# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Migration

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Migration", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Bitcoin’s Quantum Risk Is Smaller Than Feared, Researcher Says

A recent analysis indicates that Bitcoin's vulnerability to quantum computing attacks is less severe than commonly perceived. While concerns persist about future quantum machines breaking cryptographic protections, the immediate risk is limited. Reports highlight that only approximately 10,230 BTC, valued at several hundred million dollars, are held in addresses with exposed public keys, making them the most susceptible targets. These are primarily in mid-to-large-sized wallets, many dating back to Bitcoin's early days. Current quantum hardware remains insufficient for such an attack, operating at just over 100 qubits, whereas millions of stable, error-corrected qubits would be required. Experts like Andreas Antonopoulos and Adam Back emphasize the need for proactive preparation rather than panic. They recommend developing upgrade paths, discouraging key reuse in wallets, and testing migration procedures to ensure a smooth transition if quantum risks materialize in the future.

bitcoinist02/10 00:01

Bitcoin’s Quantum Risk Is Smaller Than Feared, Researcher Says

bitcoinist02/10 00:01

When Migration Becomes the Norm: Why 'Your Own EVM Chain' Is Becoming Standard

In the past year, the industry's real "voting" has shifted from governance forums to deployment scripts, migration plans, and budgets. Projects are choosing ecosystems through action, not words—migrating mainnets, prioritizing tool stacks, and betting on networks with stronger market effects. A prime example is Noble, a leading stablecoin infrastructure in Cosmos, which moved to its own EVM L1, signaling that the main battleground for stablecoins and app distribution remains in EVM ecosystem due to its mature developer tools, wallet/dApp ecosystem, and concentrated liquidity. The trend toward "having your own EVM chain" is becoming standard. While EVM offers clear advantages in assets, integrations, and tools, generic chains come with constraints like fee volatility, congestion, and shared sequencing. Application chains/rollups allow teams to internalize these constraints—tailoring block times, execution models, and infrastructure to their business needs, and aligning transaction revenue with growth incentives. Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) platforms like Caldera are reducing the high costs and complexity of building and maintaining chains, turning "chain-as-a-product" into a replicable strategy. They focus not just on deployment but also on solving interoperability challenges—e.g., via Caldera's Metalayer, which standardizes cross-chain bridging and integration to reduce friction for users and developers. As migration to EVM continues, the focus shifts from "which chain to choose" to "how to control growth." Owned EVM chains/rollups offer more stable fees, better performance, and tighter integration of incentives and revenue. With RaaS lowering build costs and interoperability layers reducing cross-chain friction, having a dedicated execution environment is becoming a scalable, standard solution for projects aiming to master their own growth.

marsbit02/05 08:39

When Migration Becomes the Norm: Why 'Your Own EVM Chain' Is Becoming Standard

marsbit02/05 08:39

The Quantum Computing Threat to Bitcoin

Bitcoin faces an existential threat from quantum computing, which could break the elliptic curve digital signature algorithm (ECDSA) securing the network. Approximately 25% of all bitcoin—including the 1.1 million BTC in Satoshi’s wallet—are stored in vulnerable early "pay-to-public-key" addresses, where public keys are exposed on the ledger. Later address types only reveal public keys during transactions, creating a brief attack window. The timeline for quantum computing is uncertain, but if it emerges before Bitcoin transitions to post-quantum cryptography (PQC), attackers could steal and liquidate billions in bitcoin, causing a market collapse. A coordinated migration to quantum-resistant algorithms is urgently needed, though implementing PQC could take 6 months to 2 years. A controversial proposal suggests "burning" un-migrated coins to prevent mass theft, but this risks setting a precedent for confiscation and contradicts Bitcoin’s core principles of individual sovereignty. As the largest financial "honeypot" with direct and liquid value, Bitcoin is a prime target. The network must proactively upgrade before quantum computers become capable of breaking current encryption.

marsbit02/02 12:13

marsbit02/02 12:13

Another NFT Platform Falls As Rodeo Announces Shutdown

Rodeo, a social-focused NFT marketplace, is shutting down in early March due to its inability to achieve sustainable growth. The platform will remain fully operational until February 10, then switch to read-only mode before going offline on March 10. This gives users a limited window to download their work and migrate assets. Rodeo will provide tools to help users transfer media and metadata to decentralized storage like Arweave, aiming to preserve on-chain references and prevent loss of work. CEO Kayvon Tehranian cited a loyal but insufficient user base, framing the platform as an unsuccessful experiment in social collecting. This closure follows similar recent shutdowns, like Nifty Gateway, highlighting ongoing challenges in the NFT market.

bitcoinist01/28 21:31

Another NFT Platform Falls As Rodeo Announces Shutdown

bitcoinist01/28 21:31

‘No deposit flight’: Galaxy disputes Standard Chartered’s $500B stablecoin risk

Standard Chartered Bank warns that U.S. banks, particularly regional ones, could lose $500 billion in deposits by 2028 due to growing adoption of stablecoins, which they see as a structural risk. The bank also projects the stablecoin market could grow to $2 trillion in the same period. However, Galaxy’s head of research, Alex Thorn, disputes the idea of "deposit flight," arguing that funds would merely "migrate" rather than leave the banking system entirely. He compares it to money market funds, where cash ultimately returns to banks through treasury purchases. The debate highlights ongoing tensions between the crypto and banking industries.

ambcrypto01/28 17:02

‘No deposit flight’: Galaxy disputes Standard Chartered’s $500B stablecoin risk

ambcrypto01/28 17:02

Everything Unveils SDEX-to-EV Token Migration Framework Ahead of May TGE

Following its rebrand to Everything, the team behind the SDEX token has announced a structured migration framework to transition holders to the new EV token ahead of its Token Generation Event (TGE) in May. This move aims to align with the project's expanded scope and long-term ambitions, ensuring current participants retain access while introducing a new token model for future growth. Two initial pathways are offered for existing SDEX holders: a locked 12-month staking pool with vesting EV tokens and a community pre-sale emphasizing long-term alignment over short-term liquidity. The migration is designed to prevent supply shocks and maintain SDEX utility during the transition, with more access routes and call option mechanisms to be introduced later. CEO Jean Rausis stated the rebrand and migration form a unifying framework to deliver long-term value. While the migration may cause some token-level dilution, the goal is to accelerate ecosystem expansion, expecting long-term growth to outweigh dilution. The initial phase targets current SDEX holders and early investors, with broader public access planned post-TGE. Everything is a unified DeFi protocol integrating swaps, AMM, lending, borrowing, and perpetual trading within a single smart contract architecture, built on the SMARDEX infrastructure to enhance capital efficiency and reduce systemic risk.

TheNewsCrypto01/24 06:08

Everything Unveils SDEX-to-EV Token Migration Framework Ahead of May TGE

TheNewsCrypto01/24 06:08

From Hyperliquid to Solana: How an ICO Promise of 'Chain Switching' Shakes Investor Trust?

In a controversial move, the digital collectibles platform Trove announced its sudden migration from Hyperliquid to Solana on January 19, citing a liquidity partner’s decision to liquidate a significant HYPE position. This shift contradicts earlier ICO promises that emphasized Hyperliquid integration and HYPE token backing, triggering backlash from investors who now demand refunds. The ICO, which initially raised over $11.5 million, faced scrutiny after the team briefly prolonged the fundraising period, causing speculative spikes on prediction market Polymarket. Investigations revealed that Trove had transferred $45,000 from its angel round directly into prediction markets, and allegations emerged that the team offered paid promotions to influencers. Community trust eroded further as Trove proceeded with token generation and distribution plans without addressing refund requests, despite the fundamental change in platform and tokenomics. The incident highlights risks in crypto investing, especially around anonymous teams, opaque fund management, and unilateral post-ICO changes.

比推01/19 14:11

From Hyperliquid to Solana: How an ICO Promise of 'Chain Switching' Shakes Investor Trust?

比推01/19 14:11

On-Chain Data Analysis of Tudou Guarantee's Shutdown Event: A Chain-Based 'Black Industry Migration' Triggered by US Sanctions

On January 16, Tudou Guarantee announced the cessation of its services and the closure of all public groups. Beosin Trace conducted an on-chain data analysis of the incident, revealing that Tudou was a major black/grey market escrow platform on Telegram. After the shutdown of Huione Guarantee in May 2025, Tudou became its main successor, experiencing a significant increase in transaction volume. However, from December 2025, Tudou's deposit activities declined sharply, with almost no activity after January 10, 2026. A refund address saw a spike in outflows on January 11, aligning with the platform’s shutdown preparations. Many former Tudou merchants migrated to Xinbi Guarantee, which saw a surge in USDT deposits, averaging 2,700–2,800 transactions per day between January 8–16. These addresses have been flagged as high-risk by Beosin KYT. The shutdown is linked to increased U.S. sanctions targeting Southeast Asian cybercrime throughout 2025, including actions against entities in the Philippines, Cambodia, and Myanmar, which disrupted illegal operations and forced platforms like Huione and Tudou to cease operations.

marsbit01/19 10:19

On-Chain Data Analysis of Tudou Guarantee's Shutdown Event: A Chain-Based 'Black Industry Migration' Triggered by US Sanctions

marsbit01/19 10:19

More Than One Person Has Wasted Three Years on Base

A developer known as tuna, co-founder of Pandemic Labs, publicly criticized Base, the Ethereum L2 network backed by Coinbase, for failing to support builders despite initial promises. After nearly three years of developing 10 different products—including games, AI agents, and prediction markets—on Base, tuna received no meaningful support, even after creating the hit game *Infected*, which gained 50,000 users. In contrast, within 48 hours of launching a game on Solana, *Addicted*, it generated $4 million in revenue. Tuna expressed frustration that Base appears to prioritize certain projects like Farcaster and Zora while ignoring independent developers. Other builders, such as Shivam Tandon of zkCross Network and Jacek from the DEGEN project, shared similar experiences, citing ignored outreach and a lack of engagement from Base and its lead, Jesse. Despite bringing significant traffic and value, these teams felt overlooked, with DEGEN even choosing to expand to Solana, where they received immediate support and recognition. Critics argue that Base operates with a top-down, “narrative-driven” approach aligned with Coinbase’s interests, rather than fostering an open, community-oriented ecosystem like Solana. While Base’s 2026 roadmap focuses on asset tokenization and the Base App, many developers question whether it truly intends to serve the broader community or mainly functions as an extension of Coinbase.

比推01/14 13:39

More Than One Person Has Wasted Three Years on Base

比推01/14 13:39

Developer's Personal Account: I Wasted Three Years on Base

Developer @weretuna, co-founder of @pndmdotorg, shares a critical account of their three-year experience building on Base, the Ethereum L2 chain backed by Coinbase. Initially drawn by promises of strong developer support and an "app-first" narrative, the team built over 10 products, including games, AI agents, and prediction markets. Despite creating @infecteddotfun, one of Base's most viral games that gained 50k followers in a month, they received no support, retweets, or even responses from the Base team. The author realized that support was selectively given to projects affiliated with Base's investments, like Farcaster and Zora, rather than based on merit or innovation. After receiving empty promises of support for their successful launch, the team migrated to Solana. There, they built @addicteddotfun, which generated $4M in revenue in 48 hours, becoming a major 2025 crypto game. The conclusion is that developers should build where the users and liquidity are—currently Solana—and avoid chains that fail to deliver on promises of support, ultimately saving time and achieving greater success.

marsbit01/13 09:06

Developer's Personal Account: I Wasted Three Years on Base