# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Liquidity

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Liquidity", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

The 4 Truths Behind Polymarket's LP Market-Making Incentives and the Fee Trap

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, has recently shifted its incentive structure towards rewarding Liquidity Providers (LPs) to solve its core problem of low market depth. While most markets remain free, it now charges a taker fee on specific markets (all Crypto markets, NCAAB basketball, and Serie A football) to fund new LP reward programs. The fee is calculated on a symmetric curve, highest near 50% probability. The platform has introduced two main incentive systems: one rewards LPs whose limit orders are executed (Maker Incentives), and another rewards LPs simply for providing resting liquidity, even if orders aren't filled (Liquidity Incentives). A third system allows anyone to sponsor additional rewards for specific markets. A key argument is that the fees paid and rewards earned could be a strong anti-sybil metric for a potential POLY token airdrop, valuing genuine liquidity provision over mere trading volume. However, a counter viewpoint argues the LP program is a potential trap. Critics claim that the displayed ROI for LPs is misleading as it doesn't account for "LP wear and tear"—losses from filled orders that can't be easily exited. They state professional market makers avoid it due to insider trading risks and that the model of subsidizing liquidity with massive daily rewards is unsustainable. The concern is that widespread fee implementation could erase Polymarket's competitive edge over traditional betting platforms. Proposed solutions include a fixed fee on profits only, using a POLY token for native liquidity, and charging for premium products like parlays instead of core markets.

Odaily星球日报03/22 04:08

The 4 Truths Behind Polymarket's LP Market-Making Incentives and the Fee Trap

Odaily星球日报03/22 04:08

Gold Plunges for a Week, '1983 Great Sell-Off' Repeats, Middle East 'Selling Gold for Funds'?

Gold recorded its worst weekly decline in 43 years, echoing the historic 1983 sell-off. Spot gold fell for eight consecutive days, while silver dropped over 15%, with palladium and platinum also declining. The sell-off was triggered by escalating Middle East conflicts, which raised energy prices and reduced expectations for Fed rate cuts. Markets now price a 50% chance of a Fed hike by October. Higher inflation expectations and rising real interest rates diminished gold's appeal as a non-yielding asset. Additionally, tightening dollar liquidity, reflected in widening cross-currency basis swaps, intensified pressure on gold, often liquidated first during dollar shortages. Technical indicators worsened, with RSI falling below 30, triggering stop-losses and self-reinforcing selling. Gold ETFs saw outflows for three straight weeks, losing over 60 tons. The current situation parallels the 1983 crash when OPEC nations, facing falling oil revenue, sold gold reserves to raise cash, causing a rapid price collapse. Then, as now, Middle Eastern selling pressured gold, with impacts spreading across commodities. Despite a 4% year-to-date gain, stagflation risks are rising. Goldman Sachs estimates energy price increases could reduce global growth by 0.3% and raise inflation by 0.5-0.6%. Gold's future depends on real interest rates and geopolitical developments—continued conflict may sustain pressure, while de-escalation could revive safe-haven demand.

marsbit03/21 03:08

Gold Plunges for a Week, '1983 Great Sell-Off' Repeats, Middle East 'Selling Gold for Funds'?

marsbit03/21 03:08

活动图片