# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Theft

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Theft", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Frequent Pokémon Card Heists: Is On-Chain Storage for Physical Collectibles a Risky Solution?

Rising global thefts and frauds targeting high-value Pokémon cards, such as armed robberies in Los Angeles and Hong Kong, highlight systemic risks in the physical collectibles market. As these items become increasingly financialized, traditional transaction methods—relying on in-person meetings, private trust, and community trades—are exposing participants to heightened personal and fraud risks. The market’s infrastructure has failed to keep pace with the liquidity and cross-regional nature of these assets. While local card shops are enhancing security measures, such as improved surveillance and formalized transaction processes, these efforts remain limited to specific locations and cannot scale globally. In response, some projects are exploring blockchain-based solutions to introduce verifiable ownership, custody, and transfer mechanisms. For instance, platforms like Renaiss on BNB Chain are developing specialized smart contracts that link physical cards to on-chain NFTs through certified custodians, binding asset status and location to enable secure, borderless trading. However, merely tokenizing cards without robust, transparent custody and verification does not address real-world risks. The evolution toward on-chain systems aims to provide a foundational layer of trust—enabling validation, reducing physical delivery risks, and clarifying accountability. Not every collector may adopt full blockchain integration, but the market grows increasingly dependent on such infrastructure to ensure safety, authentication, and liquidity as collectibles transition into high-stakes digital assets.

marsbit01/13 09:31

Frequent Pokémon Card Heists: Is On-Chain Storage for Physical Collectibles a Risky Solution?

marsbit01/13 09:31

North Korean Hackers Celebrate a 'Fat Year': Record $2.02 Billion Stolen in 2025, Money Laundering Cycle Approximately 45 Days

North Korean hackers set a record in 2025, stealing $2.02 billion in cryptocurrency, a 51% increase from 2024, despite a decrease in the number of attacks. Their cumulative thefts now total at least $6.75 billion. They achieved this by conducting fewer but more sophisticated attacks, often through infiltrating crypto services with IT workers or using complex impersonation strategies against executives. The overall crypto industry suffered over $3.4 billion in stolen funds. A key trend is the extreme concentration of losses, with the top three hacks accounting for 69% of the total. The disparity between the largest attack and the median hack reached a record 1000x. North Korean actors exhibited distinct money laundering patterns, heavily favoring Chinese OTC services, cross-chain bridges, and mixers. Their laundering cycle for major heists is approximately 45 days, moving through stages of immediate layering, initial consolidation, and final cash-out. Simultaneously, individual wallet thefts surged to 158,000 incidents affecting 80,000 users, though the total value stolen ($713 million) decreased. In a positive development, DeFi hacking losses remained low despite increased Total Value Locked (TVL), indicating improved security measures are having a significant impact. A case study of the Venus Protocol demonstrated effective real-time threat detection and fund recovery.

marsbit01/10 03:10

North Korean Hackers Celebrate a 'Fat Year': Record $2.02 Billion Stolen in 2025, Money Laundering Cycle Approximately 45 Days

marsbit01/10 03:10

Behind Cryptocurrency 'Thefts and Scams': Why Does Civil Relief Frequently Encounter Obstacles?

Behind the surge in cryptocurrency "thefts and scams", why does civil relief frequently hit roadblocks? This article explores the legal challenges through two representative cases. In Case 1, a company paid 800,000 USDT to a Chinese employee of an overseas exchange for a listing service, only to have the employee disappear. Despite cross-border complexities and initial police refusal to accept the report (citing the company’s foreign status and claims that crypto "is not protected by law"), lawyers eventually secured case acceptance by invoking criminal procedure rules and citing regulatory recognition of virtual assets as property. However, formal立案 (case filing) is still pending. Case 2 involved a woman scammed into transferring over RMB 3 million to a USDT exchanger for a fake investment. While police quickly arrested the exchanger, the main scammer remained abroad. The exchanger was released due to lack of criminal intent, and a civil lawsuit against them for unjust enrichment was rejected at filing. The judge indicated that even if accepted, such cases rarely succeed. The analysis highlights key obstacles: the "criminal procedure takes precedence" principle often blocks civil suits until criminal proceedings conclude; if a criminal judgment orders restitution, further civil claims are barred; and bypassing criminal reporting to file civilly usually results in the case being referred back to police, wasting time. Ultimately, when crypto crimes are involved, civil relief is extremely difficult. The more viable path remains criminal prosecution, despite its own challenges, as civil victories are exceptionally rare in practice.

marsbit12/09 19:39

Behind Cryptocurrency 'Thefts and Scams': Why Does Civil Relief Frequently Encounter Obstacles?

marsbit12/09 19:39

活动图片