US Treasury Starts GENIUS Act Rollout With Notice Of Proposed Rulemaking

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-04-02Обновлено 2026-04-02

Введение

The US Treasury has published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to begin implementing the GENIUS Act, a federal law governing payment stablecoins. The 87-page proposal outlines how federal and state regulatory frameworks will interact, allowing states to adopt "substantially similar" rules with some discretion. The NPRM references the OCC’s flexible approach to regulating stablecoin issuers and sets a transition timeline: once the law takes effect, only authorized issuers can operate, and by July 2028, unlicensed stablecoin sales will be illegal. The proposal also preserves a state-option pathway for smaller issuers with under $10 billion in issuance, provided states certify regulatory alignment. Treasury is soliciting public feedback on the proposed rules.

The US Treasury on Wednesday published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that launches the administration’s first formal effort to implement the GENIUS Act, the new federal law governing payment stablecoins that was signed by President Donald Trump last year.

The NPRM is the Treasury’s initial regulatory proposal to give effect to the statute’s requirements and solicits public comment on how the department intends to apply the law.

GENIUS Act’s Proposed Rules

Under the GENIUS Act — formally titled the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act — Treasury is charged with setting out, through notice-and-comment rulemaking, high-level principles for assessing whether a state regulatory regime is “substantially similar” to the federal framework.

The department’s 87-page proposed rule explains how it expects federal and state authorities to interact under the new regime and identifies matters on which Treasury seeks input from stakeholders.

Treasury’s proposal signals that it anticipates states will look to federal guidance, including standards the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has proposed, when deciding how prescriptive their own rules should be.

The NPRM cites the OCC’s approach, which the OCC says is intended to be flexible and calibrated to the nature, scope, and risks posed by a permitted payment stablecoin issuer’s activities.

Treasury’s draft leaves room for states to adopt principles-based requirements, indicating that state regulators will have discretion to design standards for issuers who qualify under a state regime.

The ultimate effects will depend on the specific content of each state’s regulatory regime, which the proposal anticipates could vary widely because the GENIUS Act grants states discretion in implementing their own frameworks.

Treasury Draft Sets Timeline

The draft rule also sets out the transition timeline and market consequences contemplated by the statute. Once the GENIUS Act takes effect, entities will be barred from issuing payment stablecoins in the United States unless they are authorized as permitted payment stablecoin issuers.

In addition, the statute makes it unlawful, beginning July 18, 2028, for digital asset service providers to offer or sell unlicensed stablecoins to persons located in the United States.

To preserve a state-option pathway for smaller issuers, the law allows a state to license payment stablecoin issuers with a consolidated total outstanding issuance of no more than $10 billion, but only if the state certifies that its regulatory regime is substantially similar to the federal framework.

Taken together, the department is seeking public input on the proposal’s details as it moves toward finalizing rules intended to implement the GENIUS Act’s structure for supervision, licensing, and consumer protections in the stablecoin market.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap’s recovery toward $2.35 trillion on Wednesday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the GENIUS Act and what is its full formal title?

AThe GENIUS Act is a new federal law governing payment stablecoins. Its full formal title is the 'Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act'.

QWhat action did the US Treasury take to begin implementing the GENIUS Act?

AThe US Treasury published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which is its initial regulatory proposal to implement the statute and is soliciting public comment on its application.

QWhat is the key deadline set by the statute for digital asset service providers regarding unlicensed stablecoins?

ABeginning July 18, 2028, it will be unlawful for digital asset service providers to offer or sell unlicensed stablecoins to persons located in the United States.

QWhat is the maximum issuance limit for a state to license smaller payment stablecoin issuers under the 'state-option pathway'?

AA state can license payment stablecoin issuers with a consolidated total outstanding issuance of no more than $10 billion, provided the state certifies its regulatory regime is substantially similar to the federal framework.

QWhich federal agency's approach does the NPRM cite as a model for states to consider when designing their own rules?

AThe NPRM cites the approach of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which is intended to be flexible and calibrated to the risks of a stablecoin issuer's activities.

Похожее

Huawei Cloud Rejects Token Price War, Zhou Yuefeng Seeks a New Winning Formula for AI Cloud

At the 2026 Huawei Cloud INSPIRE Creator Conference, CEO Zhou Yuefeng outlined Huawei Cloud's distinct strategy in the competitive AI cloud market. Instead of engaging in price wars based on token volume or Maas revenue—a common focus for rivals like Alibaba Cloud and ByteDance's Volcano Engine—Huawei Cloud is shifting the competition towards real-world productivity gains. Zhou highlighted three core differentiators: a fully domestic computing stack (Ascend, Kunpeng), a focus on government and enterprise clients rather than consumer internet, and a deep commitment to open-source ecosystems. To this end, Huawei Cloud launched a suite of new products under the "Agentic Infra" paradigm, including the AICS Lingqu computing cluster, AMS memory storage, and the ModelArts Next platform. These aim to solve enterprise challenges in deploying AI agents, such as latency, memory, scheduling, and security. The strategy further involves creating specialized industry zones ("AI Dream Factories") for sectors like healthcare and embodied intelligence. For example, a smart medical zone developed with Shanghai Ruijin Hospital aims to democratize expert-level diagnostic capabilities. In essence, Huawei Cloud is positioning itself not as a commodity token provider, but as the foundational infrastructure for industrial AI, leveraging its domestic supply chain and hybrid cloud solutions to serve sectors where productivity, not just scale, is the ultimate measure of value.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Huawei Cloud Rejects Token Price War, Zhou Yuefeng Seeks a New Winning Formula for AI Cloud

marsbit1 ч. назад

70% of the Public Opposes AI, Americans Hope the U.S. Loses the AI War

70% of Americans believe AI development is moving too fast, with growing public resistance evolving from online criticism to real-world protests and violence. This widespread anti-AI sentiment stems from fears of job losses, rising utility costs, environmental damage, threats to democracy, and financial instability. Key incidents illustrate the backlash: Google's former CEO Eric Schmidt was loudly booed at a graduation for promoting AI; AI company ads are vandalized; protests and even violent attacks target AI firms and data centers. Polls show deep public pessimism and strong local opposition to data center construction, often surpassing resistance to nuclear power plants. The core grievances are economic and practical: AI is seen as automating jobs, concentrating wealth, and increasing household electricity and water bills due to massive data center resource demands. Environmentalists also oppose AI's high energy use and carbon emissions. This opposition has turned AI into a major political issue in the US. While the Trump administration prioritizes AI innovation for global competition, bipartisan pushback is growing. Democrats and factions within the MAGA movement are forming temporary alliances to support stricter regulations and local bans on new data centers, pressuring the administration to choose between its tech industry backers and its voter base. The situation highlights a profound national divide over AI's future.

marsbit1 ч. назад

70% of the Public Opposes AI, Americans Hope the U.S. Loses the AI War

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片