‘We will never sell’: Metaplanet stands firm as Bitcoin losses top $1.2B

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-20Обновлено 2026-02-20

Введение

Metaplanet, a Japan-based Bitcoin treasury firm, has seen its holdings of 35,012 BTC incur over $1.2 billion in unrealized losses amid the market downturn. Despite the significant paper loss, CEO Simon Gerovich firmly stated the company will never sell its Bitcoin, emphasizing a strategy focused on accumulation and increasing Bitcoin per share. He expressed cautious optimism that Bitcoin may have found a floor around $60,000, though he acknowledged market uncertainty. In the short term, demand for put options indicates some traders are betting on further downside, targeting $58K or lower. However, whale accumulation of 200,000 BTC in the past month may help stabilize prices, though a sustained recovery likely requires increased retail demand rather than leveraged trading.

Simon Gerovich, the CEO of Japan-based Bitcoin treasury firm Metaplanet, has acknowledged that the ongoing crypto rout has been painful.

In late 2025, the firm’s stash (35,012 BTC) saw a paper loss of $619 million following the BTC price crash. The unrealized loss has now doubled to over $1.2 billion as of February.

However, Gerovich assured that the firm has no plan to offload its stash if the crypto winter deepens, adding that,

“Our strategy remains unchanged. We exist to accumulate Bitcoin and grow Bitcoin per share, which we increased by over 500% in 2025. We will never sell our Bitcoin.”

On Bitcoin’s next direction, Gerovich, like Fidelity and most analysts, was cautiously optimistic of a potential market bottom around $60K.

“I personally believe Bitcoin may have found a floor around $60,000, though I hold that view with humility. Nobody knows.”

But he maintained that BTC will likely print a new all-time high and slammed critics of Bitcoin treasury firms.

Bitcoin sees spike in downside bets

In the short term, however, demand for downside protection remained strong, with some eyeing a potential BTC price dip below $60K.

According to the Options tracking platform, Laevitas, there was a surge in bearish bets, eyeing $58K and $55K in late February and March.

“Downside protection remains in demand. Over the past few hours: 1864 BTC $58K puts bought for 27FEB26 ($687.72k), 276 BTC $58K puts bought for 6MAR26 ($205.14K). Also, 600 BTC $55K puts bought for 27MAR26 ($551.18K) on Feb 17.”

The above positioning was interesting because the broader put/call ratios were still constructive and leaned bullish.

This underscored that, despite the potential for a rebound, big players remained cautious that another leg down could occur before a true market bottom is formed.

Even so, Bitfinex analysts noted that whales have scooped up 200,000 BTC in the past 30 days. According to them, the ongoing whale accumulation reinforced their price-range outlook, adding to that,

“That can stabilise price, but upside is usually slower and range-bound until retail spot demand increases. Confirmation is spot-led continuation, not leverage-led spikes.”


Final Summary

  • Metaplanet CEO was cautiously optimistic that BTC could bottom out above $60K, adding that the Bitcoin treasury firm won’t sell its BTC holdings.
  • Whales scooped 200K BTC and could drive the sideways structure above $60K, but there was increasing demand for downside protection.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is Metaplanet's current strategy regarding its Bitcoin holdings despite the unrealized losses?

AMetaplanet's strategy remains unchanged; they exist to accumulate Bitcoin and grow Bitcoin per share, and they will never sell their Bitcoin.

QHow much has Metaplanet's unrealized loss on its Bitcoin investment grown as of February?

AMetaplanet's unrealized loss on its 35,012 BTC has doubled to over $1.2 billion as of February.

QAccording to the CEO, what price level does he believe may be a potential floor for Bitcoin?

AThe CEO believes Bitcoin may have found a floor around $60,000, though he holds that view with humility.

QWhat does the surge in bearish bets, as reported by Laevitas, indicate about market sentiment?

AThe surge in bearish bets, such as puts targeting $58K and $55K, indicates strong demand for downside protection and caution among some big players that another price decline could occur before a true market bottom is formed.

QHow much Bitcoin have whales accumulated in the past 30 days, and what is the expected impact on price according to Bitfinex analysts?

AWhales have accumulated 200,000 BTC in the past 30 days, which Bitfinex analysts say can stabilize the price, but upside movement is expected to be slower and range-bound until retail spot demand increases.

Похожее

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit53 мин. назад

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit53 мин. назад

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片