. And the example of The Revenue Act of 1913, which started as an income tax that only affected 3% of the population and grew to affect 50%, puts in question the veracity of this “for billionaires only” narrative.
Experts think that for the bill to pass Democrats would have to asset an income threshold that includes more citizens. And if not, and the bill still passes, The Washing Post believes that “it will only be a matter of time before lawmakers apply the tax to ordinary Americans.”
“Billionaires get all the attention, but the real money is in the hands of the broader public, as the collective value of real estate and mutual funds dwarfs what the nation’s uber-wealthy hold.”
And if extended to the wider public, what would happen to the traditional and crypto markets during tax season? If most American investors need to sell crypto holdings in order to pay this tax, fear and bearish movements would likely come into the picture.

crypto

Total crypto market cap at $2,1T in the daily chart | TradingView.com

你可能也喜欢

上半年,VC们的钱一半投向了AI,光这30家公司就融了超1700亿元

2026年上半年,国内AI赛道融资呈现爆发式增长。IT桔子数据显示,上半年AI赛道股权融资事件达1203起,总金额突破3000亿元,已远超2025年全年。其中,仅6月份融资额就突破1000亿元,DeepSeek的510亿元首轮融资是重要推手。 融资地域高度集中,北京、杭州、上海、深圳四城贡献了超86%的融资规模。北京以955亿元位居第一,杭州因DeepSeek带动跃居第二。 从细分赛道看,大模型融资1598.53亿元,独占鳌头,拿走超半数资金。AI基础层(算力、芯片等)融资725.68亿元,AI+具身智能赛道融资906.44亿元,是项目最活跃的领域。AIGC应用赛道融资596.05亿元,商业化成熟度最高。 资本布局节奏清晰:早期项目(种子/天使轮)数量多但单笔金额小,重在“广撒网”;成长期(A/B轮)是核心战场,贡献了近半数融资额;成熟期项目数量少但单笔金额最大,是赛道“压舱石”。 早期投资聚焦“世界模型”等具身智能底层技术,大模型早期窗口已基本关闭。中后期融资集中于头部企业,TOP20公司融资金额占全赛道过半。其中,DeepSeek、阶跃星辰、Kimi构成“大模型三巨头”;七家人形机器人公司组成第二梯队;AIGC应用、自动驾驶及AI制药等领域也有企业获得大额融资。 展望下半年,全年AI融资额有望突破6000亿元,但节奏可能“前高后低”。大模型赛道将开启“淘汰赛”,资金向头部集中,纯通用大模型的创业窗口已经关闭。

marsbit24分钟前

上半年,VC们的钱一半投向了AI,光这30家公司就融了超1700亿元

marsbit24分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片