Winklevoss‑Backed Gemini Cuts Up To 25% Of Staff, Exits UK, EU, And Australia

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-02-06Обновлено 2026-02-06

Введение

Gemini, the cryptocurrency exchange founded by the Winklevoss twins, announced significant layoffs and a withdrawal from key international markets. The company is cutting up to 25% of its workforce, affecting around 200 employees, and will wind down operations in the UK, EU, and Australia. This decision is part of a strategic shift to focus resources on its new prediction markets platform, Gemini Predictions, which the founders believe represent a major future growth opportunity. They cited regulatory complexity and operational challenges as reasons for scaling back global expansion. Since its mid-December launch, the prediction platform has seen over 10,000 users and $24 million in trading volume. The company's stock (GEMI) has fallen over 85% from its all-time high.

Gemini (GEMI), the cryptocurrency exchange founded and run by billionaire twins Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, announced significant changes to its business on Thursday, including deep job cuts and a withdrawal from several major international markets.

Gemini Scales Back Global Operations

Gemini plans to reduce its workforce by up to 25%. This decision could affect approximately 200 employees worldwide, as the exchange disclosed its increased focus on artificial intelligence (AI)-related operations.

The cuts will span multiple regions, including the United States and Singapore. At the same time, it will wind down operations in the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Australia, signaling a sharp pullback from markets it once viewed as central to its global expansion strategy.

In a blog post published Thursday, the Winklevoss twins acknowledged the challenges the company has faced overseas. They said operating in foreign jurisdictions has proven difficult due to a combination of regulatory hurdles and operational complexity.

As a result, the founders said Gemini had become overstretched and needed to simplify its structure to remain competitive. The twins described the layoffs as a necessary step to realign the company with its long‐term goals.

“Today, we are reducing our size again by roughly 25%,” they wrote, adding that they believe the resulting organization will be better positioned to carry out the crypto exchange’s mission.

Winklevoss Twins’ Bet On Prediction Markets

The restructuring comes as Gemini narrows its focus toward what the founders see as the next major growth opportunity: prediction markets.

The Winklevoss twins said they believe prediction markets have the potential to become as large as, or even larger than, today’s capital markets. In their view, these platforms can harness collective intelligence and market dynamics to generate insights about future events in ways traditional systems cannot.

As part of this strategy, Gemini has invested in securing the necessary license to launch its own prediction marketplace, positioning the company as an early entrant in what it describes as a new and promising frontier.

The exchange launched Gemini Predictions in mid‐December and says early adoption has been encouraging. According to the company, more than 10,000 users have already participated, trading over $24 million on the platform since its debut.

The founders framed this shift as an evolution of Gemini’s vision. While the company’s first decade focused on building infrastructure for the future of money, they now envision a broader “super app” that bridges both money and markets.

They added that to successfully pursue this direction, Gemini must concentrate its resources and reduce distractions. By scaling back its global operations and workforce, the company aims to free up the bandwidth needed to develop and expand its prediction market offerings.

The 1-D chart shows GEMI’s 85% crash since its September public debut. Source: GEMI on TradingView.com

At the time of writing, the exchange’s stock, trading under the ticker symbol GEMI, was trading at $6.69. This represents a 7% drop in the past 24 hours and is over 85% below the stock’s all-time high of $45.90.

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat percentage of its workforce is Gemini cutting, and which major international markets is it exiting?

AGemini is cutting up to 25% of its workforce and is exiting the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Australia.

QWhat new area of focus did the Winklevoss twins cite as the reason for the company's restructuring?

AThe Winklevoss twins cited a new focus on prediction markets and AI-related operations as the reason for the restructuring.

QAccording to the founders, what were the main challenges that led to the decision to pull back from international markets?

AThe main challenges were a combination of regulatory hurdles and operational complexity in foreign jurisdictions.

QWhat is the name of Gemini's new prediction market platform, and what early adoption metrics were shared?

AThe platform is called Gemini Predictions. Early adoption metrics show over 10,000 users have participated, trading over $24 million since its mid-December debut.

QHow much has Gemini's stock (GEMI) fallen from its all-time high, and what was its price at the time of writing?

AAt the time of writing, the stock was trading at $6.69, which is over 85% below its all-time high of $45.90.

Похожее

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit3 ч. назад

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit3 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手3 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手3 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit5 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit5 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片