Trump Pushes Digital Assets Into U.S. Banking System

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-05-20Обновлено 2026-05-20

Введение

President Trump has issued an executive order directing federal agencies to revise financial regulations to integrate digital assets and fintech into the traditional banking and payments system. The policy aims to streamline rules, lower barriers to entry, and encourage collaboration between fintech firms, banks, and regulators. A key directive is for financial regulators to identify and amend any rules that unfairly prevent fintech companies from partnering with federally regulated banks. Specifically, the order requires the Federal Reserve Board to evaluate its system for providing payment accounts and services to non-bank financial institutions. This review includes examining whether Federal Reserve banks can issue such accounts independently, which could benefit entities like Wyoming's Special Purpose Depository Institutions (SPDIs). The move follows recent limited master account access granted to the crypto exchange Kraken and ongoing Fed efforts to establish a more formal framework for such access.

On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing the federal government to revise its regulatory frameworks in order to incorporate “digital assets and innovative technology into traditional financial services and payment systems.”

The order said:

“It is therefore the policy of the United States to streamline regulatory processes, reduce unnecessary barriers to entry, and encourage collaboration between fintech firms, federally regulated financial institutions, and Federal financial regulators.”

Expanding Crypto-linked Access to Fed Payment Services

The document recommends that the United States integrate financial technology services into its preexisting payment and banking infrastructure.

Over the next three months, the chiefs of financial regulators are required by the order to evaluate their current laws and identify any regulations or documents that unfairly prevent fintech companies from forming relationships with banks authorized by the federal government.

As a consequence of the evaluation, Trump ordered regulators to take action within six months to promote innovation. Among these measures is a request that the Federal Reserve Board of Governors examine the current system for providing payment accounts and services to non-bank financial enterprises and uninsured depository institutions.

Additionally, this evaluation inquires as to whether or not the twelve Federal Reserve banks have the authority to issue payment accounts apart from the board. Special purpose depository institutions in Wyoming and other jurisdictions with comparable structures may be particularly well-served by this provision. An SPDI based in Wyoming, Kraken, was earlier this year allowed access to a restricted version of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas’s so-called master account. Similar access has been requested by other firms.

After unveiling a plan in December to provide access to some businesses, the Federal Reserve is now hard at work creating a more official “skinny” master account.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitcoin Faces Pressure as Retail BTC Activity Hits Record Low

TagsAltcoinBitcoin

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat did the executive order issued by President Trump aim to do regarding digital assets?

AThe executive order aimed to direct the federal government to revise its regulatory frameworks to incorporate digital assets and innovative technology into traditional financial services and payment systems.

QWhat are the three main policy goals stated in Trump's order for encouraging fintech?

AThe policy goals are to streamline regulatory processes, reduce unnecessary barriers to entry, and encourage collaboration between fintech firms, federally regulated financial institutions, and Federal financial regulators.

QWhat specific action did the order require the Federal Reserve Board of Governors to examine?

AThe order required the Federal Reserve Board of Governors to examine the current system for providing payment accounts and services to non-bank financial enterprises and uninsured depository institutions.

QWhich recent development for a specific type of institution is mentioned as being well-served by the order's provisions?

AThe order's provisions may particularly well-serve Special Purpose Depository Institutions (SPDIs) in Wyoming and other jurisdictions with comparable structures, referencing Kraken's earlier access to a restricted Fed master account.

QWhat is the Federal Reserve currently working on regarding master accounts, according to the article?

AFollowing a plan unveiled in December, the Federal Reserve is now hard at work creating a more official 'skinny' master account to provide access to certain businesses.

Похожее

Ripple’s RLUSD Lands In Mastercard’s Stablecoin Settlement Expansion

Mastercard is expanding its stablecoin settlement capabilities, adding Ripple's RLUSD alongside other regulated stablecoins like USDC and PYUSD. This move allows issuers and acquirers to settle card transactions using digital assets on various blockchains, including Ethereum, Solana, and the XRP Ledger. The enhancement introduces intraday, weekend, and holiday settlement options, aiming to provide more flexibility, especially for cross-border payments and treasury operations. Mastercard positions this as a network-level addition that complements existing processes, with initial support focused on the US and Latin America. Ripple views RLUSD's inclusion as validation for regulated stablecoins in institutional payment infrastructure, highlighting the growing demand for faster, always-on settlement.

bitcoinist55 мин. назад

Ripple’s RLUSD Lands In Mastercard’s Stablecoin Settlement Expansion

bitcoinist55 мин. назад

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Web3 to AI Agent: Veteran Crypto VC Variant Bets $300 Million on Pivot

Variant Fund has announced the launch of Variant 4, a new $222 million early-stage venture fund. Its investment thesis has evolved from "digital ownership" to a broader theme of "sovereignty," focusing on technologies that enhance user agency—the control individuals have over their lives, assets, and identity. The firm distinguishes between mere automation and systems that genuinely empower users, emphasizing that the key question is who ultimately benefits: the user or the platform. This new framework encompasses Variant's existing investments in areas like public blockchains (Ethereum, Solana), developer infrastructure, decentralized finance (e.g., Uniswap), and consumer applications. It also informs recent early bets on projects such as Honcho (for self-custodial AI agent memory), Octet (cryptographic verification of physical location), and here.now (an "agent cloud" for owning and composing generative content). Variant's core mission remains to back founders building technologies that expand user sovereignty, moving towards an internet where users possess unprecedented agency rather than being the product.

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Web3 to AI Agent: Veteran Crypto VC Variant Bets $300 Million on Pivot

marsbit1 ч. назад

Solana Explosive Growth Pushes Its Monthly Perps Volume Beyond Prior Records

Despite bearish market conditions and price volatility, Solana is demonstrating significant strength in its derivatives market. The network's monthly perpetual futures volume has surged to a new record, exceeding $76.7 billion in May 2026—a 34% increase from the previous high. This growth reflects heightened speculative activity and trader engagement. Analysts note that perpetual contracts are becoming crucial financial primitives, with Solana positioning itself as a network for genuine on-chain price discovery and execution. Concurrently, Solana is experiencing a massive increase in stablecoin activity, processing over $79.9 billion in stablecoin volume in one week, underscoring its role as a major hub for on-chain liquidity and transactions.

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Solana Explosive Growth Pushes Its Monthly Perps Volume Beyond Prior Records

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow