# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Volume

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Volume", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

90,000 Users Participated, $14 Billion USDT Trading Volume: Huobi HTX Peak Competition Ignites the 2025 Year-End Finale

Huobi HTX's "Peak Championship" trading competition for 2025 has concluded, attracting over 90,000 participants and generating a total trading volume exceeding 14 billion USDT. Nearly 1 million USDT in rewards were distributed. The event featured three core formats: Points Race, Individual Challenge, and Team Competition, with both spot and futures tracks. Approximately 56,000 users joined the Individual Challenge, with top winners in both tracks each receiving 17.4 billion HTX tokens. The Team Competition saw intense participation from 126 trading teams. In the spot team category, "孙哥小弟" team won first place with a trading volume of over 196 million USDT, employing a steady strategy focused on major cryptocurrencies. The third-place "메타 기사단" (Meta Knights) team made a remarkable comeback by capitalizing on altcoin opportunities. The futures team champion, "小青龙社区," achieved a trading volume of over 420 million USDT through strong coordination, while the third-place "天道智能合约" team, composed of Web3 developers, rose steadily with a disciplined, logic-based approach. For the 2026 season, Huobi HTX plans significant upgrades, such as introducing an "AI Strategy Captain" for human-machine collaboration, adding rankings based on profit and yield, implementing smart team-matching, and launching a "one-click copy trading" feature to enhance accessibility and inclusivity.

marsbit12/19 08:22

90,000 Users Participated, $14 Billion USDT Trading Volume: Huobi HTX Peak Competition Ignites the 2025 Year-End Finale

marsbit12/19 08:22

Why Does Hyperliquid Earn Less Than Coinbase?

Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange, processes near-Nasdaq-level perpetual trading volumes but captures significantly lower fees compared to centralized platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood. While Hyperliquid cleared $205.6 billion in notional volume over 30 days, it generated only $80.3 million in fees—an effective take rate of ~3.9 bps. In contrast, Coinbase and Robinhood achieve take rates of ~35.5 bps and ~33.5 bps, respectively, by operating as retail brokers that monetize multiple layers: distribution, balances, subscriptions, and order flow. This gap stems from a structural difference: Hyperliquid positions itself as a low-fee *market layer* (like Nasdaq), providing high-throughput execution and清算 infrastructure, while brokers like Coinbase control user relationships and extract value through higher-margin activities. Hyperliquid’s model includes permissionless distributor frontends (Builder Codes) and product deployment (HIP-3), which drive ecosystem growth but also create long-term fee compression risks by outsourcing high-value distribution. To defend its economics, Hyperliquid is taking steps to retain distribution control, integrate HIP-3 markets natively, and introduce balance-driven revenue streams like USDH (a native stablecoin with 50% reserve收益 sharing) and portfolio margin (10% interest fee on borrows). These moves aim to shift its model from pure exchange-level execution toward a hybrid approach that captures broker-like profit pools—without sacrificing its core infrastructure advantages. The key challenge remains balancing open ecosystem growth with tighter economic integration to avoid being commoditized as a wholesale execution venue.

marsbit12/18 07:03

Why Does Hyperliquid Earn Less Than Coinbase?

marsbit12/18 07:03

活动图片