Why Biden’s Hostile Tax Proposal Threatens Crypto Investors

Bitcoinist发布于2022-03-29更新于2022-03-29

文章摘要

Crypto investors could tumble if Biden's expected proposal for a minimum 20% tax on unrealized gains were to pass Congress....

Crypto investors could tumble if Biden’s expected proposal for a minimum 20% tax on unrealized gains were to pass Congress. The harsh  “eat the rich” measure has been described as unworkable and unconstitutional by many experts.
The “Billionaire Minimum Income Tax” would target U.S. households worth more than $100 million and assess a 20% minimum tax rate on both income and unrealized capital gains. This would mean that assets that have not yet become income (stocks, real state, crypto, etc, that have not been sold) would also be taxed.
This plan seems to be full of issues. Starting from having to redefine what ‘income’ is, plus the impossibility to achieve its promises, and many threats that could endanger investors from all classes, not just billionaires.
Analyst Willy Woo believes that “It would crush the stock market. Imagine forcing every successful founder and investor to sell their shares in said successful public company every time valuation goes up to pay tax. Then pass that tax money from the best capital allocators to the worst.”
The aggressive approach traces back to the one offered last year by Senate Democrats, which focused on the idea that “The wealthy pay low-income tax rates” citing two primary reasons: their income is taxed at preferred rates and they are able to choose when their capital gains income appears on their income tax returns.
The Hill alleged that “if successful, it is unlikely that this untapped source of money would be confined to the Bezos class. It would allow the government to tax wealth.”
Crypto Investors And Unrealized Capital Gains
The White House said in a statement that president Biden “believes that it is wrong for America to have a tax code that results in America’s wealthiest households paying a lower tax rate than working families.”
The Hoover Institution’s Tyler Goodspeed argued via Yahoo Finance “If you do think that the highest-income households… in the U.S. should pay a higher tax burden, then there are more efficient ways to do that,” adding that “There are lots of issues when you start taxing unrealized capital gains.”
Regarding preferred rates go, Fisher Investments had noted that there are two simple reasons for it:
“One is incentivizing long-term investment, which drives job creation. The other is to account for inflation, which can offset a large chunk of long-term returns. Preferential rates help people avoid taking inflation-adjusted losses on their investments, which would skew the risk/reward calculation.”
Applying the tax would be complex. The valuation of several assets can be subjective, not to mention a costly operation. And for stock and crypto gains, as analyst Willy Woo mentioned, investors would likely have to sell part of their holdings.
Fisher Investments added that “Considering many of these same politicians decry investors’ alleged short-termism, discouraging long-term investing is a very odd position to take.”
“… forcing people to sell stocks in order to pay Uncle Sam for their unrealized gains forces them to make moves that run counter to their long-term investment goals and preferred portfolio strategy. It is basically a giveaway to overseas institutional investors, who would be the logical buyers.”
Moreover, it is not clear yet whether unrealized losses would be taken into account. If so, a complex scenario of tax refunds might take place if a market crash happens.
Why Crypto Investors Should Care
Last year, The Washington Post called out this tax-the-rich idea explaining that “In practice, it would be an unworkable and arguably unconstitutional mess that could harm everyone,” given that the Constitution may not even permit taxation of unrealized gains.
For this reason, many think that this plan will not pass Congress.
It has been widely pointed out that it would be impossible –besides illegal– to apply this tax to billionaires only. And the example of The Revenue Act of 1913, which started as an income tax that only affected 3% of the population and grew to affect 50%, puts in question the veracity of this “for billionaires only” narrative.
Experts think that for the bill to pass Democrats would have to asset an income threshold that includes more citizens. And if not, and the bill still passes, The Washing Post believes that “it will only be a matter of time before lawmakers apply the tax to ordinary Americans.”
“Billionaires get all the attention, but the real money is in the hands of the broader public, as the collective value of real estate and mutual funds dwarfs what the nation’s uber-wealthy hold.”
And if extended to the wider public, what would happen to the traditional and crypto markets during tax season? If most American investors need to sell crypto holdings in order to pay this tax, fear and bearish movements would likely come into the picture.

crypto

Total crypto market cap at $2,1T in the daily chart | TradingView.com

你可能也喜欢

a16z 深度分享:别再抓 AI 味了,这是一份与AI写作共舞的实操指南

a16z 深度分享:别再纠结于识别“AI味”,而应学习如何与AI协作进行有效写作。本文认为,单纯识别AI写作的“破绽”并不可靠,且这些特征在人类写作中也长期存在。文章从四个维度分析了AI辅助写作的常见特征,并提供了实用的编辑与协作指南: 1. **修辞特征**:警惕“洞察形状”的写作,如语义空洞的“公司腔”、过度对仗、总结式短语等。这些表达听着好听但缺乏实质,应通过“转述测试”进行编辑,追求具体和直白。 2. **嗓音特征**:避免千篇一律的“Alexa嗓音”,如泛泛的温情、可循环套用的句式、抽象名词和低摩擦词汇。写作应保留个人特色和具体表达,仅在需要标准化沟通(如支持文档)时使用中性语调。 3. **结构特征**:注意“结构过剩”问题,如过度使用子标题、清单、路标和套路化开头。结构应为内容服务,根据不同体裁(如叙事、指南、评论)选择合适格式,避免生硬套用模板。 4. **标点特征**:无需过度回避破折号等所谓“AI标点”,关键在于使用得当、不影响阅读流畅。应避免标点使用过于密集或单一,并通过朗读来检验其自然度。 核心建议是:利用AI辅助构思、组织和初稿撰写,但务必注入个人思考与风格。重点不应是“是否由AI生成”,而是最终内容能否清晰、有效地达成沟通目的。好的写作是工具与创作者意图的共同成果。

marsbit18分钟前

a16z 深度分享:别再抓 AI 味了,这是一份与AI写作共舞的实操指南

marsbit18分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片