Why is Crypto the Key Infrastructure for the Large-Scale Adoption of AI Agents?

深潮Опубликовано 2025-12-09Обновлено 2025-12-09

Введение

Why Crypto is Key Infrastructure for AI Agent Mass Adoption For AI Agents to become widely deployable autonomous software, they require two core capabilities: composability and verifiability. These are inherently lacking in traditional Web2 systems but are natively provided by cryptocurrency networks. AI's future lies not in isolated models but in agents that automatically call services, compose with other agents, write code, test, and execute decisions involving financial actions. This agent composability depends on verifiability—knowing another agent executed as promised. Web2 infrastructure (APIs and SaaS) fails here due to black-box operations, mutable data, unprovable results, centralized audits, and manual settlements. Cryptocurrency provides the missing verified base layer through: 1. Verifiable Execution: Smart contracts and ZK proofs enable transparent, provable on/off-chain actions. 2. Verifiable Identity: DIDs and signed agent code ensure trust and integrity. 3. Verifiable Value Transfer: Automated payments, revenue sharing, collateralization, and penalties enable direct fund management without intermediaries. As AI evolves from code generation to full-cycle automation (writing, testing, running, fixing), especially with real-world financial impact, crypto becomes essential. It enables automatic penalties for failures, rewards for contributions, multi-agent settlements, and trustless coordination—making AI economically viable beyond demos. In short: AI enables...

Written by: Blockchain Knight

For AI Agents to truly become "widely deployable autonomous software," the two most critical capabilities are: composability + verifiability.

These are precisely what traditional Web2 cannot provide, but cryptocurrency systems inherently possess.

1. AI needs composability, and composability must be built on verifiability

The future of AI Agents is not a single model, but rather: automatically calling other services; combining other Agents; automatically writing code; automatically testing; automatically executing decisions (including actions involving funds). This is called agent composability.

The problem arises: if one Agent calls another Agent, but you cannot verify whether the other party actually executed as expected, the entire automation ecosystem cannot form a closed loop.

Web2 infrastructure (API + SaaS) cannot provide this strong verifiability because: APIs are black boxes; data can be tampered with; execution results cannot be proven; permissions rely on centralized audits; funds cannot be settled automatically.

In other words: a Web2 Agent cannot fully trust another Web2 Agent. Therefore, automation stops at the "demo level."

2. Cryptocurrency provides the "verifiable base layer" that AI lacks

Crypto provides the underlying three major capabilities needed for AI's future ecosystem:

1 Verifiable execution

Smart contracts are transparent and provable. ZK proofs enable even complex off-chain execution to be verified. AI can confirm that "the other party indeed did what I requested."

2 Verifiable identity

Decentralized identity DID/Key, and the Agent code itself can be signed.

This solves: who did it, whether it is trustworthy, and whether it has been tampered with.

3 Verifiable value transfer

Smart contracts support: automatic deductions, automatic payments, profit-sharing for multi-party collaboration, collateral and penalties, and escrow mechanisms.

This enables AI to directly manage and allocate funds without relying on institutions. This is something Web2 cannot achieve.

3. AI programming requires "self-testability," and involving funds requires "automatic verifiability" even more

Anthropic's recent acquisition of Bun is a signal:

AI is evolving from "automatically writing code" to a complete cycle of "automatically write → automatically test → automatically run → automatically fix."

Once AI automatically runs code and that code directly impacts the real world—such as executing trades, managing budgets, paying API fees, and participating in economic activities—it must have cryptocurrency's verifiable fund security system.

Otherwise, AI is just a toy and cannot engage in the real economy.

Crypto enables AI to:

  • Automatically penalize "execution errors";

  • Automatically reward "good contributions";

  • Automatically settle accounts during multi-Agent collaboration;

  • Automatically settle without requiring human trust.

This is a necessity for the future AI Agent economy.

4. Summarized in one sentence

AI automates software; Crypto makes automation trustworthy. Without the verifiability provided by cryptocurrency, AI Agents cannot operate at scale in the real economy.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhy is verifiability crucial for the composability of AI Agents?

AVerifiability ensures that when one AI Agent calls another, it can confirm the other Agent executed as expected, which is essential for building a trustworthy and automated ecosystem. Without verifiability, composability cannot be reliably achieved, hindering large-scale deployment.

QHow does cryptocurrency provide the verifiable execution layer that AI Agents need?

ACryptocurrency enables verifiable execution through smart contracts and zero-knowledge proofs, ensuring transparency and provability. This allows AI Agents to trust that actions, such as service calls or transactions, are performed correctly without relying on central authorities.

QWhat are the three key capabilities that cryptocurrency offers to support AI Agent ecosystems?

ACryptocurrency provides three key capabilities: 1) Verifiable execution via smart contracts and ZK proofs, 2) Verifiable identity through decentralized systems like DID/Key, and 3) Verifiable value transfer, enabling automatic payments, settlements, and economic interactions without human intervention.

QWhy can't traditional Web2 infrastructure support large-scale AI Agent automation?

AWeb2 infrastructure relies on APIs and SaaS that are opaque, mutable, and lack provability. It cannot guarantee untampered data, verified execution results, or automated value transfer, making it impossible for AI Agents to fully trust each other or operate autonomously in economic contexts.

QHow does cryptocurrency enable AI's transition from 'automated coding' to a full cycle of writing, testing, running, and fixing?

ACryptocurrency provides a verifiable financial and execution layer that allows AI to autonomously manage funds, enforce penalties for errors, reward contributions, and facilitate multi-Agent settlements. This ensures safe and trustworthy automation in real-world economic activities, moving beyond mere code generation to full operational cycles.

Похожее

Is AI Creating a New Class of 'Information Poor'?

AI is generating a new kind of "information poverty." The core issue isn't that AI denies answers to the poor; it's that it provides abundant, cheap, and plausible-sounding answers to everyone. This availability shifts the true scarcity from obtaining answers to possessing the **judgment to evaluate them** and the access to turn them into real-world opportunities. New information poverty thus describes those who have AI tools and outputs, but lack the complementary skills, authorization, and contextual experience to critically assess and act on them. Research reveals a multi-layered divide: access to AI is stratified by income and platform design (e.g., premium vs. free, embedded tools). In workplaces, usage heavily favors higher-paid, more experienced, or formally trained employees, with AI often automating entry-level tasks that were traditional stepping stones. Crucially, the heaviest users are often mid-career professionals whose existing expertise allows them to effectively judge and leverage AI outputs, while novices risk over-relying on them without building judgment. While controlled experiments show AI can significantly boost low-skilled workers' performance, real-world adoption and benefit are constrained by unequal social and organizational structures. Historically, general-purpose technologies first reward those with existing complementary capital. AI, by affecting judgment-based work, may accelerate and deepen this initial inequality gap, even if it narrows over decades. The danger lies in the illusion of competence it creates, potentially stunting the very critical thinking needed in an era where judgment is paramount.

marsbit18 мин. назад

Is AI Creating a New Class of 'Information Poor'?

marsbit18 мин. назад

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit1 ч. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报1 ч. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报1 ч. назад

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit1 ч. назад

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

2025 год — год институциональных инвесторов, в будущем он будет доминировать в приложениях реального времени.

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.12.16Обновлено 2025.12.16

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на AI (AI) представлены ниже.

活动图片