The Macroeconomic Underpinnings of Africa's Payment Market Landscape

链捕手Опубликовано 2026-06-05Обновлено 2026-06-05

Введение

The African payments market, characterized by the world's highest mobile money penetration and fastest-growing cryptocurrency adoption, is not a coincidence but a macroeconomic necessity driven by deep structural factors. Two key drivers create this landscape: (1) Africa's heavy reliance on commodity exports, trade, and remittances, generating massive cross-border settlement and remittance demand; and (2) chronically underdeveloped financial infrastructure, exacerbated by international bank de-risking, foreign exchange mismanagement, and persistent inflation. This vacuum has allowed mobile money and crypto to thrive. Mobile money platforms replace banks for domestic payments, while cryptocurrencies serve as a store of value against local currency depreciation and a low-cost medium for cross-border exchange. A crucial division lies along the Sahara Desert. North Africa is integrated into the oil-anchored MENA framework, while Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), plagued by dollar shortages and fragmented currencies, has become a natural, massive market for mobile money and crypto. Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa are global leaders in adoption. The SSA economy is deeply dollarized due to currency instability, yet suffers from a severe "dollar shortage" caused by trade deficits and limited export capacity. This creates parallel forex markets and high remittance costs. Cryptocurrencies, particularly stablecoins, fill this gap by providing access to dollar liquidity, cheaper cross-border...

Africa's payment market exhibits distinct characteristics, boasting the world's highest mobile money penetration rate and fastest cryptocurrency adoption growth. This is not a coincidence at the market level, but an inevitability stemming from the long-term evolution of its macroeconomic structure.

This article analyzes the two underlying structural drivers behind this inevitability: (1) Africa's long-term reliance on resource exports, trade flows, and remittances creates immense demand for cross-border settlement and money transfers; (2) Africa's local financial infrastructure is underdeveloped, plagued by international bank de-risking and mismanaged foreign exchange controls, leading to a chronic banking sector gap and persistent inflationary pressures.

These two forces jointly create a vacuum where mobile money and cryptocurrencies have flourished: mobile money platforms replace banks as daily payment channels, while cryptocurrencies assume roles traditionally held by local fiat currencies or the US dollar in emerging economies, serving both as a store of value against currency depreciation and as a low-cost cross-border exchange medium.

On this continent, the key dividing line is the Sahara Desert: north of it integrates into the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) framework anchored by oil and aligned with the Middle East; while Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), amid severe dollar shortages and fragmented currency systems, has given rise to a vast market with an inherent need for mobile money and cryptocurrencies. SSA countries represented by Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa are among the global leaders in mobile money and cryptocurrency adoption.

1 Africa's Macroeconomic Panorama: A Large, Young, Yet Commodity-Dependent Primary Economy

1.1 Demographic Structure

In 2025, Africa's population reached approximately 1.55 billion, accounting for about 19% of the global total. It is the world's youngest continent, with a median age of only 19, and also the fastest-growing continent, with an annual growth rate of around 2%, unmatched by other continents.

By 2100, Africa's population is projected to nearly triple to 3.81 billion, constituting 37% of humanity. In stark contrast, Asia's population is expected to peak mid-century before declining, while Europe and Latin America face absolute shrinkage; only Africa will experience substantial growth throughout the century (see Figures 1 and 2).

This demographic trend has profound implications for payment infrastructure. With traditional bank coverage still relatively low, large numbers of young, urbanizing, mobile-native cohorts are entering the labor market and consumer economy at scale. Consequently, demand for convenient, low-cost financial services (including payments, savings, and credit) will only intensify.

1.2 Resource Endowment and Industrial Structure

Africa possesses exceptionally rich natural resources. According to OPEC's Annual Statistical Bulletin, as of 2024, Africa's proven crude oil reserves were approximately 119.4 billion barrels, accounting for about 7.6% of the global total, with the largest reserves concentrated in Libya, Nigeria, Algeria, and Angola. Beyond hydrocarbons, Africa's mineral resources hold significant global importance and dominate several categories: the continent is the world's primary diamond-producing region, holds about 49% of global cobalt reserves, and is the absolute source for platinum group metals (PGMs), with South Africa alone controlling around 78% of global PGM reserves. These endowments make Africa a crucial node in the global commodity supply chain.

However, much of this wealth is still extracted and exported as raw materials, with minimal downstream processing or value addition. Concurrently, local manufacturing and agriculture are underdeveloped, infrastructure is severely lacking, and finished goods like refined petroleum and processed foods remain import-dependent. This economic structure of being "large in both imports and exports" locks the continent into the trade dependency pattern discussed next.

1.3 Trade Dependency and Remittance Flows

The African economy is deeply intertwined with global trade and overseas remittances. In 2023, Africa's cross-border merchandise exports and imports reached $604.5 billion and $684.5 billion, respectively, while remittance inflows stood at $52.16 billion. For reference, Africa's total GDP in 2023 was approximately $2.96 trillion. These two pillars—trade and remittances—are pivotal in Africa's economic structure and have generated massive demand for B2B cross-border trade settlement and C2C cross-border money transfers, respectively.

Cross-border trade is a vital pillar of the African economy, but its commodity-dependent export structure and persistent trade deficits make it highly sensitive to global macro cycles. In 2023, African merchandise exports totaled $604.5 billion (down 15.1% year-on-year), imports were $684.5 billion (down 1.6% year-on-year), resulting in a trade deficit of about $80 billion (see Figure 3). Over a ten-year trend, Africa is extremely sensitive to global commodity cycle volatility. The 2015–2016 oil price plunge pushed African trade volumes to a two-decade low, stalling resource-dependent economies (e.g., oil exporters like Nigeria, Angola) while non-resource economies maintained 7%–8% growth, creating a clear divergence. The 2020 COVID-19 shock triggered another collapse: global commodity prices plummeted, African GDP growth fell to -2%, followed by a V-shaped recovery in 2021. Most recently, in 2022–2023, driven by the commodity price surge from the Russia-Ukraine conflict, African exports briefly spiked. However, simultaneously, the Fed's aggressive rate hike cycle boosted the dollar and tightened global liquidity, subjecting the continent to severe imported inflation and currency depreciation.

Africa's trade partner structure has shifted significantly over the past decade (see Figure 4). Asia, led by China and India, has surpassed Europe to become Africa's largest source of imports—its share of Africa's total imports rose from 28% in 2010 to 36% in 2023, while Europe's share fell from 38% to 32%. On the export side, Europe remains the top destination with a 39% share, but Asia's share grew from 24% to 28%, and the Middle East's share expanded sharply from 3% to 11%. North America's role has shrunk on both ends. These changes reflect the deepening commodity trade corridor with China and the growing importance of Gulf states as energy buyers and investment partners.

Beyond intercontinental trade, Intra-Africa Trade is also growing rapidly, but barriers such as currencies and languages between countries remain bottlenecks to be overcome. Intra-African trade volume reached $192.2 billion in 2023, up 3.8%. However, intra-regional trade accounts for only 18% of Africa's total exports, compared to 70% for Europe and 52% for Asia. This reflects persistent barriers like tariff fragmentation, currency inconvertibility, and weak cross-border infrastructure. Against this backdrop, the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) began operation in 2021, aiming to boost intra-regional trade by 52% upon full implementation, but progress has been slow.

Remittances are another lifeline for the African economy and a source of massive C2C payment demand. According to World Bank data, remittance inflows to Africa were $52.2 billion in 2023. The top five remittance corridors were Saudi Arabia → Egypt, UAE → Egypt, USA → Nigeria, Kuwait → Egypt, France → Morocco. African labor export to the Gulf, North America, and Europe creates a continuous reverse flow of income to households. These corridors constitute one of the largest sources of cross-border C2C remittance demand and also feel the acute pain points of the traditional financial system in cross-border transfers—high cost, long time, and opaque progress—issues that will be discussed in detail in the next chapter.

2 The Deep Mismatch Between Trade/Remittance Demand and the Underdeveloped Financial System

2.1 Low Bank Coverage, Massive Unbanked Population Gap

Africa's formal financial system covers only a minority. According to the World Bank's Global Findex Database 2021–2022, only 49% of adults in Sub-Saharan Africa had a financial account; by 2024, this figure rose to 58%, still among the lowest globally. Beyond low coverage, bank branch density in Africa is also lagging. The IMF's Financial Access Survey shows Kenya has only 4.4 bank branches per 100,000 adults, Morocco has 22.2, and even South Africa, Africa's most developed banking system, has only 38.7, all well below the global average. The result is massive unmet demand for basic financial services: payments, savings, credit, and insurance.

2.2 International De-risking and Correspondent Banking Withdrawal

Africa's second major obstacle stems from the retreat of the international financial system itself. Due to concerns over anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) compliance risks, compounded by local realities like lack of formal ID, fixed addresses, incomplete tax records, and a high cash economy share, global major banks have engaged in a wave of de-risking. Since 2016, correspondent banking relationships have contracted sharply. According to SWIFT data, South Africa lost over 10% of its overseas correspondent banks, while Angola's decline reached 37%. This withdrawal directly increases the cost of legitimate cross-border transactions and excludes smaller African financial institutions from the global financial system.

2.3 Mismanaged Forex Controls and Chronic Inflation

Currency system fragility further amplifies these structural flaws. Due to fiscal deficits and a weak tax base, many African central banks resort to printing money to finance government spending, fueling persistent imported inflation. Food, fuel, and raw material prices for manufactured goods rise sharply due to currency depreciation. Concurrently, shallow capital markets, a highly concentrated banking sector, and a historical deficit in central bank independence lead to a broken monetary policy transmission mechanism, making interest rate hikes ineffective at curbing inflation or stabilizing exchange rates. In 2024, Africa's overall inflation rate reached 20.1%, the highest among major global regions, severely eroding the real value of local currency savings.

2.4 Consequence: Cash Dominance and Payment System Failure

The triple failure of banking exclusion, de-risking, and monetary instability leads to evident consequences. The vast majority of Africans still rely on cash for daily transactions; Sub-Saharan Africa has the world's highest remittance costs, averaging 8.46% per transfer according to the World Bank's Q3 2025 Global Remittance Price Report; and ordinary citizens lack effective inflation-hedging stores of value. The banking system comprehensively fails on three dimensions: access convenience, affordability, and currency stability, thus creating a market vacuum rapidly being filled by emerging payment channels and cryptocurrencies.

3 In the Vacuum Left by the Traditional Financial System, Mobile Money and Cryptocurrencies Flourish

In the gap created by an absent banking system, forced by severe inflation and currency depreciation pressures, Africa has developed the world's most vibrant mobile money and cryptocurrency markets. The emergence of these alternative payment channels is not a matter of choice but of necessity—they solve real problems the banking system cannot address: accessibility, affordability, and stability.

3.1 Mobile Money: Africa Leads the World

Africa accounts for the majority of global mobile money transactions. According to the 2025 Global Findex database, about 40% of adults in Sub-Saharan Africa use a mobile money account as their primary (or only) formal financial service. Kenya's M-Pesa platform is the archetype: leveraging ubiquitous USSD technology (accessible via basic feature phone keypads), it built a network of millions of offline agent points, supported by near-universal mobile coverage, ultimately capturing 90.8% of Kenya's mobile money market share, and successfully expanded to seven other African countries including Tanzania, Ghana, and Egypt. This architecture based on offline agents and low-tech barriers proves far more scalable and inclusive than traditional branch-based banking, accumulating a massive user base across urban and rural Africa.

3.2 Widespread Cryptocurrency Adoption Across the Continent

Cryptocurrency adoption rates in Africa are globally leading and rising sharply. In the Middle East and North Africa region, the total on-chain value received between July 2024 and June 2025 was approximately $600 billion; Sub-Saharan Africa recorded $200 billion in the same period, a 52% year-on-year growth, primarily driven by retail users and concentrated in a few countries (Nigeria, South Africa, Ethiopia, Kenya). Cryptocurrencies effectively meet the dual needs of African businesses and individuals for a store of value against inflation and low-cost cross-border settlement, precisely the needs that neither mobile money nor the formal banking system can adequately fulfill.

4 Heterogeneity Within the African Continent

4.1 Why Understanding Internal Divergence Within Africa is Crucial

Africa's 54 countries span 42 different currency systems and belong to multiple language spheres: Francophone, Anglophone, Arabophone, Lusophone, and Hispanophone. This linguistic and monetary fragmentation is not merely a cultural distinction but deeply embedded in cross-border trade, financial flows, and regulatory systems: payment networks are disjointed, regulatory frameworks are independent, and market opportunities are highly fragmented. Therefore, beyond establishing a holistic understanding of the continent's macroeconomic environment, it is essential to recognize the differences in culture, regulation, and financial systems across its internal sub-regions.

4.2 Dividing by the Sahara: MENA vs. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)

The most common analytical framework currently divides Africa by the Sahara Desert into two major systems: the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

North Africa is highly integrated with the Arab world in culture, institutions, and economic structure, with its economy centered on oil and gas resources and deeply embedded in the global energy market. Correspondingly, its financial system and policy frameworks operate more within the MENA ecosystem, with a relatively mature banking sector and lower financial exclusion.

In contrast, Sub-Saharan Africa largely operates outside this system. It is precisely this market, long plagued by deep-seated financial system inadequacies, dollar shortages, and monetary instability, that drives the explosive growth of crypto and mobile money. SSA currently accounts for nearly 60% of global mobile money transaction volume and is also the world's fastest-growing region for cryptocurrency adoption.

4.3 The Five-Region Framework: Divergence in Demographics, Economy, and Fintech Ecosystems

For further granularity, Africa can be divided into five regions, each exhibiting distinct macroeconomic characteristics. North Africa and Southern Africa have the highest GDP per capita; West Africa and Central Africa are relatively less developed; East Africa has the lowest per capita income. However, economic growth rates exhibit an inverse relationship with wealth levels: East Africa grows the fastest, followed by Central Africa, North Africa, West Africa, and Southern Africa.

Cryptocurrency adoption patterns show similar features. Nigeria alone (in West Africa) accounts for most SSA crypto transaction volume; simultaneously, East Africa, South Africa, and North Africa also show high cryptocurrency adoption. Central Africa and broader West Africa are still largely in early-stage markets. This divergence essentially reflects differences in financial exclusion levels, dollar shortage pressures, and regulatory environments across regions.

5 The "Dollarization" and "Dollar Shortage" Behind Sub-Saharan Africa's Payment Market

5.1 Dollarization in Sub-Saharan Africa

Sub-Saharan African economies exhibit a high degree of dollarization, far exceeding most other regions globally. The share of US dollar deposits and loans serve as key proxy indicators for dollarization levels: in Nigeria, dollar deposits once accounted for up to 40% of total deposits, and over 80% of external debt is dollar-denominated; in Ghana, dollar deposits have also reached relatively high levels of 20%–30%. This dollarization is not accidental but a manifestation of rational economic behavior in the face of long-term monetary instability.

5.2 Three Structural Drivers of Dollarization

Dollarization in Sub-Saharan Africa stems from three distinct economic pressures.

First, Store of Value: Due to fiscal deficits and external imbalances forcing central banks to print money, local currencies depreciate continuously, and the dollar provides a stable measure of value.

Second, Medium of Exchange: Commodity prices (oil, minerals, food) are globally priced in dollars, and intra-African trade, even between African countries, is often settled in dollars—because the dollar is more stable than any single local currency.

Third, Financing Channel: Shallow local capital markets mean businesses and governments must borrow dollars from international creditors; when dollar debt becomes too large relative to dollar income, exchange rate risk becomes acute, further pushing more funds into dollar deposits.

5.3 Causes of the "Dollar Shortage"

The real pain point in Sub-Saharan Africa's current payment market is the dollar shortage. Limited foreign exchange earnings from exports (due to commodity dependency and weak manufacturing exports), coupled with huge trade deficits and debt servicing pressures, continuously drain government foreign exchange reserves. Consequently, central banks can only ration official forex supply through administrative controls. This scarcity breeds a parallel black market where dollars trade at a significant premium—sometimes 50% to 100% above the official rate. Residents and businesses unable to access forex through official channels turn to informal channels: global remittance companies like Western Union, informal exchange houses, and increasingly, stablecoins and cryptocurrencies. The gap between the official and parallel market exchange rates is precisely the crack through which alternative payment systems can wedge.

5.4 Why Cryptocurrencies Thrive in This Vacuum

Stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies perform three key functions missing from the formal banking system. They bypass capital controls, providing access to dollars via parallel markets; they complete cross-border transactions at costs lower than banks and traditional remittance corridors; and they offer a globally liquid store of value unaffected by local currency risks. Therefore, cryptocurrency adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa is overwhelmingly retail-driven, with small individual transaction amounts. As shown in Figure 11, compared to other global regions, Sub-Saharan Africa has a higher proportion of transfers in the $1,000 to $10,000 range, reflecting small-scale remittances, informal business trade settlement, and individual savings flows. Nigeria dominates the region, accounting for about 45% of Sub-Saharan Africa's on-chain transaction volume (as shown in Figure 12), but Kenya, South Africa, and Ethiopia are also important regional hubs.

5.5 De-dollarization Attempts and Their Structural Limitations

African policymakers and regional institutions have attempted to reduce dollar dependence. The Pan-African Payment and Settlement System (PAPSS) aims to settle intra-African trade in local currencies and reduce forex costs; the planned West African "Eco" currency zone seeks stability through monetary union; central banks have also employed aggressive interest rate hikes and capital controls. However, all these efforts face a fundamental constraint: Sub-Saharan Africa's structural trade dependency. As long as the continent imports more than it exports, runs persistent external account deficits, and earns most foreign exchange from commodities, dollar demand will persistently outstrip supply. De-dollarization requires industrialization and trade rebalancing, a multi-decade transformation process that policy alone cannot achieve. In the interim, mobile money and cryptocurrencies will continue to play a significant role, filling gaps left by the traditional financial system.

Conclusion

Africa's standout performance in mobile money and cryptocurrency adoption is not a market coincidence but a macroeconomic inevitability.

The continent's young demographic structure, abundant natural resources, and deep integration into global commodity markets have spawned massive cross-border payment flows. However, its weak financial system, chronic monetary instability, and severe dollar shortage render the formal banking system fundamentally incapable of meeting this demand.

Mobile money solves domestic payment issues; cryptocurrencies are solving cross-border value transfer and inflation hedging issues. These are not niche applications or speculative holdings, but critical financial infrastructure filling the vacuum left by structural economic constraints. The crucial point is that these constraints are not cyclical; they are rooted in Africa's resource dependence, limited industrialization, and underdeveloped financial markets.

De-dollarization requires trade rebalancing and industrialization, both multi-decade transformations. Until then, and likely long after, alternative payment channels and currencies will remain at the heart of the African economy.

Original article link

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat are the two main macroeconomic structural drivers that have led to Africa's unique payments market landscape, characterized by high mobile money and crypto adoption?

AThe two main drivers are: (1) Africa's heavy reliance on commodity exports, trade flows, and remittances, creating massive demand for cross-border settlements and payments. (2) The continent's underdeveloped traditional financial infrastructure, which suffers from issues like 'de-risking' by international banks and poor foreign exchange management, leading to a chronic absence of reliable banking services and persistent inflationary pressures.

QHow does the economic and payments landscape differ between North Africa (MENA) and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)?

ANorth Africa (MENA) is economically integrated with the Middle East, anchored by oil, and has a relatively more developed banking system. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), in contrast, suffers from severe US dollar shortages and fragmented monetary systems. This makes SSA a market with a natural, acute demand for mobile payments and cryptocurrencies, which have seen the fastest adoption rates in the world here.

QWhy have cryptocurrencies seen such rapid adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa, and what specific needs do they fulfill?

ACryptocurrencies have seen rapid adoption in SSA because they fulfill critical needs left unmet by traditional finance: (1) They act as a store of value against local currency depreciation and inflation. (2) They serve as a low-cost medium for cross-border exchange and remittances, bypassing expensive and restrictive official channels. They effectively fill the vacuum created by a lack of dollar access, capital controls, and unstable local currencies.

QWhat is 'dollarization' in the context of Sub-Saharan Africa, and what are its three structural drivers?

ADollarization in SSA refers to the widespread use of the US dollar alongside or instead of local currencies. Its three structural drivers are: (1) Store of Value: The US dollar provides stability against chronic local currency devaluation. (2) Medium of Exchange: Commodities are priced in dollars, and even intra-African trade is often dollar-denominated for stability. (3) Financing Channel: Shallow local capital markets force governments and firms to borrow in dollars, reinforcing dollar dependency.

QWhat role does mobile money (like M-Pesa) play in Africa's financial ecosystem, and how does it differ from the role of cryptocurrencies?

AMobile money (e.g., M-Pesa) primarily solves the problem of domestic financial inclusion and daily payments. It provides accessible, low-cost payment, savings, and transfer services via basic mobile phones, effectively replacing banks for everyday transactions. Cryptocurrencies, on the other hand, primarily address the problems of cross-border value transfer (remittances, trade) and inflation hedging. They function as a store of value and a global settlement network, filling gaps that mobile money and traditional banks cannot.

Похожее

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News1 ч. назад

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News1 ч. назад

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News1 ч. назад

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.4k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片