‘We will never sell’: Metaplanet stands firm as Bitcoin losses top $1.2B

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-20Обновлено 2026-02-20

Введение

Metaplanet, a Japan-based Bitcoin treasury firm, has seen its holdings of 35,012 BTC incur over $1.2 billion in unrealized losses amid the market downturn. Despite the significant paper loss, CEO Simon Gerovich firmly stated the company will never sell its Bitcoin, emphasizing a strategy focused on accumulation and increasing Bitcoin per share. He expressed cautious optimism that Bitcoin may have found a floor around $60,000, though he acknowledged market uncertainty. In the short term, demand for put options indicates some traders are betting on further downside, targeting $58K or lower. However, whale accumulation of 200,000 BTC in the past month may help stabilize prices, though a sustained recovery likely requires increased retail demand rather than leveraged trading.

Simon Gerovich, the CEO of Japan-based Bitcoin treasury firm Metaplanet, has acknowledged that the ongoing crypto rout has been painful.

In late 2025, the firm’s stash (35,012 BTC) saw a paper loss of $619 million following the BTC price crash. The unrealized loss has now doubled to over $1.2 billion as of February.

However, Gerovich assured that the firm has no plan to offload its stash if the crypto winter deepens, adding that,

“Our strategy remains unchanged. We exist to accumulate Bitcoin and grow Bitcoin per share, which we increased by over 500% in 2025. We will never sell our Bitcoin.”

On Bitcoin’s next direction, Gerovich, like Fidelity and most analysts, was cautiously optimistic of a potential market bottom around $60K.

“I personally believe Bitcoin may have found a floor around $60,000, though I hold that view with humility. Nobody knows.”

But he maintained that BTC will likely print a new all-time high and slammed critics of Bitcoin treasury firms.

Bitcoin sees spike in downside bets

In the short term, however, demand for downside protection remained strong, with some eyeing a potential BTC price dip below $60K.

According to the Options tracking platform, Laevitas, there was a surge in bearish bets, eyeing $58K and $55K in late February and March.

“Downside protection remains in demand. Over the past few hours: 1864 BTC $58K puts bought for 27FEB26 ($687.72k), 276 BTC $58K puts bought for 6MAR26 ($205.14K). Also, 600 BTC $55K puts bought for 27MAR26 ($551.18K) on Feb 17.”

The above positioning was interesting because the broader put/call ratios were still constructive and leaned bullish.

This underscored that, despite the potential for a rebound, big players remained cautious that another leg down could occur before a true market bottom is formed.

Even so, Bitfinex analysts noted that whales have scooped up 200,000 BTC in the past 30 days. According to them, the ongoing whale accumulation reinforced their price-range outlook, adding to that,

“That can stabilise price, but upside is usually slower and range-bound until retail spot demand increases. Confirmation is spot-led continuation, not leverage-led spikes.”


Final Summary

  • Metaplanet CEO was cautiously optimistic that BTC could bottom out above $60K, adding that the Bitcoin treasury firm won’t sell its BTC holdings.
  • Whales scooped 200K BTC and could drive the sideways structure above $60K, but there was increasing demand for downside protection.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is Metaplanet's current strategy regarding its Bitcoin holdings despite the unrealized losses?

AMetaplanet's strategy remains unchanged; they exist to accumulate Bitcoin and grow Bitcoin per share, and they will never sell their Bitcoin.

QHow much has Metaplanet's unrealized loss on its Bitcoin investment grown as of February?

AMetaplanet's unrealized loss on its 35,012 BTC has doubled to over $1.2 billion as of February.

QAccording to the CEO, what price level does he believe may be a potential floor for Bitcoin?

AThe CEO believes Bitcoin may have found a floor around $60,000, though he holds that view with humility.

QWhat does the surge in bearish bets, as reported by Laevitas, indicate about market sentiment?

AThe surge in bearish bets, such as puts targeting $58K and $55K, indicates strong demand for downside protection and caution among some big players that another price decline could occur before a true market bottom is formed.

QHow much Bitcoin have whales accumulated in the past 30 days, and what is the expected impact on price according to Bitfinex analysts?

AWhales have accumulated 200,000 BTC in the past 30 days, which Bitfinex analysts say can stabilize the price, but upside movement is expected to be slower and range-bound until retail spot demand increases.

Похожее

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbit5 мин. назад

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbit5 мин. назад

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbit10 мин. назад

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbit10 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片