# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Innovation

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Innovation", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Crypto President, or the Yuan Shikai of the Industry?

An article titled "Encryption President or Industry's Yuan Shikai?" draws a historical parallel between former U.S. President Donald Trump and Yuan Shikai, a Chinese general who briefly restored imperial rule in 1915, suggesting that both were initially seen as saviors but ultimately betrayed their supporters' trust. The piece argues that Trump was embraced by the crypto industry during the 2024 election as a pro-crypto leader who would ease regulatory pressures. His administration did take initial friendly steps, such as replacing SEC Chair Gary Gensler and pausing lawsuits against major exchanges, which helped drive Bitcoin to new all-time highs. However, the article claims this support was superficial and self-serving. It highlights that Trump and his family allegedly engaged in lucrative meme coin schemes, with tokens like TRUMP and MELANIA, which reportedly earned the family over $1 billion before crashing and harming retail investors. This behavior is compared to the corruption of President Ulysses S. Grant's administration. Furthermore, the author contends that Trump’s trade war and tariff policies, particularly the escalation against China in October 2025, triggered a massive market crash. On October 11, 2025, Bitcoin plummeted from $126,000 to around $102,000, leading to over $19 billion in liquidations and marking the start of a crypto winter. The article concludes that Trump used crypto for political gain and personal enrichment rather than genuinely supporting technological innovation, ultimately damaging the industry and betraying the trust placed in him. It warns that real progress must come from technological advancement, not political figures.

比推03/05 13:33

Crypto President, or the Yuan Shikai of the Industry?

比推03/05 13:33

Who Controls Computing Power, Implicitly Controls the Future of AI: Anastasia, Co-founder of Gonka Protocol

Who Controls Compute, Controls AI's Future: Gonka Protocol Co-Founder Anastasia The centralization of compute power, not just AI models, is the critical power node in AI's future, argues Anastasia Matveeva, co-founder of Gonka Protocol. While public debate focuses on models, true power lies in the underlying infrastructure—access to GPUs, power, and data center capacity. This centralization creates structural barriers to innovation, enforces a rent-extraction model, and introduces systemic fragility. Gonka is a permissionless global network designed to decentralize AI compute. It enables anyone to contribute or access GPU resources via a programmatic, open API. Key to its efficiency is an architecture that minimizes overhead, ensuring most compute is used for actual AI workloads (primarily inference) rather than network maintenance. Rewards and governance are tied to verified compute contribution, not capital stake. The protocol addresses scalability and accessibility by allowing participants of all sizes to join without permission, with influence proportional to their compute power. It supports the emerging AI agent economy with transparent, dynamic pricing and reliable, verifiable computation. While currently not optimized for strict data sovereignty, its decentralized design avoids data accumulation, and its governance allows for future evolution to meet regulatory demands. The urgency for such decentralized solutions is high to prevent a calcified AI future dominated by a few infrastructure gatekeepers.

marsbit03/03 07:58

Who Controls Computing Power, Implicitly Controls the Future of AI: Anastasia, Co-founder of Gonka Protocol

marsbit03/03 07:58

Written at the UAE-Oman Border: Survival Insights for Crypto Natives After Crossing Through the Fire

Authored by brother bing, co-founder of MegaETH, this article reflects on the relationship between technology and civilization after the author witnessed missile attacks and defense systems at the UAE-Oman border. The author argues that technology acts as an amplifier of a civilization’s inherent trajectory—enhancing productivity and coordination in healthy cycles, while fueling addiction and conflict in periods of decline. Applying this lens to crypto, the author observes that the industry has drifted from its original cypherpunk ideals. Crypto was meant to be a parallel system offering borderless finance, low coordination costs, and individual sovereignty. However, the pursuit of legitimacy and integration with traditional finance (TradFi) has diluted its transformative potential. Many early, structurally meaningful use cases—such as unsecured microloans and cross-border savings—have been sidelined in favor of financialization and speculative gains. The article calls for a return to crypto’s original mission: building infrastructure that enables genuine sovereignty rather than serving as middleware for legacy systems. It urges the community to resist short-term incentives, prioritize meaningful development, and realign with the values of openness, criticism, and independence. The author concludes by emphasizing the importance of individual agency and the courage to build alternative systems despite prevailing uncertainties.

marsbit03/03 07:36

Written at the UAE-Oman Border: Survival Insights for Crypto Natives After Crossing Through the Fire

marsbit03/03 07:36

MegaETH Co-founder: The 48 Hours Escaping Dubai Made Me Rethink the Entire Crypto World

MegaETH co-founder shares a personal reflection after fleeing Dubai amid regional tensions, using the experience to critique the current state of the crypto industry. Witnessing missile defense systems in action provided a new perspective on technology’s dual role: it amplifies civilization’s trajectory, acting as a lever rather than a fundamental upgrade. In healthy cycles, tech enhances productivity and collaboration, as early internet forums did. In decline, it becomes a weapon of attention or control. The author argues crypto was meant to be a parallel system—a way to rearchitect finance with fewer borders, lower collaboration costs, and flexible exit mechanisms. Instead, the pursuit of legitimacy led to integration with traditional power structures, sidelining foundational ideals like undercollateralized loans, pension structures, and cross-border savings. Stablecoins, while functional, often just repackage sovereign currency rather than create independent monetary systems. The author calls for honesty: backend integration isn’t reinvention. The disappointment in crypto stems not from price volatility, but from misaligned priorities—choosing attention and valuation over structurally meaningful, albeit “boring,” innovations. The conclusion urges the community to reclaim its agency: build tools for real sovereignty, not amplification of insecurity. Avoid cowardice, sharpen the blade, and forge a parallel system through verification and conviction. QED.

marsbit03/03 04:58

MegaETH Co-founder: The 48 Hours Escaping Dubai Made Me Rethink the Entire Crypto World

marsbit03/03 04:58

活动图片