# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Order Book

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Order Book", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

The Midfield Battle of Perp DEX: The Declining, The Self-Rescuers, and The Latecomers

The article "Perp DEX Midfield Battle: The Declining, The Self-Rescuers, and The Newcomers" discusses the shifting landscape of decentralized perpetual exchanges (Perp DEX). Hyperliquid saw a weekly trading volume of approximately $15 billion, driven largely by commodity contracts like crude oil, gold, and silver amid geopolitical tensions and market volatility. Meanwhile, GMX Labs is hiring a CEO, moving away from its founder-driven model, and dYdX's market share dropped from 73% in early 2023 to single digits by late 2024. The decline of GMX and dYdX is attributed to several factors: reliance on token incentives that inflated trading volumes artificially, architectural limitations (e.g., GMX's liquidity pool model capping open interest, dYdX's costly migration to Cosmos), and misjudging key competitive factors like performance and market maker density. Hyperliquid, in contrast, grew slowly without VC backing or token incentives. It built its own L1 chain with a fully on-chain order book, focusing on transparency to attract market makers. It strategically expanded into traditional assets only after establishing a robust ecosystem, enabling it to capture demand during events like the Iran crisis. It now leads with ~54% of open interest among top Perp DEXs, ahead of Aster (~15%). The article concludes that the first generation of Perp DEXs is transitioning to professional management, while new opportunities lie in replacing traditional financial infrastructure, as Hyperliquid demonstrates by handling real-world demand.

marsbit03/27 09:31

The Midfield Battle of Perp DEX: The Declining, The Self-Rescuers, and The Latecomers

marsbit03/27 09:31

How Much Money Has Kalshi Actually Made? Deconstructing the Prediction Market Business Behind 200 Million Trades

In this analysis of Kalshi, a leading prediction market platform, the author examines its business model, transaction data, and regulatory landscape. By accessing Kalshi’s public API, the study reveals that the platform has processed over 203 million transactions with a total volume exceeding $41.7 billion. More than 82% of this volume comes from sports betting, positioning Kalshi as a de facto sports gambling platform accessible to users as young as 18. The platform operates a central limit order book (CLOB) where users trade binary contracts that settle at either $1 (if the event occurs) or $0 (if it does not). Kalshi generates revenue through a variable fee structure: Takers pay a fee based on the formula 0.07 × C × P × (1-P), where C is the number of contracts and P is the price, while Makers pay a quarter of that rate. Total fee income amounts to $545.6 million. Kalshi ecosystem includes markets, events, and series, with major volumes driven by events like the 2024 U.S. presidential election and Super Bowl outcomes. The platform’s fee model is compared to traditional sportsbooks, highlighting how its variable structure adapts to implied probability. Regulatory oversight falls under the CFTC, though enforcement remains limited, creating a grey area that allows Kalshi to operate with fewer restrictions than conventional gambling platforms. The analysis also touches on market结算 practices, liquidity incentives, and the broader context of prediction markets, including competitors like Polymarket and regulatory cases such as PredictIt’s legal battle with the CFTC.

marsbit03/13 04:30

How Much Money Has Kalshi Actually Made? Deconstructing the Prediction Market Business Behind 200 Million Trades

marsbit03/13 04:30

Trading Everything, Never Closing: RWA Perpetual Contracts — The Final Piece of DeFi Devouring Wall Street (Part 2)

This article explores the emergence and implications of Real World Asset (RWA) Perpetual Contracts (Perps) in DeFi, focusing on their potential to bridge traditional and decentralized finance. It analyzes key projects, contrasting two primary architectural models: the order book-based system, exemplified by Hyperliquid's HIP-3 ecosystem (e.g., Trade.xyz), and the oracle-priced liquidity pool model used by protocols like Ostium. The former prioritizes 24/7 market-driven pricing with oracles for risk management, while the latter favors accuracy and safety by pausing trading during market closures. A significant portion is dedicated to the regulatory landscape, particularly in the US. The analysis highlights the legal barrier of the "Shad-Johnson agreement," which subjects equity-based derivatives to dual SEC and CFTC jurisdiction, effectively blocking compliant retail single-stock perps. This creates a window of opportunity for offshore markets operating under Regulation S exemptions. The article proposes a symbiotic "CFD Broker + RWA Perps Dex" model for growth, where DeFi protocols act as back-end clearing engines for traditional brokers handling front-end compliance and user acquisition. Finally, it examines the external variable of traditional exchanges like NYSE planning their own 24/7 trading platforms. While this could erode DeFi's current monopoly on continuous trading and provide better underlying price feeds, it also forces DeFi to compete on different strengths like higher leverage, permissionless access, and superior capital efficiency. The conclusion posits that RWA Perps represent a fundamental restructuring of global leverage markets, evolving into a high-speed execution layer atop regulated traditional finance.

marsbit03/12 03:41

Trading Everything, Never Closing: RWA Perpetual Contracts — The Final Piece of DeFi Devouring Wall Street (Part 2)

marsbit03/12 03:41

Honeypot Finance: The New Full-Stack Perp DEX – Can It Challenge Hyperliquid?

Honeypot Finance, a new full-stack perpetual DEX, is emerging as a potential challenger to established players like Hyperliquid. With a $35M valuation and backing from investors like Mask Network, it aims to reshape the Perp DEX landscape through a unique hybrid model combining order book efficiency with AMM resilience. Unlike traditional models, Honeypot integrates an order book (via Orderly Network) for low-slip execution during normal conditions and a proprietary AMM that activates during high volatility, ensuring continuous tradability. It also introduces a structured risk management system featuring layered vaults—allowing conservative capital to enter "Priority Vaults" for safer yields, while risk-tolerant users opt for "Secondary Vaults" for higher returns. The platform employs a multi-stage liquidation process to minimize unfair liquidations and avoid automatic deleveraging (ADL) unless absolutely necessary. The ecosystem is supported by a closed-loop tokenomics model. The $HPOT token (500M fixed supply) benefits from protocol fee buybacks and burns, tying its value to real revenue. HoneyGenesis NFTs act as yield-weight amplifiers, rewarding long-term stakers or offering permanent boost options when burned. Having already facilitated over $120M in total trading volume ($20M in perpetuals), Honeypot aims to create a synergistic system—from meme launchpad (Pot2Pump) to derivatives trading—that captures and sustains value through actual usage rather than inflationary incentives. Its success hinges on attracting sustained liquidity, proving its risk infrastructure under stress, and validating its full-stack integration approach.

marsbit12/23 09:03

Honeypot Finance: The New Full-Stack Perp DEX – Can It Challenge Hyperliquid?

marsbit12/23 09:03

活动图片