# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Volume

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Volume", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

90,000 Users Participated, $14 Billion USDT Trading Volume: Huobi HTX Peak Competition Ignites the 2025 Year-End Finale

Huobi HTX's "Peak Championship" trading competition for 2025 has concluded, attracting over 90,000 participants and generating a total trading volume exceeding 14 billion USDT. Nearly 1 million USDT in rewards were distributed. The event featured three core formats: Points Race, Individual Challenge, and Team Competition, with both spot and futures tracks. Approximately 56,000 users joined the Individual Challenge, with top winners in both tracks each receiving 17.4 billion HTX tokens. The Team Competition saw intense participation from 126 trading teams. In the spot team category, "孙哥小弟" team won first place with a trading volume of over 196 million USDT, employing a steady strategy focused on major cryptocurrencies. The third-place "메타 기사단" (Meta Knights) team made a remarkable comeback by capitalizing on altcoin opportunities. The futures team champion, "小青龙社区," achieved a trading volume of over 420 million USDT through strong coordination, while the third-place "天道智能合约" team, composed of Web3 developers, rose steadily with a disciplined, logic-based approach. For the 2026 season, Huobi HTX plans significant upgrades, such as introducing an "AI Strategy Captain" for human-machine collaboration, adding rankings based on profit and yield, implementing smart team-matching, and launching a "one-click copy trading" feature to enhance accessibility and inclusivity.

marsbit12/19 08:22

90,000 Users Participated, $14 Billion USDT Trading Volume: Huobi HTX Peak Competition Ignites the 2025 Year-End Finale

marsbit12/19 08:22

Why Does Hyperliquid Earn Less Than Coinbase?

Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange, processes near-Nasdaq-level perpetual trading volumes but captures significantly lower fees compared to centralized platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood. While Hyperliquid cleared $205.6 billion in notional volume over 30 days, it generated only $80.3 million in fees—an effective take rate of ~3.9 bps. In contrast, Coinbase and Robinhood achieve take rates of ~35.5 bps and ~33.5 bps, respectively, by operating as retail brokers that monetize multiple layers: distribution, balances, subscriptions, and order flow. This gap stems from a structural difference: Hyperliquid positions itself as a low-fee *market layer* (like Nasdaq), providing high-throughput execution and清算 infrastructure, while brokers like Coinbase control user relationships and extract value through higher-margin activities. Hyperliquid’s model includes permissionless distributor frontends (Builder Codes) and product deployment (HIP-3), which drive ecosystem growth but also create long-term fee compression risks by outsourcing high-value distribution. To defend its economics, Hyperliquid is taking steps to retain distribution control, integrate HIP-3 markets natively, and introduce balance-driven revenue streams like USDH (a native stablecoin with 50% reserve收益 sharing) and portfolio margin (10% interest fee on borrows). These moves aim to shift its model from pure exchange-level execution toward a hybrid approach that captures broker-like profit pools—without sacrificing its core infrastructure advantages. The key challenge remains balancing open ecosystem growth with tighter economic integration to avoid being commoditized as a wholesale execution venue.

marsbit12/18 07:03

Why Does Hyperliquid Earn Less Than Coinbase?

marsbit12/18 07:03

Ethereum (ETH) May See Triple-Digit Gains, ETF Inflows Become a Catalyst

Ethereum (ETH) is showing signs of potential for a significant upward move, with the recent recovery in spot Ethereum ETF inflows acting as a key catalyst. After a pullback from the $3,650–$3,350 supply zone, ETH is now consolidating near $3,200. This coincides with a technical resistance level formed by the 200-day moving average, creating a conflict between technical pressure and improving fund flows. Key data highlights include a 28% increase in spot Ethereum ETF assets since November 21, growing from $16.8 billion to $21.5 billion. Net automated trading volume, while still negative at -$1.38 billion, has improved significantly from the extreme -$5 billion levels seen in October, indicating a structural shift in market sentiment. This metric’s 30-day moving average is also rising, a pattern last observed in early 2025 before ETH’s historic rally. On the price chart, ETH is testing a critical demand zone between $3,100 and $3,180 on the 4-hour chart. Holding this area could lead to a rebound toward the 200-day EMA and a potential challenge of the $3,450 resistance. A break above $3,450 could open a path toward $3,900. However, a breakdown of the channel support might trigger a retest of the $3,000 level. Derivatives data from Hyblock shows a neutral but fragile market structure. While funding rates are positive and mild, the buy/sell order ratio remains balanced, suggesting that spot traders have not yet formed a strong bullish bias. The key for ETH’s next major move depends on whether buyers can sustain the current demand zone and whether improving spot ETF inflows and automated trading activity can convert into sustained upward pressure.

cointelegraph_中文12/12 06:18

Ethereum (ETH) May See Triple-Digit Gains, ETF Inflows Become a Catalyst

cointelegraph_中文12/12 06:18

活动图片