# Сопутствующие статьи по теме On-Chain

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "On-Chain", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

2 Days, 20x: A Quick Look at the Automated Market Making Mechanism of the New Gem Snowball

Snowball, a new meme token launched on pump.fun on December 18, gained significant traction in the English-speaking crypto community by introducing an automated market-making mechanism designed to create a self-sustaining "snowball effect." Unlike typical meme coins where creators take a fee (usually 0.5%-1%) from each transaction, Snowball redirects 100% of this fee to an on-chain bot. This bot uses accumulated funds to buy back tokens, add liquidity to the pool, and burn a small portion of tokens periodically. The goal is to create continuous buy pressure and improve trading depth, theoretically allowing the token to grow organically through increased trading activity. Within four days, Snowball reached a $10 million market cap with over 7,000 holders and relatively decentralized ownership. However, the mechanism relies heavily on sustained trading volume to fuel the buyback bot. In a cold market with low on-chain activity, this "flywheel" could reverse if new buyers diminish. While the structure reduces developer exit risk, it doesn’t eliminate other meme coin dangers like large holder dumps or narrative fatigue. Similar projects like FIREBALL are emerging, indicating interest in "mechanism-driven memes," but past examples like OlympusDAO and Safemoon show that mechanisms alone don’t guarantee long-term value. Snowball remains primarily a meme experiment—interesting, but high-risk.

深潮12/22 10:24

2 Days, 20x: A Quick Look at the Automated Market Making Mechanism of the New Gem Snowball

深潮12/22 10:24

Analyzing 10 Key BTC Top Indicators: Why Is the Current Bull Market Different from Previous Ones?

"Analysis of 10 Key Bitcoin Top Indicators: Why the Current Bull Run Differs from the Past" This analysis examines 10 classic on-chain and technical indicators to assess whether Bitcoin has reached its cycle top. Historically, market peaks were marked by multiple indicators flashing extreme overbought signals simultaneously. However, the current bull run (as of Q4 2025) shows notably divergent, more moderate readings. Key findings include: The Pi Cycle Top indicator has not yet triggered a crossover signal. The Puell Multiple remains in a moderate 1-2 range, indicating miner selling pressure is not extreme. The Bitcoin Rainbow Chart shows price is in the yellow-orange zone, not the red "sell" bubble territory. The MVRV Z-Score sits in a neutral 2-4 range, far from previous cycle peaks of 7-10. The Altcoin Season Index remains low (30-40), showing no major capital rotation from BTC to altcoins. Long-Term Holder (LTH) supply shows a slow distribution, but Short-Term Holder (STH) supply, while rising, did not peak concurrently with the price high on October 6th. Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL) has declined to 0.34 from a high of 0.64 in March 2024. The analysis concludes that the market's structure has fundamentally changed. The explosive, retail-driven peaks of 2017 and 2021 are being replaced by a more gradual, institutional-led market, largely attributed to Bitcoin ETF inflows providing stability. This suggests Bitcoin is transitioning from a cyclical asset to a mainstream reserve, making historical indicator thresholds less reliable and requiring adjusted analysis frameworks for future cycles.

深潮12/22 08:16

Analyzing 10 Key BTC Top Indicators: Why Is the Current Bull Market Different from Previous Ones?

深潮12/22 08:16

Columbia Professor Exposes the 'Conspiracy of Giants Going On-Chain': Beware the 'Suit Simps' Selling Out Crypto's Future

In his article, Columbia Business School professor Omid Malekan expresses skepticism toward the recent embrace of tokenization by major traditional finance (TradFi) firms—including DTCC, SWIFT, Visa, Stripe, and PayPal. While these companies publicly promote blockchain's benefits—such as real-time payments, 24/7 settlement, and programmability—they largely ignore the existential threat that permissionless, decentralized networks pose to their core business models. Malekan argues that truly decentralized systems like Ethereum fundamentally challenge the centralized control these institutions rely on. For example, DTCC’s tokenization efforts avoid addressing how direct on-chain issuance could eliminate the need for centralized clearinghouses. Similarly, stablecoins threaten SWIFT’s cross-border messaging monopoly and Visa’s card-based payment model. Although these firms see growth opportunities in blockchain—such as new fee structures or expanded services—they face an innovator’s dilemma: their legacy businesses must be disrupted for crypto’s full potential to materialize. Malekan warns that these companies, driven by risk aversion and entrenched interests, may push for regulatory capture and compromise core crypto values like permissionless access and censorship resistance. He highlights concerning trends: JPMorgan limiting tokenized assets to accredited investors, DTCC favoring permissioned “enterprise chains,” and Stripe supporting a initially permissioned blockchain. Malekan cautions against “suit simps” in crypto—those who compromise decentralization to appease traditional finance—and urges the industry to avoid diluting its foundational innovations as TradFi adopts blockchain technology.

比推12/19 21:39

Columbia Professor Exposes the 'Conspiracy of Giants Going On-Chain': Beware the 'Suit Simps' Selling Out Crypto's Future

比推12/19 21:39

活动图片