Why XRP isn’t moving despite $1.2B in ETF demand

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2025-12-22Обновлено 2025-12-22

Введение

Despite over $1.2 billion in inflows into XRP spot ETFs and consistent institutional demand, the price of XRP has remained relatively stagnant, trading near $1.94. This price action occurs alongside a notable increase in accumulation by large wallets (whales), whose supply has climbed back toward 12.8%. Technical indicators show the asset trading below key moving averages, with RSI at 43 and low buying pressure. The convergence of institutional and whale activity suggests a shift in market control and positioning for a potential future move, even though a bullish price breakout has not yet occurred.

Who holds the power in XRP? Lately, institutional money has moved in, and big wallets are also trying to take control again. And get this! This is all happening with price action that isn’t anything to write home about.

Here’s what you need to know.

ETFs set the tone

Spot XRP ETFs’ inflows have pushed total net assets past $1.2 billion. Even on mellow days, inflows have remained positive. The interest looks extremely consistent (though muted), rather than like a one-off spike.

The trend is interesting, though. Even with the big streak of green, Ripple’s [XRP] price has held near $1.90 instead of reacting impulsively. That’s a big buying sign, with institutions building exposure gradually to set a base.

Whales have some skin in the game

Santiment data indicated that wallets holding between 100 million and 1 billion XRP have begun increasing their share again. Whale supply has climbed back toward the 12.8% range after a brief decline earlier this month.

The move hasn’t been gradual. After dipping in mid-December, large-holder ownership spiked, so holding isn’t passive. They’re positioning.

When whales step in alongside institutional inflows, it means market control is shifting hands.

XRP is trying to steady itself

At the time of writing, XRP traded near $1.94, still below its key exponential moving averages (EMAs). The 20, 50, 100 and 200-day EMAs remained overhead, so the greater trend hadn’t yet flipped bullish.

That hesitation is visible in the momentum as well.

RSI was at around 43, with mild recovery but no strong buying pressure. OBV has also flattened after falling earlier in the month.

That means selling has reduced with no new demand. The MACD was below zero, too, though downside momentum appeared to be slowing.


Final Thoughts

  • XRP price is flat near $1.90, but $1.2B+ in ETF assets and rising whale supply mean holders aren’t deterred.
  • Control is shifting, even without a price breakout.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QDespite over $1.2 billion in ETF inflows, why hasn't XRP's price shown significant movement?

AThe article suggests that institutional money is building exposure gradually to set a base, which is a form of strategic accumulation rather than impulsive buying. This consistent but muted interest, combined with the fact that XRP's price is still below its key exponential moving averages, has resulted in a lack of strong upward price momentum.

QWhat does the recent activity of large XRP wallets (whales) indicate?

AData from Santiment shows that wallets holding between 100 million and 1 billion XRP have increased their share, with whale supply climbing back to around 12.8%. This spike in large-holder ownership after a mid-December dip indicates they are actively positioning themselves, not just passively holding.

QWhat do the technical indicators (RSI, OBV, MACD) reveal about XRP's current market momentum?

AThe RSI was around 43, showing mild recovery but no strong buying pressure. The On-Balance Volume (OBV) has flattened after a previous decline, indicating that selling has reduced but there is no new demand. The MACD was below zero, though its downward momentum appeared to be slowing.

QHow is 'market control' in the XRP ecosystem changing according to the article?

AMarket control is shifting as both institutional investors (via consistent ETF inflows) and large wallet holders (whales) are increasing their positions. This coordinated activity means that power is consolidating among these larger players, even though the price has not yet broken out.

QWhat is the overall sentiment of holders despite the flat price action near $1.90?

AHolders are not deterred. The significant ETF assets exceeding $1.2 billion and the rising supply held by whales demonstrate strong conviction and a long-term positioning strategy, suggesting confidence in XRP's future despite the current lack of price movement.

Похожее

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1 ч. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1 ч. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить T

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Threshold Network Token (T) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Threshold Network Token (T).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Threshold Network Token (T)После приобретения вами Threshold Network Token (T) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Threshold Network Token (T)С легкостью торгуйте Threshold Network Token (T) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

836 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2024.03.29Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить T

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на T (T) представлены ниже.

活动图片