# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Investment

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Investment", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Quarterly Loss of $12.4 Billion: Why Can’t It Stop Strategy from Frantically Buying Bitcoin?

MicroStrategy (now Strategy) reported a staggering net loss of $12.4 billion in Q4 2025, primarily due to the adoption of a new fair value accounting standard that required marking its holdings to market amid Bitcoin’s sharp decline to around $65,000. Despite the loss, the company aggressively expanded its Bitcoin position, purchasing an additional 41,002 BTC in January 2026, bringing its total holdings to 713,502 BTC — approximately 3.4% of Bitcoin’s total supply — with an average cost of $76,052 per coin. The firm’s core software business, though profitable with $123 million in Q4 revenue, was overshadowed by its Bitcoin-centric strategy. Strategy raised over $25.3 billion in capital during 2025, leveraging financial instruments to amplify its Bitcoin exposure. It maintains $2.25 billion in cash reserves to cover dividends and interest for 2.5 years. CEO Phong Le acknowledged risks, stating that if Bitcoin fell to $8,000, the company might need to restructure debt rather than sell BTC. The firm’s "Bitcoin flywheel" model relies on continuous capital raising and BTC appreciation, but compressed mNAV (1.07) and high-yield preferred shares (STRC, 11.25% dividend) reflect market skepticism. A prolonged downturn could trigger a negative feedback loop: falling BTC value → reduced ability to raise capital → potential forced BTC sales. Executive Chairman Michael Saylor emphasized long-term optimism, citing supportive U.S. policy and institutional adoption, while downplaying quantum computing risks as a decade away. Strategy remains a high-risk, high-reward bet on Bitcoin’s future.

比推02/06 14:44

Quarterly Loss of $12.4 Billion: Why Can’t It Stop Strategy from Frantically Buying Bitcoin?

比推02/06 14:44

From Holding to Controlling: When Bitcoin Starts 'Buying Listed Companies'

From Holding to Controlling: When Bitcoin Starts "Buying Listed Companies" In a landmark event, Bitcoin has entered the capital structure of a publicly traded company as a form of capital contribution for the first time. On February 4, Nasdaq-listed insurance brokerage Tianruixiang Holdings announced that an undisclosed investor would contribute 15,000 Bitcoin in exchange for equity in the company. Valued at approximately $1.125 billion (based on Bitcoin's price of $75,000 at the time), this transaction marks a historic shift. This is not about buying a Bitcoin ETF, holding BTC, or issuing debt to purchase Bitcoin. It represents a direct exchange of Bitcoin for equity in a listed company. Over the past two years, a profound change has been underway: Bitcoin is systematically entering the balance sheets of public companies. Companies like MicroStrategy (now Strategy) have fundamentally altered traditional corporate logic. They no longer operate solely based on their core business but function as financial vehicles, continuously issuing stock and convertible bonds to raise capital for purchasing Bitcoin. This has given rise to a new type of entity: the **Bitcoin Treasury Company**. Other examples include Japan's Metaplanet, and U.S.-based firms like Twenty One Capital and Bitcoin Standard Treasury. A significant阵营 (camp) of publicly traded companies now holds substantial Bitcoin, including: * Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy): over 710,000 BTC * Major miners like MARA, Riot, and Hut 8 * Exchanges like Coinbase and Bullish * Bitcoin treasury companies * Tech and payment firms like Tesla and Block Their commonality is that they have integrated Bitcoin as a fundamental part of their capital structure. The Tianruixiang deal represents an evolution of this trend. Upon completion, the company would hold more Bitcoin than Coinbase, making it a top-tier Bitcoin treasury. Crucially, this isn't a case of "using fiat to buy Bitcoin," but rather resembles using Bitcoin to effectively "acquire a Nasdaq-listed shell company." This structure transforms the transaction from a simple investment into a form of **reverse merger by crypto assets into traditional capital markets**. Bitcoin is no longer merely held; it is being used to **restructure ownership itself**. A clear path is emerging: from MicroStrategy's massive holdings to miners, exchanges, and treasury companies, and now to direct equity-for-Bitcoin swaps, **Bitcoin is reconstructing the "public company network."** When this system becomes large enough, Bitcoin will evolve beyond a "crypto asset" into a financial infrastructure embedded within the global capital system. *Content is for informational purposes only and not investment advice. Markets are risky; investments should be made cautiously.*

marsbit02/06 10:57

From Holding to Controlling: When Bitcoin Starts 'Buying Listed Companies'

marsbit02/06 10:57

From 'Hardcore' to 'Weak': Who is the Real Hardliner When Bitcoin Falls?

An article titled "From 'Solid' to 'Weak': Who is the Real Hardliner When Bitcoin Falls?" analyzes the behavior of prominent crypto figures and institutions during a sharp Bitcoin price decline in February 2026, when BTC dropped from its $120,000 high to briefly under $60,000. The piece rates key players based on their public statements and on-chain actions during the crash. Michael Saylor and his company MicroStrategy are hailed as the "true hardliner" for their "suicidal" buying spree, purchasing billions of dollars worth of BTC at prices between $87,974 and $91,519, despite now holding at a loss. Their rating: "Solid (walking the talk, the one true god)." Binance is praised for its "top-tier" action of converting $1 billion of its SAFU fund into Bitcoin. Veteran trader Peter Brandt is also rated "top-tier" as an "honest bear" for consistently warning of a 50% correction since the market peak and sticking to his technical analysis. Author Robert Kiyosaki is rated "theoretical" for his constant anti-fiat rhetoric but slow action, waiting for extreme prices to buy. Model-based analysts PlanB and Benjamin Cowen are heavily criticized and rated "NPC (for entertainment only)" for their failed predictions and major shifts in narrative. Former "pump king" Arthur Hayes is rated the worst ("Weak") for going silent on Bitcoin after his lofty price predictions, instead discussing macroeconomics without stating his position. The conclusion states that only two types of people are worth following: "madmen" like Saylor who buy relentlessly with public proof, and disciplined traders like Brandt. All other predictions and analyses are deemed mere noise. The final question posed to readers is whom they trust: the influencers who changed their tune or the verifiable on-chain buyers.

marsbit02/06 09:34

From 'Hardcore' to 'Weak': Who is the Real Hardliner When Bitcoin Falls?

marsbit02/06 09:34

活动图片