# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Security

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Security", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

2026 Death List: Games Are Dead, DeFi Is Dead, Tools Are Dead, Who's Next?

"Death List 2026: A Quiet Mass Extinction in Crypto" The crypto market is experiencing a wave of silent shutdowns in early 2026, with over 10 Web3 projects ceasing operations within 90 days. Unlike dramatic collapses of the past, these projects are dying quietly, often with a simple announcement before servers go dark. Key failures span major sectors: - **Play-to-Earn Games**: GENSO Online is closing with monthly costs 5x its revenue. Pixiland abandoned its Web3 plans and token generation event (TGE), and Forgotten Runiverse went offline indefinitely due to broken funding. - **DeFi Protocols**: ZeroLend, once a leading L2 lender with $250M TVL, is honorably shutting down after suffering from fragmented liquidity across multiple chains and the withdrawal of oracle support. Polynomial canceled its TGE, admitting its product was in a "decaying state." Step Finance collapsed after a $40M hack originating from a compromised executive's device. - **Infrastructure & Tools**: Parsec, a well-funded on-chain analytics tool, failed to compete against giants like Dune and Nansen and shut down after 5 years. ENS scrapped its Layer 2 Namechain because Ethereum's Fusaka upgrade slashed mainnet gas fees by 99%, making the L2 unnecessary. Common themes behind the failures include a fundamental lack of sustainable revenue, the trap of unsustainable multi-chain expansion, and security failures that are often human, not technical. The industry is seeing a brutal consolidation of capital towards projects with real demand, like stablecoins and RWA, while regulatory clarity pushes out non-compliant players. Despite the carnage, some projects, like Polynomial and ZeroLend, are choosing responsible shutdowns over harming their communities, setting a new standard for accountability.

Odaily星球日报03/04 08:35

2026 Death List: Games Are Dead, DeFi Is Dead, Tools Are Dead, Who's Next?

Odaily星球日报03/04 08:35

AI Within the Range of Artillery

"AI in the Range of Cannons" discusses the vulnerability of AI infrastructure in the context of modern warfare, triggered by a real-world incident. On March 1, an Iranian missile struck an Amazon data center in the UAE, causing a fire, power outage, and disruption of about 60 cloud services. This led to a global outage of Claude, a major AI service running on Amazon's cloud. Although officially attributed to surging user demand, the incident is linked to a U.S.-Israel airstrike on Iran that used Claude for intelligence analysis, despite a recent U.S. ban on Anthropic (Claude's developer) for refusing unrestricted military use. The article highlights that this marks the first physical destruction of a commercial data center in war, emphasizing that AI, though virtual, relies on physical infrastructure located in geopolitically unstable regions like the Middle East. Silicon Valley has heavily invested in AI infrastructure in the Gulf due to cheap electricity, wealthy sovereign funds, and data localization laws, with projects from Amazon, Microsoft, and OpenAI. However, security frameworks like the Pax Silica agreement focus on chip controls and political alignment, ignoring physical security risks. The piece raises critical questions: When data centers serve both civilian and military purposes, are they legitimate targets? International law lacks clarity. The incident shifts focus from AI replacing jobs to its fragility—over 1,300 large data centers worldwide are protected only by basic measures like fire systems and generators. As AI becomes national infrastructure, its protection becomes a collective responsibility, beyond individual companies or governments. The title’s metaphor underscores that in an era of conflict, even advanced technology lies within the range of destruction.

marsbit03/03 10:29

AI Within the Range of Artillery

marsbit03/03 10:29

Deciphering the Dispute Between Anthropic and the War Department: What Does Trump Intend?

The article reflects on the decline of the American republic, drawing a metaphor between the gradual process of death—observed during the author’s father’s passing—and the slow erosion of democratic institutions. It examines the recent conflict between AI company Anthropic and the U.S. Department of War (DoW) as a symptom of this decay. Under both Biden and Trump administrations, Anthropic’s Claude AI was approved for use in classified environments, subject to two policy restrictions: no mass surveillance of Americans and no use in fully autonomous lethal weapons. The Trump administration later reversed its stance, opposing the idea of a private company imposing policy limits on military technology and threatening to designate Anthropic a "supply chain risk"—a move typically reserved for foreign-adversary companies. The author argues that this response reflects a broader breakdown in governance: the increased use of arbitrary state power, the decline of legislative process, and the erosion of property rights and predictable rule-of-law order. The confrontation raises fundamental questions about who should control advanced AI—private actors, the state, or yet-to-be-defined public mechanisms. While not causing institutional decline, the episode signals deeper dysfunction: the state’s willingness to coerce private entities and the blurring line between democratic oversight and government overreach. The author warns against equating "democratic control" with "government control" and calls for vigilance to protect civil liberties as AI and governance continue to evolve.

marsbit03/03 06:08

Deciphering the Dispute Between Anthropic and the War Department: What Does Trump Intend?

marsbit03/03 06:08

活动图片