Bitcoin meets FOMC after 39% January gains with Fed path 'uncertain'

Cointelegraph发布于2023-02-01更新于2023-02-01

文章摘要

The second best January on record for BTC price action comes face-to-face with differing opinions on U.S. economic policy.

Bitcoin (BTC) hovered around $23,000 on Feb. 1 after sealing its best January performance in ten years.

BTC/USD 1-hour candle chart (Bitstamp). Source: TradingView

“”

End of Bitcoin bear market is "default view"


Data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView confirmed a monthly close of around $23,100 for BTC/USD — its highest since July 2022.


The largest cryptocurrency finished the first month of the year up 39.6%, according to statistics from Coinglass.

BTC/USD monthly returns comparison (screenshot). Source: Coinglass

“”

The impressive performance emboldened bulls, many of whom had kept the faith despite mass misgivings from more conservative market participants.


“Bitcoin closes with a Monthly swing low,” trader, entrepreneur and investor Bob Loukas reacted.


“I mean, anything can happen, right. But the absolute default view must be the bear market ended in Dec.”


As Cointelegraph reported, opinions differ considerably over how Bitcoin will behave in February, with one trader expecting “bearish” conditions to return after five-month highs.


The picture for the month ahead continues to be clouded by macroeconomic triggers. Notably, Feb. 1 will see the United States Federal Reserve confirm its next interest rate hike, with the European Central Bank doing the same on Feb. 2.


While the former hiking 25 basis points (bps) is all but “unanimously” priced in, crypto research and analysis firm Arcane Research says, the future remains less certain.


“Due to a relatively strong market recovery, Chair Powell may take the advantage to maintain hawkish restrictive undertones, emphasizing the importance of incoming economic data,” it argued in a blog post released on Jan. 31, adding that consensus “expects a 25bps hike on Wednesday and another 25bps hike to 475bps on March 22.”


“Currently, zero adjustments during the May 3 and June 14 FOMC meetings are priced as the most likely outcome, but a further hike of 25bps remains within the realm of possibility,” it noted.


Expectations of a 25-basis-point hike totaled 99.3% at the time of writing, according to CME Group's FedWatch Tool.

Fed target rate probabilities chart. Source: CME Group

“”

Should the door be open for surprises, volatility may increase as a result, with rate hike decisions already a classic catalyst.


Arcane nonetheless showed that with each passing hike, volatility around the Fed’s move has cooled.


“This could suggest that the trend of massive FOMC-induced volatility in BTC is receding,” it concluded.

Bitcoin volatility comparison chart (screenshot). Source: Arcane Research

“”

Dollar strength eyes key rebound


Another concern for crypto performance comes in the form of U.S. dollar strength.

In a market update last week, trading firm QCP Capital warned subscribers that a “massive positive divergence” was in play on the U.S. dollar index (DXY).


Traditionally inversely correlated with risk assets, DXY has been in a downtrend since mid-2022, but has stemmed losses into the new year.


“This is the same setup we saw in BTC/ETH in Dec - and as we witnessed there, any breakout to the topside will therefore be extremely sharp and violent,” QCP wrote.

U.S. dollar index (DXY) 1-day candle chart. Source: TradingView

你可能也喜欢

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

今年以来,比特币先驱Adam Back及其创立的Blockstream频繁引发争议。本月初,调查账号NatInfoSec发布长文,指控Blockstream发行的比特币矿业票据(BMN)可能存在严重问题。 指控核心包括:1. **算力与兑付能力存疑**:根据BMN的兑付义务,Blockstream需运营远超其公开显示的算力(约15 EH/s),但未在公开渠道找到相匹配的矿场、电力或算力证据。票据条款允许其以任意来源的BTC进行兑付,透明度不足。2. **高收益与高风险**:相关票据提供高达20%的固定年化收益,在波动剧烈的挖矿行业中难以持续,资金来源成疑。3. **关键人物前科与披露问题**:Blockstream矿业业务的重要关联方、Exacore CEO Christopher Cook曾被判邮件欺诈罪,但此前未在发行文件中披露,其背景陈述也存在夸大。4. **牵连BSTR上市计划**:质疑者担心BMN的潜在风险可能波及Adam Back关联的、正筹备SPAC上市的Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company(BSTR),尽管其法律独立性尚不明确。 BitMEX Research随后发表评论,承认Cook的前科属实且高收益令人担忧,但认为其他部分指控证据不足或存在误导,例如BMN与BSTR在法律上可能独立。社区争论焦点集中于Blockstream矿场算力的**可验证性**——投资者能否独立核查支撑收益的真实挖矿活动。 目前,围绕BMN仍存在几个关键疑问:实际发行规模与责任边界、矿场算力是否足以支撑兑付、近20%固定收益的具体来源、兑付资金的链上可验证性,以及Cook的实际角色。Blockstream尚未对此作出系统性回应。尽管指控有待最终证实,但BMN产品在透明度、风险披露和收益合理性方面,确实存在需要厘清的空间。

marsbit3小时前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

marsbit3小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片