# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Institutions

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Institutions", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Similar Trends? Just an Illusion: Why Bitcoin Today Is Fundamentally Different from 2022

This article argues that comparing current Bitcoin price action to 2022 is a superficial and misleading analogy, as the underlying conditions are fundamentally different across three key areas. First, the macroeconomic backdrop is the complete inverse. 2022 was defined by high inflation, aggressive interest rate hikes, and tightening liquidity environment, forcing capital into risk-off mode. In contrast, the current environment features declining CPI, an impending rate-cutting cycle, and central banks re-injecting liquidity, creating a strong risk-on appetite for assets like Bitcoin. Charts are presented showing Bitcoin's negative correlation with CPI and its positive correlation with US liquidity indices. Second, the technical market structure differs significantly. The 2021-2022 period formed a bearish weekly "M-top" pattern, characteristic of a major cycle top. The recent pullback is framed as a potential "bear trap" within a larger bull market, with the $80,850-$62,000 zone acting as a major area of consolidation that offers a favorable risk-reward ratio for buyers. Third, and most crucially, the investor base has structurally changed. The 2020-2022 market was retail-driven and highly speculative. Post-2023, the approval of Bitcoin ETFs has ushered in an "era of institutionalization," creating a new class of structural, long-term holders. This has locked up supply, drastically reduced volatility from historical highs of 80-150% to a current 30-60%, and provided a stable base of underlying demand. The conclusion states that a repeat of the 2022 bear market would require a new major inflationary shock, a return to quantitative tightening by central banks, and a decisive break below $80,850. In the absence of these conditions, declaring a structural bear market is premature. The core difference is a shift from a "retail-driven, high-leverage" market to an "institution-driven, long-term holding" one.

marsbit01/20 10:10

Similar Trends? Just an Illusion: Why Bitcoin Today Is Fundamentally Different from 2022

marsbit01/20 10:10

Institutions Besiege the Crypto World: Deconstructing Three Fatal Traps, A Core Guide for Retail Investors to Avoid Pitfalls

Amidst the recent crypto market hype—such as the London Stock Exchange adopting blockchain settlement, prediction markets hitting $700M in daily volume, and Vietnam’s high USDT payment success rates—many retail investors are eager to jump in. However, this article warns of three major traps set by institutions to exploit散户 (retail investors). First, the LSE’s move is not an endorsement of crypto but a strategic power grab to control on-chain asset pricing and settlement rules, sidelining retail participants. The advice: avoid short-term speculation on "institutional narrative coins" and focus on long-term spot holdings. Second, prediction markets are dominated by professional Wall Street teams using quant models, insider information, and arbitrage strategies. Retail traders, relying on limited information, are at a severe disadvantage. The guidance: only use disposable funds for such high-risk activities. Third, while USDT adoption in Vietnam appears promising with 97% payment success, it serves mainly as a hedge against currency volatility rather than mainstream payment. Challenges like trust issues, slow confirmations, and limited usability hinder broader adoption. The core advice for散户 is to avoid chasing hype, not overweight high-risk sectors, and stick to long-term positions in major cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH. Separate entertainment funds from investment capital, and stay rational to survive institutional dominance.

marsbit01/19 05:39

Institutions Besiege the Crypto World: Deconstructing Three Fatal Traps, A Core Guide for Retail Investors to Avoid Pitfalls

marsbit01/19 05:39

Hiring at $200K Annual Salary: Wall Street Advances into Prediction Markets

Wall Street firms are aggressively entering the prediction markets, with trading giants like DRW, Susquehanna, and Tyr Capital building specialized teams. DRW is offering up to $200,000 in base salary to hire traders who can monitor and trade on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. Trading volume in these markets surged from under $100 million in early 2024 to over $8 billion by December 2025, attracting institutional interest. Unlike retail traders who often bet on single events, institutions focus on cross-platform arbitrage and structural opportunities. For example, hedge funds can use prediction markets to hedge investments with greater precision by pairing positions—such as buying "no recession" contracts on Polymarket while shorting overvalued bonds in credit markets. Market makers like Susquehanna, which has privileged access to lower fees and higher limits on platforms like Kalshi, are set to reduce arbitrage opportunities and improve liquidity. This professionalization may lead to more complex products, such as multi-event combos and conditional probability contracts. The entry of well-capitalized, technologically advanced institutions signals a maturation of prediction markets, mirroring the historical pattern of散户-driven innovation eventually dominated by professional players. While retail traders may find niches in long-tail events, the era of easy profits from informational edges is likely over.

marsbit01/15 04:02

Hiring at $200K Annual Salary: Wall Street Advances into Prediction Markets

marsbit01/15 04:02

2026 Must-Read: Who Pays for the Bull Market

"Who Pays for the Bull Market in 2026?" by Dovey Wan of Primitive Ventures analyzes the structural shifts in Bitcoin's market dynamics post-ETF approval and institutional adoption. Despite regulatory tailwinds and mainstream integration, BTC underperformed traditional assets like gold and equities in 2025, with suppressed volatility due to Wall Street arbitrage and derivatives trading. Key insights include: - **Onshore vs. Offshore Divergence**: U.S. investors (via Coinbase) drove buying at highs, while offshore exchanges (e.g., Binance) saw selling pressure. - **Institutional Role**: Corporate buyers (e.g., MSTR) used NAV premium arbitrage to accumulate BTC, but ETFs are largely held by non-institutional investors, with hedge funds reducing exposure. - **Retail Absence**: Retail participation declined as wealth shifted to AI stocks and traditional markets, with crypto CEX traffic falling. - **Native Sellers Emerge**: Early BTC holders and miners sold significantly, with miners diverting resources to AI infrastructure. Bitcoin’s financialization ("paper BTC") introduces systemic fragility, tying its future to macro liquidity and DAT/ETF premiums. The 2026 outlook hinges on macro conditions and institutional proxy valuations, with potential risks from leverage unwinds. The article calls for genuine on-chain adoption to transform passive holdings into active utility, envisioning crypto as a global, supranational financial rail.

比推01/13 17:21

2026 Must-Read: Who Pays for the Bull Market

比推01/13 17:21

活动图片